Charity may not be the best to solve real humanity problems.

Tell me which charity have saved 3 billion people from hunger.

http://scienceheroes.com/

Tell me who killed dozens of million people by hunger.

Google did more to bring me information that the library-protection laws in france.

A nice video describing famous scientists who were right, but not believed.

I like it because they explain some rational reason, like unserious clinical practices raised founded skepticism.

This recognition that being wrong was rational is seen also in Thomas Kuhn "The Structure of Scientific Revolution"

http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/Kuhn.html

Human factor is key to understand erroneous skepticism, and respect of both your own scientific rigor and other's skepticism is important on the side who is anyway right but denied.

Not talking of the mass of erroneous ideas pushed by people who were right on one key point.

an article about Rossi's reactor, in Russian

cited by http://lenr.seplm.ru/

https://zen.yandex.ru/media/de…-5c79d32df8046e00b3c5a111

nothing really new as I understand

Like for LENR, just a good experiment, with no ambiguity, reproduced by another respected lab, would be enough to get all VC run to him...

Problem is either it is not as reliable as claimed, or that it is so great that nobody want to share the data for reproduction...

Latest independent reproduction by Tajmar was a fiasco, that supporters blame of mistakes, and skeptics applaud as evidence of absence. I cannot cut.

Останется ли Россия в числе лидеров новых энергетических технологий?

О необходимости российской программы по холодному ядерному синтезу и плазмоидным реакторам

Подробности: https://regnum.ru/news/innovatio/2625783.html

Любое использование материалов допускается только при наличии гиперссылки на ИА REGNUM.

Will Russia be among the leaders of new energy technologies?

On the need for the Russian program on cold nuclear fusion #LENR and plasmoid reactors

https://regnum.ru/news/innovatio/2625783.html

( from http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/doklad-klimova )

an old video on Cold fusion, Bockris and Fleischmann

Comment seems quite reasonable.

Thanks very much Ahlfors for your research.

Today I'm sad that quite nothing serious is public, and that only your business people analysis raise some good news, and that I hear no report of serious collaborations. (no hearing does not mean it does not exist)

However, it seems there are signs (and buzz) about hidden excitation by each, causing lack of cooperation and great silence...

To all: What are your analysis ? Am i wrong? Misled ?

Is it him?

https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/

Sad news.

Ahlfors wrote:

last ones

Is it news to have explicitly reference to "that produce heat" as justification for the usefulness of the claims? It seems they claim that "producing heat" for some hydride is just a fact, and improving that fact is useful?

good luck boys!

some good news, even if much is hidden... I should delay my depression a little more.

In the same historical perspective, Ruby present an article puting latest MIT Colloquium in perspective with 30 year of Cold Fusion.

The MIT colloquium was great as described.

Cold fusion research thriving at 30-years young

https://coldfusionnow.org/cold…search-at-30-years-young/

at the end there is listing with most slides and videos

Hum, ... There is a cognitive war in MIT...

They are losing taste for wind, that they loved mostly for international laws (leading to useless wind farms in Mongolia)...

It's complicated, and full of manipulations like we see on LENR.

JedRothwell True

I'm more concerned by the legal problems, allowances, permits, and the war of ego, of policians populism, conservatism & fashions...

Like many problems, including LENR, the technical part is the easiest and predictable.

For me it was and it will be the symptom of what is happening to France. Maybe that is the core of the shock.

Hopefully there is only one severe wounded.

This chronicle by one of the best International Affairs analyst in France would deserve to be translated with due credits

https://bfmbusiness.bfmtv.com/…-europe-1704-1154780.html

All is said.

Knowing that the only EPR reactors in production are in China, I understand they feel that affair is important to analyze.

If I was the bishop I would ask China to manage the project... even if artists and engineers are French

the inactive blogs (there are much more) made me sad all the night. They make me older of a decade.

I know some may be not so aligned with tastes and reason.

