Presumably Axil has 'appropriate' reactor design details available
Keep the power production of the reactor under 10 watts.
Presumably Axil has 'appropriate' reactor design details available
Keep the power production of the reactor under 10 watts.
LENR reactor developers do not understand the nature of the reaction that they are trying to utilize. This lack of understanding will lead to a destructive situation that will destroy the reactor that they are trying to build.
Electroweak vacuum decay is the factor that these builders must come to terms with and devote much thought on how to avoid the problems that vacuum decay presents. In order to deal with vacuum decay, these builders must know that it exists and what it is doing to their reactors.
I beleive that there are ways around the vacuum decay issues but they are contrary to common beliefs and desires of these builders of the LENR reactor.
This video provides a good overview of the vacuum decay issue and the role of the EVO in the LENR reaction.
External Content
www.youtube.com
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
The EVO is the nucleation seeds referenced in the video. The nucleation of the exciton polariton condensate (EVO) is the means that reduces the vacuum potential inside the condensate below that of the Higgs field vacuum. Fortunately, that reduced vacuum state is unstable and the EVO condensate will eventually became unstable and destroy itself saving the universe from its destruction. But before that terminal state of the EVO is reached, the LENR reactor will be subject to distrutive forces that can't be countered but must be avoided by appropriate reactor design.
Wow, this thread suddenly turned from a crackpot thread to a serious one, as long as there is no more Axilian content.
It looks like you better go back to the playground thread.
Could 'wavy space-time' bridge the gap between quantum physics and general relativity?
This new theory suggests that the unification between quantum physics and general relativity has eluded scientists for 100 years because huge "fluctuations" in space and time mean that gravity won't play by quantum rules.
But if those fluctuations in spacetime can be removed, it might be possible to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity.
For example, being a negative vacuum, the EVO has no virtual particles production in its spacetime to make the vacuum uncertain.
Could the Higgs field produce this unstable vacuum state?
Yes, the Higgs field can produce an unstable vacuum state.
Quotehttps://www.quora.com/Is-the-H…ore%20symmetry%20breaking. Is the Higgs field unstable? - Quora Apr 4, 2017 — The Higgs field of the Standard Model of particle physics is indeed unstable, as it has a nonzero vacuum expectation value. What that means is that the lowest energy state of the field is not the state in which all excitations (particles) are absent. But this describes the state of affairs before symmetry breaking.
The Higgs field is a scalar field with two electrically charged components and two neutral components. It's unstable because it has a nonzero vacuum expectation value. This means that the field's lowest energy state isn't the state where all excitations are absent.
The Higgs field is thought to be metastable, meaning it's only in its local minimum energy and not yet in a true vacuum state.
The Higgs field can break out of its false vacuum in a domino effect called vacuum decay. A bubble of vacuum decay would spread throughout the universe at the speed of light.
Since the Higgs field is not present inside the EVO, science could observe how quantum mechanics effects gravity by observing the the internals of the EVO.
Dear young guard!
Further one cannot achieve success by inventing new entities, be they dark or colored photons, rainbow particles, dark matter and dark energy, negative or positive vacuum states, “dark” hydrogen and a “square” or toroidal atom, and the like. On this path we have reached a dead end.
The complete theory of the LENR reaction is far more complicated than just the activation of a fusion reaction. There are many complications that need to be fitted symaltainiously into the entire rubric of the reaction.
For example, why is the hallmarks of the LENR reaction seen when fusion of deuterium occurs and not when other types of nuclear reordination are manifest?
Why are some LENR systems able to capture electrons without the production of heat?
Why can LENR systems stabilize radioactive isotopes?
There are many more types of characteristics that must be explained all at the same time. Fusion is just one small feature of the reaction. There has been a large number of LENR system developed over these many years with each having a unique set of reaction ideosysrocies. We must look at all these systems to find a single theory that explains them all.
Needless to say, that complete theory will be complicated.
An example of a "explain it all" theory is general relativity. Science has tested that theory in many hundreds or thousands of experiment over 100 years or more, And with each test, that theory holds up perfectly. The LENR reaction is proving to be far more complicated that general relativity.
You have no clue of QM. The electron can be at any place at the same time with a given probability! 2 is total garbage.
The total probability of electron existence is 1. The probabilities of all the superpositions of the electron add up to 1.
