Posts by Zephir_AWT

Quote

The fake Higgs is a simple resonance of the proton relativistic mass (what a surprise when using protons... just a simple multiplication...)

For me Higgs boson not only is real but even first supersymmetric particle ever discovered. If we would have microwave eyes, we would see sparse dodecahedral foam across the whole sky. Similar foam of "dark matter" emerges around particles and "Higgs bosons" are nodes of it. But because Peter Higgs predicted anything like this, this insight has been burrowed for not to threat Nobel prize appraisal and for to substantiate building of even larger colliders. There is lota stuffs hidden before eyes of laymen public.

Note also the dichotomy of experimental estimations of Higgs boson mass and Hubble constant. This isn't accident at all: both stars, both particles contain dark matter field around itself, which increases the density of Higgs field foam around them in comparison with observations utilizing photons only.

BTW Why the thread named "Celani discovery of High Temp Superconductor rejected" disappeared from here - a censorship?

Or just plain inability to keep the temporal continuity of forum?

Quote

Celani, as a physicist, should know that magnets do not store or make appreciable amounts of energy and in any case, no usable energy at all

Francesco Celani looks like quite Renaissance character for me - he is consistently around most of breakthrough findings of recent era: cold fusion, magnetic motors and now unitary theory.

For example Celani started to study Superconducting Tunnel Junctions (Ni-Pb; T=4.2K) and he found intriguing results using thick junctions in 1985 already. One of these were contaminated (by chance) from several other elements and showed behavior similar to superconductivity even at temperature as large as 77K (Ln2). It was stated a multi-disciplinary commission in order to clarify the origin of this effect. Unfortunately the results were rejected, because in disagreement with the BCS model/theory (for which the max. temperature of superconductivity stated at 32K). One year later Bednorz and Muller (from IBM, Zurich), independently (and starting from different points of view), found similar results in Cuprate oxides mixed with rare-hearts and got Nobel Prize for it.

So that once Celani gets interested about magnetic motors, you can be sure, there is something about it. Unfortunately for cold fusion supporters the overunity is getting to be the same economical competition for LENR research, like LENR already is for mainstream nuclear researchers. We can even experience the same evasions on this very forum: the fear of losing reputation, adherence to only scientifically published reports, etc.

Now the bullied became the bulliers itself. Why people cannot learn even from their very fresh personal history?

Quote

Only paranoic die-hard conspiracy theorists may think differently

The maverick researchers tend to overestimate importance and scope of their findings in similar way, like mainstream physicists. But the experience learns us, there is not smoke without fire. The pushing of anomalies made by conspirationists often comes in hand with pluralistic ignorance of mainstream masses, which tend to ignore all anomalies. After all, aren't we all in forum dedicated to cold-fusion/LENR which is still considered a typical pseudoscience founded and pushed by nanothermite conspiratorist Steven Jones?

Quote

The history of physics (alas, seldom studied by physicists) clearly shows

It's important to learn from the past, but not to make religion of it because situation can objectively change - so that our experience may not remain fully transferable to it. In dense aether model the space-time around us looks like water surface, which is observed by its own ripples. At proximity it looks complex and incomprehensible like Brownian noise of underwater. With increasing distance these fluctuations compensate mutually, so that the surface rippes spread in regular circles. This corresponds the dominant era of mainstream science based on transverse wave model and ignoring background. The physicists got an impression, that observable reality is governed by two simple theories (general relativity and quantum mechanics) and that all practical predictions can be made by their adding of proper terms and propagators.

But with increasing scope of the observations regular character of surface waves disappears and water surface reality becomes chaotic and turbulent again in similar way, like the quantum reality at small scales.This is also why objects at scale of atom orbitals or average stars looks so perfectly round and outside them they gain irregular or even spikey hyperdimensional character again. So that the evolution of reductionists model in physics reverses its sign and seemingly individual models separated from mainstream gain their credit again. The reality described by these theories doesn't look like regular spheres at this scale - but merely like foam composed of many individual surfaces.

Quote

Almost all of physicists consider SM the state of art. How it is possible that they are wrong and a few percent right ?

Easily, at the time of Galielo the Ptolemy epicycles were also considered a state of art. With compare to epicycle theory Standard Model looks ever worse for me, because it's not based on any geometric insight behind it - it's fully formal regression based on Lagrangians and their propagators fitted to collider data by two dozens of constants - so it also cannot also calculate nothing more than scattering amplitudes - i.e. no mass of any particle or its life-time. It's pure "WYSIWIG", i.e. "what you see is what you get" formal garbage disguised as a theory. It cannot even predict mass of simplest particle observable, i.e. of Higgs boson. The technical derivation of the Higgs mechanism, consists in a mere reshuffling of degrees of freedom by transforming Higgs Lagrangian in a gauge-invariant manner. Furthemore a well known "hiearchy problem" implies, that quantum corrections can make the mass of the Higgs particle arbitrarily large, since virtual particles with arbitrarily large energies are allowed in quantum mechanics. The guesses go from 10^-9 GeV to 760 GeV. There are so many comparably likely models - most of which contain continuous parameters whose values aren't calculable right now - that the whole interval is covered almost uniformly.

Quote

It's should be clear to all now, that significant new advances in physics can come exclusively from large, well funded, organization as CERN or very large international projects as ITER.

