Posts by axil

Some perspective please...

Nuclear fission of heavy elements was discovered on December 17, 1938 by German Otto Hahn and his assistant Fritz Strassmann, and explained theoretically in January 1939 by Lise Meitner and her nephew Otto Robert Frisch. The first commercial fission reactor: The Mark 1 reactor led to the US Atomic Energy Commission building the 60 MWe Shippingport demonstration PWR reactor in Pennsylvania, which started up in 1957 and operated until 1982. During that period of development, many $billions were spent using every specialist in the allied science stable.

Rossi has done the same type breakthrough job on his own with his own funding.

http://www.techtimes.com/artic…ish-red-planet-colony.htm

New Human Subspecies Likely To Emerge As Martian Planners Try To Establish Red Planet Colony

It is now recognized that the radiation environment in space and on extraterrestrial colonies need permanent protection from long term exposure to radiation.

A LENR reactor could provide this protection by generating a radiation proof shield around space travelers and colonists.

The method for generating this shield is based on the chirality of the particles that are produced by the LENR reaction. A fluid running through the LENR reactor would be chiral polarized to left handedness. The fluid could then circulate inside a network that would carry this polarization to the outer shell that enclosed the living volume of the spacefarer. The chiral polarized fluid would transfer its left handed particle properties to the material that makes up the protective environmental shell in which the spacefarer is enclosed.

This radio-protective environment could be included in the air envelope, spacesuits, space stations, vehicles both ground and space, and living areas in general.

This technology would protect the humans species form high rates of mutation, associated genetic diseases and possible evolution into divergent species.

The LENR reaction requires specific properties in order to produce the LENR reaction. Even through there may be a number of types of plasmoids that have been identified, non of these plasmoid types demonstrate the required properties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmoid

Quote

Bostick wrote:

Plasmoids appear to be plasma cylinders elongated in the direction of the magnetic field. Plasmoids possess a measurable magnetic moment, a measurable translational speed, a transverse electric field, and a measurable size. Plasmoids can interact with each other, seemingly by reflecting off one another. Their orbits can also be made to curve toward one another. Plasmoids can be made to spiral to a stop if projected into a gas at about 10⁻³mm Hg pressure. Plasmoids can also be made to smash each other into fragments. There is some scant evidence to support the hypothesis that they undergo fission and possess spin.

On the other hand, Vortexs do demonstrate these required LENR properties. These properties include superconductivity, coherence, Bose condensation, ultra high Q, double vortex structure, and chirality based on that double structure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex

Farming red tide for Pyrolitic carbon fertilizer

An unmanned and completely automated robotized ship can skim the coastal waters to farm red tide to convert this organic matter to Pyrolitic carbon fertilizer. LENR could provide the power source. The ship could produce fertilizer as well as liquid hydrocarbons.

Quote from Ed Lewis

I kind of decided if people comment on my posts anonymously, I probably won`t read it.

Its your loss

The Caterpillar tracks that are made by the monopole soliton is clear in two x-rays.

But there seems to be the dipole double dot marks made in many of the 10 x-ray emulsions. The double dots look like they are paired in a magnetic flux tube connection as was seen in ECCO and the fresh LION ash.

It is amazing that these solitons can exists dormant for a long time (year) without stimulation.

Corrected, thanks

https://www.npr.org/templates/…tory.php?storyId=89562594

Quote

"Researchers say that adding charcoal to soil may provide more benefits for long-term soil quality than compost or manure. It could also be used to sequester carbon captured from carbon dioxide emissions. Mingxin Guo discusses new applications for the technique, used more than 1,500 years ago in the Amazon basin."

I beleive that the production of pyrolitic carbon fertilizer using the heat from a LENR reactor will solve the climate change issue in short order.

Here is how pyrolitic carbon fertilizer production could work. A crop harvesting vehicle now discards crop residue such as stocks and leaves back onto the field. This crop residue will decompose in short order thereby releasing its carbon content back to the atmosphere.

The gas content of the crop: hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, etc will be vented back into the air and what remains is pyrolitic carbon fertilizer that could then be directly deposited onto the field and plowed into the soil.

Through this method, the excess carbon in the atmosphere could be readily sequestered and at the same time greatly add to the fertility of low grade farming lands.

