axil Verified User
  • Member since Oct 10th 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by axil

    Axil: I advise all who what to replicated the Rossi tech to use the QuarkX approach.


    And what, pray tell is the QuarkX approach? Build a little tube and make it light up blue? Yeah, that sounds like the way to go.

    I now believe that there is multiple LENR reaction types. For example, Rossi has developed a low temperature LENR reaction and has tested it in the yearlong IH test. The mechanism for this type of LENR reaction is based on magnetic flux line focusing by the hexagonal based lattice of mica. This reaction mechanism follows along the lines that was shown to be effective in the Golden Balls of D. Cravins where the magnetic flux lines of a SmCo5 magnet is focused by the hexagonal based lattice of graphite.

    See


    https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16184


    This article explains how magnetism can be focused into skyrmion magnetic textures involving topological, non-topological and instanton droplets driven by spin-transfer torque in materials with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Interaction


    During the year long test, informed by the performance of Lugano test reactor, Rossi has stumbled on the plasma phase LENR reaction and has built the QuarkX reactor to take advantage of this reaction type. Rossi has come to believe correctly that the plasma type LENR reaction is superior to the low temperature LENR reaction type and has in effect tossed the low temperature technology in the trash as noncompetitive.


    The QuarkX technology is very difficult because it demands very high temperature structural materials. This requires specialized expertise in material science and extensive testing to ensure the robustness of this material under extreme stress over time. This concern for the integrity of the long term performance of the tube material has prompted Rossi into carrying out very long duration operational testing.


    The plasma based LENR reaction is centered on the production of nanoparticles produced by the condinsation of metal vapor. Polaritons naturally form on those nanoparticles that convert the spin of infrared photons into powerful magnetic fields.


    By the way, I believe that the SunCell is using the plasma phase LENR reaction. Like Rossi, R. Mills has stumbled on this reaction type and is attempting to bring it to market.


    I am saying that if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. If Mills encounters unexplained plasma based high energy reaction, it is human nature to reform and modify your existing thinking to incorporate that reaction into those existing theories. Mills would naturally resist rejecting all his ideas formed over a lifetime and that are central to the survival of his company whether they are valid or not to impartially include a these new experimental results.


    On top of that, it is in the commercial interest of Mill’s company to avoid any nuclear based theory that would restrict his ability to patent his experimental results or taint his work with the onus associated with LENR.



    cleardot.gif



    The Low temperature E-Cat is always in danger of melting down whereas the QuarkX is not. The COP on the QuarkZ is far higher than the LT E-Cat. I advise all who what to replicated the Rossi tech to use the QuarkX approach. The LT Ecat is inferior to the QuarkX.


    By the way, what has happened to the SunCell?

    http://rexresearch.com/stuff/stuff7/adamenko.pdf


    The Proton 21 experiment informs us about the true nature of LENR. That nature is not based on the detection of excess heat, but on the way that LENR processes energy.



    Explanation:


    The ash of a LENR experiment contains activated metallic nanowires that are covered with Surface Plasmon Polaritons. This nanoparticle acts like a synthetic monopole tachyon. When this particle receives energy, the energy is reformatted by particle creation into muons. In other words, energy comes in and muons come out. This behavior has been seen in observations by Holmlid. This behavior has been predicted to occur in monopole tachyons as described in string theory.


    The Inside Story:

    Quasilocal Tachyons and Black Holes


    http://slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-11616.pdf


    And following the link on page 19


    The forces we analyzed in this section, which act to force excitations into the bulk

    gravitational solution dual to the con¯ning geometry, may provide a gravity-side manifes-

    tation of this phenomenon. This e®ect is similar in some ways to the description of black

    hole evaporation via hadronization in [18].



    Plasma-Balls in Large N Gauge Theories and Localized Black Holes


    https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0507219v3.pdf


    LENR is not as simple minded as many expect, but a complex cutting edge proof of many aspects of theoretical science.

    Here is a statement of opinion that you have missed.


    Fine control and manipulation of the strong force and the constituents of subatomic particles: quarks, will bring advancements in technology that can scarcely be imagined. It will make Star Trek science look like kindergarten play.

    axil : Can you point us to the source, or was this just an other Disney clip of the weekend?

