All cells contain calcium. So it's no mystery that it reoccurs.
Sorry to make it more clear. The hen experiment has been debunked already a long time ago. Referencing it's shows some lack of knowledge in the field.
Also army reports usually are just summaries of existing work. You cannot draw any conclusion about the content being true/correct.
The only serious work done in the field of biological transmutation was about 137Cs in Russia. So I would stick to measurable and reproducible experiments.
arise
Verified User
- Member since Aug 19th 2020
- Last Activity:
Posts by arise
-
-
As a scoop, what i can say is that a researcher close to me from Pasteur institute at Paris made experiments in this way to me ( under table..)
we had done forbidden things so put living mouse cells in Petri dishes fully deficient in calcium.
After a while, however, calcium had reappeared .. out of nowhere...
-
All of the assholes in this thread have lost their uncle, they are lost DEFINITIVELY
Even PhysicsForDummies has gotten lost in adult threads now, that's to say
-
each pair of conductive layers 50, 52 is a fuel layer 54 that contains a fuel mixture having nickel, lithium, and lithium aluminum hydride LiAlH.sub.4 ("LAH"), all in powdered form.
Preferably, the nickel has been treated to increase its porosity, for example by heavy water present in micro-cavities that are inherently in each particle of nickel powder.
I think that the mechanism of E-cat patent is the confinement of D-clusters in the space of nano-powder.
I think they make light of the surface potential control.
But I believe that the surface potential control is important.
I recommend that they think the cold fusion theory again.
I am sure that my theory is correct.
link to my theory
-
Russ George has worked with Arata probably you don't know who he was ?
Rossi refers himself to Arata"s understanding too surely from the expertise of your mouth only a bad sign.. However Takahashi ( you know ?) worked also with Arata.
What else, okay, could you share your background in the field ?
Continuing to discuss the data plots in Russ George's "Atom Ecology" blog. This time ... synchrony.
George claims that, at times, the activity in a fuel pellet in a particular reactor can fall into synchrony with activity from another fuel pellet in a separate reactor. The figure below is displayed as evidence of this (or at least that is my best guess). I also include the original caption (ltalics)
The behaviour of two cold fusion reactors thermal atomic ‘clocks’, started 02 May 2018 and faithfully still performing and displaying this behaviour like a pair of fine ‘Dutch’ clocks. They are electronically separated though perched on the same lab bench like Huygens clocks, and are repeatedly and randomly started and stopped, yet they always become synchronized. Sychronicity of anomalous heat production (cold fusion) is displayed in the fine structure in red while the black trace shows one ‘reactors’ gamma signature synchronizing with the disparate yet synchronous feedback heat signals of the twin reactors. Keep in mind that the gamma signal is on average 1 million times less prominent than the heat signal.
Synchrony is mentioned in the caption but I see no direct evidence for it in the figure itself. In the absence of labels on the vertical axis I will assume the red trace is reactor temperature (although in the caption it is said to represent "synchronicity" and in the red-lettered label under the plot it seems to be rate of excess heat production). I would now normally expect to see a similar trace from a different reactor so that we can compare the two and examine them for signs of synchrony. But no. There is no other heat-related trace visible. The red trace certainly looks like something I know, it looks like the time course of a state variable from a system consisting of 2 linear oscillators with weak coupling. In such coupling, this state variable would be antisynchronized with a sate variable the oscillator. I am puzzled , though, that this all looks so linear. It looks exactly like the superposition of 2 sine waves and this is untypical of nonlinear systems (both the superposition part and the sine wave part). This is a problem because I take the Atom Ecology fuel to constitute a nonlinear system both because of its bursty behaviour and because of its apparently nonlinear dependence of reaction rate on temperature. Perhaps what is happening is that the temperature oscillations are tiny compared with the nonlinearities in the system and so they act almost linearly.
In any case ... there no direct evidence of synchrony of heat generation shown here.
