axil Verified User
  • Member since Oct 10th 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by axil

    why does Axil want to reconcile loose theories of 15 MK hot fusion with LENR

    What is the difference in the hydrogen fusion reaction in the Sun with the carbon reaction in other stars? If hydrogen fusion is going on in LENR, then Carbon fusion is going on in the thunderstorm system. Why is one reaction possible and the other is not?


    “For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring” is a quote by Carl Sagan.


    In stars with central temperatures greater than 15 million Kelvin, carbon fusion is thought to take over the dominant role rather than hydrogen fusion. The main theme of the carbon cycle is the adding of protons, but after a carbon-12 nucleus fuses with a proton to form nitrogen-13, one of the protons decays with the emission of a positron and a neutrino to form carbon-13. Two more proton captures produce nitrogen-14 and then oxygen-15. Another neutron decay leaves nitrogen-15. Another proton capture produces oxygen-16 which emits an energetic alpha particle to return to carbon-12 to repeat the cycle. This last reaction is the main source of energy in the cycle for the fueling of the star.


    While this process is not a significant part of the sun's fuel cycle, a star like Sirius with somewhat more than twice the mass of the sun derives almost all of its power from the carbon cycle. The carbon cycle yields 26.72 MeV per helium nucleus.

    The issues to be considered are how the carbon fusion cycle can be consistent with the current theories of the LENR based cold fusion reaction? Also, how can so much carbon be transmuted in the Thor reaction at 26.72 MeV per helium nucleus produced without some sign of energy production being evident in the thunderstorm reaction chamber?


    If you cannot come up with some answers, just ignore these issues.

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    We know that the black hole produced by an EVO produces a spherical event horizon because we see a hollow crenellated spherical ball of material that is composed of mostly transmuted elements.

    According to general relativity, the event horizon of a non-rotating Kerr black hole is a perfect sphere. However, the event horizon of a rotating black hole is more complex and is generally considered to be oblate or ellipsoidal in shape because of spacetime frame dragging caused by its rotation.

    The event horizon is a boundary around a black hole beyond which nothing can escape, including light.

    Although the event horizon of a Kerr black hole would be a perfect sphere, it would not appear as one because of gravitational lensing. If you were stationary or moving directly towards or away from the black hole, it would appear as a perfect circle that was apparently larger than the actual black hole.

    I believe if someone can't develop a theory with a strong mathematical basis, they shouldn't be making fake "theories".

    I do not feel qualified to be making such postulates. I only have a BS in Engineering Physics from Cornell, and I work with mathematical algorithms and physics related phenomena. But I have never really worked in pure physics. So that does not qualify me to make broad based speculations. I do feel qualified to judge certain people as unqualified to make their broad all-knowing statements. And I think those type of people are really bad for our goal of getting LENR research accepted.

    This post reeks of arrogance, false pride, and self aggrandisement.


    Take Ken Shoulders as an example, He had little education in fundamental science but he could humble the most prominent and arrogant scientists of his age in his humble and self effacing way.


    While working with his son sometime around 1980, Shoulders had replicated a phenomenon observed by William Bostick, an atomic physicist at the Stevens Institute of Technology. Shoulders would eventually dub his findings exotic vacuum objects, or EVOs. He described an EVO as a cluster of electrons that channels energy (though the source of that energy was uncertain). Shoulders believed he had used the electrons’ energy to melt microscopic holes in various materials. Church had offered their research to dozens of companies and government agencies, including the Office of the Vice President, but no one was interested.


    EVOs break the laws of physics as they are currently understood. Electrons shouldn’t be able to cluster together, as Shoulders claimed, because an electron’s negative charge will repel other electrons. Anyone trying to hold together the north poles of two magnets will get a sense of the problem. And so when Shoulders presented his findings to established scientists, such as Richard Feynman, a Nobel laureate physicist at Caltech, he was dismissed outright.

