Quote from Alan Smith

EM and PM are different manifestations of the same force caused by the alignment of the orbital and intrinsic magnetic moments of the bound electrons of a ferromagnetic material (to take a simpler case)

Ordinarily, electrons in a material are arranged such that their magnetic moments cancel out. But sometimes—either spontaneously, or owing to an applied external magnetic field such as that produced by a current flowing in a nearby coil—the electron magnetic moments will tend to align. When this happens the bulk material produces a net total magnetic field.

Believe it or not, special relativity produces magnetism in electromagnetism.

Quote from Cherepanov2020

Let's understand each other... You write about "electromagnet"... I wrote about permanent magnets... And that's what interests me - I'm interested in how this different FORCE is generated?

Stable Higgs mode in anisotropic quantum magnets

Rare earth magnets are able to produce LENR effects due to the energy potential that they generate. The potential is called the Mexican hat potential. Both the Higgs field, superconductors, and anisotropic quantum magnets produce the same energy potential called the Higgs mode. It is this potential through spontaneous symmetry breaking that produces the FORCE associated with all these systems.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

No Axil. If you read the article you would realize the experiment was simulated on a quantum computer. It was not real experiment. There was no discussion of negative energy being "in fact real". You live in a fantasy

world.

I know its hard for a clown to understand these concepts, so here is a video that discusses the ideas and research of Masahiro Hotta and other experimentation in this field. The video also references a number of associated articles that cover research in this area.

It is my contention that the EVO is a structure which is oftentimes generated within the LENR reaction that generates coherence and associated vacuum based negative energy. As such, the EVO steals energy from a LENR system, teleports it to the far field, and leases only transmutation and matter disappearance in its wake. The energy that the LENR reaction produces is teleported to to other entangled locations in the vacuum. The takeaway is that the resultant indicators of the LENR reaction are problematic to resolve. Where energy production is expected, it is not found. What appears is only transmutation and/or missing matter.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

No, we have never seen this demonstrated in any experiments ever.

Negative energy is not "in fact" real. Only in your universe of alternative "facts".

being a clown, you have never interested yourself in experimentation. I doubt that you even know what an experiment is.

If you read the Wired article, you would have seen that that the experiment by Masahiro Hotta and his replicators show that negative energy is produced by entanglement and quantum teleportation.

There appears to be a connection between LENR, negative energy, coherence, quantum entanglement, and lack of energy production in the vacuum reaction.

The Quest to Use Quantum Mechanics to Pull Energy out of Nothing

The Quest to Use Quantum Mechanics to Pull Energy Out of Nothing

The quantum energy teleportation protocol was proposed in 2008 and largely ignored. Now two independent experiments have shown that it works.

www.wired.com

In LENR experimentation, we have seen cases where both matter and energy seem to disappear from cavities that are totally enclosed inside crystals. This matter and energy might be teleported to other areas of the vacuum remote from the site of the reaction.

Energy teleportation and possibly even matter teleportation shows why coherence and superconductivity is a necessary foundational underpinning of the vacuum reaction component of the LENR reaction.

Negative energy which most of science beleives is impossible to produce is in fact real and caused by a imbalance between the vacuum expectation values (VEV) of two or more separate areas of the vacuum.

Garret Moddel, SSE Special Session, Jan 22, 2022, Advanced Propulsion & Energy IV

Session co-chair Professor Garret Moddel of UC Boulder presents "Extracting zero-point energy: does it violate the second law?"

www.youtube.com

Garett Moddel has patented (it actually works) a device that extracts energy from the vacuum.

An experiment that show energy extraction from the vacuum

MODDEL STYLE QUANTUM ENERGY CONVERTER WITH NANOCAVITIES

prof. garret moddel of the university of colorado in boulder used a USAF grant to make a special diode with optical nanocavities it converts infinite #quantu...

www.youtube.com

In his product development, Moddel has found that extracting energy from the vacuum causes unavoidable decay of the matter that his device is constructed from. This decay is called vacuum decay and is seen in all LENR devices that produce energy. This decay is a significant issue that must be overcome before LENR can be used as a reliable power source.

Re: researchers listening to Axil

The Vacuum reaction is a certain show stopper for LENR reactor development. Unless the LENR developer understands what he is up against, the developer will sorely fail.

The case that exemplifies this situation is the work of Garett Moddel who claims that energy can be directly harvested from the vacuum using specially designed diodes that employs the Casimir effect.

Garett Moddel recently confirmed that the primary thing holding up the mass production of this device is reliability. The devices work great when they are first produced, but quickly break down and become useless. Moddel believes that until he gets more research money to analyze how and why the cells break down over time there will not be a wide-spread industrial roll out of this technology. Finding a rich backer who would take a strong interest in this device might invest in this project so that this reliability hurdle might be defeated and bring this great technology to a useful marketable product. But unless the vacuum reaction is understood in detail, all R&D money will be wasted.