In explanation, the probability of finding an electron at a single point is always zero. This is because the square of the wavefunction, |ψ(x)|2, is the probability density to detect the electron at any particular place in space and probability densities necessarily assign zero probability to single points.
However, the probability of finding an electron within a certain region of space is not zero. This region of space is called an orbital. Orbitals are commonly represented by the boundary surfaces that enclose the region where there is a 90-95 % probability of finding the electron.
The total probability of finding an electron somewhere in space is 1. This is because the sum of the probabilities of finding the electron in all possible orbitals is 1.
The probabilities of all the superpositions of the electron add up to 1. This is because the superposition of two or more wavefunctions is a new wavefunction that is a linear combination of the original wavefunctions. The probability of finding the electron in the superposition state is the sum of the probabilities of finding the electron in each of the original states.
Why? A dark brain fart will be converted into a white EVO, that will generate a new universe with humans that now have white brain farts!
The universe is mostly dark; it is 96% dark with dark matter dominating matter and dark energy dominating energy. So the universe is mostly dark brain fart and the space that we call home is bright brain farts.
So the universe is two universes existing together but they are connected in a state of equilibrium by a process that is somehow controlled by the EVO.
I have a theory about this.
The universe was found to be in a steady state in terms of the size of the universe up to 10 billion years ago. Then after that time, the universe began to expand at an increasingly accelerating rate. What caused this accelerated expansion?
According to arXiv, superconductivity in palladium deuteride is observed below 54 K.
Superconducting transition temperatures in compressed hydrogen-rich materials range from 20–75 K. In 2018, a hydrogen-rich solid, LaH10, was reported to have a superconducting transition temperature of −23 °C.
High-temperature superconductors (high-Tc or HTS) are materials with a critical temperature above 77 K (−196.2 °C; −321.1 °F). This is the boiling point of liquid nitrogen.
These superconductive dust particles then served as an optical cavity in which EVOs could form.
I beleive that as the universe grew older, it because cooler and the temperature of the universe eventually dropped below the superconductor temperatures one after another of these various types of superconductor dust particles.
This new type of superconductive dust became able to generate EVOs that began to increase the production of dark matter and dark energy. As more of this dust is created, then more dark energy is produced which leads to an accelerating expansion of the universe.
But electrons are matter, and since they are fundamental particles they are unable to decompose.
The electron situation is a very strange case when it comes to the polariton. Quantum mechanics says that the electron can be in two places at once.
Electrons can be in a "superposition" of being in two separate places simultaneously. This is possible because an electron is a highly unified "bundle" of electron-positron field energy.
Modern quantum physics understands electrons as being distributed within orbitals. Orbitals are mathematical descriptions that represent the probability of the electrons' existence in more than one location within a given range at any given time.
Scientists discovered about 80 years ago that it is possible to be in two locations at the same time for an atom or a subatomic particle, such as an electron.
For example in the double slit experiment, a single electron can pass through two slits at the same time to create an interference pattern.
In the case of the exciton-polaritons where the EVO can move away from the place of its creation, the electron partly remains within the exciton at a fixed position, but the electron partly resides within the polariton which is also inside the EVO.
When the EVO terminates, the polariton decomposes into electrons and photons. The superposition of the electron resolves to completely locate the electron to the EVO. This is how the LENR reaction produces energy. High energy from the EVO is carried by electrons and photons which are both produced when the polariton decomposes, and then the electrons excite the surrounding atoms to produce heat. The photons also transfer their energy to the surrounding atoms in the same way.
Furthermore, the EVO does live in two worlds, one in which the Higgs field manifests inside the EVO. In this low energy condition massive EMF amplification produces fusion of deuterium into helium. But when the negative energy of the vacuum inside the EVO reaches a threshold level, then the Higgs field is excluded from inside the EVO, and transmutation takes over and energy production outside the EVO is stopped.
As an example of this transition case, this is why Egely sees transmutation begin when the power density of his reaction exceeds a threshold and carbon begins to appear on his electrodes.
I'm really confused now about the concesus about EVO's. Are they Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), or are they a new Universe? Or are they simply a room temperature superconducting BEC? Or are they an exiton polariton structure of anti de-Sitter space? Please, self proclaimed experts in EVO's, help me understand.
The EVO is a Exciton-Polariton Bose Einstein Condensate.