    Shoulders’s credibility was not helped by his maverick reputation, his lack of formal education, or the company he kept. Puthoff, his closest friend at SRI, was a former Scientologist who was still convinced that Uri Geller had psychic powers. Shoulders had also become close to John Hutchison, who promotes himself as a lovemaking guru and the inventor of levitation and life-extending devices. These relationships, and many others with more conventional scientists, were the result of Shoulders’s openness to unusual ideas. No matter how outlandish, Shoulders never rejected a new theory before carefully thinking it over and, if appropriate, testing it. He wished others would extend him the same courtesy. EVO research photo

    Photograph from Shoulders’s testing of EVOs, which he hoped would be key to an alternative-energy source.

    But was there any worthwhile science in Shoulders’s EVO research? After dismissing the inventor’s findings, Feynman became aware of the discovery of similar clusters of charged particles made at the National Bureau of Standards and the work of a professor at the University of California, San Diego, who had noticed the same thing 10 years earlier but had not conducted further research. On January 31, 1986, Feynman mailed an apology letter to Shoulders: “When you were in my office I could not see how 1010 or 1011 electrons could be kept as a ball in a vacuum without ions. . . . I must apologize for it has come to my attention that it is indeed possible.” Feynman confirmed that the electron clusters Shoulders and his son witnessed were feasible, a small victory in the face of mass rejection. But the existence of a physical phenomenon is a far cry from an alternative energy source. Nonetheless, Shoulders declared in his self-published book, EV: A Tale of Discovery, “I believe this gateway will open into one of the greatest industries yet known.” Despite years of filing patents and pitching the research to various companies and government agencies, Shoulders never found a taker.


    The fault lies with the arrogance and pomposity of those takers. Shoulders was, is, and always will be on point.

    Regarding axil i like some of his ideas ( not all for sure ;( )

    I think that the LENR reaction explain more than the production of gainful energy. It is a gateway into new science that can greatly advance the assent of mankind.

    For example, using the EVO, black holes as an element of quantum computing can be produced in a controlled and stable manor.


    According to the holographic principle, information about a black hole's


    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8DvM4mdzBNxpdegCDJiqdygITMhd5djCWjkdLTjRYz19TMwTv


    interior is encoded on its two-dimensional surface area. This surface area is known as the black hole's event horizon. We have already seen this black hole event horizon's surface presented in our observations as those micron sized crenellated balls of transmuted matter.


    The information is said to be smeared on those two-dimensional spheres, described by the event horizon. The information is encoded on the surface as a hologram.


    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT2y6-8aajCOXZprVtbx3SU1KQUKlGRtYCrMEZqh28u75Be5CEH


    The amount of information that can be stored in a black hole is only limited by its surface area. The storage capacity increases as the black hole swallows matter. The amount of data that could be stored on the surface of the EVO black hoke is on the order of 10^50 hard disks. Allowing science to access and control of these black holes is a advancement of unlimited potential.


    In the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, also known as the gauge/gravity duality, it is believed that the information encoded on the event horizon of an Anti-de Sitter (AdS) black hole can be read out. The AdS/CFT correspondence is a theoretical framework that relates a gravitational theory in AdS space to a boundary conformal field theory (CFT). According to this duality, the information stored in the black hole is dual to the degrees of freedom of the boundary CFT.

    In the AdS/CFT correspondence, the information is not lost but rather encoded in the correlations and entanglement of the CFT degrees of freedom. The boundary CFT can be thought of as a holographic representation of the gravitational theory in the bulk AdS space, including the black hole. The information encoded on the event horizon can, in principle, be reconstructed by studying the properties of the boundary CFT.


    However, it's important to note that the AdS/CFT correspondence is a highly theoretical framework and its precise details and limitations are still under active investigation. Providing science with a AdS black hole provides valuable insights into the understanding of black holes and information storage, the practical implementation of reading the information from the event horizon of an AdS black hole will be facilitated with access to the AdS black hole will be an area for ongoing and future research and a topic of active study in the field of quantum computing.


    Did Lenny discuss how to seperate the split EVO entangled pair by 10 billion light years? I could watch the video but I would prefer an explanation from an "exper

    Sometimes you just have to put in the work, Hard work is painful when life is devoid of purpose. But when you live for something greater than yourself and the gratification of your own ego, then hard work becomes a labor of love.

