Quote from Wyttenbach

This is clear from a math point of view. But time cannot rotate as it is strictly 1 dimensional.

The concept of time in physics (special relativity) cannot be separated by the concept of space. A rotation is always associated to a plane (only in 3d we can associate a rotation with an axis!). Therefore in 4d spacetime there are 6 possible rotation planes.

Lorentz transformation are encoded by hyperbolic rotations in "mixed spacetime" planes
https://www.physicslog.com/blo…entz-hyperbolic-rotation/

Quote from Wyttenbach

Or you have to explain the physical meaning of a mixed space time rotation...

A mixed space-time rotation is simply an hyperbolic rotation in Minkowski space-time with signature [+++-]. This is related to the variation of mass with speed in special relativity.

"The motion of a massless charge that moves at speed of light can be described using a composition of a rotation in the γ_xγ_y plane followed by a scaled hyperbolic rotation in the γ_zγ_t plane and can be encoded in Cl_3,1 algebra with a single spinor."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320274378_Maxwell%27s_Equations_and_Occam%27s_Razor

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320274514_The_Electron_and_Occam%27s_Razor

"21th century scientists":

"The proton is a state of two up quarks and one down quark bound by gluons, but quantum theory predicts that in addition there is an infinite number of quark–antiquark pairs."

"We establish the existence of intrinsic charm at the 3-standard-deviation level, with a momentum distribution in remarkable agreement with model predictions"

Evidence for intrinsic charm quarks in the proton

Nature- Impact Score, Overall Ranking, h-index

Quote from Wyttenbach

Quarks (weight 3..6 MeV) eject (exchange..) 80MeV Gluons...an even more crazy fantasy...

The standard model has been invented by fools lost in endless math, that never studied basic experiments- only the fudged CERN ones...

I don't think they are "fool" in the strict sense of the word. They simply put career, money and social acceptance before truth seeking.

Quote from RobertBryant

"and please stay tuned for exciting news about the proton."

https://juanrojo.com/2023/06/0…fe-of-the-amazing-proton/

"Maar wat heeft dit te maken met het proton, ik hoor jullie denken? Nou, een proton weegt ongeveer een giga-elektronvolt. Een giga-elektronvolt is een handig meeteenheden in de wereld van elementaire deeltjes. Een charm quark, die “zwaardere neef” van het up quark, weegt ongeveer 40% meer dan een proton. Het zou best gek zijn als protonen bevatten charm quarks, toch?

Stel, jij ontvangt een pakketje, en die pakketje weegt een kilo. Valt mee, niet zo zwaar. Maar opeens, als je het pakketje opendoet, de inhoud weegt 2 kilo’s! Hoe kan dat? Zo’n vreemde situatie is uiteraard verboden in ons dagelijkse leven, maar het komt voor in de opmerkelijke wereld van de kwantummechanica."

we are here behind the Magic Mirror of "kwantummechanica"

Alice in Wonderland

"Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

Could a new realistic electron model explain both ultra-dense Hydrogen and Kenneth Shoulders Exotic Vacuum Objects?

Chat-GPT

"Yes, it is possible that a new electron model could help explain both ultra-dense Hydrogen and Kenneth Shoulders' Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVOs). Ultra-dense hydrogen involves electrically neutral particles with a magnetic moment similar to an electron's, which could play a role in LENR. On the other hand, EVOs are described as highly organized, micron-sized clusters of electrons with soliton behavior and high electron population density. These EVOs can interact with solid material, causing a low-energy phase transformation and atomic disruption without conventional heating.

While these two phenomena have different characteristics, a comprehensive electron model might be able to explain both ultra-dense hydrogen and EVOs by considering the unique properties and behaviors of electrons in these systems. However, further research and validation are needed to develop such a model and confirm its ability to explain these observed phenomena."

Could ultradense hydrogen explain LENR?

Chat-GPT

"Yes, ultra-dense hydrogen can help explain LENR (Low-energy Nuclear Reactions). Ultra-dense hydrogen particles, also known as "H(0)", are electrically neutral and can overcome the Coulomb barrier, which is a necessary condition for LENR to occur. These particles can be involved in nuclear reactions with other elements, such as lithium or boron, producing energy without emitting neutrons or penetrating gamma rays. The energy produced is mainly manifested as kinetic energy of the reaction products and as X-ray emission from bremsstrahlung. Ultra-dense hydrogen particles can provide a possible explanation for the observed LENR phenomena, but more research is needed to fully understand the underlying processes."

Quote from rubycarat

For LENR to occur, the electrons need to force the nuclei closer together. This requires a new kind of electron interaction. This realization is one of the important consequences resulting from this discovery.

Seems however that it's not sufficiently clear that "a new kind of electron interaction" requires necessarily a new realistic electron model.

A Theory of atomic nucleus that might be correct

Pg 208

Valerio Dallacasa, Paolo Di Sia, Norman D. Cook

par. 10.3.1 The Magnetic Force Between Nucleons

Models of the Atomic Nucleus

The Charming Proton ...

or "What happens when you don't care about Occam's razor"

"A Charming New View

Recently, a team led by Juan Rojo of the National Institute for Subatomic Physics in the Netherlands and VU University Amsterdam analyzed more than 5,000 proton snapshots taken over the last 50 years, using machine learning to infer the motions of quarks and gluons inside the proton in a way that sidesteps theoretical guesswork.