The EVO is a spacetime that has a negative cosmological constant which is anti-de Sutter spacetime.
The EVO is a spacetime that has a set of fields that differ from ambient spacetime in that the Higgs field is not active inside the EVO.
Because there is no Higgs field expressed inside the EVO, any matter that enters the EVO decomposes into quarks and gluons.
I am beginning to see the merit in the theory that our universe is a mix of both positive and sequestered negative vacuum states. The Negative state contribution is called the dark universe.
QuoteThe two largest pieces of the Universe, dark matter and dark energy, are the two that we know the least about, yet nothing less than the ultimate fate of the Universe will be determined by them. Dark matter tends to pull the Universe together, and dark energy tends to drive it apart. A full understanding of this cosmic struggle will require major observational and theoretical breakthroughs.
The EVO may have a role in the dark universe. I will next post about my hypothesis that the EVO has a modified electroweak particle called the dark photon.
Dark photon theory is a hypothetical theory about a particle that could help explain dark matter. Dark matter is a mysterious substance that makes up 85% matter in the universe, but remains invisible.
The dark photon is the electroweak dual of the photon.
Dark photons are also known as hidden photons. They are proposed to be a force carrier particle similar to the photon of electromagnetism, but potentially connected to dark matter.
Dark photons are dark because they arise from a symmetry of a hypothetical dark sector. This sector is made up of particles that are completely neutral under the Standard Model interactions.
Dark photons could be detected because of their kinetic mixing with the ordinary, visible photon. They could also interact with the Standard Model if some of the fermions are charged under the new abelian group.
Dark photons could help explain why galaxies rotate faster than they should and why light bends around massive objects more than it should.
Display MoreBelief in the Big Bang is a scientific psychosis. The hypothesis of the Big Bang and the origin of our material World from one point in space-time and physical vacuum lulls the mind and does not help solve any of the pressing problems of modern physics, namely:
1) the problem of the fundamental incompatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity;
there is a lot of evidence out there which cannot easily be explained without a big bang. You might almots say by now that disbelief in big bang theory was a psychosis. Not saying you can't construct alternate theories - but they are pretty contrived.
The compatibility of QM and GR is very strongly hinted by holographic principles shown in string theory. It does not yet work properly - and in fact one reason for hoping for some non-big-bang early universe theory is that would remove the current theoretical problem to using string theory.
But blaming experimental evidence because it is not convenient for theory is a mugs game. Why not instead work on a better theory?
Sabine might put this discussion into perspective. Now that we have insight into the EVO, we can research what when on at the moment of the Big Bang as Sabine mentions. The universe may have begun through vacuum decay as per this video.
A process (vacuum decay) that has just been experimentally verified to exist can cause transmutation (which has been shown to occur actioned by EVOs)
The EVO is a Exciton- Polariton Bose Einstein Condensate of a similar quantum mechanical modality as the condensate used in the referenced experiment. Research on these condensates are usually done using cold atomic atoms because producing polariton based condensates are hard to do and using these cold condensates make experimentally analyze easier.
Postulating the primacy and absoluteness of the movement of matter in our World leads to the conclusion that cold nuclear fusion is a method and form of movement of matter. Cold nuclear fusion always occurs during any movement of matter, and this can easily explain everything.
Then there is no need for the fantastic hypotheses of the Big Bang and the true and false vacuum.
As Paul Sutter explains, the universe was different early on as verified by the CERN collider. The forces that we now have were different early on, There is a loophole in nature where those early states of the universe can now be created inside the EVO.
The fantastic hypotheses that you fear is accepted by science and it underpins our understanding of nature.
The way the laws of physics works inside the EVO makes protons and neutrons impossible to exist. But the EVO is unstable and the EVO will terminate so that a plasma of quarks that had been produced inside the EVO will reform into new elements when the EVO is gone. This is what Aureon Energy has developed in their nuclear waste water remediation. stabilization product. Aureon does not mention fusion or fission. They say that do nuclear reorganization where heavy elements turn into light elements.
External Content
www.youtube.com
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Agree with RB
QuoteQuote from RobertBryant The actual article is about NUCLEATION.. not nuclear transmutation
Axil salad is confused and confusing.
On the contrary, the article is about the discovery of False Vacuum Decay in a Bose Einstein Condensate and a domain wall that protects the False Vacuum Decay decay mechanism.