    If you had watched Leonard Susskind video, you would understand, and you might also learn something.

    One of the major principles that is becoming prominent in science today is the principle of duality. Most of the theory that is current now involves duality. One of the components of this advance in physics and cosmology is Anti-de-Sutter spacetime(AdS).. AdS is a component of the revolutionary AdS/CFP duality, one of the major well studied broad range of topics of physical theory and has resulted in the explosive development in current theoretical physics.. There have been 15,000 references addressing this duality currently in physics research. The AdS/CFP duality relates gravity and general relativity to quantum mechanics.


    AdS is the gateway into the development of quantum gravity and many other fields of study.. The AdS/CFT correspondence also known as holographic duality, is a conjectured relation between quantum field theory and a higher-dimensional gravity theory. It relates the quantum physics of strongly correlated many-body systems to the classical dynamics of gravity in one higher dimension.


    The AdS/CFT correspondence was proposed in 1997 by Juan Maldacena in the context of string theory,


    It is a concrete example of holography, which suggests that all the information about the interior of some region is actually contained on the boundary.


    The AdS/CFT framework shows that the two different pillars of physics, General Relativity (Very Big) and Quantum Mechanics (Very Small), are equivalent. However, this is only true in a limited and controlled version of reality with different dimensions.


    When energy is added to AdS, a black hole forms. This is what happens when matter and energy is added into an EVO. These excitations are added to the black hole at the center of the EVO. (See video)



    If an EVO splits in two, with the two being entangled, the pair could be separated through 10 billion light years and they could be used to instantly communicate via a wormhole over ten billon light years. (See video)


    This wormhole might provide a path to enable travel through the 10 billon lightyears.. (See video) (ER=EPR)



    Quantum Gravity, Entanglement, de Sitter Space and Black Holes



    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    https://arstechnica.com/scienc…0large%20scales.%E2%80%9D

    The Universe in a lab: Testing alternate cosmology using a cloud of atoms
    We can't experiment with the Universe, but we can make something that works like it.



    Alternate universes
    The scientists fit together equations for the Universe and equations for the Bose-Einstein condensate to draw conclusions about how the early Universe might have behaved.


    Sparn said the team simulated positive curvature by increasing the density of the potassium-39 going outward from the center of the experimental setup. They simulated negative curvature by decreasing it.


    “We showed that it is possible to simulate spatially curved and expanding spacetimes in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Sparn said. “This is what you need for a homogeneous and isotropic universe, which should be a fair assumption on large scales.”


    During the last few years, scientists have been using quantum atomic systems to find analogies to complex systems in the cosmos, Szmuk said. This connects atomic physics and astrophysics.

    By using a exciton polariton condensate, at system can be created that has a negative spacetime curvature. This type of system which acts as an analog universe is what an EVO is.

    Mark Leclair, and his company "Nanospire" long ago distanced themselves from LENR for, IMO, business reasons, but their story still intrigues me. Much more to he, and his partner Serge's story than this, if interested:


    Mark LeClair -- Nanospire cavitation jet machining, transmutation, crystalline water (rexresearch.com)

    Do you remember this post;


    A commercial opportunity has developed for LENR in the production of neon gas for chip manufacturing. The $20 billion US chip manufacturing initiative could be short-circuited by the lack of neon supply. LENR transmutation from B-J. Huang et al equipment could provide pure neon for the new US chip lasers as well as show that transmutation from the LENR reaction is a strategic national technology industrial imperative. It is high time for the US to initiate a crash program to develop a LENR industrial base as a critical US governmental development priority.


    Exclusive: Russia's attack on Ukraine halts half of world's neon output for chips


    WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) - Ukraine's two leading suppliers of neon, which produce about half the world's supply of the key ingredient for making chips, have halted their operations as Moscow has sharpened its attack on the country, threatening to raise prices and aggravate the semiconductor shortage.