The new scrutiny picked up a background blur in the images that had escaped past researchers. In relatively soft collisions just barely breaking the proton open, most of the momentum was locked up in the usual three quarks: two ups and a down. But a small amount of momentum appeared to come from a “charm” quark and charm antiquark — colossal elementary particles that each outweigh the entire proton by more than one-third."

inside the proton the most complicated thing imaginable

EVO and four dimensional electromagnetic analytic functions:

Waves of Charge. Four Dimensional Analytic Functions.

The EVOs Exotic Vacuum Objects

Quote from Cydonia

Do the De Broglie postulates fit too into Occam's Razor ?

Yes, the energy-mass m of the charged elementary particles is equal to the Zitterbewegung angular speed ω in natural units. This value is also equal to the product of the elementary charge e and the module of the vector potential A and to the curvature of the Zitterbewegung trajectory 1/r_e

ħ = c = 1

m = ω = eA = 1/r_e

The charge's vector potential module consequently is a measurable value being simply the value of mass/charge ratio.

This is in perfect agreement with Prof. Kanarev concept of "axiom of Unity":

"Реальность Единства пространства, материи и времени очевидна. Поэтому распространение знаний, базирующихся на фундаменте аксиомы Единства, также неотвратимо."

Quote from THHuxleynew

This is one of those philosophical arguments that does not alter predictions - the different formulations of the theory are provably identical.

Aharonov-Bohm effect is not a "philosophical argument" but an experimental evidence that shows the physical reality of the electromagnetic potentials. You cannot explain it using only E/B fields.

Quote from Wyttenbach

For classic 3D field everything is clear und you can use A for large sets of field sources.

But the whole field sucks since Dirac, who claimed that also mass is a flat field what is bare nonsense. Annihilation of electron/positron lead to 3 photons not 2 as some fringe physics folks once invented without any proof.

All serious experiments refute every single fake claim made by the standard model church members. There is no separate strong force its just the magnetic force as Schaefer could prove with deep scattering experiments. Quarks are only a resonance of hadronic mass and nobody ever could separate them. E=mc² just work for classic EM fields as already Poincaré did show long before Einstein. Only a dilettante like Dirac could use E=mc² as field equivalent mass energy...physicist doing experiments know that real mass never acts field like and you first have to add energy to crack the mass...

The standard model is a scary theater for deranged minds.

Display More

Definitely there are no doubts that Standard Model is deeply flawed and unrealistic. It's an excellent example of Occam's Razor principle violation.

Also the mainstream Dirac equation interpretation is not acceptable.

It's quite easy to find the electromagnetic origin of the inertial mass (i.e. Newton law F=ma) using the vector potential, but as far as I know nobody has proposed a pure electromagnetic origin of inertia using only E/B fields.

Electromagnetic potentials are more fundamental than EM fields

"Although use of the vector and scalar potentials (A, phi) in place of the EM fields (E, B ) is

considered simply to be an option in classical theory, in quantum theory they are understood

to be more fundamental than the derivative electric and magnetic fields (E, B ) which are the

‘coin of the realm’ in ordinary classical theory. In classical electrodynamics the choice of

which variable pair to use is arbitrary, and the overall resulting predictions in terms of

observables are indistinguishable. Nonetheless, cogent arguments can be made (and is made

here) that the (A, phi) approach is to be preferred, even in classical EM theory, because of

increased transparency in application."

Electromagnetic potentials basis for energy density and power flux

Misleading Concepts: Quarks

THHuxleynew

"Alas new theories need to predict (quantitatively) the direct experimental evidence of internal structure:"

There is a premise here that is not explicitly stated, that so called "Deep inelastic scattering" observations can be used as an efficient tool for understanding the internal structure of the proton. It's like to try to understand the structure of a glass vessel using gun shots and analyzing the behavior of the fragments.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Your idea that charge can move at light speed is just a mathematical fantasy as we know no charge exists without a carrier and all carriers have mass hence you always violate some relativistic models...

no charge exists without a carrier? Really? This is nothing more than a cognitive bias.

I think that no carrier exists without a charge and an associated magnetic flux...

I repeat again: learn your own lesson:

"So forget your education as it will only blind and disturb you."

An important point of Prof. Kanarev work that is strictly related to Occam's Razor principle:

ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ

Уважаемые искатели научной истины!

История науки свидетельствует: процесс распространения знаний, связанных с реальностью, неотвратим. Никакие запреты и инквизиторские костры не способны остановить этот процесс. И наоборот, знания, не имеющие связи с реальностью, неотвратимо отправляются в небытие.

Реальность Единства пространства, материи и времени очевидна. Поэтому распространение знаний, базирующихся на фундаменте аксиомы Единства, также неотвратимо.

FOREWORD

Dear seekers of scientific truth! The history of science shows that the process of spreading knowledge related to reality is inevitable. No prohibitions and inquisitorial bonfires can stop this process. And vice versa, knowledge that has no connection with reality inevitably goes into non-existence.
The reality of the Unity of space, matter and time is obvious. Therefore, the spread of knowledge based on the foundation of the axiom of Unity is also inevitable.

Quote from Wyttenbach

You first have to accept that fields always need sources! Then you can try to include the magnetic moment field into your 4-potential... Good luck.

Or first you have to accept that sources need fields?

Gödel's incompleteness theorems - Wikipedia