Posts by nkodama

Quote from Wyttenbach

As said: If you like the most dirty process invented ever...Then go on.

Cold fusion can be clean. Ultra hot particle fission never!

cold fusion is clean because cold fusion do not create the excited state of 4He because small D2 has denser electron density between 2 d and denser electron shield the coulomb repulsive force between 2d. The heat cause stronger vibration of d-d to cause fusion by the shorter d-d distance.for this case no extra energy is needed and have a clean fusion no emission of neutron nor high energy gamma ray.

Laser fusion and Plasma fusion is a dirty because extra energy is needed to have fusion which create the excited state of 4He.

Thus cold fusion is by far better than these fusions to have extra energy to cause the excited state of 4He.

The job is not the cold fusion but design the plant or power generator for the product but thus job is not the job of university researchers so it has very high risk. Usually for this case venture company use a company who is doing this kind of design and development. Thus at the glance of job description I thought that jobs were not by clean planet but other company.

However, I checked their web site and found the similar jobs.

I believe that this direction must have a huge risk because clean planet has no experience to design the product they have design the experimental tool. The requirements are totally different and Sono managers can not check the quality of the design.

My partner has the experience to develop such kind of tool and know well about the market.

clean planet started the product of power gererstor by themselves by hiring the engineer of plant design, but I do not think it is a good direction. I think Miura should design the power gererstor.

Clean planet is a group of academic researchers thus, they do not have the capability to design the tool by themselves.

Several jobs in clean planet website.

Your link is the job of clean planet.

->it must not be the job of university researchers.

In their website they started the production stage of power generators but this stage need the different company not the venture company from university.

Cold fusion has a lot of confusion like this posting because so many experiment and it’s mechanism has not been discussed.

Confusion is caused by the incorrect nucleus model.

The mechanism of cold fusion is the compression of covalent bond of D2 at metal surface T site to transition of electron from n=1 to n=0, which is the deep orbit. But this deep orbit has not been introduced to the nucleus model: neutron is a pair of proton and electron in deep orbit of n=0.

Therefore correct nucleus model must be discueed by nuclear physics and particle physics society not only by cold fusion society.

Correct nucleus model proved by transmutation experiment by cold fusion

Correct nucleus model proved by transmutation experiment by cold fusion neutron to be tightly bound protonelectron pair and nucleus to be constituted by protons and internal electrons and no neutrinos exist| International Journal of Innovative Science…

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Noriyuki-Kodama-2/publication/354142363_Mechanism_of_Cold_Fusion_with_Nano_Metal-Particles_and_Conceptualized_Reactor_to_Control_the_Nano-_Metal_Particle_Potential/links/6127121b035d5831d772619d/Mechanism-of-Cold-Fusion-with-Nano-Metal-Particles-and-Conceptualized-Reactor-to-Control-the-Nano-Metal-Particle-Potential.pdf

https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT21AUG335.pdf

Nano metal particle is promising if it is a composite that ceramic nano metal with holes, in which metal is embedded to prevent transformation to bulk from nano metal.

The issue is the trigger of cold fusion and potential control.

Cold fusion need the potential control on the reaction surface but composite nano metal particle cut the current path.

More importantly, heater they use unintentionally change the potential.

You will review my papers, which I explain my Conceptualized reactor for nano metal particle.

Cold fusion is now on the stage to improve heat generation per volume of the reactor and it must be easy to use for hours application, thus, hazardous gas’s of D2 is not fit to house use.

Cold fusion is not on the replication stage.

Because plasma fusion and laser fusion seem to be successful.

They have very high heat generation at the sacrifice of huge reactors with much safer than atomic power plant.

What about cold fusion?

If cold fusion reactors to be small to install the house, it may be useful. But power generation can cover the house electricity.

I hope venture company think this way.

Again NASA Lattice confinement fusion is Not hot fusion but COLD fusion based on compression of covalent bond between covalent bond of Li

https://ijisrt.com/cold-fusion-mechanism-of-bond-compression of Er-D.

