Frank,
Mats Lewan said this today on his blog:
-I know that Tom Darden has recently met with people I personally know, not far away from me, claiming that the 1MW test was technically and fundamentally flawed and that COP was around 1, that there was no production in the customer’s factory, that the customer didn’t seem trustworthy to them, and that IH has not been able to replicate Rossi’s claims.
-I have strong indications that IH already before the lawsuit knew that Rossi had a working technology but again claimed that they didn’t know how he did it.
-At least one person with close connection to Darden, also financially, is contacting key persons around Rossi, trying to convince them that Rossi is a fraudster and that they would be wise to stop collaborating with him or at least be careful not supporting him in any way. The message also includes claims that IH through its investigation continuously discovers deceptive behaviour by Rossi.
Pretty damning comments wouldn't you say? COP1, Rossi's "customer" seemed "untrustworthy", the factory made, or produced nothing, therefore the results are not legitimate. Classic Rossi, if IH is right in what they say about the facility and customer. He does try to control, or influence all facets of the test. Why?
This wouldn't be his first time doing this either, as he did the same with the 26 Oct 2011 "Military Customer Acceptance Test", for which he even found some friend (still unidentified to this day) to pose as a "NATO Colonel" to "sign for delivery" after the test was deemed by him to be successful. Even though the 1MW plant was only run at 500kw, and...get this, Rossi had a 500kw generator hooked up to his container, and running the duration of the test!
Yes, this smells now the more I hear. Someone on ECW had a good idea: If Rossi wants to prove what he claims, he can let Lewan talk with this customer, and also allow Mats to meet his Leonardo employees, and visit this supposed research facility Rossi is using to further refine his Ecat-Quark. Easy enough to do, and makes perfect sense for Rossi. -if he were being honest, to set up. The customer could even remain anonymous.
But seriously; do you think Rossi would ever allow this? These type visits, or interviews, have been requested before, and always he says he will check into it, but never comes back with an answer. If pushed on the matter, he then resorts to the snakes and chatterers bit.
I say Rossi grant something like this, and if he won't agree, than we have our answer. He is a scammer.