    Your comprehension of my posts is weak. Did you not see the reference by Jones Beene


    I will copy it here to help you out


    From Jones Beene


    Quote Possibly the best thing that could happen is for Randell Mills to demonstrate strong gain in that SunCell device. If it turns out that Mills device is arguably nuclear - it will not be covered by the hydrino IP. There have already been "inside" rumors that recent delays in the "Mills' Roadshow" are due to radioactivity showing up. This is expected in LENR but not in hydrino-tech and it could change the IP landscape.

    axil : May be you should look for a job at Disney. If you would start to think about what you write, then you might better understand your problems. Just try to guess how many muons you would like to focus on a missile and then start to think where you can buy them...


    Wuttenbach, you are uninformed in this area.


    Have you calculated how many muons are produced in the SunCell reaction? I understand that the SunCell road show has been disrupted by the detection of radiation.


    From Jones Beene


    Quote

    Possibly the best thing that could happen is for Randell Mills to demonstrate strong gain in that SunCell device. If it turns out that Mills device is arguably nuclear - it will not be covered by the hydrino IP. There have already been "inside" rumors that recent delays in the "Mills' Roadshow" are due to radioactivity showing up. This is expected in LENR but not in hydrino-tech and it could change the IP landscape.


    also


    Chernobyl catastrophe should not have happened. Some factor outside of known nuclear engineering principles increased the reactivity of the core of the reactor. Electric discharge doing a test could have push the reactor into supercriticality.


    https://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-ex/papers/0304/0304024.pdf


    Leonid Urutskoev looked into the question of why chernobyl exploded. He found that it should not have exploded. He then looked into finding what factor might have contributed to the meltdown. He found that a electric explosion in water produced enrichment of U235 in uranium sufficient to put the chernobyl reactor into a supercritical state.


    TITLE: Study of the Electric Explosion of Titanium Foils in Uranium Salts


    AUTHORS: Leonid I. Urutskoev, Dmitry V. Filippov


    KEYWORDS: Electric Explosion, Nuclear Decay


    JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Modern Physics DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2010.14034 Sep 05, 2014


    ABSTRACT: The results of experiments on electroexplosion titanic foil in water solutions of salts of uranium are presented in this paper. It is shown, that as a result of electroexplosion occurs appreciable (to 20%) distortion of an initial isotope parity of uranium. In the most solution parts, observable isotope distortion occurs in favour of enrichment by 235U. At the moment of electroexplosion it was not observed an appreciable stream of the neutrons. By means of Cs label and by methods by α, β, γ-spectrometry and mass-spectrometry it have been shown, that isotope distortion occurs at the expense of non-uniform “disappearance” of both isotopes from a solution. The isotope distortion leads to infringement of the 234Th secular equilibrium in the uranyl solution. The equilibrium infringement between the 234Th and 234mPa, i.e. within the proper thorium decay chain, was observed also. The assumption about that the effects are caused of low-energy nuclear reactions at the moment of electroexplosion is suggested.




    From


    http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf

    The view that the power generated by LENR is based on fusion is wrong. My view of LENR as informed by the recent experiments of Leif Holmlid Professor emeritus Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry.University of Gothenburgis predicated on the control of the quarks inside of matter. If these quarks can be manipulated and managed, control of matter at any arbitrary distance might one day be possible.


    Leif Holmlid has been at the forefront of research in metallic hydrogen since the 1980s. Most of the advanced experiments with metallic hydrogen are currently presented by Lief Holmlid, who claims the formation of superconductive dense hydrogen or deuterium cluster nanoparticles that are disrupted during pulsed laser illumination. He appears to be considered a competent researcher, and peer-reviewed mainstream journals are regularly publishing his work. What is remarkable is that the findings of the "ultra-dense" state now labeled as state 0 have not been confirmed, even though the initial experiments were done years ago. The experimental procedure does not seem to be beyond what can be done on the desktop with appropriate equipment, and yet there are no published negative replications or failed replications.


    Professional scientists should study this Rydberg matter and to replicate, attempting to confirm or disconfirm.


    Those with high theoretical knowledge and skill should study the Holmlid’s papers and criticize them.


