Posts by axil

    axil I don't know. I am just a human. It is you who started the thing about humans not being perfect etc.

    Please continue your mission of 'generation of good science' along with nascent sieber identity. Leave us kids alone.

    It's the other way around, Leave me alone.

    something makes me thinking about Mental Quantum Dynamics (MQD) which is btw a cause of lenr #axil axil .

    Rossi is able to generate huge amounts of virtual photons which stimulate lenr. That is why you can't reproduce his effect when he is not around.

    This strong virtual photons flux also affects some people so they draw vivid pictures of subatomic particles and funny inkblot charts.

    Most of the time, the irrationality of the human emotional response throughout science clouts logic, judgement, and clear thinking. It might be worth the effort to replace these flawed individuals with an appropriate artificial intelligence program.


    user='441']axil[/user] is there virtual quarks already? What color are they?

    decay of matter is an indirect reference to the reorganization of quarks in matter catalyzed by particles that come from amplified vacuum energy condensation.

    You have a point, If an electron/positron pair as fermions can condense from the vacuum, so can a quark pair(aka meson). Their color/flavor is based on the available vacuum energy that the quarks condense from.


    The vector meson ρ in the presence of external magnetic field has been investigated in the framework of the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model, where mesons are constructed by infinite sum of quark-loop chains by using random phase approximation. The ρ meson polarization function is calculated to the leading order of 1/N c expansion. It is found that the constituent quark mass increases with magnetic field, the masses of the neutral vector meson ρ0 with spin component sz=0,±1 and the charged vector meson ρ± with sz=0 also increases with magnetic field. However, the mass square of the charged vector meson ρ+ (ρ−) with sz=+1 (sz=−1) decreases linearly with magnetic field and drops to zero at the critical magnetic field eBc≃0.2GeV2, which indicates the possible condensation of charged vector meson in the vacuum. This critical magnetic field is much lower than the value eBc=0.6GeV2 predicted by a point-like vector meson. We also show that if we use lowest Landau level approximation, the mass of the charged vector meson ρ± for sz=±1 cannot drop to zero at high magnetic fields.

    The vacuum in strong magnetic field

    Ingredients needed for possible superconductivity:

    A. Presence of electric charges?

    Yes, we have them: there are virtual particles

    which may potentially become “real” (= pop up from the vacuum)

    and make the vacuum (super)conducting.

    B. Reduction to 1+1 dimensions?

    Yes, we have this phenomenon: in a very strong magnetic field

    the dynamics of electrically charged particles (quarks, in our case)

    becomes effectively one-dimensional, because the particles tend

    to move along the magnetic field only.

    C. Attractive interaction between the like-charged particles?

    Yes, we have it: the gluons provide attractive interaction between

    the quarks and antiquarks (qu=+2 e/3 and qd=+e/3)

    In his theory of LENR, Rossi sites quadrupole magnetism as the source of the LENR reaction. This conjecture is close to the truth but the details are not correct. Magnetic fields do catalyze the LENR reaction but it is monopole magnetism that does it. This conjecture is easily deminstrated by an experiment.…-isotope-decay-constancy/

    The anisotropic magnetic field from an Alcomax magnet is shown to change the nuclear decay constant by 2%. You can convince yourself that an anisotropic magnetic field can produce LENR effects by using a strong anisotropic rare earth magnet to change the nature of radioactive decay.

    A magnetic field produced by an electric current will have no effect no the radioactive decay constant.

    It is not the photons that produce the LENR reaction but the "virtual photons" that are the cause of LENR. The "virtual photons" are really the increase in the excitation of the vacuum produced by any number of EMF based causes.

    These various EMF causes all have a common theme, excitation of the vacuum that generates the increased probability of creation of various subatomic particles that interfere with the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) processes that keep matter from decaying.


    Hal Fox presented a brief to the point overview of his work with high-density charge clusters. Hal Fox is of the opinion this technology has great potential. I remember about 15 years ago when Hal Puthoff was working with Ken Shoulders in this same thing at Jupiter Technologies. This technology has been a long time coming and it is still not here. At the end of Hal Fox's discussion I asked, "Hal, Do you believe that Shoulder's electron clusters are superconductive?" Fox answered, "Yes they are superconductive and superfluid." I believe that this is a most important point. That's why I brought it up.

    Typical Axil, who promotes mechanism of LENR in accordance to last particle, which he just did read about in popular press.

    The particle has been around for sometime now

    Just because you do not know about it, does not mean that is does not exist.

    I first mentioned the exicon back in 1/2016 in this post with many references thereafter.

    Some ideas for an improved Parkhomov replication (not a replication thread)

    You should do more reading and less talking.

    axil but howbout excitonium?

    Excitonium is the foundation on which LENR is built, but it requires the addition of photons to complete its LENR function. This entanglement of excitons with photons is the reason why heat and/or light is required in a LENR system to see LENR activity.

    It gets absorbed and redistributed between many atom (nuclei) colliding along single line at the same moment. This dense line traps the released radiation like the optical filament so it has nowhere to escape.

    this would be true for a bose condensate, but this is not the case here.

