Ruby Carat published about Vitaly Kirkinsky et al CF results(~2002..2016) in 2019,,
https://coldfusionnow.org/tag/vitaly-kirkinsky/
It could still be chemical technically, that's in the order of core ionisation energies and dense hydrogen/hydrinos..
LeBob
Verified User
- Member since Jul 18th 2019
- Last Activity:
Posts by LeBob
-
-
Strong force nuclear reshaping can cause any type of radiation. Thus stay far away behind some 1/2 meter of concrete at least and use remote control. Dying like Ikarus might be a nice thing for the last 5 seconds of inspiration you probably get...
Your caution is duly noted, but I will add that I'm sure it's possible to completely avoid strong force splitting interactions for the most part and stick to electroweak picoscale, nuclear tension releasing and long-range forces on a scale which is blockable by microwave oven walls and a couple of feet of air. I would agree don't try what I did precisely because the mix was "safe" God willing, but completely imprecise, there are other ways that have been inspired. Could have gone south.
-
Possible to get some interesting reactions with simple forms of carbon, e.g. graphite + hydrogen loaded catalytic alloys.
Low voltage (24V DC x 4amp) reaction pictured below.
I did try a microwave experiment with a more complex mixture of elements including carbon. It was operating strange for days after like there was "strang radiation" in the wiring. Also, the outlet was burnt, maybe extra current somehow conducted out of the microwave. The multi-element approach is likely to get safer results than the ones you guys are getting FYI.
Very unscientific and imprecise fuel mix but it subjectively proved a concept and there were bright flashes, a bit brighter than just putting metal utensils in the microwave. A liquid nutritional supplement containing Iron, zinc, simple proteins/amino acids, mixed with powdered incense ashes, and a pinch of salt. This was literally applied to tissue paper put in a glass in a microwave while still wet on a low setting. Good thing I was in the next room waiting for the doped paper to carbonise when I heard the loud zappy noises. Went in the well-vented kitchen and it was quite bright, smelling of ammonia. Turned off the microwave. Afterwards, a component of the microwave would turn itself on and make strange noises when plugged in, a fan/motor on but not microwave. Like there was some charged stuff cycling in the wires.
I am not in the lovely country I was when I did this FYI lol. Was kinda scared but I did keep some ashes which I dumped in the trash heap later, I didn't have any professional equipment besides referencing others observations in research papers. I do realise there is a better, simpler and safer approach obviously. A few have been written down.
There are others that sell such claims e.g. by using micro waves. But such claims are sold since ancient times...
But please tell me one reason why they should sell it and not produce the gold themselves.....
Because he straight up didn't actually turn copper into gold. He probably did transform the substance into something different if he did the right thing.. by the way, microwave stimulation is a perfectly legitimate way to stimulate medium energy reactions. I am thankful that I happened to see strange stuff without having bad side effects. There are medium-range chemo-nuclear transformations with hydrogen that should change the colour of metals, one paper (Dufours) talked about iron powder turning pink after the reaction.
-
https://phys.org/news/2021-01-…al-antivirals-affect.html
Fat-soluble vitamins like vitamin K , D , and A seem to bind to the viral proteins, reducing viral attachment rates!
-
Unfortunately Uranium (depleted or not) is not freely tradeable in the UK or EU. Unlike the USA where you can buy yellow cake and other materials.
Yummy, vegan lemon pound cake!
-
Display More
Yes but . . . Employment in those sectors is not counted as part of the energy sector. Those are building trades. Furthermore, the number of people doing that will be approximately the same as the number of people now working to replace heating system houses, and buildings. As the technology matures, I expect cold fusion devices will require less maintenance, and the equipment will last longer, so employment in those sectors will decline.
See the "2020 U.S. Energy & Employment Report" I linked to above. Employment in "energy efficiency" is included but there will be no need for efficiency with cold fusion. This Report lists "Motor Vehicles" on p. xv as part of the energy industry, especially alternative fuels vehicles, hybrids and fuel economy. All of those jobs will disappear with cold fusion. People will still be making automobile engines, but I do not think that should be counted as part of the energy industry. That is transportation.
For example, this report says:
"COMPONENT PARTS More than 1/5, 22%, of component parts firms derived all their revenue from products that increase fuel economy for motor vehicles."
There will be no need to increase fuel economy with cold fusion. Other aspects of the vehicle will be improved, such as durability, safety, economy and so on, but no effort will be made to improve fuel economy or efficiency because cold fusion energy costs nothing. Any trade-off will be made in the other direction, decreasing efficiency in order to increase safety, for example. Or using cheap steel instead of expensive plastic or carbon fiber body parts, because it will not matter that steel makes the vehicle heavier.
