Of course this is debatably proven in the lab, you are one of many people who have released theoretical study and experiment measurements with favorable conclusions of H*, better will come after. I am largely agreeing with you. The "Deep electron" hydrogen atom can be orbiting the core itself.
This is conseptually exactly the same as dense hydrogen which is a condensed EM state that enables a whole spectrum of electroweak/magnetic and relativistic interactions. So in a general conseptual sense you are "right". The true mechanism is possible in more than one of those theoretical models because it stands on basic principles that don't require measurements beyond what most of those models accept. All that is required is hydrogen and a garden of metals, conductors and semiconductors with the right properties. For ease of understanding, this is like kneeling or a posture of prayer for the atom, you don't have to know what is under the ground to get closer to it snd change your posture. Same with electrons and the hydrogen atom. Power is releases on your electromagnetic knees 😊🙏🏽. Hence why one can insist that these theories have right parts and must therefore not be far from what I have described.
Out of the wreckage of the Second World War, the UK transformed itself. It rebuilt its
shattered economy. It founded the NHS. It created national insurance. And it helped establish
international institutions like the United Nations so that the world would never endure a
tragedy on this scale again.
Human progress doesn’t come in straight lines. Instead, there are rare moments where
transformative change is possible — where decades’ worth of progress can be achieved in a
matter of months.
Such an opportunity for transformative change may now be upon us. As the UK begins
to emerge from Covid-19, which has cost tens of thousands of lives and over £300 billion in
2020 alone,1
we have a similar opportunity to that which existed in 1945.
While the scale of national tragedy is alive in our minds, the Government must seize this
opportunity, and ensure we are much better prepared for the next extreme risk event that will
devastate lives and economies on a global scale. The UK must become a global leader in
ensuring long-term resilience to extreme risks, and keep pace with the significant steps the
United States is taking in this area.
We do not know which extreme risk event will come next — it might be another pandemic, or
it might be something completely different. But we do know what many of the most extreme
risks are, and how best to prepare for them. This report offers a roadmap for how to do just
that — it provides an insurance policy for Britain against the biggest threats we face.
Display More
Your in a good path with these statements Sir. This kind of preparedness comes from the inside, home/community growing and from cooperation between the health, tech and infrastructure people.
Check out r/PicochemicalLight there are links there, plus The BLP, SAM and pico-chemistry pages on this site. Before you are done check LENR-CANR site and info on solar corona. The question is answered imo, it is real. If you would like someone to proof read or have a second or third opinion from a radically different age bracket I'm open! I've been following this intensely since I was 14ish.
This is a classic picture where usually we see 2 s electron that can be spin paired. Already here classics physics has no answer about what spin pairing really means. It's a magnetic bond as also all electrons are bound by EM-flux. charge only occurs on separation of the electron flux from the proton flux.
All nuclear bonds are charge like and currently is difficult to predict in which case a proton-charge-proton interaction does not lead to fusion. Real physics just evolves now.
I am grasping the jist of this. The point I am making is there is a big difference between a hydrogen atom merging with a nucleus as a neutron and a dense hydrogen dipole orbiting at relativistic speeds just outside the nuclei in pseudochemical EM arrangements. Both of these hypothoses have different scales of energy, one produces interesting rare effects and is a stablizing multi-element affair. That being said I am greatly intrigued by the model, it could overlap with what has been proposed along with other atom models.
Aren't the s orbitals, the first 1-4 electrons in proximity to the nucleous, in spherical orbits capable of similar condensed binding/interaction effects? This while not influencing the nucleous through direct bond. Why do this when there already is a modular picochemical mechanism present in transition atoms and unstable atoms? This pre-exists all the models being prosed and would work regardless of GUTP, SAM, SO(4) or the standard model with Q field theory.
Reactions need to happen inside a layered muti-element substrait so only light, heat, stable matter and electricity get out. This is only a problem due to method, not of the underlying variety of wonderful phenomina. Like how certain proteins and compounds In a cell are created and destroyed within the cells membrane! Food goes in, filtered and burned; neutralized waste and productivity comes out 😁!
Well, just checked in to see what the latest crazes are amongst the anti-vaxxer brains trust…
And I wasn’t disappointed! Top of the list of nuttiness was XXXXXX magnetism, until, in the spirit of open-mindedness, I decided to test the theory, before mocking it… And I couldn’t believe this at first, but it actually worked!
Firstly I tried sticking my phone to my unvaccinated arm, and nothing happened. Nada. Zilch. Then I tried sticking it to my (still sore) vaccinated arm and… IT WORKED! And it was was happily stuck there for quite a while. Even as I walked around the room whilst (gently) moving my arm about. To say I was shocked would be an understatement. And what’s more, my phones bluetooth then paired to my arm, and now my phone is able to access the 5g network! Awesome! So much for all those foolish doubters.