I would like to explain the mechanism of transmutation. Bond compression of hydrogen molecules can turn hydrogen molecules to be smaller molecules with electron in deep orbit at the proximity of a few nm from protons.

The created small hydrogen, small H2 or small D2 or small HD can shield the coulomb repulsive force between nucleus and small hydrogen can fuse with target metal.

This was proved by the experiment by Iwamura by cold fusion reactor.

They use D2 and atomic number increased by 4 thus d2=4proton. This indicates that d is constituted by 2protons and one internal electron.

This can be the same under plasma reaction although the probability is very low and similar phenomena were observed in nuclear reaction experiment.

This this hav a huge impact on the nuclear physics the researchers must explain based on cold fusion mechanism by their experiment.

Quote from RobertBryant

Uranium?.. Thorium?....,,

,the intended fuel is not just Erbium..

Dash et al had some interesting results with deuterium plus Uranium

https://www.researchgate.net/p…_RADIOACTIVITY_OF_URANIUM

Forsley et al got

Strontium 85..92

Xenon 125 131

Cadmium 109 Cesium 137 etc

https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2009108331A2/en

Display More

all experiments can be explained by the cold fusion mechanism of bond compression and in plasma bombardment of D2 cause mechanical compression of D2 which transition of electron of N=1 to deep electron orbit,n=0 to created small D2 or small H2.

Please share this to them.

Cold Fusion Mechanism of Bond Compression

(PDF) Cold Fusion Mechanism of Bond Compression

PDF | On Aug 19, 2021, Noriyuki Kodama published Cold Fusion Mechanism of Bond Compression | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

Mechanism_of_Cold_Fusion_with_Nano_Metal-Particles_and_Conceptualized_Reactor_to_Control_the_Nano-_Metal_Particle_Potential

(PDF) Mechanism of Cold Fusion with Nano Metal-Particles and Conceptualized Reactor to Control the Nano- Metal Particle Potential

PDF | Although the nano-metal particles have the high capability to generate the very high excess heat due to the larger reaction site on the nano-metal... |…

www.researchgate.net

Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

(PDF) Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

PDF | Abstract:- Original nucleus model in the 1920s was internal electron theory that the atomic nucleus is constituted by protons and electrons, and... |…

www.researchgate.net

Cold Fusion Mechanism of Bond Compression

(PDF) Cold Fusion Mechanism of Bond Compression

PDF | On Aug 19, 2021, Noriyuki Kodama published Cold Fusion Mechanism of Bond Compression | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

Novel Cold Fusion Reactor with Deuterium Supply from Backside and Metal Surface Potential Control

(PDF) Novel Cold Fusion Reactor with Deuterium Supply from Backside and Metal Surface Potential Control

PDF | It is proposed that Cold fusion can occur in metal by D + hopping to T sites with Don the metal surface. In this mechanism, D + hopping is... | Find,…

www.researchgate.net

Possibility of transmutation of Er by small H - > small D2 are Tm. Yb. Lu. Hf.

So some can be radioactive and chemically hazardous.

Quote from RobertBryant

They haven't taken off yet.. maybe by 2026,2030?

"We expect to reach TRL 5 after three years by demonstrating scaled output with modeling and extended lifetime experiments."

To be sure...NASA might give them a few hundred hours burn before they do..

in which case there will be plenty of activated neutrons,and less stable actinide isotopes

which may have gamma.beta,alpha emissions much higher than background

.. as long as they are encased in heavy metal like the Topaz of Soviet yore

they should be OK?

Display More

Er+2d=Er+4proton=Hf.

This transmutation is inevitable but Hf is stable it is ok. No neutron from cold fusion due to it is Not via excited state of 4He.

Quote from Alan Smith

If anybody is interested in this, erbium, the raw material is relatively cheap.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/394…06ca53:g:eEAAAOSwgxdiZ~F-

Er does not absorb hydrogen to compress D2 at space between the nano metal era particle.

This is the meaning of lattice cold fusion.

