would you board a spaceship built by a flat earther?
I am not claiming censorship system as it is now is effective and not corrupt. But is is absolutely essential. Things like 'emegrence of gravity from uncertanty principle' do not worth space on the cloud storage they take along with many other theories.
I understand your point, but only if one considers LENR a fringe science like your other examples. I do not see it that way though. LENR is different. As Jed mentioned, LENR has had many successful experimental outcomes and replications by reputable scientists, and labs. I am not talking about the garage tinker types doing stuff on their own, but employees on salary for private, and government labs. Not a very fertile setting for the birth of a fringe science.
Many of them even invited their critics to come check out what they were seeing. Tanzella/McKubre made the offer to prominent physicist, and skeptic Garwin, and his side-kick Lewis. They accepted, and then spent a day in their lab. They found nothing out of sorts, and Garwin made a report to that effect. That is not what fringe science looks like, nor how fringe scientists act.
Then there is GEC working with NASA to develop a hybrid version of the tech, for space power generation applications. That is for real, and not some concocted fake science story. That alone puts LENR in it's own separate category, and deserving of at least some attention from mainstream science. And just last year, Google appealed to mainstream science to accept research into LENR. Not something they would do if they thought it was fringe.
I could go on and on, but point is that the science is real. It may not meet the criteria to say it is proven yet, as last years "Team Google" thread showed, but it is not fringe.