Although upon reflection, I doubt there’s much to worry about, as I haven’t heard of any cases of someone exploding whilst undertaking an MRI scan, and a quick internet search seems to show a correlation between ‘sweatiness of climate’ vs incidents of ‘sticking’. Perhaps your folks should turn the aircon up a bit?
Although to be fair, we should also keep our minds open to other explanations:
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Huxley! Still playing King Cnut against the rising tides of idiocy alarmism it would seem. I know you try to keep things impersonal, and offer rational arguments based on scientific papers that you provide links to, but on the other hand , Wyttenbach writes things in big red text, so it’s very hard to know who to believe.
Bob#2…. You noticed a lot of blood clots amongst people you ‘know’.
At first I thought that this was a worrying statistic, suggestive that there are large number of clot victims going uncounted. Until I checked the numbers.
The average American knows 600 people, although in this case (sorry but) I’ll assume that you and your milieu are particularly antisocial types. Hence, you personally only know 300 people, and they themselves only know 300 people each. This multiplies out to give you a ‘covid rumour network’ of 90,000 people.
But… according to this website, you could expect between 10 and 30 cases of blood clots per 100,000 people.
So it would seem you and your ilk are doing just fine. (Or perhaps are exceptionally antisocial).
FM1… (fairly sure it stands for FloridaMan, right?!) I’m not sure what you’ve got against the WHO and the CDC, but I for one am glad that health policy is decided by well-educated experts who have relevant qualifications, as opposed to a paranoid Swiss anti-semite, and a man who seems to think that:
Now I’m no organic chemist, but I’m pretty damn sure the active ingredient in ivermectin is… ivermectin, and the active ingredient in molnupiravir is, wait for it…. molnupiravir. And plitidepsin, yep, you guessed it… (or rather, you didn’t)… is plitidepsin.
I even looked up the molecular structure of each of these three, just to check you hadn’t uncovered some stunning and important new piece of hidden information, only to be severely disappointed.
I’d be happy to be proven wrong though, so feel free to post the source of this nonsense, if only to prove you haven’t also veered off into the long grass of Wyttenfacting.
Bryant. Oh dear. This is the grand FLCCC promoted ivermectin report you’ve all been waiting for? To quote its findings:
Twenty-one RCTs involving 2741 participants met review inclusion. Meta-analysis of 13 trials found ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average Risk Ratio 0.32, 95% condence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.72; n=1892; I2=57%; low to moderate-certainty evidence. Low-certainty evidence found ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average 86% (95% CI 79% to 91%). Secondary outcomes provided very-loworlowcertainty evidence. Lowcertainty evidence suggests that that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for ‘need for mechanical ventilation’, whereas effect estimates for ‘improvement’ and ‘deterioration’ favoured ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare and evidence of no difference was assessed as low to very low-certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.
Which, funnily enough seems to tally almost exactly with what the WHO, CDC, nearly all public health bodies, Rothwell, Huxley, and quite frankly any sensible person who is not completely in thrall to either Fox News or Wyttenbach, says:
Namely that lots of biased evidence doesn’t somehow magically cancel out to make unbiased evidence, but instead piles up into one big steaming turd, that is extra alluring to lower taxanomic phyla those without a solid background in statistics.
And last, and least, Wyttenbach. (LENR forum’s own Reinhard Heydrich, see paragraph five, ‘the judeo-masonic conspiracy’) Where to begin? Or why even bother? Old and unvaccinated, we should (god forbid) probably start preparing to say nice things about him.
Suffice to say, I’ve noticed a pattern: falls in covid cases in USA/Europe, he credits to lockdowns, whilst falls in covid numbers in India, are completely credited to ivermectin. Despite them having equally harsh rules, backed up by policemen with sticks. Odd that.
Although perhaps not entirely unexpected… After all he is a computer ‘scientist’, where there is no room for nuance in the binary, black-and-white, works-perfectly-or-not-at-all world of computing.
Thats why the normies relegate them to the basement, or if they are lucky, the back office in most corporations… A fitting description of this thread’s new place in the forum, perhaps.
Sometimes I think this thread is only kept open as a charitable act, to provide relief to a few long-suffering wives during lockdown. Japanese visas only last so long, after all.