The carbon so sequestered will stay in place in the soil for many thousands of years as witnessed by the presence of pyrolitic carbon fertilizer still in the soil after 1500 years in the Amazon basin.

Quote from Adrian Ashfield

I have no reason to doubt that the main emission is 200-400 nm.

However even a small percentage of 100 kW in the visible range would be bright.

The range that Rossi gave us was 100 to 200 nm for the SK spectrum. The heat produced is infrared so the heat is just a very small faction of the total energy output. So is the visible light generation. A good example of how the EMF spectrum falls is the SunCell where most of the energy is also produced in the XUV range. Unlike Mills, Rossi is choosing to waste that XUV and visible energy.

It is obvious that Rossi's antics are affecting many of you'll greatly. It might be therapeutic if you'll forget about Rossi. Rossi seems to be well funded and funding will make him imperious to any influence that you'll can heap on him. He is now able to achieve his own destiny for good of ill on his own hook.

Axil Axil

At 44:29 of Bob's video, the LENR active agent seen in ECCO is an ultra dense hydride that will produce strange radiation tracks. Since it is a superconductor, it is metastable and retains its activity for months if allowed to extract energy from matter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LION

Hi Axil, what you have to say about LENR interests me and so I pay attention to it. Above you say-- " Since it is a superconductor, it is metastable and retains its activity for months if allowed to extract energy from matter."

This is something you have said many times before so I decided to try an experiment.

LION 1 was run between May 26th and May 29th 2017- one year ago.

I had a few grains of dust left of the outside crust, so I placed them in a LFH ceramic tube at 800C for 8 hours. When cool I placed them on a specially prepared x Ray emulsion.

On one side of the green plastic outside I placed GOLD Leaf and on the other side SILVER Leaf. This on both sides was folded several times so the leaf was essentially a foil.

The Dust was then placed on the GOLD side and a piece of foam placed on both sides of the emulsion on top of which was placed Barium Ferrite magnets, North on one side South on the other, taped together and left for three months. The magnets were 4cm x 2 and 3/4cm x 1cm.

These are the results:

IGNORE the black square in the photos, it is simply CCD pixel damage in the USB Microscope.

THANKS AXIL for your suggestion.

THE PHOTOS are best viewed in Full Screen Mode.

That there is anything on the emulsion is amazing and the curvature is an added bonus. --GREAT IDEA AXIL. THANKS.

Quote from Shane D.

Anyone ever heard of this Simon Brink? First time for me. From his website (experiments), he appears to have his fingers in many LENR pies. Good he is attending the ICCF21. The other attendees will be able to feel him out, to find out if he is legitimate. Hard to hide lack of knowledge on the subject, or bad intention at a LENR conference.

Here is his abstract: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…preview=Brink-Simon-1.pdf

Forget Simon Brink, he is a R. Mills hydrino acolyte.

Quote from Wyttenbach

This is nothing extraordinary. All dense mass is magnetic flux. Like charge, magnetic flux can be attractive or repulsive. Nothing counter intuitive... Magnetic flux always is chiral.

A photon is just magnetic flux and gets (its rest mass) slowed down to the e.g. absorbing electron speed. But the speed of the magnetic flux "inside" the electron is still at light speed.

Interesting for concrete applications are only effects where no absorption happens and the photon gets slowed down until it seems to be at rest = just spinning! This happens in Holmlid's case, where the spinning photon energy part finally gets "added" to the proton's spin. But this "adding" is an other story.

You are so amazingly smart. I want to know what spin is and how it can be right handed or left handed if a particle like the electron or the neutrino does not actually spin.

Quote from THHuxleynew

In the case of Rossi it is clear that the builder has no evidence (and has never had any evidence) that these devices work. That makes reverse engineering a process nearly certain to be futile. Although Rossi moves on to new devices it is notable:

(1) The old devices are left abandoned, seemingly of no value

The discarded systems are a learning experiences and they teach what must be accomplish in the new system to make the final SYSTEM usable. The old systems add tools to the inventors toolkit.

(2) Each new generation device has flakier calorimetry than the previous (and the original demos were obviously flaky).

Calorimetry is only a problem when the system produces a low COP. If the system produces 100KeV and needs 100 milliamps as input then calorimetry is not that important.