The Vacuum reaction part of the LENR reaction make LENR unreliable. Any LENR reactor will fail after a period of energy production. Nobody has produced a LENR reactor that will last for an extended period of time.

This mode of reactor failure is seen in every type of LENR energy extraction device, and nobody has figured out how to build a reliable long lasting LENR reactor. In more detail, any reactor that includes extracting energy from the vacuum will eventually destroy the device that performs this energy extraction through transmutation. This is what will hold back any LENR product from the marketplace unless the deleterious effects of vacuum reaction is overcome.

For example, one idea that might work is the development of a self charging lithium ion battery using an onboard downsized Moddel device. After a acceptable lifecycle timeframe, say a 1000 recharge cycles, the battery will fail either from the the failure of the vacuum recharge device or the lithium battery chemistry itself

At 9:06 in the following video

Breakthrough Superconductor Experiment Fails to Replicate

Quote from Alan Smith

Thank you axil . Why should we accept a simple explanation when we could have a complicated and probably un-provable one?

The reaction is very complicated. Preconceived expectations in experimentation can lead to misleading analysis. As I said up-thread, both fusion and vacuum decay might be happening concurrently. Such multiple causality is why sometimes a LENR researcher will see radiation, and neutrons, and sometimes no energy production is seen. I am certain this situation has occurred in your research. You just brush it off as a distraction.

The vacuum decay theory is provable because of the presence of the evidence of the electroweak unification associated with the vacuum reaction. When iron and rare earths are found as products of transmutation and no neutrons and gamma radiation or energy is detected, that is proof that fusion is not the cause of such transmutation. The researcher thinks that something went wrong with the experiment then he starts over from the beginning and looks for what he expects to see. What he doesn't expects to see is ignored as a failed experiment..

Unjustified expectations has lead to the failure of Holmild's company. Holmlid expected to see subatomic particles generated in his H(1) experimentation. But what he was actually producing was EVOs. Sveinn Ólafsson reports that no subatomic particles are produce in his Holmlid replication, but what he is actually producing is EVOs. When Sveinn understands that EVOs are produced by a superconductor, then his research and that of Holmlid will make sense.

Fusion is not the only process that is know to transform elements, there is also another recognized method that involves modification of some or all of the 19 fundamental cosmological constants in nature.

Through certain condensed matter systems, the EVO provides the ability to modify some or most of these 19 constants of nature.

The modification of just one of these constants that is most likely to produce transmutation is the mass of the up and/or down quark. Even the Higgs field itself can be modified over a wide range. We also know that the EMF is superseded in the LENR reaction by the unification of the electroweak force.

See this video for a description of the list of these fundamental constants.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

How does "condensed matter science" create anything? Science attempts to explain and predict things with mathematics. It does not create things. Real scientists don't explain things this way, and they use math.

Besides being a clown, you are a science illiterate. Your posts show how you are so uninformed that it is almost a waste of time talking to you, but as a consequence of my good nature here it goes anyway. In efforts of outreach, there is always hope.

Both experimentalists and theorists in quantum condensed-matter physics try to understand the behavior of complex systems of atoms and molecules. Their interests include quantum computing, high-temperature superconductivity, quantum phase transitions, spin systems, disorder, and other strongly correlated phenomena. LENR experimental research is an example of condensed matter science.

You will see some typical examples of condensed matter experimental science and associated equipment as follows:

Condensed Matter Physics | Physics & Astronomy | University of Pittsburgh

It is my belief that Holmlid misidentified the particles that he was seeing after the laser pulse. What Leif was seeing was EVOs. Sveinn Ólafsson, one of Holmlid's replicators failed to see the types of particles that Holmlid claims he saw. From Sveinn's cloud chamber, strange radiation tracts are a sign that EVOs are being produced. I think that Holmlid was producing EVOs. Ultra dense hydrogen is a superconductor which might be acting as a optical cavity in which an electron condensate may form. If so, EVOs would be produced.

Check out Sveinn's (the video at 24:00) puzzlement regarding the strange tracks in his cloud chamber that only appear after the laser pulse.

Those who are interested in the LENR reaction... at least the vacuum components of it... should understand the basic character of the Higgs field. What makes the vacuum reaction possible is the ability of condensed matter science to create microbubbles of the Higgs field using electron based condensates. Through these microbubbles called EVOs, atomic matter can be deconstructed and reorganized in a process called transmutation.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

On Wikipedia?

The institute for advanced studies. Where do you go to advance your foolery?

Quote from Gennadiy Tarassenko

Who told you that, Higgs or something...

I did the research to answer this question: The transmutation of light elements into heavy elements like iron and rare earths cannot be accomplished through fusion. Science believes that supernovas produce such elements. In fact, the formation of iron in stellar fusion caused the initiation of a supernova.

The atomic principle is the only way that I could see that could result in the transmutation of light elements into heavy elements.

