Zephir_AWT Member
  • Male
  • Member since Oct 21st 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by Zephir_AWT

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    Quote

    Subsequent research in Germany, 2016, produced null results when arcing was eliminated in the LN, and measurement errors accounted for due the the EMP of the discharge,, thin film phenomenon non addressed


    Thank you for info - but do you have some link for more details? Poher also did many blind experiments with non-superconductive materials (some are even shown at this video) and the impulse he observed was much higher, than any possible error of measurement. BTW Wasn't it Podkletnov's Impulse generator, what you're talking about by now?

  • Bose condensation as a force multiplier.

    Quote

    Be careful about that magnetic field claim of Defkalion's. Nobody ever observed it who didn't work for them. I checked.

    I never heard of balls of lights, in connection to Defkalion the less - but the magnetic field has been witnessed at their public demos by multiple people. The problem with AxillAxill is, you can be never sure which portion of his agenda is real and which is just a confused speculation - IMO it's sorta 50/50. His common deduction mode consists of merging various sources together just because they contain some common word or phrasis of his momental prefference.


    Quote

    That is the reason why we see no progress. Every drop of pipi is secrete!

    Yes, the LENR research doesn't need any fossil or whatever else conspirative lobby for its censorship today, the LENR researchers manage it by itself more than willingly. IMO this situations worsens the more, the closer we get to some practical applications.

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    Quote

    Visible matter, dark matter and dark energy would be continuously created into the indefinite future in about the same proportions that are observed today.

    In dense aether model the universe is steady-state, yet dynamic system. The galaxies are continuously evaporating to clouds of photons, neutrinos and dark matter, which are condensing somewhere else into a new galaxies like the giant density fluctuations of vacuum.


    On the left it's is how the process really looks like from high-dimensional perspective, on the right how it looks from our anthropogenic perspective, which enhances the gradients and ignores the transitions (dark matter filaments). From sufficiently dimensional perspective our Universe resembles fractal Perlin noise or the clouds on the summer sky. But the people cannot spot the smooth gradients well - instead of it, the flat areas of space-time look expanded for us, whereas these deformed ones look shrunken for us.



    The dark matter is actually way more random and widespread between galaxies, than just around filaments, but it requires the good observational technology to spot it. Recently this insight of dense aether model has been confirmed. In general therefore the interior of Universe looks like giant density fluctuations of dense gas, which can be modelled with supercritical gas. You may imagine it like the interior of dense star or black hole (but no such giant black hole actually exists in our Universe).



    This is how the density fluctuations inside of dense gas look like. Their motion looks random, but it's correlated at the local space and time scales. For example, the new fluctuation is always formed at the free space between another galaxies - or the avalanche-like thickening of gas would occur. In dense aether model this is prohibited by shielding model of dark matter formation: the dark matter clouds get formed just at the places, which are most distant from already existing dark matter at the connecting lines of existing galaxies - thus emerging from/filling the voids.



    The dense aether model is scale invariant, the dark matter filaments are forming dodecahedral foam, which comes in fractal way and it repeats itself at multiple scales inside the galaxies and stellar clusters. Every massive body is pervaded with dodecahedral clusters of dark matter, which contribute for example to its tectonics because are catalyzing nuclear reactions leading to heating of their core and formation of convective cells and plumes there.

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    This is like to say, quantum mechanics is perfect theory except the tiny inaccuracy which has very big implications. Which inaccuracies have bigger implications? Are these implications really a consequence of inaccuracies of some particular theory? Is some theory really the primary reason of things? How is it possible, that the Universe existed long time before its theories were invented?


    Their inacuracies are simply consequence of the fact, all models have their validity scope. Their inaccuracies don't imply anything - instead of it, they're itself conquence of this limited validity scope. Your proclamation is the expression of the established conviction, that the Universe is driven by our theories. This conviction is the part of intersubjective religion, which is spread with its priests - i.e. physical theorists - for to vindicace their existence, but in its consequences is just naive anhtropomorphization of the Universe. The Universe doesn't cares about our theories at all, being random in essence. We are just living in the deterministic portion of it like the Boltzmann brains, because every randomness has its fluctuations of determinism.