Display More

Quote from Shane D.

Sorry, but I am having a hard time reconciling the fact that the 3 authors providing their fuel ash, never proved their original claims. That is not how science works.

We are not doing science here. This is not a question of science. It is a reverse engineering process whereby existing systems are analyzed to determine how they operates. Even the builders of these systems do not understand how they work. These builders have stumbled onto these system by chance and are trying to perfect them using trial and error methods. The goal in the reverse engineering process is to find common mechanisms that might improves the operation of these systems in general. This exercise is also a method of documenting the operation principles of these systems that have been deduced so that they are not lost as usually happens in this area of LENR.

1. Clark May 27, 2018 at 8:51 PM

   Dear Andrea Rossi:

   Can you describe some particular phase that made you tremble during the Ecat SK test?

2. Andrea Rossi May 27, 2018 at 10:14 PM

   Clark:

   we had to protect ourselves behind a grade 14 glass because looking at the light radiated by the SK could damage seriously the eyes. Few seconds after the turn on of the reactor the heat radiated from the Ecat SK broke the 14 protection glass. We had supplementary 14 protection masks. Nonetheless, I saw from that minuscule reactor exit a tremendously dazzling white light all around the laboratory and I will never forget this impression. The SK was born. I think we will make it useful. Many errors emerged, but now we work to correct them, the most difficult part has been resolved.

   Warm Regards,

   A.R.

It sounds like Rossi has duplicated the SunCell, and all in the same packaging as the QX. That power density to size ratio will be hard for the competition to beat. The muon flux out of that SK reactor might be so dense that someone could swim in it. With all that power density, how long can the fuel source last? I have not thought it possible for light to be able to break glass.

http://bigthink.com/philip-per…iences-greatest-mysteries

The Electron-Ion Collider will unravel some of science’s greatest mysteries

The electron ion collider is where science will explore what is going on in the LENR reaction. CEBAF AT JEFFERSON LAB has been studying the behavior of the insides of protons and neutrons for the last 15 years. This lab has uncovered many of the mysteries about particle chirality which forms the basis of the LENR reaction. This new upgrade to the power and resolution of the chiral particle Collider will resolve why LENR behaves as it does. We cannot understand about how LENR works without understanding what keeps matter together, for it is LENR that rips matter apart. Why does the LENR reaction cause protons and neutrons to decompose? That search is what will be the purpose of this new collider upgrade. The deepest and most profound mysteries that is LENR is soon to be revealed.

Quote from Alan Smith

And still tick-tocking. The drop-outs btw are due to the interposition of various densities of shielding between reactor and Geiger in order to better understand what we see, the dramatic spike up due to a mid-run calibration check.

Did you'll get the new detector working yet?

The case for Muon catalyzed fusion

The interrelated nuclear reactions that are occurring concurrently in a typical LENR reactor are multifold. For example, In the ECCO reactor, there is likely multiple nuclear active reactions going on at once. These reactions include nucleon decay that is producing sub atomic particles (muon and pions), muon/pion catalyzed fusion and fission.

But how can we tell the nature of these interrelated reactions. One way to determine if muons are producing nuclear reactions is to confine the reactor in a magnetic bottle to increase the population of muons that are confined to the nuclear active zone of the reactor. If muons are active, then there should be a marked increase in the level of transmutation that is occurring. There should also be a increase in the energy production of the reactor since the muons will decay inside the nuclear active zone. Also, muon catalyzed fusion should increase inside the reactor rather than wasted in the far field. If no difference in transmutation or energy production levels are seen then the PRIMARY LENR reaction is the sole source of the transmutation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

An indication in an experiment that muon reactions happen in a LENR reaction.

Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole

Georges Lochak*, Leonid Urutskoev**

http://disq.us/url?url=http%3A…z28qmbSGq_Hw&cuid=2168707

This experiment shows that U238 is fissioning at a faster rate than U235 since U235 was enriched.

The uranium was far removed in distance from the Primary LENR reaction source. Yet both U238 and U235 were found to fission. Muon induced fission is the likely cause of this fission reaction.

Quote from H-G Branzell

How do you reconcile your paper with the Standard Model?

Celebrate

http://artsci.case.edu/smat50/