    Some 45% to 54% of the world's semiconductor-grade neon, critical for the lasers used to make chips, comes from two Ukrainian companies, Ingas and Cryoin, according to Reuters calculations based on figures from the companies and market research firm Techcet. Global neon consumption for chip production reached about 540 metric tons last year, Techcet estimates.


    Both firms have shuttered their operations, according to company representatives contacted by Reuters, as Russian troops have escalated their attacks on cities throughout Ukraine, killing civilians and destroying key infrastructure.


    The stoppage casts a cloud over the worldwide output of chips, already in short supply after the coronavirus pandemic drove up demand for cellphones, laptops and later cars, forcing some firms to scale back production.


    While estimates vary widely about the amount of neon stocks chipmakers keep on hand, production could take a hit if the conflict drags on, according to Angelo Zino, an analyst at CFRA.


    "If stockpiles are depleted by April and chipmakers don't have orders locked up in other regions of the world, it likely means further constraints for the broader supply chain and inability to manufacture the end-product for many key customers," he said.


    Before the invasion, Ingas produced 15,000 to 20,000 cubic meters of neon per month for customers in Taiwan, Korea, China, the United States and Germany, with about 75% going to the chip industry, Nikolay Avdzhy, the company's chief commercial officer, said in an email to Reuters.


    The company is based in Mariupol, which has been under siege by Russian forces. On Wednesday, Russian forces destroyed a maternity hospital there, in what Kyiv and Western allies called a war crime. Moscow said the hospital was no longer functioning and had been occupied by Ukrainian fighters.


    "Civilians are suffering," Avdzhy said by email last Friday, noting that the company's marketing officer could not respond because he had no internet or phone access.


    Cryoin, which produced roughly 10,000 to 15,000 cubic meters of neon per month, and is located in Odessa, halted operations on Feb. 24 when the invasion began to keep employees safe, according to business development director Larissa Bondarenko.


    Bondarenko said the company would be unable to fill orders for 13,000 cubic meter of neon in March unless the violence stopped. She said the company could weather at least three months with the plant closed, but warned that if equipment were damaged, that would prove a bigger drag on company finances and make it harder to restart operations quickly.


    She also said she was unsure the company could access additional raw materials for purifying neon.


    The Economy Ministry of Taiwan,home to the world's largest contract chip maker TSMC, said that Taiwanese firms had already made advanced preparations and had "safety stocks" of neon, so it did not see any supply chain problems in the near term. The statement to Reuters echoed similar remarks from Taiwan's central bank earlier on Friday.


    But smaller chipmakers may be harder hit, according to Lita Shon-Roy, president of Techcet.


    "The largest chip fabricators, like Intel, Samsung and TSMC, have greater buying power and access to inventories that may cover them for longer periods of time, two months or more," she said. "However, many other chip fabs do not have this kind of buffer," she added, noting that rumors of companies trying to build up inventory have begun to circulate. "This will compound the issue of supply availability.”


    Ukrainian neon is a byproduct of Russian steel manufacturing. The gas, which is also used in laser eye surgery, is produced in China as well, but Chinese prices are rising steadily.


    Bondarenko says prices, already under pressure after the pandemic, had climbed by up to 500% from December. According to a Chinese media report that cited Chinese commodity market information provider biiinfo.com, the price of neon gas (99.9% content) in China has quadrupled from 400 yuan/cubic meter in October last year to more than 1,600 yuan/cubic meter in late February.


    Neon prices rose 600% in the run-up to Russia's 2014 annexation of the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine, according to the U.S. International Trade Commission.


    Companies elsewhere could initiate neon production but it would take nine months to two years to ramp up, according to Richard Barnett, chief marketing officer of Supply frame, which provides market intelligence to companies across the global electronics sectors.


    But CFRA's Angelo Zino noted that companies may be unwilling to invest in that process if the supply crunch is seen as temporary.

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    If the EVO is producing the LENR reaction OUTSIDE of the EVO, then it must be generating a LENR force carrying particle


    Could the EVO be generating dark photons.