    It struck me that Rossi is blowing smoke and inventing things just like Zephir likes to invent new physics to explain his word salid theories.

    Perhaps I missunderstand but is his reactor a bit like a spark gap? Problem I see is how to ensure all three strike arcs at the same time. Typically as you crank up the voltage wouldn't one arc over first causing the source voltage to drop preventing arcs forming in the others?

    IMHO, there is no wires used to interconnect the three QX reactors. All controls are done by wireless RF signals.

    See this video for an example

    What strikes is Rossi's answer on how 3 quarks were connected. He messed up in series and parallel and after a while you understand that it actually was in parallel. Now think of the quarkx as analogous device. When the control circuit senses feedback how would it know which unit it is coming from? Please don't tell they all behave as perfect twins.

    At some point chubby guys on the 2.0 panel asking about feedback and Rossi answers that it is a complex feedback. How this feedback was fed over a single wire during the test from 3 units!?

    No return signal to the controller was shown on the oscilloscope.

    The QX is like a piece of firewood, you heat it up and it burns, you cool it off and it cools.

    RF simulation on and it produces heat, RF simulation off and it does not produce heat except for a heat after death effect.

    The power level is controlled by the voltage supplied in the initial activation pulse.

    Lipinski fusion produces helium and no neutrons: p+ 6Li→3He(2.3 MeV)+4He(1.7 MeV) p+ 7Li→4He(8.6 MeV)+4He(8.6 MeV) You should read something about it finally..

    The same astroblaster effect which attenuates the momentum before collision also absorbs the recoil after it - so no gamma is produced.

    Does the transmutation produces in the ash support this assumed reaction pathway?

    But post 932 states that deuterium is used in the reaction, so where did those neutrons go?

    Rossi was asked if the LENR reaction only occurs in the submillimeter sized pintpoint of plasma (0.08mm diameter by 0.6mm long) located in the center point between the electrodes. He did not answer.

    It seems to me that the plasma is just a reaction stimulating mechanism(like a spark) that pumps energy into the ball lightning like lights that float around inside the entire interior volume of the QX tube.

    In other words, If the LENR reaction is only produced inside the submillimeter sized pinpoint of plasma, the power density of the reaction would be too great to keep the plasma temperature between 2000k to 3000k. A plasma temperature of 10s of thousands of degrees would be required to produce 100 watts of power. For example, the tungsten filament inside a 100 watt light bulb is far bigger than the volume of the plasma ball. This also means that the measurement of COP by spectroscopic means is invalid since the plasma does not produce the LENR reaction.

    If the LENR reactive medium was not present in the QX and no LENR reaction was occurring, then the plasma would still produce the same light output.

    Since the QX and fluorescent lights are both plasma based systems, they might share the same lifetime shortening behavior of turning the systems off and on frequently. The QX life expectancy might be maximised is the QX is kept active continually without interruption.

    In light of this possible operational constraint, a stand alone cryptocurrency generation system can be supplied with the QX home power system whereby the homeowner could produce the QX user's own crypto-money when the power produced by the QX system was not night or when the QX user was at work. But do people need to work when they can produce their own money?

    The QX control box produces heat and requires high cooling requirements that use lots of power. I believe that this heat is caused by the generation of reactive power in capacitive and inductive factors in the QX that the QX is generating to resists the power that is driving its 8 second operating cycle. The generation of this reactive power is to be expected since Plasma based lamps that closely resemble the QX reactor produces this reactive power.

    The Fix for this heat generated by reactive power in the QX is to add inductive and capacitive power storage to the QX controller.

    I found a explanation of reactive power that is alway present in AC based systems as follows:


    Well then what produces Lipinski fusion: Astroblasters? And if it is fusion, where are the gamma. tritium, and neutrons?

    Regarding: "You obviously haven't read as much of his work as I have, he did work with EV's in gaseous environments. But no dusty plasma work, I agree. But the evidence for dust inside the Quark is zero- we just speculate."

    To my way of thinking, there are two mechanisms that will carry the polaritons in the LENR reaction that could possibly apply to the QX type system. Metallic Hydrogen and/or lithium, or the nanoparticle based reaction.

    The nanoparticle based reaction happens in a dusty plasma, but the Metallic hydrogen mechanism happens when a preprocess based fuel preparation process is used.

    The observation of a clear tube indicates that a electrode pre preparation process is used to carry the Metallic hydrogen into the sealed tube via the electrodes. The metallic hydrogen exits from their site of creation and these particles are free to move around inside the tube.

    The metallic hydrogen hypothesis would also predict that the QX is subject to potential meltdown if the control of the QX is mismanaged. Metallic hydrogen has no temperature limit on how hot a LENR reaction that it can produce.

    Yes, you are right about Lipinski, this is why i suggest that Rossi could be strongly inspired by theses works.

    If Axil's layout is good, probably carbon electrodes should be more reliable. BTW , according to T° reached Rossi's had to solve big problems due to differences of dilatation.

    Why 2700° ? Because probably he improved Lipinski's work by adding molten nickel..

    BTW , no need of LiAlH4 rather just LiH and molten Ni.