Cold fusion will even reduce overall employment in transportation. Cold fusion engines will ultimately be simpler than internal combustion engines. They will take less labor. In fact I doubt they will take any labor at all. I expect they will be made with robots, which is how Toyota previous hybrid engines are made. You can tell by looking at one that no human being could assemble most of the components in such a thing. The tolerances and scale of the parts in the bolts holding it together make it look more like a modern computer circuit board than a 1960s Volkswagen engine.
Electric vehicle engines are much simpler and cheaper to make than internal combustion engines, and they take less labor. Electric cars are reducing the number of people employed in the auto industry.
I discussed many of these issues in my book, and the my paper describing how cold fusion is likely to lower the cost of energy to zero, and the equipment cost of many by a factor ranging from 200 to 600 in the near term, depending on the type of equipment. Yes, I do mean that electric generators themselves will be 200 times cheaper. There is no future in making things that cost 200 times less than today's models.
The cost of computer memory fell by eight orders of magnitude from 1955 the 2015. Fortunately for computer makers, the demand for computer memory increased by more than eight orders of magnitude, so earnings did not fall by 10E8. People now use much more computer memory and disk memory than they ever did in the past. I personally own several terabytes of hard disks, which is probably more than existed in the whole U.S. in 1960. However we will not need 200 to 600 times more electricity in the future than we now use. So the decline in the cost of generators will not be counterbalanced by increased demand. Major industries are converted to something smaller than today's bubblegum business.
See:
Cold Fusion and the Future
https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusiona.pdf
Cold Fusion Will Lower the Cost of Both Energy and Equipment
You stimulate thoughts! I really earnestly believe the vision will take form one way or another. Yes, it will reduce the cost of energy and everything that needs energy to produce including equipment. Technical employment still shouldn't be assumed to disappear. Safe and human servicable, with factories that still employ people, that sounds good. This is where engineering psychology, wholistic planning and economics come in.
Possibly false are the employment assumptions. Balancing human involvement and participation will be important even if it technically could be avoided. "LENR" is so efficient robot manufacturing, to cut people out of the loop, may not be desirable for parts of the supply chain people will enjoy. Consciously giving people jobs for life purpose and fulfillment seems the wiser approach if you have an ultra cheap energy source. I would prefer a system were the devices are manufactured to be human sevicable, aesthetically pleasing and simple. Using AI and robotics to improve customer and worker experience while allowing them to enjoy gainful participation. Allowing electricians, technicians, and engineers to, with a little training, fix them shouldn't be a problem. We want our electronics infrastructure to be so dependant on specialised expensive tech that as soon as an EMP strikes or internet drops we can't use them or build more? Advanced yet hardy, well engineered tech that can be used anywhere it's needed.
More like an upgraded hybrid of microwaves, catalytic heaters, dyson vacuum cleaners and fancy gasifier rocket stoves than super limited stuff.
-
Display More
I
speculated several years ago that the expected old cratered surface
would be in fact the face of a planet rejuvenated by tectonics.
Indeed, the movement of the couple Pluto / Charon and his seven main
satellites around their common center of gravity creates tidal
forces, who wear the deep ocean at a very high temperature.
(Relatively ...) Thermophilic organisms should develop in the deep
warm lakes. I wrote this hypothesis in a paper about Eris in the 109
issue of the french journal “FUSION”, but the paper was
unfortunately shortened by the editor.OK,
Pluto and Charon are gravitylocked but satellites that rotate faster
than the couple Pluto / Charon accelerate the rotation of the god of
the underworld and his ferryman of the deads, and thus loose energy.
They end up crashing or be ejected.On
the contrary, those satellites who are running slower than the
rotation of Charon around Pluto get energy and move away from the
barycenter. This is the case of Nyx, Styx, Hydra and Cerberus. In
the same time the couple Pluto/Charon decelerate, and there is a
dephasage between the speed of rotation of the two dwarf planets, and
thus tidal creation of heat.Nevertheless,
added to this tidal energy, it is not possible to exclude some LENRs
of the deuterium or lithium catalysed by the metal of the rocky core
of the dwarf planet.It
is the same thing for Cerès : the famous “bright spots” on the
surface are clearly made by a cryovolcanic activity. And to this day,
there is no satellite reported around Cerès, so no source of tidal
energy. What is the source of the internal heat of Cerès?LENR,
why not?But
the Sphere of Roche of Ceres is 300 000 km large, so it is not
impossible that some unknown satellites lies in this region. I
suggest the name of Zea, Triticum, Oriza, Sorghum et Astrebla for
these small bodies. Each of them will represent a cereal of each
continent of our Planet. Ceres is the godess of the harvests. Don't
forget his beautiful blond hairs when eating your Kellogs muesli
during the breakfast !And
if there is no "Kellogs" moons in the sphere of Roche of
Ceres, we must consider LENRs to explain the active geology of the
dwarf planet.Whatever is real in these high energy phenomina must be a rock or stone-like foundation of many mysteries across the solar system. Thanks for sharing David.
