Engineer48,
I thought you arrived to the conclusion that mixing Ni+Li+LAH together is NOT a good idea. Why do you bring out one of the very few successful replications (so reported at least) that incidentally has been made with the collaboration of…
Hi GaameOver,
Where do your see LI that melts at 180C?
QuoteInitial fuel consisted of a mixture of uniform mixture of Ni powder weighing 0.9g and lithium aluminum hydride (Li[AlH4]) - 0.1g.
"Considering that we do not know the internal structure of the reactor, and therefore cannot completely rule out that there were other charges inside it besides the one weighed and inserted by us, we may repeat the above calculations taking the weight of…
Try this one:
http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/GEC16/Session/MW6.27
http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-c…H-Ni_Stepanov_English.pdf
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016…khomov-replication-video/
Quote from Engineer48: “Of course powered by energetic protons leaving the Ni+H reaction.”
It would be great is LENR experimenters could validate sup-atomic particle emission from LENR reactors. Specifically, try to convince the replicators to…
Piantelli did that and stated in his patents that he found proton energies up to 6.7MeV.
https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2702593B1/en
Quoteprotons that are expelled by the nuclei, which have a determinable and characterizable energy. For example, in case of Nickel, the expelled protons have an energy of about to 6.7 MeV
Error duplicate post.
This 15 Euro coin shows the safe & low temperature p+Li7 aneutronic fusion reaction which will forever change the world.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016…eer48/#comment-2859854627
Aneutronuc fusion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneutronic_fusion
Of course powered by energetic protons leaving the Ni+H reaction.
Guys,
IH item 5 talks about 5 example images A - E that are not shown in Abd's downloaded PDF of item 5.
Anyone know if they can they be obtained as they should be VERY interesting images.
Hi GameOver,
The tubing stated out clear.
Note the lack of dirt and grime on and around the pumps in this earlier photo of the 4 banks of 6 pumps.
.
Hi Bob,
Have pending orders with Leonardo, in time order, for:
5 x 10kW domestic reactors
10 x 1MW low temp reactors fir a customer who have delayed the process due to the legal activity
5 x 50kW QuarkX reactors for my Remote Area plant that is self powered
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016…ystem-concept-engineer48/
2 x 1MW reactors for local commercial heat customers
Hoping for my team & myself to be trained during the Leonardo install of their next few US reactors
Where possible, will keep the forums informed.
Display MoreQuote from Engineer48: “Hi Stephen,
I don't attack anybody. What I may do is to present another viewpoint than yours, debate the data but never attack the poster.
With your claimed deleted posts, did you ever take that issue up with Frank?
BTW even…
My client's pays me. I expect my team will deliver much more of value to the client than the ECat.
I debate the issue, I don't attack unless you consider having your opinion questioned is an attack?
As far as I know, I have never had posts deleted, disappeared by Disqus yes but not deleted my someone.
.
Hi Stephen,
I don't attack anybody. What I may do is to present another viewpoint than yours, debate the data but never attack the poster.
With your claimed deleted posts, did you ever take that issue up with Frank?
BTW even today I had a few of my posts appear when posted but upon a refresh, they are gone. Sometime they come back, sometime they never reappear and are eaten by the cloud.
Rossi has not offered me a job or position, what he will do is work with me as a nonexclusive agent that guides the customers I find through the Leonardo purchase process, then work with Leonardo and the client's engineer's to plan and do the install and commissioning process. No money comes by way until the client's engineers sign off and accept the plant.
.
My clients are heavy steam users and their plant people eat steam engineering for breakfast.
Before my 1st install, my engineering team & myself will be trained to install & maintain ECats.
Nothing new here, my interests were disclosed a long time ago.
.
Abd and others,
I have had posts saying waiting for approval and many posts go missing for days but normally do eventually surface.
Other frequent posters have also commented on this happening to them.
It is not Frank, it is Disqus.
.
Rossi seems very clear and confident about dealing with the various IH claims.
Well, I maybe jumping to conclusions, but I would say that the photo evidence and the statement from Rossi shows an extreme likelihood that both photos are in NC, which I am sure IH can verify with comparison photos of the NC site and the test site.
So…
And the need for a dividing wall at Raleigh was?
Yes, they look very similar.
In one photo the ceiling joists are perpendicular to the long axis of the containers, in the other they are parallel.
The photo with the grey door is probably in NC, which is quite possibly why it disappeared from from the…
In both photos the ceiling beams are at right angles to the length axis of the Red containers, the wall to beam supports are the same and the beam sizes are the same.
Also note there are more than 1 Grey door in the office container. Doors have different handles, locks and swing open differently.
I suggest both images are in Doral.
Speaking of North Carolina, there is another photo of the red Plant, which I believe <i>was </i>taken in NC, that shows the other end (presumably) of the one of the red containers, with some hoses or cables going in (that don't show up in the USPTO images).…
Look at the roof beams and how they are supported at the wall interfaces in the 2 red container photos. They are the same in both photos of the red containers, so both photos are probably at the same site.
Also attached how the reactors, heat exchanger, condensate tank and piping may have been arranged.
As the 40ft ECat container with the dual reactors is clearly elevated quote a lot, this would suggest the black unit on the other side of the wall is 10ft high as Rossi claimed, which BTW does not have the top structure of a container.
Surely yous heard the rumor?
JMP is owned by a subco of IHIPH.
They knows everythin about what JMP does, owns, operates, etc.
No DD required. Pays themselves $1000 a day for heat, they does... while knowin exactly what theys gettin'.
That's right! You…
Back to reality:
Yet JTV initialed the name change.
And there is no way IH would jump into bed with, trust their brand new dual 1MW reactors to, an unknown US startup without knowing of and checking out the UK parent.
BTW Jed why did John. T Vaughn alter the company name and initial the statement from the customer's lawyer? Have been told it is his handwriting. Maybe you can verify?
http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads…es/4035/6736/original.jpg
Surely IH did due diligence on the UK parent of the US company they were getting into bed with for the 1 year trial and to ensure themselves the company would pay for the $1k per day heat account? Which would suggest it would be a very strange business agreement that IH did not know who the UK parent was, even if they never visited their heat customer's production area.
The IH heat customer's current legal name is J.M. Products Inc. which was altered from J.M. Chemical Products Inc as per the sunbiz web site.
Hi Bob,
Could not find the IH customer's company registration details?
Try this:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016…-case/#comment-2818052034
Even shows the name change
A new post 1 year test ash analysis document has surfaced on NewVortex, showing the author as Bo Höistad.
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/g…onversations/messages/790
Document download here:
http://s000.tinyupload.com/download.php?file_id=02747932063906224836&t=0274793206390622483690244
About chromium if there is inox in the reactor it may be contaminants...
maybe isotopic analysis will say more
MFMP asked Parkhomov about missing Lithium in per fuel analysis. He said lab could not easily detect it. Amazing statement that. Especially when it was detected in post ash. Why use a lab that can't do a proper analysis and that issues analysis on plain page with no company headers/footers, run numbers, page numbering, number of samples taken, sample sizes, etc?
