Slower death than Novichok ..
JJ. died in 1940
History... Unfortunately, J.J. Thomson died without knowing that Maxwell had “set him up with a false theory,” and that Maxwell had actually deceived J.J. Thomson...
Slower death than Novichok ..
JJ. died in 1940
History... Unfortunately, J.J. Thomson died without knowing that Maxwell had “set him up with a false theory,” and that Maxwell had actually deceived J.J. Thomson...
WEll, a wire carrying a current always deflects a compass needle when I try it. Maybe you have a different kind of electricity in Russia?
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/GAsy/kfh5GUjJU
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…PG-ZFUMw/edit?usp=sharing
Since we are talking about flows on closed manifolds, I suggest you take a closer look at flows along (2,3)-toric knots (homeomorphic to a trefoil) on a torus, on a pretzel and on a manifold of genus 3, in order to compare them with an electron, a muon and a tau-lepton.
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/GAsy/kfh5GUjJU
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…PG-ZFUMw/edit?usp=sharing
The local minimality of flows is provided by differential equations, and the global minimality is established by integral variational equations. Maxwell's equations provide a local minimality of the electromagnetic vector potential flow in the Minkowski space.
We physicists are tired of your mathematical fantasies. You tortured us with your false judgments about Maxwell's equations and about Minkowski space, which does not exist in nature... Maxwell's equations are an absolute lie! It is not difficult to verify this. Read my material carefully - We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 01/19/2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Nj1U/VcuDSB5zT
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 01/19/2021 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…98wsyrME/edit?usp=sharing
I am not your opponent. You just disagree with everyone else about this "no charge" concept, so I don't think it would be right to call me and everyone else your opponent. They don't as much oppose you, as ignore your "theory".
I don’t have my own theory... Therefore, I don’t understand why you argue this way. I did only what I did - I found fatal arithmetic errors in Maxwell... Analysis of these errors, which are not my theory, shows both me and those who analyze these errors that these Maxwell errors nullify or invalidate the existence of the "electric field according to Maxwell", "electric charges according to Maxwell" and "electric forces according to Maxwell.
Thanks for checking in.
Lots of things have changed in my world view, particularly about geopolitical villains.
But I am still under the misguided perception that Coulombs Law is dimensionally consistent, and I see no glaring error in Maxwell's Equations.
I even still believe Rossi has nothing.
Maybe it's just me, and you can call me an idiot if you want.
I do not insult my opponents... You are just a “misguided” person who does not read my articles... This is normal...
Display MoreI just double checked and Coulombs law you mentioned does in fact pass dimensional analysis, not surprisingly.
The constant ke is called the Coulomb constant and is equal to 1/4πε0, where ε0 is the electric constant; ke ≈ 8.988×109 N⋅m2⋅C−2
The m^2 in ke cancels the r^2, the q1q2 cancels the ke C^2, leaving Newtons, the unit of force.
What is the hangup? You do realize fundamental constants have units too, right?
A year has passed... Has anything changed in your worldview? If it has not changed, then read this article in English -
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Nj1U/VcuDSB5zT
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…98wsyrME/edit?usp=sharing
One can use Maxwell’s equations to solve the velocity of light. It is predicted as only a function the permittivity and permeability of free space. The speed of light as measured is precisely as predicted.
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Nj1U/VcuDSB5zT
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…98wsyrME/edit?usp=sharing
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Nj1U/VcuDSB5zT
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…98wsyrME/edit?usp=sharing
Russian scientists have conducted sensational studies of ether density
Russian scientists have proven the existence of ether - https://www.pravda.ru/eureka/1972564-efir/
Drive.google.com/file/d/1u9MD6p70b6FDQQWy87SIMXjPa913CWS3/view
Однако, возможно, лучшим термином была бы электронная гравитация. Я намерен показать, что уникальное состояние электронов имеет форму гравитации, которая обеспечивает передачу энергии, которая катализирует ядерные процессы. К сожалению, такая длинная логическая цепочка лучше всего подходит для серии дополняющих друг друга презентаций.
