Guest
So What now?
It seems to me that IH have no alternative, given the Judges confirmation of the ERV reports 'successful conclusion' to challenge the ERV report's conclusions. Whilst there are a number of contributors on this forum who may have very legitimate reasons for believing the report is less than 'sound' I think it will be quite a challenge to convince a Jury with 'expert witnesses' who are 'independent' and 'expert'.
All the accusations levelled at Rossi and Penon will likely to be levelled at IH's expert witnesses. Regardless as to the 'truth' this will be an almost impossible task for IH. Why, the Jury will ask, when the ERV first certified the E-Cat Unit to report he was satisfied each of the Validation requirements within the Validation Test period, and IH paid Leonardo the second payment of $10,000,000.00; was this so different when the $89 million became due on the completion of the final 'successful' ERV report when there was an improvement in the performance of the E-cat during the test.
Best regards
Frank