-
Just seeing this, will check out.
-
This basically boils down to the question what matter state would be able to vaporise a thin Tungsten rod.
To vaporise this fast, extremely high (eddy) currents are required. Another indication that a superconductive space could be present. There is however lack of a light flash in response to vaporisation.
Another option is of course that the Tungsten tip is simply falling out of it´s holder to make it disappear.
Tungsten vaporising shouldn't be surprising concidering the fact that it is a transition metal with, in addition, unstable isotope fractions. Hydrogen will cause beta emmission and pico-chemical energies that should completely vaporize small bits. It would be most interesting if they find isotopes similar to it's decay chain, and "plus one" pico-hydrides analogous to larger isotopes. Confirming importantly, along with interesting.
-
Sir, for the thousanth time no fundamental changes to the understanding of nuclear physics and chemistry are needed to explain LENR like happenings. The 2d classical electron orbit field is probably the closest. The Russians/Americans/other who have an experiment backing their papers aren't screaming that all of chemical and nuclear science is wrong. They are looking at it from a different (pico-chemical Millsian from what I gatker) angle of known physical laws. Learn from them (Extiel), could swear you're a spy trying to confuse people.
Display MoreВзаимодействие с другими людьми
We get a strange dialogue ...
Created by Mr. Rob Woudenberg - “Understanding low energy nuclear reactions. An overview by Péter Kálmán, Budapest University of Technology and Economics "Further, Mr. Cydonia gives us a link to this article -
"Charged particle assisted nuclear reactions in solid state environment: renaissance of low energy nuclear physics" by Peter Kalman and Tamas Keszthelyi, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Physics.
You invite us to discuss this article ... What am I doing? I am discussing ... And in my opinion I disclose my disagreement with the author of this article - Peter Kalman. What is my main disagreement? It consists in the fact that the particles are not charged with ANYTHING, i.e. there are no charges on the electron and proton and there were no ... I support my opinion by citing the original tracts of Charles Coulomb ... That is, I defend his position! I am against the distortion of the position of Charles Coulomb!
You wrote - “you have pushed your model in many threads of this forum, you insist on calling the attention of everyone to your ideas, but as support you offer only lenghty and very hard to properly translate writings that offer little to none supporting evidence to your claims other than your opinion. "
But excuse me - it was not I who discovered the proton's own magnetic moment in 1933 ... Is this my idea? It was not I who discovered the electron's own magnetic moment in 1947! And that's not my idea either ...
In my opinion, I rely on those ideas that were open before me ... I am trying to explain to you and the site visitors the misconceptions of Peter Kalman. What are my opponents doing? They are braiding me with "revisionism" and "Trotskyism" ... Is that a discussion of physics and its problems ???
Many of you continue to believe in the existence of a "charge" on the proton and electron ... To everyone who believes in this, I have long ago asked my simple questions - let's say you are “believers in the existence of a charge on a proton and an electron”, you are right and the charge is magically formed on both the proton and the electron ... Then explain to me and all physicists the following - "How is a charge of the same modulus and different" sign "on a proton and an electron born during the decay of a neutron?" Let me explain ... When the neutron rotates, forces arise that separate a small part from the neutron, i.e. the neutron is divided in the ratio 1: 1836 ... Due to the rotation of the neutron, the generated particles, the proton and the electron also rotate, and in this the Law of conservation of angular momentum is manifested ... The substance of the proton and the electron is absolutely the same as in the neutron ... What happens? Two identical substances rotate in the same direction - the proton's own magnetic moment was discovered in 1933, and the electron's own magnetic moment was discovered in 1947 ... Since the proton's mass is 1836 times greater than the electron's mass, their magnetic moments are different ... This is logical ? Yes, it is logical ... So why, having a different mass, two identically rotating substances generate the same charge modulo ??? This is nonsense! It can't be! There is and cannot be logic in this! And this is another proof that there are no charges on either the proton or the electron!