Display More
You do not have to be anti-vaccine to be pro-Ivermectin. They both are effective, one is cheaper, has been available for years before in other use cases and avoids the concerns of many people. Different vaccines are good for different sexes, age brackets and unique medical situations. Ivermectin seems to cover many bases.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
That's a very interesting and well-written paper. It helps explain something I observed many years ago. I found that use of a ferrofluid in the coil gap of high-power loudspeakers both reduced the acoustic efficiency and increased the heating over time of the coil and magnet. In one instance, the fluid actually caught fire and destroyed a speaker operated at well below its rated input power. This was at a college show with four punk bands, and luckily a nearby raver had an almost-full bottle in hand, and put out the fire.
I want an in depth elemental composition list of the coils, the magnets and the ferrofluid. Thats the sure way to truly squash the claim or unfolda miracle alternate explanation.
I like doing that too, I also happen to be religious, but I also like quantifiable facts and the laws of physics in regards to new devices. The only possible devices one could call "magnetic generators" work with the EM fields inside of the atoms, those do work theoretically. interested observer I wasn't even necessitating the papp engine worked more than once. I'm saying the reason they said it worked in the patent was absolutely plausible within the laws of physics, research I've read and that has been shared personally.
Magnetic motors, earth engines, Papp motors, yadda yadda. It seems as though the people who believe that ANY of these free energy schemes are real believe that ALL of them are real. I wonder if this is genetic.
The Papp motor is real or at least possible, even if it wasn't practical when it was built.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
OHh this is not possible. There must be an entropic shift abiding by maters laws in order to release energy.
As I'm am not a Guinea pig I will not take a RNA vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine simply is here thanks to multiple fraud. This is the main reason not to touch it. J&J is very save for males age >60. RNA vaccines arn't safe for any group. You take it at your own risk...
Tight variable but these statistics give an overwhelming conclusion that besides J&J and perhaps up and comers, less expensive drugs and vitamin C/D will do your virus in well. Not many want to admit it, but it seems a lot more clear. There do seem to be significant sex differences in response to vaccine types and treatments.
Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19
Stephanie Seneff1and Greg Nigh21Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail: [email protected] 2Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
ABSTRACT
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter.We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for trans-generational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies
The spike proteins effects do remind me of prions in many ways, seems prions are a part of the spikes structure? A biological puzzle. Can anyone in good conscience recommend the mRNA based vaccines for those under 35, pregnant, with current cardiovascular conditions or breastfeeding? Not in my understanding based on the information shown. There are somewhat less risky vaccines (Janssen?) and even better there are the combined approaches of diet/lifestyle, vitamin supplements and Ivermectin. The Ayurvedic dude in India's herbal suggestion might be placebo but would help solely because they had to eat more plant-based, due to reduced inflammation.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Display More
Sketchy response, when he said local drug manufacturing it sounds like ivermectin works to well at a reletively low cost for their margins. How about letting the Manitoban doctors and patients choose their option after seeing the stats/evidence.
I am not an expert (as many others here) in serology, epidemiology, virology and statistics, so I cannot judge what was right or wrong with these correlations, but I would expect that they did not came up with simply fictious factors or parameters...
"In multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, blood pressure, smoking status, and geographical location, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was not associated with having a vitamin D level less than 20 ng/mL before (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.22) or during (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.09) the pandemic; it was also not associated with having a vitamin D level less than 30 ng/mL before (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.93-1.27) or during (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91-1.23) the pandemic. Similar results were observed in propensity score analyses. SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was associated with obesity (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.46), not having a college degree (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.21-1.62), and Asian (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.13-1.87), Black (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.25-3.34), Hispanic (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.15-3.27), American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (OR, 2.01; OR, 1.54-2.62) race/ethnicity, and was inversely associated with high blood pressure (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96), smoking (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78), and residing in the US Northeast (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92) and West (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.67). "
So effectively, the things you have stated from the study do associate covid with lower abilities to absorb/make vitamin D in the skin from an equal amount of outdoor light. Aside from smoking, obesity, and high blood pressure all other variables correlated with having higher skin melanin content along with living in dimer geographical regions of the world. How much Vit D utilized by antiviral systems in the body may differ from the amount floating in the blood this time around.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
High levels of Vitamin D to prevent SARS-Cov2 infection a myth?
FindingsIn this cohort study of 18 148 individuals whose vitamin D levels were measured before the COVID-19 pandemic, low levels of vitamin D were associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in unadjusted univariable analysis. However, after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, blood pressure, smoking status, and geographical location, vitamin D level was not associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.
What was the right correlating factors among age, see, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, blood pressure, smoking status, and geographical location.
Interesting. Even though I am pro-Ivermectin and pro-Vitamin D/C supplementation as a standard procedure, that "misinformation" can still be true relatively. Even though you may still be more likely to get blood clots from the vaccine than early treatment and recovery with ivermectin, supplements and lifestyle, vaccines seem more beneficial for some than others.
