- Member since Oct 10th 2014
Posts by gio06
-
-
https://pocketmags.com/us/skep…89787/why-e-cat-is-a-hoax
If anyone wants to know why the Ecat is a hoax, you can pay $3 and find out.
you can stop after reading this "unquestionable" "very strong" argument:
"As cold fusion was notoriously debunked by the scientific community in the 1990s..."
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
-
-
External Content soundcloud.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
-
-
Sergei Godin - Sochi 2018 - Experiments on the "Energoniva" prototype setup
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
Sochi, Day Review - 3rd October 2018:
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
-
-
-
Electron Structure, Ultra-Dense Hydrogen and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
Abstract:
In this paper, a simple Zitterbewegung electron model, proposed in a previous work, is presented from a different perspective that does not require advanced mathematical concepts. A geometric-electromagnetic interpretation of mass, relativistic mass, De Broglie wavelength, Proca, Klein-Gordon and Aharonov-Bohm equations in agreement with the model is proposed. Starting from the key concept of mass-frequency equivalence a non-relativistic interpretation of the 3.7 keV deep hydrogen level found by J. Naudts is presented. According to this perspective, ultra-dense hydrogen can be conceived as a coherent chain of bosonic electrons with protons or deuterons at center of their Zitterbewegung orbits. The paper ends with some examples of the possible role of ultra-dense hydrogen in some aneutronic low energy nuclear reactions.
-
-
Ascoli65
Scientists are human and can be foolish or even fraudulent.
Science runs on money and reputation, these things distort and corrupt science from its ideals.
I agree that it was the input from certain scientists that encouraged IH to press on with supporting and funding Rossi, and cost them time and money, but the responsibility is with IH to do the due diligence for their investors.
So in the specific case of the scientists that gave support to Rossi is it;
1. They were just taking a look (which is what scientists should be doing).
2. That they actively provided support for Rossi (but in good faith).
3. That they are guilty of falsifying or fabricating data.
If you choose 2. and think they actively provided support to Rossi then boo hoo so did Defkalion, Industrial Heat, Fabiani, Penon, Matts Lewin, Frank Ackland, Sifferkol and many others.
At some point the scientists must have felt confidence that Rossi had something because it was the science rumour mill that got Huw Price excited enough to write his article.
In this case I am sure those scientists will have had their reputations questioned by their colleagues.
It seems to me that the real point is 3. You think the Bologna physicists are guilty of falsifying or fabricating data or some kind of professionaly fraudulant behaviour.
Now that is a major charge which scientific institutions and funding bodies need to take seriously.
If what happened was just a demo controlled by Rossi and no scientific papers were produced then it will be difficult for you.
If scientific papers were produced but they are full of errors and poor measuring then the best you can hope for is to have the authors censured for sloppy science.
If what happened was a real scientific test and papers were published with falsified data then there is a real case that you should submit to the appropriate institutions and bodies that funded the work.
Good luck.
Zeno
Its'important to remember at this points that the Italian parliament has never fully answered to many parliamentary questions on this subject, even after a huge number of formal solicitations. Notable exception an elusive answer from Dino Piero Giarda (Ministro per i rapporti con il parlamento)
-
Summarizing:
Rossionium is a new element, it shields gamma rays and neutrons very well.
Heat exchangers made by Rossionium can work up to 20000 K.
Atomic structure of Rossionium is a pair (or more) of antimatter electrons orbiting around a core composed by a special virtual particel called “jonp-says”.
Interesting insights, but don't forget the old style "RossioNium secret"
-
-
"The Naval Institute sponsors a series of essay contests with individuals (CNO), foundations (The Wood Foundation), schools (Naval Postgraduate School), and a host of great companies/corporations.
The Emerging & Disruptive Technologies Essay Contest is cosponsored with the Leidos Corporation. For 2018, we are pleased to announce the following winners:"
..."By Michael Ravnitzky"
-
"How is a weak beta emitter like Tritium "one of the most dangerous radioactive isotopes existing"?"
-
On. Scilipoti (Camera dei Deputati) formal parliamentary question on Rossi Demo:
Interrogazione parlamentare sull'e-cat di Rossi
-
@hunter If you are of the opinion that LENR is a myth, why are you posting here? What do you think you are adding to the forum exactly?
Fighting against something that "does not exist" reveals that something should exist, indeed
Nobody that does not believe in astrology posts anything in an astrology forum
-
Filing her
Due diligence would be simple, in fact I am staggered that previous investors with an interest in cold fusion (they know who they are) never obtained a gamma spectrum from Rossi's reactors, failure to do that is inexplicable.
Rossi himself explains why, answering to Celani:
https://youtu.be/ejhkG-wYWY4?t=594
"Lei con quello strumento [gamma spectrometer] era in grado di vedere dentro il reattore"