• Member since Mar 5th 2020
• Last Activity:

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

I'm too busy right now to respond. There is a lot of new data, and we will announce it soon. I think it will please everyone.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

Dear All

Mizuno Tec. Inc is the official page. I didn't even know MTI page before. Mr. Daniel made it ahead of time, causing confusion. I also contacted Mr. Daniel and gave him a lot of attention and suggestions. Mr. D is also a page I made for me. The pager was not well managed and caused distrust and confusion to many people. I will also be careful in the future.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

私はこれ以上の入力データを持っていません。

[Google translate 'I don't have multiple input data' Alan.]

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

校正データーです。Control data.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

図面は同じ試験炉で、熱損失補正前と補正後です。

"The drawing is the same test reactor, with heat loss correction and after correction."

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

A few more words from the cook would be very helpful to understand why.

水野：良いところに気付きましたね。出力計算は平均値を使っていたので、元ファイルを添付します。

いつでも校正後の値が大きいです。

Mizuno: You've noticed some good points. Since the output calculation used the average value, attach the original file.

The value after calibration is always large.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

I don't think so. Look at Figure 10 of Mizuno and Rothwell J Cond Matt Nucl Sci 29:1-12 (2019), then equation 2 of the same paper. The equation they fit to their calibration data is fractional power capture = O/I = 0.98 - [5.0811E-4 x T] where T is "the reactor temperature"

水野：

このときは炉温度で補正式を作りました。同じく校正データーも同じ形状、重さの炉で補正式を作りましたが、精度が悪く、正確ではなかった。そのために箱からの熱逃散を補正に使った。その結果、極めて精度が良くなった。

私が出すデーターは新しいものほど精度、正確性が良い。さらにどのような形の、重さの炉であっても補正を入れた一般式で表すことが出来るようになった。

Mizuno:

Before 2017, the correction formula was made with the reactor temperature. Similarly, for the calibration data, a correction formula was made with a reactor of the same shape and weight, but the accuracy was poor and it was not accurate. Therefore, the heat dissipation from the box was used for the correction. As a result, the accuracy became extremely good.

The newer the data I give, the better the accuracy and precision. Furthermore, it became possible to express any type and weight of furnace by a general formula with correction.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

水野：　以前の試験では90％が直流電源です。交流電源も使用しましたが、加熱では試験結果に違いは有りません。直流の方が測定は楽です。

Mizuno: 90% of the previous tests were DC power supplies. An AC power supply was also used, but there is no difference in the test results with heating. DC is easier to measure.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

この校正データーは今では使用しない。前に書いたように校正試験はいつもアップデートしてるので、注意して欲しい。水野忠彦

This calibration data is no longer used. As I said before, the calibration test is always updated, so please be careful. Mizuno Tadahiko

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

Here is the loss-corrected 120 W plus excess plot.

.

この120W入力で350W近くに達する過剰熱データーは私は知りません。風量測定を始めた2017年からのデーターを全て再確認しましたが、有りません。私のデーターでは無いと思う。

I don't know the excess heat data reaching 350W with this 120W input. I reconfirmed all the data from 2017, when I started measuring the air volume, but there are none. I don't think it's my data.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

Robert

この計算は不正確だ。熱の箱からの逃げる量の補正をしていない。

This calculation is incorrect. The amount of escape from the heat box is not corrected.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

古いデーターは正確では無い。測定系も日々改良している。その度に校正試験を行う。補正係数も日々正確になる。新しいデーターを見てほしい。総合的な報告書は特許申請後行う。

Old data is not accurate. The measurement system is improving daily. A calibration test is performed each time. The correction coefficient is also update every day. Look at the new data. Comprehensive report will be made after patent application.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

DR Mizuno

Questions from replicator

Desireless posted on ECW..

Can you ask Prof. Mizuno if he developed a way how to run activated reactant with no excess heat?

Will it run with Protium only? Is there a comparison when running with Deuterium and Protium with the same reactant?

活性化した炉を不活性化するのは簡単です。Heを入れたり、空気を入れると直ちに過剰熱は出なくなります。再活性の程度は入れたガスや温度、さらした時間によって変わります。軽水素でも熱は出ましたが、100％H2のガスは無いので、重水素の影響を無視できません。

Deactivating an activated furnace is easy. Excess heat does not come out immediately when He or air is added. The degree of reactivation depends on the gas and temperature used and the exposure time. Even with light hydrogen, heat was generated, but since there is no 100% H2 gas, the effect of deuterium cannot be ignored.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

The graph showing Wex/g against the temperature (1/T) Is that power produced per gram of reactant (Ni mesh+Pa or D2)?

The graph showing Wex/g against the temperature (1/T) is that power produced only per gram of reactant Ni mesh.

• ## MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY

I'm new to posting. I have posted the same one.

Jed is having a hard time answering, so let me talk. This is the only data I can publish now, but let's make a detailed announcement after applying for a patent. The CF phenomenon is absolutely true. It can be controlled very easy. However, the mechanism is still unknown. When the data comes out, an excellent researcher will give an answer. There is still much to study. Let's do our best. Don't lose to Corona. Believe in the future and advance.