Геннадий ! Забудь про электроны - их нет в природе! Дж.Дж. Томсон фатально ошибся, думая что открыл электрон, так как основывался на фатальных арифметических ошибках Максвелла .-
Для Шипова Геннадия Ивановича об ошибках Максвелла, 14 марта 2024 года - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/QNHu/RSU5iJexu
1 hour 52 minutes 56 seconds - Let’s take the question of moving charges - says Nizovtsev... Vladimir Vasilyevich, unfortunately, also did not familiarize himself with Maxwell’s mistakes.... Otherwise, he would have known long ago that THIS question is absolutely far-fetched and ephemeral, since “Maxwell charges” do not exist in nature, but he is talking about them...
1 hour 52 minutes 40 seconds - We need to break away from electrodynamics... - says Nizovtsev... This is what I liked in his speech and it’s clear why... But because electrodynamics is built on Maxwell’s erroneous theory and on Maxwell’s mistakes.. We need a completely new electrodynamics... In fact, we must return to the path that Charles Coulomb correctly laid out for us, and it is precisely this direction that must be developed, understanding that electric current is the movement of the “mass of electricity” according to Charles Coulomb and the movement of photon mass along Cherepanov A.I., i.e. Photon mass is the mass of electricity...
2 hours 12 minutes 05 seconds - Ivanov M.Ya. talks about conservation laws... But the question arises about what conservation laws are we talking about? The fact is that Losinets pointed out conservation laws in his slide, but did not indicate which laws he was talking about. For example, Zatelepin V.N. at one seminar he objected to me - “There is no law of conservation of mass in nature!”... At the same time, I believe that in nature there is no Law of Conservation of Energy - this is an absolutely ephemeral thing and I constantly talk about this in my videos and write about it in my articles. The law of conservation of energy in the universe does not work, May 20, 2019 – https://cloud.mail.ru/public/2zau/4ifDPeA74 The law of conservation of energy in the universe does not work, May 20, 2019 – https://drive.google.com /file/d/10zGzwbUvnvRYMnKvTxA0FnyhUEW3koFl/view?usp=sharing
2 hours 31 minutes 15 seconds - Ivanov says - “Current of what?.... Current of energy...” From my point of view, this is absolute nonsense, since “energy” is not a material substance - energy is a mathematical parameter.
2 hours 42 minutes 15 seconds - Magnitsky wonders about electric current... Below I have already written about this and repeat - In fact, we must return to the path that Charles Coulomb correctly laid out for us and it is precisely this direction that must be developed, understanding that electric current is the movement of the “mass of electricity” according to Charles Coulomb and the movement of photon mass according to A.I. Cherepanov, i.e. Photon mass is the mass of electricity...
2 hours 43 minutes 11 seconds - Cherepanov A.I. - Sunlight is an electric current - it also flies in a vacuum to our Earth. I have already written about this below - I repeat - In fact, we must return to the path that Charles Coulomb correctly laid out for us, and it is precisely this direction that must be developed, understanding that electric current is the movement of the “mass of electricity” according to Charles Coulomb and the movement of photon mass along Cherepanov A.I., i.e. photon mass is the mass of electricity... Study of the external photoelectric effect, Cherepanov A.I., February 21, 2024 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Gamd/4HSbqAVDE
Excerpt from my article written in April 2018... - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/iniJ/mW6wMzQei
Millikan's fatal errors, August 7, 2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/vVBe/xvBnVDENx
Following the lecture on ETHERODYNAMICS, Dmitry Losinets, Moscow State University, December 12, 2018, part 1 -
Following the lecture on ETHERODYNAMICS, Dmitry Losinets, Moscow State University, December 12, 2018, part 2 -
Letter from Cherepanov A.I. physicists and the President of the RAS March 5, 2024 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Q5Tc/5taqpakh1
Dynamics of the ether, Atsyukovsky V.A., 1974 – https://cloud.mail.ru/public/pfC4/oAjctcMXw Dynamics of the ether, Atsyukovsky V.A., 1974 – https://drive.google.com/file /d/1AG9BkduN5TXaJC0yLtfl8BY57RSnxJM0/view?usp=sharing
Another article of mine is from 2018, and it is full of my own misconceptions - it was written in the wake of the report of Dmitry Stanislavovich Losinets -
In the wake of the seminar by V.L. Bychkova December 12, 2018 - https://drive.google.com/file/…T8fwCTsh/view?usp=sharing
