Rends Moderator - Germany
  • Male
  • from Germany
  • Member since Feb 9th 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by Rends

    Can it be that since Rossi already said that the EcatQX produces its own electricity, this cooling is needed because the QX gives back a current to the control unit which then needs to be dissipated as heat?


    If that were the case, a simple, adequately sized consumer (eg, a simple light bulb) could be integrated into the circuit to eliminate excess electricity produced by the reactor. It would have had the additional effect of giving the viewer of this experiment a 'light', but here, in the end, only endless darkness remains.

    The main problem I have is that in this experiment it is completely unnecessary to integrate a comparatively huge control unit that can manage hundreds or even thousands of E-Cat QX!


    Whatever electronics is needed to run the reactor with power and control signals must at the end pass through two thin cables.


    On the reactor itself no further control electronics can be seen, which means that the necessary voltage and the control signal must be done alone on these thin current-carrying cable, which are connected by a simple 6.3 mm crimp connector.


    As can be seen during the experiment on the oscilloscope, the glow plugs or spark plugs installed in the reactor receive a simple and continuous signal (4 seconds on, 4 seconds off, with a constant frequency waveform).


    Nobody can tell me that in order to provide such a simple control signal, one would need a controller including control electronics whose dimensions could operate an entire space station. Additional for this purpose, this controller should consume 60 watts, which then need their own cooling?


    What kind of nonsense is that supposed to be?


    The hope that this E-Cat QX is a revolutionary technology that can solve the energy problems of humanity, can basically by buried! If, after more than 6 long years, such a joke is presented as a sigma 5 apparatus and somebody has to fumble unworthily under some boxes, and then afterwards meet in backrooms with investors, then unfortunately that shows only zero substance.

    Although I am not sure, it appears to me that you are turning against Rossi? If so, that surprises me as you have been one of his biggest supporters.


    I stick to facts, that lowers blood pressure and makes life easier ;)



    If you quote you should quote including the spelling mistakes :rolleyes:

    http://www.journal-of-nuclear-…cpage=289#comment-1301046

    the heat generated by the control system and dissipated by the cooling system is warmth that from the thermal balance point of view theoretically is perfectly recoverable with COP 1 because if I have, if I dissipate 60W consumed 60W, then the same 60W I go to recover with a heat exchanger and is out of It does not have to do anything with what is the thermal balance and therefore the COP of the E-Cat, but it is clear that it is a problem to be solved because if one buys an E-Cat to make electricity, retrieve the It does not matter to him and so, so it's not the point. As a result, it is a problem to be solved, in the sense that ... and this is precisely the point where we are focusing; that is to say the maximum because that big white box that you have seen today, which is now the control system, must be reduced to a packet of cigarettes to govern ... anyway keep in mind that this control system here is able to govern a thousand of E-Cat, so the relationship is quite relevant. But the big problem is to reduce the size, because it is not ... we have a huge energy intensity at the reactor level because we produce, today we produced 20W in one, ... pretty much a tenth of a centimeter cubic. Of course, a remarkable density.


    This is ridiculous, Master Control System and Main Control Hardware and Software for the energy sector is available in any size, shape, color and, if necessary, in any desired flavor. You do not have to reinvent the wheel to get 20 or 60 watts under control (even if it's 1000 units), just buy them for example here and integrate it:

    http://www.ni.com/de-de/shop.html
    https://www.slideshare.net/san…risnl-microgrid-symposium



    Quote

    huge energy intensity at the reactor level because we produce, today we produced 20W i


    Yeah, that's of course heavy, 20W =O=O=O, you need a master's degree in nuclear physics and Einstein's brain to get a device with such tremendous power under control!:rolleyes:


    Where and when was the photo taken


    Oct. 6th 2011 in Bologna, Italy


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    And the pulsed interval of the system in operation is completely different:

    4 Seconds ON - 4 Seconds OFF - 4 Seconds ON - 4 Seconds OFF ... and so on

    ...so for the control measurement at the end of the demo the controller inside the white box was switch to a different operating mode.

    14 Seconds ON - ~1 Seconds OFF - 14 Seconds ON - ~1 Seconds OFF ... and so on