Yes Can,
probably the best explanation remains Hydride breathing therefore what saw BTE Dan remains strange too because it was a reverse hydride behavior.
Hello David,
If you increase the temperature at the edge of equilibrium (and for the same pressure) Lithium hydride decomposes LiH -> Li+ + H-. The description given by BTE Dan is going in the direction of a decomposition of LiH.
In this last experiment, it is a shame that the temperature didn't stay longer at around 400~500°C. The Ni was loading H. Above 500°C Ni didn't take much anymore.
@Dubinko
Very interesting paper! I've some questions about it:
1) Did you try the experiment again ? Was it 100% repeatable ?
2) How was the EM impulsion done ? Frequency, Current ...
Thank you for sharing,
Arnaud
The LiAlh4 decomposes slowly into Li3AlH6 : 3LiAlH4 -> Li3AlH6 + 2Al + 3H2 (Cfr T.N. Dymova, D.P. Aleksandrov, V.N. Konoplev, T.A. Silina, and
A.S. Sizareva, Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 20, 279 (1994.)
Half of the H2 content is gone with this first step of decomposition.
This decomposition starts at room temperature and the yield increases with the temperature. It is better to store the LiAlH4 in the fridge.
Is a a bit messy in the first post ... What is the 1st and 2nd "secret"?
@Alan Smith You raised the exact point of weakness of OS (Open Science). You put the finger where it hurts.
I think, OS is the best way to conduct science to discover what mother nature has not revealed. Especially when it comes to real new discoveries where all the titbits are not mastered yet. With OS gives opportunity to people to propose crazy ideas that might giant steps in the path of discovering mother nature.
Unfortunately for OS, if a dreadful weapon could be done from discoveries who will share it ? How to share it ?
When it is sunshine, OS might be marvellous. But when the storm comes, OS is not the answer anymore, even more it is the worse way to work.
@David Fojt For the songchen experiment, are you reffering to Hang Zhang ? If yes, don't be so pessimistic ... we don't know all the details, and every detail matters.
Edit : I didn't see the video yet ... and it seems bob had the a similar thought.
In the quest for a suitable tri hydride, there is in the bestiary the AlH3 ! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_hydride
This hydride can be synthesised from LiAlH4 a constituent of the HotCat.
Quote from Arnaud: “ I try to find a description of your setup but I can't find any. Where can I find it? Thank you
”
It is not availabe because quite sure dangerous thing. And have some things very diffrent as other replications so it is unlikely…
I can understand why you are very cautious about telling what you have made. Me356 had same behavior before dissapearing.
@eros I try to find a description of your setup but I can't find any. Where can I find it? Thank you
What does LWFM mean ?
Je te souhaite la réussite pour tes tentatives de refaire Shongsheng et Grass. J'ai lu que tu avais déjà bien avancé sur tes préparatifs.
Si tu veux je peux te donner un coup de main avec l'acquisition des données (Arduino, TC shield, mesure du courant, de tension et le tout avec interface PC pour le logging et l'affichage temps réel des résultats).
Arnaud
Salut David,
Merci pour ce complément d'informations. Ce que je n'arrive toujours pas à saisir est la reproductibilité de l'incident:
1. La manip était faite régulièrement et un beau jour l'incident arriva.
2. La manip a été faite une seule fois et l'incident reporté se produisit. 'Ils' décidèrent à la suite de l'incident de ne plus utiliser le protocol de la manip.
Si 1. alors on est pas très avancé si on a pas plus de détails sur la manip ayant engendré l'incident par rapport aux manips traditionnelles.
Si 2. alors on a une voie royale pour reproduire l'incident.
Je ne remets pas en cause l'incident. Je veux pouvoir cerner les conditions nécessaires pour que l'incident se produise. On pourra refaire 1000 fois la manip et ne jamais avoir d'incident. On a besoin d'avoir un élément de variable à modifier.
Arnaud
N'a-t-il pas réessayer de le reproduire ?
A titre privé, il pourrait réessayer. Le plus coûteux en équipement est la pulvérisation plasmatique, mais cela il peut le faire dans son milieu industriel.
Combien de fois M Grass a-t-il reproduit son phénomène ?
La pulvérisation cathodique avec l'Argon comme vecteur à peut-être de l'importance.
Soory Arnaud, no link exists. It has never been seen online before. It is from private correspondence. Focardi was certainly a great original thinker, and one of the real pioneers of Ni/H LENR, along of course with Piantelli. But since Piantelli outlives…
Ok I understand why I don't have this. I've studied the work of Focardi and was unaware of it.
This comment on proton decay -or rather transformation - comes from a previously unpublished note from Professor Sergio Focardi. Translated from Italian of course -fairly badly by me, but the meaning is -I hope- clear.
.....N = P + e^- + av,where e ^-is a negative electron and av is an antineutrino; radiation persists for a few minutes in the system, then they annihilate into thermal energy, no radioactivity. To determine the transformation of (elements), transforming the Proton, with emission of energy corresponding to the loss of matter is the particle that Enrico Fermi called W, which was later identified by Carlo Rubbia, work that earned him the Nobel Prize. On this system the W particle is triggered by the excitement of hydrogen atoms..... The energy provided is sufficient, taking into account that the interaction of the W particle, an intermediate boson which respects the Bose-Einstein statistics, for weak nuclear interactions....
Hello Alan, do you have a link to the original paper from Prof Focardi?
I booked my place and my hotel. Who is coming?
I will be happy to discuss cold fusion in front of a Kriek.
I might come as well and happy to discuss LENR but not behind a Kriek. Leuven is the country of Stella Artois or the Wit Hoegarden.
http://www.kaijo.co.jp/sansen/midsonic_e.html has the generator and the transducer.