There is another synchrony mentioned here. The caption mentions that "the black trace shows one ‘reactors’ gamma signature synchronizing with the disparate yet synchronous feedback heat signals of the twin reactors". I am not sure what this means. I don't know what the "feedback heat signals" means exactly. What I do know is that there is no evidence in the figure of the black trace synchronizing with anything. The black trace (gamma counts?) is strongly periodic at about 4 cycles per 10 minutes. The red trace is strongly periodic with periods of about 6 cycles per 10 minutes and a "beat" amplitude modulation with a period of about 1 cycle per 20 minutes of so. But I don't see how the black trace synchronizes with the red trace in any way. Perhaps what is meant is that these gamma oscillations and the heat oscillations sometimes appear and sometimes go away and that they both arrive at once when they do show themselves.
In any case ... no direct evidence of synchrony between gamma emission and heat generation is shown here.
So there is not direct graphical evidence of synchrony of anything presented in this particular blog post (Huygens synchronicity observed in Atom-Ecology and cold fusion, July, 9 2018). I realize that Mr George's blog posts are intended to be ruminations rather than scientific productions. But considering that this is supposed to be one of the most incredible discoveries of the past half century, one that will save the world from hunger and global warming, I think it valuable to point out just where there is actual evidence of something or other and where there is not. In this blog post ... mostly not.
-
what do you think of the relevance, about idea that great researchers have of spending a majority of their budget on high tech calorimetry while Lenr XSH doesn't manifest itself in an ambiguous way, either we see, obvious.. like the event you described, either there is nothing ?
For your side, what budget represents your calorimetry ?
I can tell you about this one - those spontaneous gamma bursts were from a cold reactor in the small hours of the morning and were completely unexpected and (from memory) never repeated. We could only assume that some remote cosmic event was responsible, but could not determine what that might have been from astronomy data. It was then and remains a puzzle. As for different graphs showing different things, we were running multiple experiments with dozens of different fuel candidates, and these would sometimes exhibit a unique feature not seen in other experiments. There are well over 5M data points from this series, which happily survived a malicious attack on our server.
-
and did you trap plasmoids ?
P.S. Graphite granules became diamagnetic after the arc treatment.
-
-
you attempted a very fundamental thing so you should give more informations on it ?
For example how and where you filled oxygen ???
I attempted to replicate the Ohsawa experiments. It was thoroughly, but fruitless. I used spectral graphite rods and distilled water. After running on air, graphite powder became shined granules. However, these granules, after ignition, burned completely. The ash amount was less than 0.01% (equal to that for the initial rods). When I run the arc underwater, the black residue was formed. However, it had not ash also. So sad...
-
PhysicsForDummies truth others are you actors in this movie too ? If not, you should try also
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
There's you with mushrooms and Wyttenbach with his donuts, the Lenr field what a cooking !
Thank. A very good start, this arc must be found in the reactor, as I understand it, you saw this arc and say that we must look for what you showed. But unfortunately my nodules did not form in magma, they formed in sandy-clay materials, with some additions of sandstone and other metamorphic rocks! I have not yet seen the granite intrusions, until I reached them. Yes, you do not mind writing an article on nodules, I would immediately bring you up to date ...
-
Even when truth is OVER OVER verified, it can still be contested...again and again.
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51602655
A Californian checked it out the hard way, PhysicsForDummies you have nothing to do with it ?
-
Does this sound like an ego quarrel ? In style, my champion Mizuno, remains the best ?
None were reported, as far as I know. I do not know whether any were presented. Smith and George say there have been presentations, but I have no knowledge of them. They say they have had visitors. I do not doubt that. But did the visitors see a convincing scientific demonstration, or a sales pitch? I have no idea. They say some of the visitors are distinguished scientists. Maybe, but since I do not know who the visitors were or what they thought, I cannot judge.
Years ago, the people at Defkalion said they had distinguished scientists visiting them who were impressed. I was able to speak to a few of those scientists. They were not impressed. What they saw did not strike me as a convincing demonstration. Without details I have no idea whether Smith and George are convincing.
Around the time Russ George left here in a huff, I said that if he wants to keep secrets, that's his right. His problem was, he wanted to keep it secret yet he wanted credit for his accomplishment. You cannot have it both ways. No one can give credit for secret result they know nothing about.
Vague statements about dancing gamma rays are not a description. You cannot give credit for that.
-
Does anyone have a paper that relates pressure to atomic diameter reduction ? Ahlfors may be ?
It should be interesting to know that in relation with what explained can .
That, or possibly rust jacking.
http://www.cbiconsultingllc.com/the-power-of-rust/
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_333.pdf