    It is not a satisfactory situation for this level of publication to continue without serious critique. It seems natural that NASA should be interested in the study of metallic hydrogen as a component of the cores of planets. Just the existence of a liquid ocean of water inside Pluto after 4.5 billion years of radioactive isotope cooling should raise some interest in studying metallic hydrogen as a possible energy source. There has been a positive review from Winterberg. There is what appears to be an arXiv preprint of one article at http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5414.pdf. In this article Winterberg concludes:


    “If as reported the state of ultradense deuterium exists, and if it is sufficiently stable to exist long enough, it could become for the release of nuclear energy as important as was the discovery of nuclear fission by Hahn and Strassmann. It is the purpose of this note that on purely theoretical grounds an ultradense state of deuterium cannot be easily dismissed.”


    In Holmlid’s latest work, the release of nuclear energy through chemical manipulation is exactly what Holmlid’s experiment has detected.


    Through the manipulation of Quarks in matter as suggested by Holmlid experiments, atomic weapons could be disabled at a distance when the fissile elements are transmuted into non fissile ones by a muon beam. The atmosphere of Venus could be modified to remove the Co2 so that Venus thereby making Venus habitable.


    The core of Mars could be reactivated with nuclear fire to restore the magnetic shield that once protected its atmosphere in the first step at terraforming Mars into someplace that can be colonized by mankind. Then Co2 could be created to start a heated atmosphere to heat Mars to livable temperatures.


    In moving the vision of mankind’s future father out from the solar system into the deep space, there is near light speed spacecraft engines that become possible to build that are driven by near light speed subatomic particles.


    The energy source that the work of Holmlid is exploring might prove to make interstellar travel practicable. Holmlid first assumed that the energy produced by the reaction he was studying was some sort of hot fusion reaction activated by laser ignition. But when Holmlid studied the type of subatomic particles that were being generated, he recognized that fusion could not generate the huge amount of power that the reaction was producing. For example, Holmlid detected Kaon triplet generation. He postulates that two protons are being destabilized into decay to produce three kaons and 390 MeV of binding energy. This very same proton decay reaction was one of the target reaction searched for by the Super-Kamiokande proton decay detector to prove that protons must decay in support of grand unification supersymmetric theory.


    http://journals.plos.org/ploso…69895#pone.0169895.ref007

    Mesons from Laser-Induced Processes in Ultra-Dense Hydrogen H(0)

    The proton is assumed to be absolutely stable in the Standard Model. However, the Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) predict that protons can decay into lighter energetic charged particles such as electrons, muons, pions or others which can be observed. Kamiokande helps to rule out some of the theories. Super-Kamiokande is currently the largest detector for observation of proton decay.


    The proton decay action could increase the energy yield by 100,000 over what was postulated in the Bussard ramjet interstellar system.


    The Bussard ramjet is a theoretical method of interstellar spacecraft propulsion proposed in 1960 by the physicist Robert W. Bussard. Bussard proposed a ramjet variant of a fusion rocket capable of reasonable interstellar travel, using enormous electromagnetic fields (ranging from kilometers to many thousands of kilometers in diameter) as a ram scoop to collect and compress hydrogen from the interstellar medium.


    bussard.jpg

    When proton decay is used as a power source for the Ramjet, once the hydrogen is collected, it is isotopically purified and the deuterium is stored in a separate container. The purified hydrogen then enters storage to even out the collection of interstellar gas. This storage strategy will enable the ramjet to maneuver freely in space without concern for variations in the density of residual hydrogen throughout space. From storage the hydrogen gas is metered into a Holmlid reaction chamber were the hydrogen is ignited into high energy plasma via the catalyzed reaction.


    Since the continued propulsion of a proton powered ramjet spaceship is dependent on interstellar hydrogen, the nature of interstellar hydrogen is the main issue of concern when designing such a spaceship. Two aspects of particular interest are the overall density and the isotopic composition of the interstellar hydrogen. The overall density controls the rate at which proton reactions can take place relative to the craft's speed and the size of the scoop's area. The isotopic composition determines which reaction pathway is best to use


    The interstellar density of hydrogen is 0.86 atoms/cm3. At a minimum, the energy gain relationship determined by Holmlid was found to be 390 MeV per each diproton reaction (two hydrogen atoms). For deuterium fusion, only 10 MeV can be generated per reaction. In the proton reaction, The remainder of the proton mass and associated electrons are used as reaction mass. From this info, the scoop volume might be calculated as of function of spacecraft speed. The faster you go the more hydrogen that you can harvest.


    There is a minimum takeoff speed required before the sustainable energy relationship is met and the scoop volume may be reduced as the Ramjet accelerates.