(PDF) Cold Fusion mechanism of bond compression

PDF | Cold fusion is caused by the compression against D2 covalent bond at the expanded tetrahedral site (T site) on the nano-roughness of the metal... | Find,…

www.researchgate.net

Quote from Calliban

A question to any resident quantum mechanics experts on this board. From what I remember from undergraduate materials science, the Schrodinger equation tells us that the position of a particle within a system can be described in terms of a probability density function. This probability declines exponentially as distance increases from the most probable position. However, it never quite declines to zero, suggesting that there is a small but real probability that two deuterium nuclei in a heavy water molecule will fuse even under standard conditions, because a tiny but real proportion of their probability density functions overlap. If true, this would suggest that nuclear fusion is taking place in ordinary water under standard conditions, but at an infinitesimal rate that is so slow that it would be difficult to detect. Even this a true description of reality?

https://www.researchgate.net/p…anism_of_bond_compression

You should read my paper on the mechanism of cold fusion.

The coulomb repulsive force between nucleus prevent the fusion and electron deep orbit can shield this repulsive force.

Your discussion on thee probability is explained in the original theoretical oaper in the electron deep orbit or deep Dirac level or you can find these paper in my reference of my papers.

Display More

Quote from Calliban

A question to any resident quantum mechanics experts on this board. From what I remember from undergraduate materials science, the Schrodinger equation tells us that the position of a particle within a system can be described in terms of a probability density function. This probability declines exponentially as distance increases from the most probable position. However, it never quite declines to zero, suggesting that there is a small but real probability that two deuterium nuclei in a heavy water molecule will fuse even under standard conditions, because a tiny but real proportion of their probability density functions overlap. If true, this would suggest that nuclear fusion is taking place in ordinary water under standard conditions, but at an infinitesimal rate that is so slow that it would be difficult to detect. Even this a true description of reality?

Everyone must study the electron deep orbit theory. Simple d nucleus never fuse to another d due to the coulomb repulsive force between d.

In case that d has electron at a few fm from d it can shield the coulomb repulsive force. This is the real cause of cold fusion.

Thus transmission experiment shows that 2d fused to target metal meaning that small D2 exists with electron deep orbit.

The orbit is closer than n=1 and a few fm from the nucleus. You can find the related paper.

Keyword is electron deep orbit, deep Dirac level and I included this paper in my reference.

This deep orbit has already proved by experiment outside nuclear physics and cold fusion.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358009569_Neutron_is_the_Tightly_Bound_Proton-Electron_and_the_nucleus_is_constituted_by_proton_and_internal_electrons

Here is electron deep orbit theory

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281089882_Basis_for_Electron_Deep_Orbits_of_the_Hydrogen_Atom

Quote from redirmogician

Hi, I would like to know if there is a feasible way to obtain usable energy from the reaction of Ultra-dense hydrogen in the scheme. And not just catalytic fusion. Is there a feasible way to convert the mass of a meson into usable energy before it is produced and eventually decays into a neutrino. Or is it possible for the energy produced by the annihilation reaction to be absorbed by the adjacent hydrogen as such.

Bond compression cause fusion ultra dense H never cause fusion.

(PDF) Cold Fusion mechanism of bond compression

PDF | Cold fusion is caused by the compression against D2 covalent bond at the expanded tetrahedral site (T site) on the nano-roughness of the metal... | Find,…

www.researchgate.net

(PDF) Cold Fusion mechanism of bond compression

PDF | Cold fusion is caused by the compression against D2 covalent bond at the expanded tetrahedral site (T site) on the nano-roughness of the metal... | Find,…

doi.org

Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

paper
https://www.researchgate.net/p…ns_and_Internal_Electrons

Summary-Presentation
https://www.researchgate.net/p…on_and_internal_electrons

I think you study the real mechanism of cold fusion. Ultra-dense H never cause fusion and fusion need the D2 with covalent bond.

Covalent bond compression cause the transition of atom to small atoms. This is called small D2 molecules which cause fusion.

Google my paper or other theoretical research of electron deep orbit.

Electron deep orbit can cause fusion.

This is a real nuclear physics and not include this physics into the current standard model of nuclear physics.

You can find my paper in Research gate.