Who then transferred his rights to his consulting company PineSci Consulting. Wonder what that is all about?
https://govtribe.com/vendors/pinesci-consulting-38yh5
Who then transferred his rights to his consulting company PineSci Consulting. Wonder what that is all about?
https://govtribe.com/vendors/pinesci-consulting-38yh5
Rossi's extremely unprofessional behavior and the superstitious belief of his followers endanger the credibility of an entire branch of research. In the meantime, it almost doesn't matter if Rossi has a working reactor. Even if, as a businessman, I would avoid any connection to him, so as not to lose credibility myself.
how many working robots does he claim to have working now?
23
Nuclear fusion reactions in deuterated metals
Hey ... that's my 'idea' Is Calcium Rossi’s Secret Catalyst?
It may take hundreds of millions of dollars to achieve that state of grace, and we can't afford to buy SEM or mass spectrometers. Your statement resembles the suggestion we put a bell on the cat.
That's right, but in order to achieve such high investments, several things are required, firstly, a reliably functioning, replicable technology (Mizuno = Check), a lot of luck, but above all a positive public opinion outside of conspiracy theories, or dogged and senseless expert skirmishes. At the moment I see very little impartial reporting on LENR out there and it won't get any better if people in this somewhat serious forum verbally clap their heads.
JedRothwell
Any criticism will be silenced as soon as there is a commercial LENR device somewhere, that produces energy in self sustain mode. Until then the criticism must be dealt with professionally. The LENR Forum serves as a platform and as a buffer to show successful researchers and their critics, as well as other interested parties, the whole picture and your statements concerning the Mizuno results will help.
Obviously they will have access to the black box to verufy that there are not power sources of any kind.
Lewis G. Larsen, 72, died on October 25, 2019.
Larsen had been intrigued by low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) research. He developed the Widom-Larsen Ultra-Low-Momentum Neutron-Catalyzed Theory of Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, with Allan Widom.
In eleven years, not one "client" or "customer" has been exposed.
J.M . Products ...just joking
I would just ask Google Research to check for possible experimental setups what role do the constantly found traces of carbon play. So when checking different recipes also always check with carbon powder in different grain size. I still have the suspicion that unintentional contamination by carbon plays a major part in the fact that experiments sometimes work, and often fail with (supposedly) the same structure, just because carbon impurities are missing.
Display MoreThere are other possible motives such as allegiances to the fossil fuel industry..or hot fusion euros.
or other big money players.
Given the billions of $ at stake.. intentional and paid trolls are a definite possiblility.
I am not saying that THHnew, Ascoli etc are this .. however
For whatever motivation..the more confusion that one creates about LENR.. the better it is to deter investment.
and LF has seen many confusing statements and innuendos from some parties
I can assure you that the admins and mods of this forum are not being paid by 'Anti LENR associations or interest groups' and we work hard as a team to find a balance which information we allow here. And that is not easy, because we are in a very controversial field of science and have to deal within it as well with equally controversial innovations that beyond, if they are true, will have an extreme impact on all aspects of human life.
For us as responsible persons here in the forum, it is therefore important to protect 'the core', so first of all to recognize obvious attacks from all possible sides and secondly to prevent them, but let pass valuable information, even if they are completely controversial and claim the opposite. This can lead to confusion and can not be prevented under the given forum rules, but we discuss every controversial post here in the forum and if this post complies with the basic rules we let it through, even if we may completely disagree with the content.
Nobody can afford this alone, therefore such processes are always intensively discussed in the team and decided in the sense of the LENR research and technology.
this fact so that it doesn't happen again in the future for some other world-changing technology.
From a macroeconomic point of view, an unregulated introduction of such a disruptive technology would certainly not be entirely unproblematic with respect to e.g. jobs, corporate profits a.s.o.
Therefore, our little discussion here is completely and totally irrelevant.
This is certainly true from a scientific point of view, but LENR does not suffer from a lack of scientific discussion, but a lack of social acceptance, which leads to labeling the research in LENR area as snake oil. An open discussion here and objective reporting by journalists, bloggers and Twitterer helps, in combination with reliable scientific data, in the long run to increase the acceptance of LENR in all areas and ultimately helps to make a breakthrough!