    There is more mass/energy content in deuterium which is about 1 atom out of 5000 captured.


    When fusion produces power for the Ramjet, only deuterium can be used. When proton decay provides power to the Ramjet, all hydrogen isotopes can be used and much of the energy content of the protons can be converted into energy.


    Holmlid uses a potassium doped Shell 105 ethylene catalyst with graphene as a quantum mechanical template on an iridium substrate to produce ultra-dense hydrogen via a quantum mechanical effect call Rydberg blockade. Once formed, metallic hydrogen can be excited into nuclear disassociation through the application of an EMF stimulus.


    I like the proton decay reaction as a basis to support a light speed capable interstellar motor. As discovered by Holmlid, LENR produces sub atomic particles, mostly muons and hydrogen nuclear fragments moving at ¾ light speeds. And even better, LENR produces its own energy from muon based catalyzed fusion as a side reaction. This fusion energy would be used to sustain the electromagnetic hydrogen collection fields.


    For those with an open mind, taking the work of Holmlid seriously might be the first step in reaching the stars.

    the slides are interesting.

    quite skeptic but report many classic results.


    A new critic of Holmlid experiment seems proposed.


    It is true, Holmlid has changed his thinking about the primary reaction behind the production of energy related to metalized hydrogen. Holmlid now understands that the energy that he is seeing in the production and acceleration of mesons are far more than what fusion can supply. Holmlid now understands that the energy needed to drive those subatomic particles to near the speed of light must come from the decay of nucleons(protons and neutrons) rather than any form of nuclear binding energy derived from the nucleus. Any fusion products must come from muon catalyzed fusion as a secondary side reaction where the muons come from the energy released by the primary reaction.

    Only the most distinguished, unencumbered, perceptive and elite thinker can consider LENR as an objective fact detached from the prejudices and politics of professional science. Price is truly a great thinker; the singular and exceedingly rare kind of man that drives the ascent of man forward..

    LENR isn't based on "Kerr effect" (how the heck did you come into it after six years of another theories?) but low-dimensionality of nuclear collisions.

    It induces the time reversible behavior, as explained here by their bosonization.


    I get it from the Rossi patent explanation of the LENR stimulant, the Holmlid laser activation stimulant, and the Holmlid spark activation method.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect


    The Kerr effect, also called the quadratic electro-optic (QEO) effect, is a change in the refractive index of a material in response to an applied electric field.


    See


    http://english.pku.edu.cn/news_events/news/research/5335.htm


    The polariton soliton is derived from the whispering gallery wave and its change of state triggers the LENR effect.

    This article mentions Professor Hew Price in regards to retrocausal quantum theory.


    https://phys.org/news/2017-07-…uantum-theory-future.html


    When LENR is activated by the kerr effect, the SPPs on the nanoparticle breaks time symmetry. The resulting quasiparticle that emerges looks like and behaves as a tachyon monopole, a particle that looks like it travels backward in time. Ask Hew Price if this LENR based mechanism sheds any light in retrocausality in quantum theory?

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/04/…er-trump-tweet/index.html

    How CNN found the Reddit user behind the Trump wrestling GIF

    The downside of trolling


    Quote

    "To people who troll on the Internet for fun, consider your words and actions conveyed in your message and who it might upset or anger," he wrote. "Put yourself in their shoes before you post it. If you have a problem with trolling it is an addiction just like any other addiction someone can have to something and don't be embarrassed to ask for help. Trolling is nothing more than bullying a wide audience. Don't feed your own self-worth based upon inflicting suffering upon others online just because you are behind a keyboard."

    What the Rossi experiments has shown over many years is that LENR in a lattice is not workable because the reaction cannot be controlled. The LENR reaction wants to operate at the boiling point of the metal lattice (nickel) which is 3000K. Rossi has struggled to control the LENR reaction at low temperatures but he always fails because LENR would invariably get to 3000K and meltdown his reactor. So Rossi finally decided to use reactor structural material that doesn't melt at 3000K. This material must be an insulator that does not melt at 3000K. Mills has stumbled on the same reaction and his SunCell runs at the vapor point of silver (2200C). Mills has solved the meltdown problem is another way, he justs runs everything as a liquid without any containment.


    Using a lattice for LENR is a losing proposition. THe plasma approach to the LENR reaction is the only way to go. I beleive that this tube material is boron nitride, a transparent isolator whose melting point is 3000C.

