Good that you returned optimist.
If I may ask:
1. Do you think the Ecat SKL is now ready for third party testing?
2. Have you fixed a date for the beginning of third party tests?
3. Are the third party test already running?
Best,
Milan
Milan:
1- almost
2- yes
3- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Truth be told, very soon now.
Since when petawatt lasers are low energy systems to justify lenr word?
Powerful is a relative term.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility
Given the time scale of a few billionths of a second, the peak UV power delivered to the target is correspondingly very high, 500 TW.
and still no fusion
https://newatlas.com/energy/hb…oron-fusion-clean-energy/
Radical hydrogen-boron reactor leapfrogs current nuclear fusion tech
QuoteThe results of decades of research by Emeritus Professor Heinrich Hora, HB11's approach to fusion does away with rare, radioactive and difficult fuels like tritium altogether – as well as those incredibly high temperatures. Instead, it uses plentiful hydrogen and boron B-11, employing the precise application of some very special lasers to start the fusion reaction.
Professor Heinrich Hora is making progress without mentioning the killer word LENR.
MFMP via Bob Greenyer has access to experimental LENR reactor data and active materials and has identified that the EVO is the active agent in the LENR reaction. Bob is in the process of characterizing the EVO. Bob has found that EVOs are carried in Ohmasa gas. If you can get access to some of this gas, you can see EVOs in action. Contact Bob Greenyer for help. He has a large volume of material on this subject. Look on YouTube for videos from Bob whose subject concerns the LION reactor. A sample is shown below with some EVO characterizations near the end of that video. If you can overlook the condemnations of Bob's work that are sure to come here, you will be facilitated by the EVO information that Bob has accumulated.
Also, strange radiation is produced by EVOs. There is information on this subject here on this site, Search on key "strange radiation"
magicsound from MFMP is a member here. He might be able to directly connect you with Bob.
YouTube Search key LION MFMP
Dear Andrea,
You were close in 2011.
Proxima Centauri is the closest star to Solar System and is orbited by the planet Proxima b. Many things are close. Do you tease us? I continue to hope that you do not tease us.
A: Will you have a product by June 1st? Please reply with “yes, no” or “I have no idea”.
Otherwise, you are not being honest with yourself, good sir.
Sincerely, and thank you for your dedication.
Tom
Tom Conover:
I am convinced that the answer is yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In your estimation, how close are you to having a completely reliable product?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
We are close
Warm Regards
A.R.
There is going to be a lot of crow eating around here very soon. Eat slowly and savor your dinner.
For the non English-speaking members as follows:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_crow
Eating crow is a colloquial idiom, used in some English-speaking countries, that means humiliation by admitting having been proven wrong after taking a strong position. The crow is a carrion-eater that is presumably repulsive to eat in the same way that being proven wrong might be emotionally hard to swallow.
Everything Bob sees in the video you link to is just the result of regular chemistry. A control LION reactor subjected to the same conditions as this one, but never using heavy water, would show the same things.
Talk is cheap; Prove it.
Then they should make a pail of transmutation diamond and a pail of transmutation quartz, sell it for a billion dollars as incontrovertible proof of whatever and fund whatever they want forever.
Large amounts of non energy producing transmutation has occured by the 100s of tons
http://coldfusioncommunity.net…18/08/244_JCMNS-Vol24.pdf
7. Puzzle of the Missing Nuclear Energy
A worth noting feature of the Silcal observations was that there was no dramatic change whatsoever in the energy
dissipation. Using the estimated energy release values of 17.13 MeV/atom of Si or 49.58 MeV per atom of Fe given in
Appendix B, for the postulated nuclear transmutation reactions, it can be shown that corresponding to 4.25 ton of metal
transmutation, the power generated should have been the equivalent of the total thermal power generated by hundreds
of 1000MWe nuclear power stations. However, in our plant there was no evidence of such massive amounts of nuclear
energy being released throughout the 11-week period, giving a handle to the skeptics to question our claims of ton
level elemental transmutations. In this context it is worth noting that nobody in published LENR literature (to the
best of our knowledge) has established a clear correlation between the quantum of transmutation products generated
in carbon arc and the expected nuclear heat release based on atomic mass considerations. On the other hand neither
has any publication claimed that the Carbon Arc experiment violates Einstein’s E = mc2 dictum. Thus if indeed the
Silcal transmutation claims are confirmed it would clearly point to the operation of new Science wherein transmutation
could be occurring without the accompaniment of the expected nuclear energy release.