    Max Tegmark, a MIT teacher: The Mathematical Universe


    versus


    Alan P. Lightman, a MIT teacher: We are living in a universe uncalculable by science.

  • Bose condensation as a force multiplier.

    In my theory the cold fusion runs via long-dimensional collisions of long chains of atom nuclei within crystal lattice, which act due to their large inertia concentrated into a small volume like the pistons and anvils. The fast collisions of atoms would be also followed with temporal formation of polarized dipoles along chains of atoms and with radiation of localized electromagnetic impulses.


    The magnetic monopoles would form, if the temporarily formed dipoles would broke faster, than the EM field could enclose/encircle the magnetic lines the force. Such a situation happens inside the superconductors and boson condensates, where the speed of light gets greatly lowered due to massive entanglement of atoms. Along the long dense chains of atoms the speed of light propagation would be lowered in similar way, like inside the boson condensates, so that the condition for formation of scalar waves and magnetic anapoles could be fulfilled there. In this way the collision and subsequent rupture of long line of atoms would be followed with emanation of vortex ring of magnetic field along axis of atom line, i.e. the monopole.


    In this regard it may be significant, that the intriguing formation of quite high magnetic field (1.6 Tesla) has been observed and widely discussed during public Defkalion demos. The intensity of magnetic field at center of large neodymium magnets is about 1.4 Tesla. Also the formation of spiral-like tracks during cold fusion experiments could be attributed to presence of both magnetic fields (cyclotron effect), both anapole character of resulting particles


    Compare the spiral like tracks in X-ray films observed around deuterium discharge on palladium by Irina Savvatimova and Leonid I. Urutskoev. The spiral-like path can be explained like the cyclotron effect of charged particles in magnetic field, or by propagation of magnetic anapoles (charged magnetic particles) by itself. In general I do consider these artifacts as an interesting byproduct of cold fusion - but IMO they're not substantial for its mechanism anyway. After all, the cold fusion gets the most effective, if it doesn't release any particles into outside, monopoles of not - just heat.

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    Quote

    Where can I find some recordings or papers, that will show reliably, that LOW Energy nuclear reactions are taking place


    For example here - but this is not what this thread is about.
    This thread is also not for ignorant pathoskeptics, who are asking the same dumb - and many times answered - questions again and again.
    You may or may not believe in cold fusion - but the absence of knowledge of accessible literature sources about it cannot be tolerated like every other ignorance.

  • The Nickel-Hydrogen Brain Trust

    Usage of plasma discharge has many advantages over plain usage of LiAlH4:

    • the traces of oxygen are continuously removed by its activation and reaction with excess of hydrogen
    • the impacting ions clean and erode surface of nickel continuously, thus revealing microcracks and crystal grain boundaries
    • the accelerated electrons reduce the surface of nickel from oxides continuously, even at the presence of traces of oxygen and humidity common in amateur conditions. It may even recycle the LiAlH4 in situ.
    • the ions (protons) implanted with high voltage would forcefully and continuously saturate the surface of nickel with hydrogen, the oversaturation of lattice can be easily reached here
    • the electric field intensity can be modulated with HF corona to a much higher voltage than just by using AC current for heater
    • the system can be still combined with Li vapors (Li+D corona is most reliable cold fusion system) and/or with LiAlH4, which would provide the hydrogen atmosphere at higher temperatures
    • the HV/HF voltage sources are cheap components and sold ready made or DIY at many chinese e-shop sites (1, 2)
    • the plasma discharge is fancy and with bit of experience it enables to monitor hydrogen pressure and its reactions with substrate visually
    • the AC/DC ratio and voltage/HF frequency used represent another wide system of variables, which would enable to tune up reaction conditions precisely and finely
    • it was actually the only Ni-H system repeatedly replicated by amateur (QuarkX/me356). Parkhomov didn't succeed in his further replications.