False Vacuum Decay is a process that changes the laws of nature actioned by the nature of the ambient vacuum..
In quantum field theory, false vacuum decay is now an experimentally verified event where a vacuum that is relatively stable decays into a alternative state. This happens through the creation of small bubbles. Nucleation is the mechanism that forms the domain wall that creates the EVO bubble. The formation of a domain wall proves that the EVO contains a vacuum state that differs from that of the ambient vacuum.
We now understand that these small bubbles are EVOs forms through the creation of a domain wall the keeps the EVO vacuum state from mixing with the ambient vacuum state.
The ambient false vacuum is a vacuum that is metastable, meaning it is relatively stable but not in the most stable state. A false vacuum can last for a very long time, but it could eventually decay into a more stable state.
.
The idea of false vacuum decay is that the true lowest energy is lower than what we think. A false vacuum is at a local minimum of the energy function, while a true vacuum is at a global minimum.
Learn about the false vacuum
I have posted elsewhere the reasons why the EVO is a bubble of anti De-Sutter Spacetime.
The WIKI states as follows:
The present false vacuum state is called (de Sitter space), while tentative true vacuum is called, (Anti-de Sitter space).[22][23]
The field structure inside the EVO makes the existence of composite particles such as the proton and the neutron impossible. When matter enters the EVO, matter decomposes into fundamental particles.
For a more detailed description of this transmutation process see this post:
Inside of an EVO, the state of the fields there do not permit protons and neutrons to exist. For example, the Higgs field is not present inside the EVO. Absorbed elements and their particles fall apart into their more fundamental constituents. When matter is absorbed into an EVO, that nuclear matter is broken apart into unpaired quarks and gluons called a quark gluon plasma (QGP). These particles accumulate, mix, concentrate, and are confined at the center of the EVO due to the reflection of these particles off the spherical domain walls of the EVO.
When the EVO terminates, this quark gluon plasma (QGP) freezes out back into protons, neutrons, and pions. Then these particles reform into various elements through hadronizing.
This quark gluon plasma freezeout process seems random based on the amount of material ingested by the EVO, the type of elements ingested, the lifetime of the EVO, and other variable factors associated with QGP processes.
Also gluon energy converts into hadrons during freezeout.
Quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a state of matter that fills the universe for a few millionths of a second after the Big Bang. The plasma is a soup of quarks and gluons, which are elementary particles that bind together to form hadrons like protons and neutrons.
https://phys.org/news/2023-02-quark-gluon-plasma-production-energy.html
.
According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, when the QGP cools down, it transforms into ordinary elementary particles when the QGP is once again exposed to ambient fields such as the Higgs.
QuoteIn the Big Bang theory, quark–gluon plasma filled the entire Universe before matter as we know it was created. Theories predicting the existence of quark–gluon plasma were developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s.[3] Discussions around heavy ion experimentation followed suit[4][5][6][7][8] and the first experiment proposals were put forward at CERN[9][10][11][12][13][14] and BNL[15][16] in the following years. Quark–gluon plasma[17][18] was detected for the first time in the laboratory at CERN in the year 2000.[19][20][21]
Lots of evidence demonstrates that the application of laser light can stimulate a fusion reaction when the conditions are suitable. How the radiation interacts with the fusion process is still unknown.
Fusion and fission are not the only processes that can cause nuclear rearrangement.
A process that has just been experimentally verified to exist can cause transmutation. This process is called "false vacuum decay".
This process has been associated with the discovery and validation of the Higgs field. It comes about when two separate states of the vacuum exist symaltainiously.
In quantum field theory, false vacuum decay is a hypothetical event that occurs when a relatively stable vacuum decays into a more stable state.
A false vacuum is a metastable state, meaning it's relatively stable but not the most stable state possible. It can last for a long time, but eventually it could decay into a more stable state. This decay happens through the creation of small bubbles. These bubbles might be what Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVO)s are.
The idea of false vacuum decay is that the true lowest energy is lower than what we currently think. A false vacuum is at a local minimum of the energy function, while a true vacuum is at a global minimum.
The EVO turns out to be a negative vacuum which is unstable. Because it is unstable, it will not destroy all matter, but it will rearrange the matter that it comes in contact with while the EVO exists for a short time.