In the wake of the seminar by V.L. Bychkova December 12, 2018 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/CsAD/gkuR9h2oC
The discovery of the electron in 1897 is in question - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/jSNV/jh4CtdVa5
Misunderstanding of the difference between mathematics and physics, July 29, 2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/yCh2/EQ7xwAexT
We analyze the report of Alexander Roaldovich Lepeshkin - New electron-inertial effects in metals, 06.18.2018 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/kL73/AcwTJeyig We analyze the report of Alexander Roaldovich Lepeshkin - New electron-inertial effects in metals, 18.06. 2018 – https://drive.google.com/file/…R2jd5M7h/view?usp=sharing
Answer from Cherepanov A.I. Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Zaitsev F.S. July 20, 2023. - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/NYTA/iMcYKCgEP
Answer from Cherepanov A.I. Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Zaitsev F.S. July 20, 2023. – https://docs.google.com/file/d…Hl8tHU8a/edit?usp=sharing
Ethereal dynamics - a unified theory, Losinets D.S., Bychkov Seminar No. 185, March 6, 2024 -
There was no discovery of the proton at the beginning of the 20th century, December 10, 2023 –
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 11/1/23, part 1 -
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 11/1/23, part 2 -
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 1.11.23, part 3 -
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 1.11.23, part 4 -
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 1.11.23, part 5 -
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 1.11.23, part 6 -
The role of Faraday field lines in the formation of tracks and the generation of strange radiation, Ivanov M.Ya., 1.11.23, part 7 -
Conference on ETHERODYNAMICS, Moscow, January 27, 2024 -
Today, as a result of my analysis of Maxwell's errors and analysis of the experiments due to which the electron, proton and neutron were allegedly discovered, I came to the conclusion that J. Thomson, E. Rutherford and D. Chadwick were dealing with photon mass and therefore did not discover electron, proton and neutron, respectively. For this reason, we do not know today what a hydrogen atom is, etc. And in this regard, this article sounds very instructive - about the works of F. Gareev -
18 different models of the hydrogen atom and all have their own experimental confirmation - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/t8ym/cbnvTofhe
18 different models of the hydrogen atom and all have their own experimental confirmation - https://docs.google.com/docume…gkKFw3DO/edit?usp=sharing
Since this article was born on October 31, 2021, it certainly contains my own misconceptions regarding the electron, proton, and neutron...
18 different models of the hydrogen atom and all are confirmed: Gareev Fangil Akhmatgareevich / 10/05/2008 -
2 minutes 38 seconds – Gareev says –
“Since I still don’t know what a mass defect is, how it is calculated, how it arises, and after I defended my doctoral dissertation, I decided to do “different things”... I realized that physics is an “interesting thing”, in that sense that it is completely differentiated and different branches of physics have their own language, terminology, etc.... And being a nuclear physicist, I realized that I have absolutely no idea what an electron is... And therefore I set myself an even simpler task - let's figure it out – WHAT IS a hydrogen atom. I set myself this task.
I now have about 18 models of the hydrogen atom. And what is most surprising is that they all describe well all existing experimental data. And these are models that are based on different principles, different equations and different assumptions. There are Newton’s equations, there are Schrödinger’s, Dirac’s equations, the evolutionary principle is considered there, there is even a model that considers the hydrogen atom as a kind of capacitor - a completely amazing thing, since it completely reproduces Schrödinger’s results. The results are completely consistent, but they are based on completely different assumptions.
The most interesting, apparently, is Gryzinsky’s work - he took Newton’s formula, added Coulomb and spin ... "
Sincerely, Alexey Ivanovich Cherepanov,
graduate of Department No. 5 of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 1978
On December 27, 2023, a seminar was held at which Anatoly Ivanovich Klimov made a report.
I recorded 3 videos following this seminar in response to A.I. Klimov’s disparaging statement. about photon mass (etheric mass). In fact, this is my message to him.