In the context of these remarks the arguments of Daniel Szumski elaborated in his “Least Action Nuclear Process”
(LANP) Theory appear relevant. We learnt about Szumski’s work through his paper presented at ICCF 20 conference
[13]. Szumski who has taken great pains to analyze in detail the transmutation observations of George Miley (see
www.LeastActionNuclearProcess.com) argues that both endothermic and exothermic nuclear reactions can and do occur
concurrently in LENR experiments, partly or wholly cancelling out net energy release. In fact he has referred to
some experimental observations of Mizuno wherein transmutations have reportedly been observed by him not accompanied
by energy release. Szumski is thus not at all surprised by our observation of “energy neutral” transmutation
reactions.
Using the measurement of excess heat is an unreliable indicator for an active LENR reaction. A more reliable indicator is the detection of transmutation. MFMP has shown the production of transmutation in LION material. In one case, The SEM data shows the production of extensive and all pervasive transmuted material in diamond which starts out as pure carbon. In another view of LION reactor material, Quartz is shown to be transmuted. In these cases, the hallmark of the EVO is apparent in these observations. Transmutation provides a stable record of the LENR reaction that is fixed in time. For example, a solid ball of mixed transmuted elements are found inside and at one end of an enclosed and empty tunnel of diamond and in other cases inside an empty tunnel of quartz. This record of transmutation is static and not susceptible to changing conditions. Experimental control is provided by the purity of the material in which the transmutation took place and the spherical form that the completely enclosed and encapsulated transmuted materia assumed. It is just not one tunnel or a few, but hundreds or thousands of them.
The LION experimental diamond evidence as follows:
This is exactly how I feel. I believe the standard model and even quantum physics is generally needing a new approach.
Can you provide any details about what needs to change in the standard model and quantum physics?
There is a degree of unwarranted and uninformed theory mixing at play here. Rossi says that his system is based on the work of Holmlid (via pico clusters). There is an unjustified association between what Rossi is doing and the work that Ken Shoulders et al has done. Rossi rejects the EVO has playing any part in his technology or LENR for that matter. Also MFMP, not only references Hutchinson in the video, he also shows results from one of the two LION experiments and also results produced by Keith Fredericks. Critics of experimental results should be as rigorous, consistent, and comprehensive as those who present the results.
In general, effective, cogent, and convincing criticism should come from those who have a depth of knowledge about the subject that is equal to or greater than those who research the subject.
Presented below is a set of experimental results regarding EVOs.
A range of EVO strike marks in unprecedented detail were found on MFMP ‘Fracture’ Hutchison Sample 4 at the classic sizes observed by Nardi/Bostick, Shoulders, Matsumoto and other authors.
Strengthening Your Immune Response to Viral Infections (COVID-19)
Regarding the control box and AI.
The unidentified partner is most likely the developer of the control box and AI. The partner must have customized an existing product to retrofit it into the function of the SKL. Just the description that Rossi has released of the control box and how it works shows that it is far beyond anything that Rossi could have come up with on his own. It is to Rossi's credit that he is now allowing the partner to increasingly contribute to the accelerating development of the SKL. This was unlike the total lack of technical signs of life he saw from money centric IH. This new super capable partner knows how to handle Rossi and is by far more to Rossi's liking and he trusts these fellows and gals.
This concentration on Rossi that has become custom here on this site is becoming increasingly misplaced. Most of the work and credit for the progress that the SKL development is achieving is due to the efforts of the partner. Rossi is now just surfing on the shoulders of his new partner.
https://bigthink.com/surprisin…elltitem=10#rebelltitem10
FYI
Here are 10 physics courses you can take now with some of the best experts in the world.
Things are getting very interesting now.
He also stated that the control box is the size of a pack of cigarettes.
If the above is true, then this is perfectly suitable to power electric bicycles and cars.
ABB is a great fit for a partner. They have a deep background in electrical and RF systems and control through RF. If ABB was the partner, they could have repurposed one of their many RF control systems to serve as a starting point for the SKL application.
Director Regarding SAFIRE two cathodes and anode destruction... In listening to Monty's talks, I'm quite certain I heard him say words to the effect that only one cathode is needed and they know how to keep the anode from being affected. My reasons for starting with the spherical/hollow/H2 anode is because that's what they did. I believe they were generating excess heat without damaging the anode. Once one gets results like those seen in their videos, one can start incrementally, little by little making changes and hopefully improvements.
The issue you might want to consider: Is SAFIRE the optimum system to produce energy from the LENR reaction?