But there is one more "blow in the gut" to "those who believe in the existence of a charge on a proton and an electron" - the question: "How can two identical substances that rotate in the same direction, but have a huge difference in mass, generate" electric lines of force " in such a way that they come out of the proton and enter the electron? "... This is real magic, this is fantasy and this is a delusional fantasy !!!There is the next question, which the “believers” are not able to answer - “how can two identical substances, which rotate in the same direction and have a huge difference in mass, generate TWO fields SIMULTANEOUSLY - electric and magnetic, while the configuration of these fields is absolute different ... It's a FAIRY TALE again and it can't be!
None of this exists in nature!
Therefore, your attempts to understand LENR mechanisms are doomed to failure - this is just my humble opinion ... Your right to agree with this or ignore ... What will happen next? History will judge us ... I wish everyone success in learning the truth.
Electromagnetism is a dualistic force. You are right people will be proved to be misinformed when high density hydrogen energy is proven openly, how it works is important too, SO keep that in mind 😁.
-
You probably refer to the Japanese NEDO project. (requires a ResearchGate account and login).
In particular this publication (accessible without account, without using VPN).
Takahashi et al paper, submittal to Proceedings of JCF20 of JCFRS, 2020 1 Enhancement of Excess Thermal Power in Interaction of Nano-Metal and H(D)-Gas
(PDF) Enhancement of Excess Thermal Power in Interaction of Nano-Metal and H(D)-Gas. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/p…_of_Nano-Metal_and_HD-Gas [accessed Jan 11 2021].
Ok thanks, that is it now! Ancient truths ever true.
-
Display More
NASA has been adding new papers in the "publications" section of the Lattice Confinement Fusion Project (all of them very interesting, so, highly recommended to go take a look), but there's one that IMHO could be taken as a sort of independent confirmation of Holmlid's work of generating fusion with a Laser:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/cita…downloads/20170002584.pdf
Experimental Observations of Nuclear Activity in Deuterated Materials Subjected to a Low-Energy Photon Beam
Summary Exposure of highly deuterated materials to a low-energy (nom. 2 MeV) photon beam resulted in nuclear activity of both the parent metals of hafnium and erbium and a witness material (molybdenum) mixed with the reactants. Gamma spectral analysis of all deuterated materials, ErD2.8+C36D74+Mo and HfD2+C36D74+Mo, showed that nuclear processes had occurred as shown by unique gamma signatures. For the deuterated erbium specimens, posttest gamma spectra showed evidence of radioisotopes of erbium (163Er and 171Er) and of molybdenum (99Mo and 101Mo) and by beta decay, technetium (99mTc and 101Tc). For the deuterated hafnium specimens, posttest gamma spectra showed evidence of radioisotopes of hafnium (180mHf and 181Hf) and molybdenum (99Mo and 101Mo), and by beta decay, technetium (99mTc and 101Tc). In contrast, when either the hydrogenated or non-gas-loaded erbium or hafnium materials were exposed to the gamma flux, the gamma spectra revealed no new isotopes. Neutron activation materials showed evidence of thermal and epithermal neutrons. CR–39 solid-state nuclear track detectors showed evidence of fast neutrons with energies between 1.4 and 2.5 MeV and several instances of triple tracks, indicating >10 MeV neutrons. Further study is required to determine the mechanism causing the nuclear activity.
I am a bit speechless that NASA is going "full monty" with these results. This is IMHO excellent news for the LENR field.
That's deuterium and unstable elements for you!
NASA does not mention Ultra Dense Deuterium however.
You could be right that there is a correlation with Holmlid´s work, but it´s not directly shown in this NASA paper IMHO.Ultra Dense Hydrogen could be formed at the surface of Deuterated metals in case there is an equilibrium of Deuterium that is absorbed and desorbed simultaneously.
NASA spends quite a bit of US tax money. Isn´t that why results are made public?
This particular less widespread isotope of hydrogen produces more genuine nuclear events including gamma and high energy neutrons than regular protium based systems. At least that's the pattern I'm getting from research papers. Wasn't there a Japanese one clearly stating the differences of the result between protium (regular hydrogen) and deuterium in reactor tests. I would suspect protium based set up would have significantly different results, heat, current and light, and that is the source many would prefer. Protium should still induce beta decay without proton capture etc. The stuff in most methane, water and ammonia you know! Would presume some of the neutrons are miscalculated atomic dense hydrogen either way?
-
New paper that discovers water has two different liquid phases.
Not directly LENR related but probably important to know:Just watched a youtube video on that!
-
Display More
Family calls for more research after young doctor left paralyzed in wake of taking Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in Mexico
https://news.google.com/articl…=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
An investigation has been launched by public health authorities in Mexico after a young doctor was left paralyzed minutes after taking the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Her family have asked for more research to be carried out.
Karla Cecilia Perez was left partially paralyzed in her arms and legs mere hours after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech jab on December 30 and was immediately placed in the intensive care unit of the hospital in Coahuila, in Nuevo Leon state. She also presented difficulties with speaking, according to media reports.
The health of the bodies immune system is wealth literally. Inexpensive safe drugs, vitamins C and D in combos with metals like Zinc and Iron seem like the safer route. Don't forget plenty of water with electrolytes., fresh air and sunlight (vitamin d and radiant disinfectant). Just an observation from the son of a nutritionist lol.
-
-
With respect to "Condensed Hydrogen is clustered at lattice defects."
One explanation would be that lattice acts as a waveguide. The distance between atoms determine what wavelengths are received (absorbed to hydrogen) due to the waveguide. A defect in the lattice then would allow for wavelengths that the normal crystal structure does not. Hence, at the defect specific wavelengths of light are absorbed to create the dense hydrogen states. One could then postulate that only with those specific wavelengths will dense hydrogen form.
I have made this argument before that the wavelengths that Mills claims are produced by the formation of hydrinos are actually the wavelengths required for the formation of dense hydrogen. If energy is required to produce dense hydrogen, then energy is not released in the formation of dense hydrogen. That is why I think energy production does not occur by hydrino formation but rather by a nuclear reaction which occurs due to the dense hydrogen. It must then follow that the energy of the nuclear reaction can convert back to these same specific wavelengths. So the strange radiation can cause hydrogen ionizations and therefore also phats. Phat frequencies for hydrogen have a one to one correspondence with energies alleged to be produced by formation of hydrinos.
I have thought since H2O is a catalyst and many other molocules and atoms in certain conditions could reasonantly accept the right "wavelenth", there should be a list of elements and compounds somewhere. Sorry I am quite sure the energy is coming from electron orbitals and magnetic bonds. Though you do have a possible point, dense hydrogen should more affectively induce nuclear decay reactions, like a tidally locked moon turning the core. But there is chemical and decay energy.
-
The real issue, IMHO, is to know if they are really neutrons. Santilli,
in his latest published patent application, changed his stance about these being neutrons (he had published about it and even sold one as a directional source of neutrons to a customs inspection service https://www.accesswire.com/462…Smuggled-Nuclear-Material ) and now calls whatever its emitted by the device “composite particles comprised by a nucleus and an electron”.
https://patents.justia.com/patent/20200027573
He has several articles (mostly self) published about how he developed this system, at least one of them used transmutations observed on targets as experimental proof of neutron emission. It seems Santilli now thinks neutrons are not even a real particle.Likely fancy words for atomic dense hydrogen!
-
Display More
No play
Max Fomitchev - Search for Alpha Decay Acceleration
Abstract
Bismuth nitrate solution exposed for 30-60 minutes to a strong electrostatic field (-20 kV potential, ~10 MV/m field strength) exhibits significant alpha, beta and gamma activity. However, the in-depth investigation using the Automated Nuclear Lab system has shown that the observed activity is consistent with the accumulation of positively charged atmospheric radon radioactive decay daughter products in the negatively charged droplet.
Natural Background
Contrary to popular belief, the natural world is full of nuclear activity. Gamma rays, neutrons, alpha and beta particles are constantly emitted by a variety of processes ranging from thunderstorms to cosmic rays. Natural radioactivity of Earth’s crust is a major factor particularly due to release of airborne radon gas, which can accumulate in unexpected places and thus influence and even confuse sensitive nuclear measurements. In this post I show how radon accumulation can affect measurements and what can be done to prevent it.
Setup
Induced decay of bismuth was originally proposed by Baranov and recently discussed by Marakhtanov. In my experiment I generally follow the experimental procedure and setup proposed by Baranov.
Conclusions
Natural radioactivity can easily influence results of sensitive measurements. Radioactive ions (like those originating from radon decay) are positively charged and therefore are attracted to and accumulate in areas of high negative potential. Therefore it is advisable to conduct sensitive experiments in a hermetically sealed environment and allow for 8-24 hours for the natural background in any captured gas to diminish prior to starting measurements.