Lessons from LENR Research, Prof. Klimov Anatoly Ivanovich, National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, December 27, 2023, part 1 -
Lessons from LENR Research, Prof. Klimov Anatoly Ivanovich, National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, December 27, 2023, part 2 -
Lessons from LENR Research, Prof. Klimov Anatoly Ivanovich, National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, December 27, 2023, part 3 -
If you analyze the consequences of Maxwell's errors, you will begin to realize that physicists were mistaken in thinking that there were neutrons, physicists were mistaken in thinking that they had discovered the electron... They incorrectly interpreted the results of their experiments, because they relied on Maxwell's erroneous theory - you can easily find these errors in section "Electrostatics" paragraphs 39-44 of the treatise "Electricity and Magnetism" of 1873.
On September 13, a seminar by Klimov-Zatelepin was held, at which Leonid Irbekovich Urutskoev made his report.
Below I present 10 videos dedicated to this report.
Graphite in a reactor should be considered not as a moderator - there are no neutrons and there is nothing to slow down, but as a transformer of photon mass - from higher to lower. The graphite masonry neutron reflector should now be understood as a photon mass or photon wave reflector.
Let me remind you that I came to the photon wave after I finally understood that in nature there is no “electromagnetic wave according to Maxwell,” and therefore there are no “electromagnetic radiation” in nature.
Water is both a coolant and a “moderator” in old physics... And now we must imagine water as a carrier of photon mass, a carrier of photon mass, and also as a powerful transformer of a more massive photon wave into a less massive photon wave, which, as it turns out, has a high probability " capture" by the uranium nucleus - by uranium protons, and which, as it turns out, divides uranium-235.
It turns out that the nature of the magnetic system and uranium and other substances in general is very complex... It turns out that we are dealing with the wavelength of the photon mass - they are different in range, but also with the mass of the “antinode” of the wave - it can be different for the same length waves of photon mass... And this may be a deep misconception and misunderstanding of physics by me and other physicists... As an example, we can cite the “loudness of sound” - the harmonic of the sound is the same, the wavelengths are the same, and the mass of the “antinode” is photon mass increases with increasing volume... Perhaps here lies the reason for our misunderstanding of what happened during the accident at the 4th block of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986. The physics of uranium fission may depend on these two factors... as well as the physics of uranium evaporation...
According to Wien's law, the wavelength of the photon wave, which characterizes the evaporation temperature of uranium, is -
λf = 2.898 •10^-3 kg•m / T°K = 2.898 •10^-3 kg•m / 4404.5 °K = 0.658•10^-6 m - this is an infrared photon...
But according to what was said above, the physics of evaporation - for example, the rate of evaporation can change significantly as the photon mass increases at the antinode of the photon wave...
Time will tell if I'm thinking correctly...
The evaporation temperature of niobium is 5015 °K, the evaporation temperature of zirconium is 4650 °K. The fuel rod wall at the RBMK-1000 reactor consists of the E110 alloy, which consists of zirconium and 1% niobium.
At the same time, uranium tablets had a much lower evaporation temperature - 4404 °K. The gas fraction from uranium was formed during the accident... And this gas, together with gas fractions, for example, xenon, whose evaporation temperature is 166.1 ° K, strontium, whose evaporation temperature is 1650 ° K, flew out of the fuel rod housing and the reactor and dissipated in those areas where contamination was subsequently discovered..., a little before the TVEL casing evaporated...
But... But a very important note - the discharge of the photon mass of the so-called radioactive elements in a very short time could transform them into stable elements, which also scattered, but no one is able to detect them, since they do not manifest themselves in any way, unlike “radioactive elements” "...
Now, in my understanding, there is no decay of the neutron and no decay of radioactive elements, which 4 years ago I began to call “unstable elements”... But what to do now? I make the assumption that these elements manifest themselves as elements that emit photon mass only because the magnetic system of these elements absorbs the photon mass and this added mass changes the physics of the magnetic system of these elements, which is formed by protons, and as a result a “discharge” of the photon occurs mass by these elements... That is, until such an element absorbs this added photon mass, there is no radiation. It turns out that in my paradigm the nucleus and the atom of an element are one and the same, since there are no electrons in nature! Time will tell if I'm thinking correctly...
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 1 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 2 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 3 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 4 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 5 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 6 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 7 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 8 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 9 -
“Earthquake” at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, Urutskoev L.I., September 13, 2023, part 10 -
Following the report of Urutskoev L.I. about the Chernobyl accident on May 10, 2023, May 18, 2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/RRN5/a4WLTPDo3