    More detailed coverage here


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The particle deep elastic scattering experiments show 6.5 sigma (standard deviations) of certainty that there are undiscover particles coexisting with the photon.

    Worst an EVO is a mythical object. Axil then goes on to surround the myth with more misinterpreted references to scientific reports. He claims authority by reference to thing he claims that only he understands. He points to the right phenomenon, then does everything possible to perverts its understanding....

    Thanks for your long and thoughtful post.


    The LENR reaction may be producing a significant number of new types of subatomic particles. But one might ask, "why haven't CERN already discovered these new particles yet".


    The CERN particle collider runs under the field structure of our current universe. CERN never found any evidence of any particles associated with long range weak force causation. In the standard model, the weak force only occurs under unstable particle activation. The unstable particle always causes the weak force to manifest. But these new EVO based particles can force the unstable particle to stabilize.


    But inside the EVO, there are other alien field structures that may be occurring. The force carrying particles produced inside the EVO may create fields that are not possible to produce inside our universe yet are still acting inside the universe. The EVO is required to produce these alien particles.


    For example, the magnetic fields produced by the EVO may differ from the magnetic fields produced in our universe. These alien EVO fields may stabilize isotopes or produce transmutation.


    The tracks seen in strange radiation may be formed from the action produced by the magnetic vortex flux tubes originating inside the EVO.


    It has been found that variations in the sun and other processes in cosmic space cause isotope half-lives to vary on earth. These variations may be produced by particles produced by EVOs inside the sun and in outer space.

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The Bose Einstein Condensate produces a north and south polarized magnetic flux tubes. As a BEC, the EVO also produces these tubes.


    There tubes drill pairs of holes into the surface that the EVO lies on. one hole for each flux tube.


    We have seen these magnetic north and south flux tubes that project out of the EVO drill holes into surfaces as well as carry transmuted matter inside them (the "cannon" in the LION reactor and other instances and systems), This means that the particles produced inside the EVO are both electroweak force carriers and transmutation active. These particles act instantaneously to affect matter. This means that the fields inside the EVO are alien unlike what we experience everyday. But these alien fields can only be created inside the EVO but can have affects in our universe.


    In this video, an EVO is imbedded in a wire and its two flux tubes project out of the EVO onto the surface and disrupt the that surface at a distance.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Strange radiation tracts are another example of how these flux tubes produce transmutation effects. As the EVO fly's over a surface, these tubes cut into it and transmute matter. Transmutation has nothing to due with gravity in this instance, it is modified magnetism.


    In this video, an EVO is moving over a surface while rotating. As it goes it dills holes in that surface using its flux tubes.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The LENR reaction can not only generate energy, it is far more consequential and impactful to society into the future than currently assumed by the LENR community.

    .

    The LENR reaction may be producing a significant number of new types of subatomic particles. But one might ask, "why haven't CERN already discovered these new particles yet".


    The CERN particle collider runs under the field structure of our current universe. CERN never found any evidence of any particles associated with long range weak force causation. In the standard model, the weak force only occurs under unstable particle activation. The unstable particle always causes the weak force to manifest. But these new EVO based particles can drive the unstable particle to stabilize.


    But inside the EVO, there are other alien field structures that may be occurring. The force carrying particles produced inside the EVO may create fields that are not possible to produce inside our universe yet are still acting inside the universe. The EVO is required to produce these alien particles.


    For example, the magnetic fields produced by the EVO may differ from the magnetic fields produced in our universe. These alien EVO fields may stabilize isotopes or produce transmutation.


    The tracks seen in strange radiation may be formed from the action produced by the magnetic vortex flux tubes originating inside the EVO.


    It has been found that variations in the sun and other processes in cosmic space cause isotope half-lives to vary on earth. These variations may be produced by particles produced by EVOs inside the sun and in outer space.


    And inspection of the elements produced in John LeClair's cavitation experiments show the appearance of gold (Au197) in the list of transmuted elements, and quite a goodly amount.


    NanoSpire - LeClair
    NanoSpire - LeClair
    www.academia.edu