    More on time symmetry...


    Time symmetry requires that the laws of nature operate the same when time goes either forward or backwards.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_translation_symmetry



    To the best of my knowledge, most physicists don't believe that antimatter is actually matter moving backwards in time. It's not even entirely clear what would it really mean to move backwards in time, from the popular viewpoint.


    If I'm remembering correctly, this idea all comes from a story that probably originated with Richard Feynman. At the time, one of the big puzzles of physics was why all instances of a particular elementary particle (all electrons, for example) are apparently identical. Feynman had a very hand-wavy idea that all electrons could in fact be the same electron, just bouncing back and forth between the beginning of time and the end. As far as I know, that idea never developed into anything mathematically grounded, but it did inspire Feynman and others to calculate what the properties of an electron moving backwards in time would be, in a certain precise sense that emerges from quantum field theory. What they came up with was a particle that matched the known properties of the positron.


    Just to give you a rough idea of what it means for a particle to "move backwards in time" in the technical sense: in quantum field theory, particles carry with them amounts of various conserved quantities as they move. These quantities may include energy, momentum, electric charge, "flavor," and others. As the particles move, these conserved quantities produce "currents," which have a direction based on the motion and sign of the conserved quantity. If you apply the time reversal operator (which is a purely mathematical concept, not something that actually reverses time), you reverse the direction of the current flow, which is equivalent to reversing the sign of the conserved quantity, thus (roughly speaking) turning the particle into its antiparticle.


    For example, consider electric current: it arises from the movement of electric charge, and the direction of the current is a product of the direction of motion of the charge and the sign of the charge.


    Positive charge moving left is equivalent to negative charge moving right. If you have a current of electrons moving to the right, and you apply the time reversal operator, it converts the rightward velocity to leftward velocity. But you would get the exact same result by instead converting the electrons into positrons and letting them continue to move to the right; either way, you wind up with the net positive charge flow moving to the right.

    By the way, optional reading if you're interested: there is a very basic (though hard to prove) theorem in quantum field theory, the TCP theorem, that says that if you apply the three operations of time reversal, charge conjugation (switch particles and antiparticles), and parity inversion (mirroring space), the result should be exactly equivalent to what you started with. We know from experimental data that, under certain exotic circumstances, the combination of charge conjugation and parity inversion does not leave all physical processes unchanged, which means that the same must be true of time reversal: physics is not time-reversal invariant. Of course, since we can't actually reverse time, we can't test in exactly what manner this is true.


    The SPP can be compared to the electron in terms of time symmetry breaking into a positron. The SPP is not LENR active until it has been converted to its antiparticle by a time reversal operator. That operator is the KERR effect that changes the rotation of photons inside the whispering gallery wave. The purpose of the LENR stimulus is to change the nature of the SPP into its LENR active form.


    20170119174546739132.jpg

    Holmlid has explained that metalized hydrogen is a superatom where the positive charge carriers are located in the center of the crystal and the negative charged carriers are located in a cloud orbiting around the positive center.


    This metalized structure is an example of HOLE superconductivity. Protons are the holes and they are superconducting.


    Particle tracks produced by LENR ash show a strange type of particle that looks to me like metalized hydrogen particles charged up with and carrying a large about of energy,

    The photos of this metalized crystal in X-ray photo emulsions show what is going on. A handful of people or groups that I know of have done research on this metalized hydride but they might have not understood what the particle that they were seeing actually was.

    These groups were the guys describing the monopole, the AIRBUS guys, Leonid Urutskoev, and the Proton 21 people.


    IMHO, the person who has done the best work is Keith A. Fredericks at http://restframe.com/


    Keith does not know what he is seeing has comes about, but he does understand how the metalized hydride behaves.

    Keith thinks that the energy loaded metalized hydride crystal is a tachyon.


    This tachyon is a very energy intensive analog particle that acts like a synthetic monopole. Keith has captured the paths of these particles as they ionize photo emulsion chemicals. From this method, he has detected the magnetic and energy content of these analog particles.

    I have continually explained how duality in physics works; metalized hydrides behave like a tachyon. There is an entire field in string theory that predicts what a tachyon will do. One feature of its behavior is Hadronization where energy is converted into mesons.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadronization

    https://www.scientificamerican…hat-is-known-about-tachy/

    What Holmlid has built might be a quasiparticle of metallized hydrogen that looks like and behaves just like a tachyon is projected to behave in string theory.