I imagine you included well known here

http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/

https://coldfusionnow.org/

Abd http://coldfusioncommunity.net/

Sifferkoll http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/

Cold fusion time (I think it was cited here) http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html

You cited greg gobble

I think you cited Mats https://matslew.wordpress.com/

New Energy Times by S Krivit http://news.newenergytimes.net/

maybe not

JP Biberian http://blogde-jeanpaulbiberian.blogspot.com/

Ecat-news (the skeptic zone) http://www.ecatnews.net/

Ecathome (a syndication running alone it seems) http://www.ecathome.eu/

http://ecat.org/

MFMP steemit https://steemit.com/@mfmp

MFMP forum http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en

Edmund Storms http://lenrexplained.com/

http://www.thinktankreport.com/

http://lenr.seplm.ru/

https://22passi.blogspot.com/

Claudio Pace http://www.claudiopace.it/

Ugo Abundi http://www.hydrobetatron.org/blog/

An indonesis blog open to LENR (Fusi Dingin)

http://energibarudanterbarukan.blogspot.com/

italian skeptics https://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/

LENR.su https://lenr.su/

LENR china http://www.lenr.com.cn/

Sengakut San http://amateur-lenr.blogspot.com/

I remember old inactive blogs

Fulvio Frisone http://www.fulviofrisone.com/en/cold-fusion

http://leonov-quantumenergeticscoldfusion.blogspot.com/

http://coldfusion3.com/

https://www.coldfusion-power.com/blog

http://coldfire-lenr.blogspot.com/

http://energycatalyzer3.com/

https://ecatscam.wordpress.com/

Too bad Peter is inactive http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/

http://lenr.co.uk/

jack cole http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/

http://londont.blogspot.com/ (not only LENR but interested)

https://newenergytreasure.com/

http://rnbe.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_5.html

http://e-catalyzer.it/

https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/

http://energy2point0.org/

http://fusionefredda3.com/

by the way, about the evolution of LENR Cities SA to LENR Cities Suisse SARL this page is clear

http://lenr-cities.com/

about associations, note the french SFSNMC

http://www.sfsnmc.org/

and also the Fondation De Broglie which does some modest experiments

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o…9061a1118da738e577ffd.pdf

sad.

I don't know for Stalin propaganda, but today what I see show me the statement on propaganda is true. Much propaganda and aggressive trolling is just there to make dissenters shut up, not to convince anybody (on the opposite, it raises skepticism on claims, but silent skepticism).

Someone in farming controversies cited this small article...

https://conversion-rate-experts.com/steel-manning/

In facts two communications tactics, opposed to usual troll/activist practices.

1. Steelmanning
   1. Attempt to re-express the other person’s position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that they say, “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
   2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
   3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
   4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
2. Feel–felt–found
   1. Demonstrate that you understand how the other person feels.
   2. Then, describe how you (or someone else) once felt the same as the other person does.
   3. Finally, describe how your mind (or someone else’s) was changed, and what you instead found to be true.

As explained, it is the opposite of strawmanning and aggressive tactics. First approach propose a usual tactic how to promote improvement during education, by first finding positive results, successes, then stating improvement points. Second approach is playing it with empathy.

I've been quite convinced myself by the natural 2nd approach by many LENR researchers who explained

• how they were initially very skeptical on LENR.
• How anyone rational and educated in physics should be skeptical.
• How they were finally convinced by experiments despite their initial belief.

In fact the usual activists tactics, the trolling tactics are not there to convince but in a context of Groupthink to shut up dissenters

http://libertytree.ca/quotes/Alan.Bullock.Quote.35C9

Alan Bullock wrote:

No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.

Jonas Matuzas on ECW open thread found that patent application by a Czech company https://patentimages.storage.g…61dca/US20190096535A1.pdf

THE METHOD OF GENERATING THERMAL ENERGY , DEVICES OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION AND HEAT GENERATION SYSTEMS

Applicant : POWER HEAT ENERGY S . R . O . , Nusle ( CZ ) (

Inventors : Oleg OLSHANSKY , Vary ( CZ ) ; Emanuel HUBENY , Praha 5 ( CZ ) ; Andrey KOLOSOV , Volgograd ( RU )

I've found 3applications on Wipo, the previous to USPTO another to Indian patent office, and another to canada.

https://patentscope.wipo.int/s…ail.jsf?docId=US239829561

https://patentscope.wipo.int/s…ail.jsf?docId=IN236856470

https://patentscope.wipo.int/s…ail.jsf?docId=CA228902500

the WIPO applications is

https://patentscope.wipo.int/s…il.jsf?docId=WO2017152889

EPO add a chinese and korean application, and cite the oricinal Czech patent

https://worldwide.espacenet.co…&NR=109074872A&KC=A&ND=4#

https://worldwide.espacenet.co…R=20190021195A&KC=A&ND=4#

https://worldwide.espacenet.co…&NR=2016136A3&KC=A3&ND=4#

It did not find anything decisive, but maybe I missed core points.

I have no idea if it works, but thi is the kind of patent that one can expect to be defendable on LENR... A nice trick that is so practical, that if sold at reasonable price, will be exploited by everybody...

Am I the only one to think about thermal engine like Stirling or Ericcsson?