The Atomic principle is the mechanism that keep protons, pions, and neutrons from decaying and provide the nuclear binding energy that keep the nucleus of the atom from disintegrating. The mass of the up and down quarks must be in a tight range (120% of ambient) to provide the mechanisms to keep the proton, pion and neutron together. The Higgs field and it associated vacuum expectation value (VEV) is what establishes the masses of the up and down quarks. In fact, the Higgs field establishes and regulates the masses of all fermions: all the quarks, electrons, and neutrinos.

Pions keep the nucleus together

Quote from Cydonia

What could be the conexxion between your plasmons postulate ad these EVO ?

Polaritons are a superposition (Mix) of an electron and a boson which makes an electron a boson. The electron can now form a Bose condensate. Such a condensate can now condense into a superconductor. A superconductor can then produce a Higgs field within a condensed matter system which interferes with the vacuum. Such interference disables the atom's formation process. This Bose condensate is what now forms an EVO.

The theory of the EVO that I have been converging on is called the anthropic principle as a resolution to the too light Higgs vacuum expectation value (VEV).

This is a theory where our universe is the only one in which we can live in. All the other values of the VEV creates universes (within a multiverse) that cannot support life and the laws of nature that support life. There are uncountable numbers of EVOs spread throughout the universe that have every possible VEV. Each one of these unique EVOs is a unique universe in its own wright. Each of these EVO types is associated with a unique VEV. By changing the VEV value beyond the VEV of our universe by 1.2 then particles cannot form neutrons and nuclear binding energy fails to form atoms.

The anthropic principle and the atomic principle in this video lecture is explained as a potential solution to the Hierarchy problem.

The video up until 13:05 addresses the anthropic principle as a solution to the Hierarchy problem and the multiverse.

The reason why the universe is not consumed by an EVO is because EVOs are unstable. An EVO will eventually explode when it absorbs more energy than it can digest.

To start the explanation, there are only two types of universes that are possible: DeSutter space and anti DeSutter space (AdS). Our universe is DeSutter space, the EVO is anti DeSutter space the anti field of DeSutter space. DeSutter space contains positive energy and a positive cosmological constant, and anti DeSutter space contains negative energy and a negative cosmological constant.

The next point is the ball of transmuted material that is most often left after the EVO terminates. That ball is likely produced by a black hole that has formed or is in the process of forming at the center of a mature EVO. The article also explains why an EVO will terminate when it is excited. Next, the article explains why energy is never released from AdS, that is, transmutation does not produce energy.

.The following article explains how this black hole forms inside Anti DeSutter space and why anti DeSutter space is unstable.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/new-math-proves-that-a-special-kind-of-space-time-is-unstable-20200511/

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

We are. Axil is apparently from the distant future, since he knows so much more than anyone else about the Lenr reaction, without a formal math or physics background. Where else could he have gotten this vast knowledge?

PhysicsForDummies: A clown from the distant past, a jester, court jester, fool or joker who was a member of the household of a nobleman or a monarch employed to entertain guests during the medieval and Renaissance. Where else could he have gotten this vast amount of nonsense. and foolery.

Ken Shoulders wrote as follows:

Quote

http://www.rexresearch.com/...



A Leak From Our Universe to Another

I can't find the reason why Ken Shoulders changed the name of the EVO from EV(large electron) to exotic vacuum object because that is what the EVO really is as follows:

Because the EVO has a negative vacuum state relative to the cosmological vacuum, the main body of the EVO cannot interact with anything in our universe with the exception of an EVO that projects magnetic vortex flux tubes.

Kiril Chukanov found this EVO barrier to exist in his experiments. Neither an electrical current nor a metal rod can penetrate into the EVO.

By having another vacuum state that differs from the vacuum in our universe, (aka differing cosmological constants) because the EVO is essentially another universe with laws of physics that differs from our universe, the magnetic field in these vortex flux tubes are different then the magnetic fields that we experience in current EMF.

One indicator that the EVO abides under a different set of physical laws is the fact that no radioactive isotopes are produced after transmutation occurs. This indicates that the EVO operates under a unified bosonic force structure which includes the unified electroweak force. This unified force structure is carried by bosons imbedded in the EVO's magnetic field of the vortex flux tubes that only existed in the early universe.

In another example, in a superconductor, electrons have no mass and photons have mass. The vacuum produced by a superconductor is an opposite anti-vacuum to our vacuum state. When the EVO magnetic flux tube touches matter in our universe, that matter is instantly reorganized and after the EVO flux tube passes by this affected matter will transmute into another random element.

In strange radiation, when a rapidly rotating EVO rapidly floats over a surface and its flux tube periodically projects onto that surface, the elements on that surface are instantly transmuted into other elements so rapidly it seems like time does not exist inside the EVO. On each rotation of the EVO, the identical same pattern of transmuted elements and their layout on the surface appears over and over again.