There are a number of LENR systems engineered to use this nuclear reengagement property (aka transmutation) to do useful things. SAFIRE is a system that converts transuranic elements to lead. The Thor system "thunderstorm" uses EVOs to convert carbon to oxygen. Just because we see nuclear processes that appear to be caused by fusion and fission, does not mean that this old style processes are the cause.
Being unstable, keep in mind that the EVO will not destroy the universe, You can also check out this video:
When an EVO absorbs matter, that matter seems to disappear. Where does that matter go, and why is the EVO unstable? Why does an EVO eventually explode in a Bosenova? If the EVO was stable according to vacuum decay, it would keep eating matter until all the matter in our galaxy was inside the EVO. What causes the EVO to stop growing?
The reason for all this strange behavior of the EVO is called "the instability conjecture".
The AdS instability conjecture is a conjecture about the initial-boundary value problem in general relativity. It provides an example of weak turbulence appearing in the dynamics of the Einstein equations.
The non-supersymmetric AdS instability conjecture can point to how quantum gravity removes the initial Big Bang.
A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein-massless Vlasov system in spherical symmetry has been established.
The numerical study of this conjecture in the simpler setting of the spherically symmetric Einstein-scalar field system was initiated by Bizón and Rostworowski.
A rigorous proof of the AdS instability conjecture in the simplest possible setting has also been provided.
A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein--null dust system with an inner mirror
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.08681.pdf
An understandable explanation of the instability conjecture is found here:
New Math Proves That a Special Kind of Space-Time Is Unstable
https://www.quantamagazine.org…ime-is-unstable-20200511/
Einstein’s equations describe three canonical configurations of space-time. Now one of these three — important in the study of quantum gravity — has been shown to be inherently unstable.
The proof involves injecting a small bit of matter into the space-time, akin to dropping a stone into a pond. Waves ripple out and back, interacting in a way that eventually creates a black hole.
https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2020/05/AdS-Black-Hole_2500_Lede_v02.mp4
QuoteHere’s the proof of instability: Moschidis showed that when he adds even a minuscule amount of matter to an AdS space-time, a black hole (or black holes) will inexorably form. However, AdS space-time has, by definition, uniform curvature everywhere, which means it cannot harbor space-contorting objects like black holes. “If you perturb AdS space-time and wait a sufficient time,” Moschidis said, “you’ll end up with a different geometry — one that contains black holes — and it’s no longer AdS. That’s what we mean by unstable.”
In a nutshell, the final result of the EVO lifecycle is the production of a micro sized black hole that causes the EVO to terminate. The next question is where do all these black holes go and why can't we detect them? It sounds like a WIMP to me.
This paper describes the experimental work done by Ferdinand Claude of the Kastler-Brossel Laboratory (LKB) of Sorbonne University, France to characterize the "ghost branch" of the dispersion of Exciton-polaritons. It is this photon field that can remove the virtual particles from the vacuum by using distrutive interference inside an EVO to make the EVO a negative energy structure (anti de-Sutter spacetime (AdS)).
https://physics.aps.org/art...
Quantum Fluids of Light Come into Sharper View
The section of the article that highlights the mechanism for negative photon production as follows:
QuoteIn a superfluid, the Bogoliubov dispersion relation has two branches, one with normal dispersion and one with negative dispersion, also known as the ghost branch. The latter branch owes its name to the fact that it is very challenging to excite—and thus to observe. The exquisite sensitivity of the pump-probe setup has previously allowed the LKB researchers to overcome this experimental difficulty and find traces of this ghost branch in reflectivity measures of their cavity
Jordan discusses Plasmoids,Ball lightning,
and Thunderstorm Generator.
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
This video is invalid information. The EVO is a Bose Einstein Condensate (BEC) of Exciton-polaritons. The EVO is a coherent structure, whereas a plasmoid is not coherent. Two features of the EVO prove that the EVO is a BEC, first, the EVO has magnetic vortex flux tubes that extend out of the main body whereas the plasmoid does not have such tubes, next, as a supersolid, the EVO forms ideal shapes like triangles and hexagons whereas the plasmoid does not forms such shapes when impacting matter.
Another dark matter video about Jamie Farnes theory of negative mass cosmology. What the Farnes theory is missing is a negative energy/mass particle, but we have that in the EVO.
The Farnes theory as follows:
https://www.aanda.org/componen….1051/0004-6361/201832898
External Content
www.youtube.com
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.