Acknowledgements
I thank Ross Koningstein, Dud Femer and Sky Jelsma for helpful suggestions and help editing this post.
Hope they repeat the experiments with atomic hydrogen absorption, heaters and electron donors.
-
Display More
OMG, I have been spending my Christmas trying to make sense of Rossi mishmash of other peoples work. What a depressing life.
I have a lapsed undergraduate physics background. The people who should really comment are the peer reviewers.
Can you find any peer reviewer here?
Also the people he borrowed the math from should really be heard from.
What does Hanno Essen have to say about it? Is Essen working with Rossi?
The whole Darwin Lagrangian part was lifted from his Essens paper. (see attachment(
Some first quick thoughts (since nobody seems to have commented on the actual content of the "paper" yet).
All this about the SK. What happened to the SKL mostly electricity version?
If the SKL works as good as he said in his results section with a COP of 54, why the He double hockey sticks does he need the SKL?
The SK will win multiple Nobel Prizes if any of this is correct.
Quote from the very beginning:
"The E-Cat technology poses a serious and interesting challenge to the conceptual foundations
of modern physics".
My comment, how can something that has not been shown to work, or even really exist, challenge modern physics?
Section from the end rehashes all the test results are lifted from the bogus Stockholm "Industrialization".
If Rossi is not lying about customers having it, has someone else duplicated his spectral analysis results and energy generation/COPlenr-forum.com/attachment/15464/?
Has this device been given to anyone to replicate his experiment?
I am still going through the doc. Same thing is with the last version. It does not indicate any source of energy, and how this energy could be calculated.
This section hints at it but has a major issue:
"2.5 Entropy of the coherent clusters
Although the formation of charge cluster coherent states is compatible with the condition
of stationary Action 22 , its probability is heavily hindered by the extremely low entropy of
such states. The order of magnitude of the entropy ratio between non-coherent and coherent
congurations is approximately equal to the number N of interacting particles, considering
that the coherent state can be described by a single wave-function, as in BEC condensate.
The Darwin Lagrangian may be used for non coherent states of N interacting electrons
observed at time scales larger than the Zitterbewegung period (tz ' 8:1 1021s). In this case
the average value of the component of the vector potential orthogonal to electron velocity
vanishes and does not play a role in magnetic interactions, but his hidden in the kinetic
energy term, being the value of its module multiplied for the elementary charge equal to the
electron rest mass in natural units."
OK, paragraph 1 makes sense in that such coherent states should be low entry.
But paragraph 2, WTF? How does this explain that such clusters should form with lower entropy? It doesn't. It is total BS.
Like everything else in this paper, no real explanation of how energy is released "from the vacuum'".
Sam, can you explain paragraph 2 and how that somehow implies these low entropy clusters?
That is my quick take. I'll continue reading.Essen Darwin Lagrangian.PDF
I would like to hope he's talking about higher entropy, cause that's where you get energy from, a local increase in entropy.
-
From the understanding revealed to me LENR based on hydrogen is predominantly a super chemical and decay acceleration-based effect, mediated by mid-range picoscale effects, electroweak in nature. Deuterium increases the chances of genuine nuclear events but is not necessary for energy production. Multi-nuclei hydride compounds and the stabilisation of unstable elements is the vast majority of excess energy in most LENR effects. Think of it like chemistry at the transition metal K shell cross of s electrons. Pico-chemistry creates high energy EM waves and thermal energy. Accelerated beta/alpha decay produces electric current directly.
r/PicoChemicalLight has quite a few links and stuff on this topic.
I have to mention the Judeo-Christian sanctuary message as the perfect analogy for the atom in this set of reactions. The courtyard is valence shell electrons, the holy place is most of the electrons and the holiest is just above the nucleus. It's important for safety and wide adoption to stay super chemical and with stabilizing cores instead of trying to create fusion or fission on a tabletop. Light, thermal differentials and high energy electrons are the desirable products. Plus producing fancy compounds.
Dufours, Mills hydrino, (cautiously/debatably) Andrea Rossi, possibly Safire and quite a few people all over the world have inspired this approach. Thus I have shared and promoted as my conscious sees fit. This is about the induced closeness of particles to H, resonant effects and electromagnetic energy released from close electron orbitals and unstable elements. Marrying atom cores and releasing imbalances of nuclear charge. A porous metal/catalyst/unstable isotope doped graphite base as a reactive electrode seems to tick all the criteria. Can be implemented in many ways.
The effects measured as "LENR" are a hearty fire, new to most and old to others.