    Following his patent, he works at 4 bars, then it's conceivable that free electrons produced by strong and quick discharges, should be slowed down considerably because of high pressure, until stopping and falling on nucleus if both electrons and nucleus "could run" in the same direction..

    Nickel might be used for the electrodes because that element is least likely to produce LENR transmutations. The Ni62 isotope is most likely the most LENR reaction resistant of all elements.

    The Lipinski system sounds like the reaction that happens in the SunCell. It might be a hydrino system.

    I thought about that too, but dismissed it on the grounds that the Aluminium vapour created would condense on the tube walls when it cooled and render them too conductive to allow for re-ignition.

    Rossi might get around the Aluminium vapour issue by preprocessing the nickel electrodes in an off line process as Rossi does with the fuel, The LENR active agent would be deposited on the surface of the nickel electrode with little aluminum being added to that surface. Piantelli does this sort of surface/fuel preparation process when he prepares his nickel rods. From what I have seen in the SEM micrographs of ME356 fuel particles, those particles are LENR active after a long fuel prep process where the LENR active agent pops out of the fuel hydride particles and moves around on the supporting carbon substrate producing transmutations in that substrate.

    Those LENR active agents might form those balls of light that float around the reaction chamber when energized by the RF signal.

    As Me356 said in the past, if you do not add pure Li to LiAlH4, your trial will be explode, unfortunally.

    I remember some replicator's already tried a similar device without..succes.

    Questions, Why Rossi used nickel for both electrodes, according to your understanding ?

    Device temperature reaches 2600 K then could not erode nickel's electrodes, in your case ?

    There are many nano and microstructures that can support polaritons. The Rossi effect most likely uses metallic hydrogen and/or lithium. Rossi's fuel preparation process generates metallic hydrogen/lithium by compressing these elements under extreme pressure inside microcavities. This molecule of between 4 and 60 atoms support polaritons on their surface and is produced through the compression of atoms in microcavities where the uncertainty principle provides the power of compression. Once formed, these molecules can float around. The TAO effect causes many of these molecules to combine into a large aggregate. It is this large luminous aggregate that is seen floating around inside the QX as miniature ball lightning.

    It is possible as an alternative to using LENR fuel, Rossi has developed a runtime process using the processed surface of the nickel electrodes by formating that surface with pits and bumps as mizuno does in his substrate preparation process.

    Rossi states on his patent that the LENR reaction occurs in the cavities in the metal surface. Rossi also said that the reactor occurs in the "hair" channel. That channel may have undergone a process where cavities were generated.

    The metallic hydride might form in the surface of the processed surface of the nickel electrode. Rossi told Frank Acland the Ni rods were processed, "so to speak".

    The HID lamp produces a very tiny hot spot in the plasma between the electrons. The temperature at the surface of the nickel electrodes are less than the melting point of nickel because the hot spot is offset from the surface of the electrode by a few millimeters.

    Sodium hydride is the chemical compound with the empirical formula NaH. This alkali metal hydride is primarily used as a strong, yet combustible base in organic synthesis. NaH is representative of the saline hydrides, meaning it is a salt-like hydride, composed of Na+ and H ions, in contrast to the more molecular hydrides such as borane, methane, ammonia and water. I

    I am 99.44% sure we are dealing with polaritons here.

    A light output coming from the QX that is driven by ionization of various elements would have a constant color output based on the electron excitation profile of each element. For example sodium is yellow and iodine is red.

    But there have been reports from many eye witnesses that the color of the light coming from the QX can charge in color. There have been reports of three colors having been seen: Red, yellow/orange, and blue.

    Therefore, the QX has an adjustable color output profile based on the adjustments made to the input RF excitations and is a function of its percentage of power output. This indicates that the ionic excitation mechanism is not where most of the light comes from in the QX.

    Polaritons produce variable color output when excited


    The spectrum of the light produced by polaritons have a double side line on ether size of the peak. This is the harkmark of laser light. Rossi cpm[;aoms about reflections making spectroscopic inspection and evaluation difficult might be due to these side peaks.

    The light produced by the QX may comes from a side emission channel of a polariton Bose condensate. The light generated by the quark is not blackbody.

    New research into polariton condensates has revealed a side emission channel that produces light whose frequency is proportional to the density of the polariton aggregation in the polariton Bose condensate...the dense polariton condinsate produces a higher frequency light (blue) and a less dense condinsate will produce red light. Rossi must have a way to control the density of the polariton population; probably from the RF input signal adjustment. The color of the light can be adjusted by the varying the pumping level of the polaritons so that any color can be produced based on the power output level of the QX.

    In summary, the color of the light generated by the condinsate is controlled by the level of "pumping" that determings the density of the polariton condinsate.


    for details see


    "While our measured PL spectra consist of the main peak and the high-energy one, this theory predicts the asymmetric triplet peaks. Our observation has a potential to demonstrate a strong coupling of an electron and a hole under a lasing phase and further leads to deepen non-equilibrium and dissipative many-body physics."

    I say that the light comes from polaritons. This polariton origin of the light can be verified because the light is coherent and will show the Mollow triplet in its spectral lines. Polaritons produce laser light and any atom that is irradiated using laser light will show a Mollow triplet.