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    Quote

    Why they are focused on ITER/Wendelstein-X

    Large projects are reliable source of jobs and money (not only for physicists, but also for private companies involved), as they can be researched infinitely. The giant centralized sources of energy warrant and justify the power of centralized governments. In contemporary society doesn't really matter if some project is contributory, but if it enables to drain the money from tax payers pockets. From the same reason the nonsensical plans of Elon Musk got so wide publicity in media. Temperature of plasma reached in Wendelstein-X corresponds the temperatures of plasma in tokamaks before forty years - I wouldn't expect very fast results from it... :)


    Quote

    Go to poor people on the whole world, show them one of the prototypes, show them how to replicate. The rest would come ALONE.

    You should do some research first. If the cold fusion research would get the resources and organization like single ITER or NIF hot fusion project, we would already have cold fusion generators in every home.

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    Quote

    It did not take too long, to put all those nations together at one table investing in the future together, instead of investing in whatever they thought, they might have needed during WW2 or WW1.

    The fact that investments into research are common doesn't imply, that these investments must be ever useful for something. The existing applications of elementary particles don't utilize the collider physics done after WWW II at all, in this sense these experiments could wait easily another fifty years or so, until we would finally have some usage for it. They serve only as an evasion for grants and jobs of physicists itself, whereas just these physicists ignore the really contributive findings like the cold fusion for whole century. The more physicists will get jobs in collider physics, the more of them will boycott the cold fusion - in this sense the investments into high energy physics research are even counterproductive. Such a research it's just a drain of resources and intellectual capacity of human civilization. The players of strategical games like the Civilization, Warcraft or AgeOfEmpire known well, it has no meaning to invest way too much resources into research the results of which become obsolete before they can be even used. But the scientists pretend, that such an optimization of research priorities has no place in real human society until their money are going.

  • EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

    Quote

    You are doubting string-theory but want to support negative energy ? Paradox, isn't it?

    Not at all, the string theory can be doubted easily, because it uses Lorentz symmetry postulate, which it assumes the existence of extradimensions. But the first thing, in which these extradimensions would manifest itself is the violation of Lorentz symmetry *). This intrinsic inconsistency of postulates leads into fuzziness of string theory predictions and wast landscape of its solution, so it cannot be experimentally tested. The negative energy is otherwise one of evidence of extradimensions, which I have nothing against - it's just poorly and vaguely defined concept as well. The string theory is just an example of mixing of otherwise relevant postulates of various theories, which just have different validity scope from inconsistent observational perspectives.


    *) It can be understood easily with water surface analogy again. If the water surface would be really 2D thin membrane driven with surface tension only, it wouldn't exhibit any drag in similar way, like the capillary waves do. But the existence of density fluctuations within (additional dimension of) underwater leads into surface wave scattering and formation of solitons (photons, neutrinos) and similar turbulences (dark matter particles). Therefore the hidden dimension of underwater manifest itself just with surface wave drag, i.e. violation of their invariance with respect to reference frame of underwater. If the string theorists would use some physical model based on tangible geometry instead of abstract equations, they would realize the fundamental controversy of their theory a long time ago.


    The string theory can be still mildly useful in very narrow range of dimensional scale, when the amplitude of perturbations doesn't induce too large drag, for example just for description of dark matter particles and scalar waves, the existence of which the physicists deny obstinately (thus killing the main way, in which their theories can be actually tested). In dense aether model the extradimensions are all around us and the quantum gravity theories are attempting to describe everyday reality all around us, despite they don't realize it at all. But the concept of extradimensions assumes, that the background space is fully flat, which is never provided in full depth. In this way, the (presence of) extradimensions tends to violate itself once their number increases. The string/susy predictions are therefore relevant only for subtle phenomena, the dimensionality of which isn't very high.


    But the existing models suffer with another problems, for example with ignorance of topological inversion of space-time at the human observer scale, which leads them into predicting of correct phenomena at wrong distance scales, where they evade attention so far. The contemporary theories are very messed from this perspective, as the physicists never understood, that the reconciliation of quantum mechanics and general relativity must be done at the distance scales BETWEEN both these theories - not just somewhere else at the esoteric Planck scale.

  • Chinese press Article on EmDrive

    Quote

    China has changed from a closed state to one of National Pride

    China is still very secretive, it has long tradition in it. No doubt, it can soon become most powerful economics in the world with all its consequences.