Personally I don't disagree and I think, it applies at best only to certain epochs of physics development - this one driven with transverse wave spreading. Now the mainstream science is only starting to slowly reietrate hyperdimensional stuffs, which were experimentally revealed by Nicola Tesla before decades and/or revealed by various individuals like Burkhard Heim, Williamson & van der Mark or Nigel B. Cook. These guys were able to calculate mass of electron and to predict its structure without expensive and useless collider experiments and well before CERN cooparation will ever manage to do:

But mainstream physicists are so ignorant, that they even don't realize, how ignorant they actually are. Because they learned to ignore research of these individuals completely, so that they get no publicity in mainstream and laymen can thus easily get an impression, that only expensive large cooperations is the only reliable way of progress, because this is exactly what the mainstream physics wants they believe. But mainstream research just reiterates the results done by someone else before years. I don't really require CERN for knowing, how to calculate electron mass and how electrons really look like.

Is There A Simpler Perspective On Some Fundamental Laws Of Physics?

By analyzing the relationship between the Maxwell and Dirac equations, they show that the “four-component Dirac spinor field” is nothing else than electromagnetic energy-momentum, whose dynamics is described by the Dirac equation. Subsequently, they derive from the model all the essential features of the electron: its mass exactly corresponds to its electromagnetic energy, its charge surface is on a sphere at the classical electron radius, its zitterbewegung (ZBW) radius is the reduced Compton radius (in the rest frame), we derive its relativistic increase of mass, show that its charge surface retains its spherical shape under any Lorentz boost, and obtain its correct magnetic moment and ZBW frequency as well.

In other words, the book explains how electromagnetic fields comprise the electron mass. This resolves the mystery of what the electron mass is “made of” (widely discussed here: Clifford Algebra and Maxwell-Dirac theory)

I think, that overunity (and cold fusion in lesser extent) are inverse time arrow based technologies and inverse time economy is also needed for their practical utilization. Many experiences and market schemes developed by Edison, Ford and another pioneers of classical era industrialization work here in opposite way. Nicola Tesla would prosper these days.

Quote

space-time Clifford algebra, showing that only one fundamental physical entity is sufficient to describe the origin of electromagnetic fields, charges and currents: the electromagnetic four-potential

Unfortunately quantum fields breaks all symmetries at the very end - these orthogonal ones are no exception. Even blondes know about it...

Wehnelt's interrupter

Quote

This is a breaktrough! Even bigger than Einstein's idea. Everything is light..

What would that imply?

Quote

The poll also confuses motives (fraudulent) with technology (does it work /has it ever worked). "Essentially fraudulent" is not correct if Rossi is a genuinely convinced fantasist who also habitually lies.

If Rossi does technology which works, how could he be a "genuinely convinced fantasist"? How his motives could be "fraudulent" after then?

What Rossi is testing by now is not so conceptually different from experiments of Me356, UnifiedGravity and others. We just have a situation - someone is doing at least some LENR research and lazy ignorant crowds still say, he has nothing. But who actually does similar things? It just resembles me this example: DIY Cold Fusion Experimenter Claims COP 11 with a NaOH Electrolysis System - largely ignored, then dismissed by ignorant public as a childish experiment. But how it differs from well controlled Bazhutov research? This situation is not so different from ignorance of Fleischman-Pons experiments: the doubting of experiments just serves as a moral justification and evasion for doing nothing, their replication the less.

Only experimentation will move us forward with LENR research, nothing else.

Quote

No comments needed.

Results for this poll have been set to private - why? It just calls for comments.

Leonid Urutskoev on the 25th Sochi CNT&BL Presentation blog

Hot fusion is futile approach to fusion which just drains money from cold fusion and it serves ipso-facto as an evasion of its ignorance for laymen.

A simple argument that hydrino, i.e. "small hydrogen" may exist Author of the study J. Va’vra from Standford university argues, that spontaneous transition from normal level to small level is unlikely because of a large electron energy difference in both states (13.6 eV + 254.16 or 510.17 keV). But the small hydrogen may be formed differently; for example, using a relativistic electron with a correct wavelength latching on a proton. Such condition may have occurred during the Big Bang, or during other very energetic and luminous events in the Universe. Compare also:

Mystery dark matter may be ordinary neutrons that have decayed The electrons released by protons wouldn't be accelerated by Coulomb barrier - on the contrary, they could remain trapped at subquantum levels.

I've had herd that it works for military contractors - which would explain its secretiveness.

It's worth to note, whole cold fusion research has started with Dr. Steven Jones observations of hellium-3 content around volcanoes and hydrothermal vents. Many cold fusion reactions produce He-3 isotope as a byproduct, thus increasing the practical importance of their research. See for example What Keeps the Earth Cooking? Helium-3 Leaking from Earth in Southern California. Neon could be also formed by nuclear reactions at place inside the Earth mantle - in similar way like the He-3.

According to astronomers, there's a “dark matter hurricane” blowing through our corner of the Milky Way galaxy. Right this second, it's passing over Earth. This dark matter can affect the speed of decay or even cold fusion of radioactive elements. Not that the climate change of catastrophic 2012 movie has been initiated by "bewildered" neutrinos, which "melted" the Earth crust. Not quite accidentally its plot has been labeled as the most "unscientific movie ever" both by MIT both NASA in unison.

Later cold fusion research indicates, that the neutrinos, high frequency electric noise and magnetic fields could catalyze the low energy nuclear reactions by itself. Radioactive decay is key ingredient behind Earth's heat and links herein. The heating of oceans and Earth crust induced by low-energy neutrinos and dark matter pervading solar system plays an important role in my geothermal theory of global warming.