    Keith has calculated that the energy carried by these strange particles is huge at 7.29 × 10e6 GeV /c2 and with a magnetic field of β0 = 1.83 × 10e7 tesla.


    In the proton 21 case, no hydrogen is present. So the perplexing thing for me to understand is that both nanowires and metalized hydrogen look and perform the same in these emission studies.


    In order to preface Keith Fredericks' video, a proviso is offered. In order to get the monopole magnetic property of the nanoparticle to express itself, a PT (parity-time symmetry breaking) state change is required.

    In other works, the nanoparticle does not follow time symmetry after the state change. This could be the reason why it looks like it is going backward in time.



    ICCF-18 : Keith Fredericks


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    axil : This is good news for chemical applications and shows the potential of Pt as a chemical catalyst. In LENR we need cavities of sub nano size not particles, but in a pile of small particles there will always be some small cavitiesm but with random shape.


    This is most likely wrong. But any "stable" plasma forms out zones with a "grid like structure", that look similar to your drawings. The SUN-CELL can be explained by plasma physics.


    Metal nano and micro particles produce vortexes of light/electrons in what can be termed as polariton solitons. (7)


    It is worth explicitly point it out because it is such an important reference (7) “Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale”. This article provides a wonderful explanation of how metal nanoparticles integrate with polaritons to form EMF energy concentrations.


    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSqVjvZDllmTDGS_5VdTfV04sWN9sFRvZ0dOthQMhgC4aX4THc1


    Simply put, the most powerful EMF amplifiaction is produced by the widest RANGE in particle sizes. A ultra small particle produces the most EMF amplification.


    Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows how the topology in the way particles aggregate explains how EMF is concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the Rossi system, this type particle according to the patent between 1 to 100 microns but mostly 5 micron nickel particles available commercially off the shelf (COTS). Other nanoparticles are produced as an ongoing process during E-Cat operation by what is termed “Secret Sauce” chemical additives. These additives provide the smallest nanoparticles in the particle aggregations. A picture of how these particles aggregate is now worth understanding (8). But there is a constraining factor that limits the aggregation of a certain size limit due to dipole forces (9).


    The largest particles produce relatively huge amounts of dipole generated current. . Other particles of various sizes accumulate around the large nickel particles (100 microns). Each of these particles produces a photonic vortex proportional to the size of the large particle member of the aggregation. These vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large amount of power concentration, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train.


    Finally, the smallest vortices associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at high rates of speed providing the largest EMF power amplification. If a 12 atom nanoparticle could be had to add to the particle mix, a huge EMF amplifiaction effect could be produced.


    The takeaway is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification effects. This fact explains why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply the intermediately sized gears that allow the large nickel gears to transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission chain. The smallest particles are the hydrogen Rydberg matter which has its own unique supercharged EMF amplification mechanism.


    I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle aggregation process that enables a sort of natural selection where the most effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of their aggregates will produce EMF implication great enough to catalyze quantum mechanical level effects.


    There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation. Particle piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must be constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate.


    6 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer


    7 – Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale

    http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf


    8 – Particle aggregation


    https://vimeo.com/36691535


    9 – The effect of the dipole-dipole repulsion on the size of the L-J particle aggregation

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Magnetic monopole beam



    One of the amazing revelations that have come out of nanoplasmonic research is the explanation of how the “dark mode” polariton soliton can produce a monopole magnetic beam. This amazing revelation is not theory; it is based on experimental results. But there is a theoretical explanation that goes along with the experimental data (10). The monopole magnetic beam becomes pronounced at polariton soliton (PS) intermediate energy levels since the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) align all the spins of the polaritons inside the soliton to project out of the soliton from its center perpendicular to its direction of wave rotation. The polariton has a spin of 2.


    There is even an experimental micrograph that shows the soliton and the monopole beam coming out of it


    nphys2406-f2.jpg



    This beam can extend out to 100 microns away from the soliton.


    Sin+t%C3%ADtulo.png


    This beam must be triggered into forming a monopole configuration by using a high electrostatic potential (50 to 100 kilovolts as per Rossi's patent) (Kerr effect)


    20170119174546739132.jpg



    10 - Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles

    http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf