MikeFid Member
  • Male
  • 70
  • from Jagna, Bohol, Philippines
  • Member since Oct 13th 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by MikeFid

  • Lithium, Food for Thought.

    Thomas Henry Moray, Ph.D., (August 28, 1892 - May, 1974) was an inventor from Salt Lake City, Utah. Moray graduated from The Latter Day Saint's Business College. Moray studied electrical engineering through an international correspondence school course. He received a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Uppsala.


    It is well documented that Moray developed a bipolar semiconductor as early as 1927. His germanium "valve" was working in 1931. In the 1930s Moray developed advanced semiconductors and transistor-like devices.


    Moray provided a complete disclosure of his semi-conductor research to Dr. Harvey Fletcher of the Bell Laboratories. Dr. Fletcher later became head of the department at Bell Laboratories that developed the transistor. Moray, therefore, could be the true father of modern electronics since his work predated the Bell Laboratory bipolar transistor findings by at least 20 years.


    Lithium is the most active of all elements, and is perhaps the most unstable of the "light elements". In some cases, transmutation can occur in an incident particle beam of less than 7 volts according to the Blokhin book (in the bibliography, and many other similar X-ray references), which gives specific product emissions for most elements (unless "classified") in respect to the frequency of an incident particle beam used at specific voltages. Powerful ionizing radiation can be used to charge field plates, or to produce 'pure electrical energy". The energy produced, is vastly greater than the electrical energy required to initiate the reaction, because it comes from the ZPR ("starlight"), and need involve no radioactive fuels or wastes. These processes were explored by Tesla prior to 1900, and by T. Henry Moray, of Utah, while in Sweden in 1912. Tesla used aluminum and some Group I elements, while Moray used spudomene or lepidolite-lithium-aluminosilicate rocks-which he called his "Swedish stone", to which he soldered triple-distilled germanium, producing semiconductor devices (which he called "valves") almost twenty years before Shockley, who got the credit. These rocks are almost everywhere in Northern New Mexico, especially found in pegmatite dikes. Sheepherders in the vicinity of Dixon (where the government mined lithium for the H-bomb), carried pieces of lithium ore in their pockets in winter, to warm their hands. The moist hands provided the electrolyte contact, and penetrating cosmic radiation (the ZPR) did the rest. The lithium-aluminosilicate elements are all below atomic number 19, and in compound form are supposed to work better than the separate, pure elements.

  • Yet Another LENR Theory

    I keep thinking of Jennison rotating wave-mechanical phase-locked cavities.
    :)


    Part 1:
    On the fundamental properties of matter


    By R.C. JENNISON


    Electronics Laboratories, The University of Kent in Canterbury, England.


    Sixty years ago de Broglie conceived the idea of ascribing wave properties to particulate matter. His original concepts were soon absorbed into the somewhat different treatment by Schrodinger which evolved into the wave mechanics that is used to compute orbitals and other problems concerned with the probability of finding particles in a particular physical situation. Wave mechanics has told us little about the particles themselves although de Broglie has always maintained that his original treatment held the key to the fundamental structure of matter itself. Very recent work, stemming originally from research into the problem of how the units of length and time are preserved in the proper frame despite the effects of acceleration, has shown that the principles of phase-locked cavities may be combined with de Broglie's wave treatment to provide a unique description of a spinning particle. Various modes of the trapped wave system are available and the properties of rest mass, inertia (independent of Mach's Principle) and quantisation all appear simply as a result of the phaselocking and feedback process that is intrinsic to phase-locked particles. The sharp bounding of the spinning wave-mechanical packet has interesting relativistic properties which may indicate why the action of quantum phenomena are concentrated into particular space-time events and are not diluted over large regions of the Universe. This approach to the understanding of fundamental matter is radically different to the philosophy of highly energetic collisions where the exotic products of the collisional energy demonstrate the patterns available from ever increasing energies. It may do more to elucidate the fundamental properties of matter upon which the quantum hypothesis, Newton's laws and the concepts of charge, angular momentum, mass, length and time are based.


    The enigmatic duality of particles and waves has influenced the development of science for hundreds of years. As with so many aspects in the history of science it has been influenced by the timing of discoveries and by the stature of the researchers. There is an old conundrum which poses the hypothetical question of what would have happened if Michelson and Morley had performed their experiment at the time of Copernicus - surely there was proof that Galileo's teachings were unscientific heresy! The nature of light has also swung between extremes of interpretation. Newton claimed that it was corpuscular, despite his experiments with prisms, and then Young demonstrated the interference from a double slit which appeared to show that it was waves. If the photo-electric effect had been discovered at about that time, Young would have been disgraced and all the development of wave theory in the nineteenth century would have taken a back place. Then in 1905 Einstein showed that light interacted with matter as if it were quantised according to the relation E = h. It is often said that Einstein invented the photon but I do not believe this to be true. He proved, quite correctly, that the interaction was quantised; he did not unequivocally state that the light itself was particulate. Despite his unique contributions to the quantum theory Einstein was highly suspicious of its interpretation and campaigned against it for the remainder of his life.


    The story turned full circle when, in 1925, Louis de Broglie showed that matter could be treated as waves. His remarkable discovery coincided with the birth of quantum mechanics dominated by the presence of Max Born in Germany and Niels Bohr in Copenhagen and so de Broglie's ideas were quickly absorbed into the somewhat different structure of wave mechanics developed by Schrodinger. This was much more compatible with the matrix mechanics of quantum theory but differed in considerable detail from the ideas of de Broglie. Wave mechanics became essentially a probability computation and did nothing to elucidate the nature of matter itself. For many decades scientists have been trying to solve the internal structure of the fundamental particles by colliding matter at ever increasing energies and studying the products of the collisional energy. But if de Broglie's original ideas were correct then there ought to be much cheaper and more effective ways of solving the mystery.

  • E-Cat Stanley Steamer

    O, I'm just a hopeless romantic, been setting up my christmas tree and putting the locamotive steam train under it, just thinking how nice it would be with all that energy to make steam, it would be great to have some of the things from simpler days. Back a hundred and twenty years ago you did not have to pay for electricity or gas for your car, you were not dependent on someone else to supply your needs.,

  • E-Cat Stanley Steamer

    So what about the tempature needed for steam engines in trains, steam powered ships and of course automobiles - plus trucks - does a steamer have the torque to pull my 5th wheel,
    should if it can pull trains! This is all old tech and should be easy to implement, instead of having to reinvent the wheel :D . Love to see the old style Steam locamotive and side paddle Steam ships! :thumbup: Can the 1 gram E-Cat do it???

  • Lithium, Food for Thought.

    The odd thing about atoms is that the actual "binding energy" never agrees with the calculated "binding energy". For example, the actual binding energy of Helium 4 is 28.293MeV. The calculated binding energy for Helium 4 is 23.79MeV. The ratio of actual to calculated binding energy is:


    So Helium 4 has a coefficient of efficiency equal to 1.189, or the energy available after disassembling the Helium atom is 4.503MeV. Now how can there be extra energy left over when the energy came from the addition of all the basic subatomic components? This is like saying that we start with 10 units of energy to put together 10 pieces of matter. Then it only takes 8 units of energy to take apart the 10 units of matter and we have 2 extra units of energy available to do with as we please. We end up with the 10 units of matter we started with plus 2 extra units of energy.


    There is no conversion of mass into energy. The extra energy came from the Aether. The process of assembling and disassembling matter to get free energy is similar to a pumping action.


    But not all atoms have a COE greater than 1. Of all the stable atomic isotopes, only Lithium 7 has a COE of less than 1. What does this mean? It means Lithium does not take free energy from the Aether when it is disassembled, it takes the free energy while it is assembled. In other words, as the atoms of Lithium are formed, they draw extra energy from the Aether and store it in the atom.


    It stands to reason that if Lithium can be either combined with another element or made to disassemble and reassemble through a high powered oscillation, then it will pump energy from the Aether directly into the atom, and from the atom into a circuit connected to the atom. Tapping the energy of the Aether through Lithium may be as simple as bombarding Lithium with X-rays or microwaves. Judging from a spectrum analysis of Lithium, perhaps the ideal frequency will be around 4.469 x 104GHz.


    It has already been reported that Lithium batteries explode. In the reports I have heard and read, Lithium batteries tend to explode near X-ray machines, such as medical equipment or airport security systems.


    Lithium is not the only isotope that would appear to draw energy from the Aether. Below is a table of all the isotopes with a COE of less than 1. EL = element abbreviation, A = atomic number. From the table it can be seen that deuterium (H2) and tritium (H3) are also excellent candidates for drawing energy from the Aether. Although there are other otherwise excellent candidate isotopes, the quantities of the isotopes occurring in nature are limited.


    http://www.16pi2.com/joomla/ma…sics/freeenergyatoms.html

  • Hidetsugu Ikegami opinion on latest E-cat test report.

    I was hoping that someone might be able to get a comment or opinion from Hidetsugu Ikegami on the latest E-cat test report since his theory THE NATURE
    OF THE CHEMONUCLEAR TRANSITION     (http://www.roxit.ax/CN.pdf) deals directly with Fusion in Li permeated Metal-Hydrogen Systems. One of the E-cat testers,
    Roland Pettersson, worked with Hidetsugu Ikegami on several experiments,ie; (Ultradense Nuclear Fusion in Metallic Lithium Liquid). See also Successful Replications — Ikegami-Pettersson.