Rossi posts have gotten increasingly popular it seems. I predict that this trend will continue well into 2020 and well after the upcoming test and demo.
Andrea Rossi
November 25, 2019 at 9:46 AM
Within the end January we will make the presentation together with them
Warm Regards,
AR
My interpretation is he means that the independent testing will be done first, then the same group that does the testing will be participating in the presentation with him, and it will take place by the end of January 2020. So a year after the previous one.
Display MoreI just fall on an old paper (ICCF14) by Hideo Kozima, Wu-Shu Zhang & John Dash
https://www.academia.edu/29953…_PULSES_VS._EXCESS_ENERGY
I remember that one key osition of Kozima is that LENR is a chaotic phenomenon, and he is one of the few to analyze the phenomenon that way (detecting 1/f noise for example). His way is interesting for me with my background of electronician.
The second law he propose is not clear to me, but seems to say there is a preference to stable results
"(2) The second law; The Stability Effect in the Yield of Product Elements by nuclear
transmutation ([4] §2.11)."
If someone can explain what it precisely mean?
The EVO is a quantum object that does not collapse on its own. It is metastable and self sustaining, and behaves s a particle. The EVO may become big enough to see with the naked eye but it is a single particle called a tachyon, and as such, it acts just like an electron quantum mechanically. When an EVO produces energy, that energy is spread out all over space and time. This is why transmutation does not produce energy and isotopes produced by LENR are always stable. A LENR system could be producing energy for months or years, but not show any of it in our real world. The EVO only realizes energy when it dies. Here is an explanation of why this is all true.
https://scitechdaily.com/quant…-have-quantum-properties/
QuoteDisplay MoreValerian Yurov was recently published in European Physical Journal. The scientists have released their calculations, according to which the Universe may have quantum properties.
Artyom Yurov explained:
“To begin with, let’s remember what quantum physics is. Perhaps this is the most amazing phenomenon known to people. When scientists started studying atoms for the first time, they noticed that everything works “upside down” in the microcosm. For example, according to quantum theory, an electron may present in several places simultaneously.
Try to imagine your cat simultaneously lying on the sofa and eating from its bowl that is in the other corner of the room. The cat is not either here or there, but in both places simultaneously. But the cat is there only BEFORE you look at it. The moment you start staring at it, it changes the position to EITHER the bowl OR the sofa. You may ask, of course, that if the cat acts so weird only when not observed by us, so how do we know that it actually acts this way? The answer is simple: math! If we are to try and gather statistical information about us looking at the cat (needed to estimate the number of cases when the cat was on the sofa and when — near the bowl), we won’t have any information. This proves to be impossible if we consider the cat being EITHER near the bowl OR on the sofa. Well, it doesn’t work like that with cats, but works fine for electrons.
When we observe this particle, it really appears in one place and we can record that, but when we do not observe it, it must be in several places at once. For example, this is what they mean in chemistry classes when they talk about electron clouds. No wonder poor children never understand this. They just memorize … ”
Decoherence Effect
Yes, the cat is not some electron, but why? Cats consist of elementary particles, like electrons, protons, and neutrons. All the particles act the same when measured on the quantum level. So why a cat can’t be in two places simultaneously?
And the other question is: what is so magical about our ability to “observe”? Because when we don’t “observe,” the object is being “smeared” all over the universe, but the moment we look at it — it is gathered in one place! Well, physicists don’t say “gathered,” they say “wave function collapsed,” but those smart words actually mean “gathered” in one place as a result of observation! How are we able to do that?
“Firstly, the answer to these complex questions appeared at the end of the last century, when such a phenomenon as decoherence was discovered. It turns out that indeed, any object is located in several places at once, in very many places. It seems to be spread throughout the universe. But if the object comes into interaction with the environment, even collides with one atom of a photon, he immediately “collapses.” So there are no mystical abilities to cause quantum collapse by observation — this is due to interaction with the environment, and we are simply part of this environment.
Secondly, there is no absolute collapse as such. The collapse happens in the following way: if before interacting with the environment the object was “smeared” over two places, (we use “two places” to simplify, in reality it might be smeared over hundreds of thousands of places) but in fact, the object presents 99.9999% (and many, many nines after) of the time in one place, and a small remaining part of time in the second. And we observe it as being in one and only place! Everything happens in no time and the bigger an object is, the faster the “collapse.” We cannot realize it or somehow register, as such devices simply do not exist. And they cannot be created.”
