Confidential
Kursiv
Member
- Member since Mar 12th 2015
- Last Activity:
Posts by Kursiv
-
-
http://www.spaceweather.com expects a low to moderate magnetic storm for Feb 13th.
Quote
GEOMAGNETIC STORM WATCH (G1-G2): Multiple CMEs are expected to graze Earth's magnetic field this week. The two most significant ones were launched on Feb. 10th by eruptions linked to sunspot AR3576. NOAA forecasters say G1-class geomagnetic storms are possible on Feb. 12th, escalating to G2-class on Feb. 13th. High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras when the CMEs arrive. -
Maybe however from the theory side to a replicable device, the path is long
This were my thoughts here as well. It's nice to have a theory, it's maybe even nicer when your theory has COP>1 in a simulation. However, if either one has an error you can only tell when you have an experiment. And havening a device is then still quite a way to go.
-
It has a CE marking, i.e. it is obviously from China!
-
-
I there any working prototype or in what timeframe a prototype can be expected?
-
Voltage is not power. How much current can you get realistically out of it?
-
Given the very cautious language in the certificate what they actually certify (actually not to much) it appears valid to me. Especially they are not certifying the calorimetric measurement setup.
In doubt, just mail eip directly and ask if they confirm if the certificate is a valid certificate issued by them. The certificate has a number and it should be available in their database when valid.
-
Knowledge of the physical theory is not sufficient for a business. The engineering part, how use the physical effect, how to make it repeatable and stable at low cost, how to use it safely, how to scale to MW output, how to make an application (not an LED lamp but a boiler) - this is a business, and it's patentable.
-
I strongly recommend to keep backup of everything on a different location than your cloud provider. These providers are pretty fast in blocking access to your data nowadays. Especially when there is a risk of a legal issue.
I went once through this when my 9 year old daughter was blocked from her Microsoft account because of not further detailed "violations of terms of usage" and could not play her beloved Minecraft anymore. Microsoft made Franz Kafka the responsible manager to design their support processes in these cases.
I strongly recommend to everybody to have backups of everything important outside of your cloud service provider, either on a different cloud provider or at home. This is true for all cloud providers (Microsoft O365 or Onedrive or Google services etc).
-
Here is the evidence for EVO
-
Merck, the only provider able to give exces energy...
You mix this up with Mars, the only provider of excess energy:
-
That's why I asked about the relationship between George and ENG8 a few days back. My take after doing some digging and reading about Haslen Backs history was as well that ENG8 is a bit questionable. But that does not necessarily means the same applies to George.
However, George has a research history on rather esoteric topics like UFOs, parapsychology, psychotronics and he invented the "Egely Wheel" which is a device to measure your ""life energy". There is a Wikipedia entry in German and in Hungarian which is readable in a translator and gives a bit of background.
-
Ms Tyutina was as well involved with multiple companies named Napier and Rapid Offside Composite, in which Haslen Back was involved (check the filings for these companies) who you can find on the ENG8 website as Founder, BDO and "co-developer of the EnergiCell technology".
The name Haslen Back has al long list of companies founded and dissolved in various industries, and has some interesting hits when you google his name, including an article in The Guardian, a Youtube video praising army equipment, and an entry from the American justice department (However, I can not check if this is the same person).
-
What is actually the relationship between ENG8 and George Egely? When you check ENG8 Website George is not mentioned.
The LinkedIn Page of ENG8 lists lots of people in roles of business development, marketing, sales, IT but no one in R&D. On the webpage of ENG8 the same. Persons seem to live all across Europe and pretty much everybody seems to have two or three other current jobs listed on LinkedIn.
I made some google-based checks on the persons involved in ENG8 and the companies listed in their LinkedIn profiles. Not all of the former activities I found were completely convincing. I'd take everything with a grain of salt here.
-
George says it is scaleable, and showed me this cell, which is for a 500 watt output.
Is this a cascade or chain of small cells or a bigger cell?
-
For example, I don't know the exact spec of the resistors used,for the tests, this is always a factor since not all resistors behave as expected at high voltage and in situations where power surges and thermal stress are operating factors.
It is difficult to believe that some unknown resistor characteristic produces energy to heat up the oil bath.
-
Is important to note that the one tested in Portugal is the air cell and it has thermal output measured with COP over 5 and the test at Culham was for Egely’s device, which is electricity in and electricity out COP. Engie is also working with a water cell with heat output. Don’t get confused.
I am confused now: Does Egely's device have a COP of 5 (electrical) or does the COP of 5 apply only for air cell tested in Portugal (thermal)?
-
Isn't this the report from Portugal (reporting thermal energy of the air cell)?
ENG8 EnergiCell Hits Q Value of 6.4 Thermal - IEP Report Aug 23ENG8 Report: IEP was contracted to witness the relevant parameters measurement concerned to the calculation of the coefficient of performanceeng8.energy -
I think is rather important to highlight that a device that produces 5 times more electric energy than it consumes is truly a game changer on its own.
Is it really electric energy, not thermic?