Can you please comment this article from Sifferkoll?
http://www.sifferkoll.se/siffe…e-simply-an-useful-idiot/
Best regards
This post and 2718/2719/2720 (below) Moved from 'Shanahan' thread -OT. Alan.
Can you please comment this article from Sifferkoll?
http://www.sifferkoll.se/siffe…e-simply-an-useful-idiot/
Best regards
This post and 2718/2719/2720 (below) Moved from 'Shanahan' thread -OT. Alan.
Did you see XH in your experiments?
Too bad you got the leak, could have been an interesting experiment, hope you will go for it again.
Hank Mills made a good summary of 'what we learned' - maybe reading it could verify/help for ideas going further. It is almost 2 years old now, so might be outdated on some issues but not much more have been revealed since:
Time to put parts of this thread over to the playground? Real science is not about personal attacks. Enough is enough.
Let Me356 work and the others who only write (yes it includes me) just have to wait for the doers.
Have you read this poster from the Italy conference that starts tomorrow?
http://www.iscmns.org/work12/TakahashiAeffectofsu.pdf
It suggests two metals in the fuel, ie Cu and Ni.
But I think not give up on the current device. Me356 said about the AURA-test that fuel get's prepared by the run, so a really long run with temp cycles might show something.
So far so good! If it was easy anyone could do it. What's next?
BobHiggins when / at which temp will you start EM-stimulation?
Hi Bob, do you have plans for assymetric waveforms? Suhas use sharp up and slow down, like a saw.
I am willing to get Me356 another chance. If there is another 'fail' of claims I think the lesson is how very skilled people can misinterpret COP measurements.
Interesting to see what ECCO can deliver.
Anyway MFMP are making a super job shining light into this field.
Thanks for the graphs - I took the freedom to copy it over to ECW.
About the COP graph: MFMP Average (red line) goes over 1 while your blue calculation goes just below 1. Would you like to comment that please?
The long term trend goes towards 1, maybe something interesting going on there after all.
Murphys law will survive both Newton and - what's his name - ehum - Einstein.
@Sherlock Holmes
Me356 had great help from MFMP and others in this community, allthough - of course - he should have all credits for his innovation getting ahead of all other.
If this first official test goes well, we can expect many more tests and a product on the market.
Yes - if they do all verifications as they shared I for one will be convinced with an error marginal of about 10% (conservative).
The enthalpy lost by vapor bubbles would make the measurement conservative showing a slitly lower COP - would'nt it?
I understand your goal of maximizing current and that is a neat solution. If a somewhat asymetrical signal would be applied the current would be lower but maybe - who knows - that would affect ions for the better. Again - just a thought. Thanks for your time and effort.
Thanks for corrections Bob, new learnings every day. About dI/dT - From a physical perspective, with no current change, there will be a steady magnetic field generated by the inductor. With no change in magnetic flux (dΦ/dt = 0 Webers per second), there will be no voltage dropped across the length of the coil due to induction. With current change - From a physical perspective, the gradual increase in current results in a magnetic field that is likewise increasing. I might use the wrong terms but dI/dT and magnetic field should be correlated.
Wyttenbach about Superwave I citate Bob Greenyear for MFMP:
"
We understand that whilst everything else was transferred to SKINNR - "SuperWave" remains protected IP of Dardik.
As I understand it, it is a key frequency and side bands and the side bands are treated as key frequency and side bands and so on in a pattern structure that is similar to a 2D fractal and can be applied as pressure, light, electromagnetic.
Mathieu has spent quite a bit of effort getting to the bottom of it - even having long conversations with Arik Boher and buying the exact same power amplifier they use.
As for what it is used for, I asked Arik on a tour of Skinner what it was for and he said (to the best of my recollection) cleaning the electrodes.
I have a video recording of that somewhere.
"
Hi Bob and all,
I am pondering if it is favorable to have an asymetric EM-signal with the purpose of driving ions (H+ and H-) towards different directions. With a symetric AC signal, or square symetric signals, the magnetic flux will go back and forth with the same magnitude, but maybe LENR is favoured by separation of H+ and H- ions and longer acceleration paths.
Maybe driving ions against Li separated from the fuel enhance the reaction? Me356 said so as I recall.
Indications of asymetric EM-signals can be found in a picture from Rossi (as a possibility):
It is also a possibility that Parkhomov used it in his Triac circuit like this:
'normal' Triac dimmer with a symetric signal:
The magnetic flux of this signal (as I understand it, roughly drawed):
Rectified Triacs with asymetric signal and flux:
I have a memory that Parkhomov used a rectifier and two triacs in his circuit but could not find that information for verification. If so he might hade the thought of a directional ion drive.
Me356 said that it works with both Triacs (chopped AC) and FETs (chopped DC) but never disclosed his signal what I know of.
Because magnetic flux is proportional to current change (dI/dt - steepness of the curve) an asymetric EM-signal could make a difference.
Plausible or busted?
I agree with can that part of the script can be to seek a sweetspot with variable temp, not only with distinct steps. Each cycle of temp up and down can have bursts of EMF at different temp levels. Adding pressure variants to that it will probably be a long run to cover all variants but that might increase the chance to find some anomali.
BobHiggins - what is your plan for scripting?