It is just an example of what it could look like.
Did Utica Boilers give you permission to photoshop their image, or is this standard procedure?
It is just an example of what it could look like.
Did Utica Boilers give you permission to photoshop their image, or is this standard procedure?
And the 'Brillouin Boiler Technology' 'sticker' is obviously photoshopped - they couldn't even bother to angle the text to fit in the box.
Here's the original boiler from Utica Boilers http://www.uticaboilers.com/product_detail.asp?key=32
Enlarged picture: http://ingramswaterandair.com/…_Sealed_Combustion_Boiler
I mean, really, how do they expect to get away with this sort of thing?
After this time, my question is:
When will we get answers to these questions???
The caption on Fig 12 says that the resistors are shading the light from an inner reaction. That this is problematic must have been realised, as evidenced by the twisting explanation that follows. It seems much more likely that the bright stripes are due to the resistor wire, which are not only being heated by the reaction, but also provide their own heat. What convincing evidence do you have that the resistor wires are actually shading an internal reaction? Do you have pictures showing that the wires are hot at low temperature (say, in the calibration run, no reaction), but in-between the wires is hotter at higher temperature (during the live run, with reaction)? Just saying that the brightness increased by a greater factor than the increase in electrical consumption is not convincing, as both the input and output power calculations are under question! If the bright stripes are due to the resistor wire, then it seems there is no inner reaction, due to the lack of candescence in the darker regions. That the bright stripes are due to the resistor wire seems obvious, by comparison to the glow in the rods outside the reactor.