- Male
- from Las Vegas, NV USA
- Member since Apr 20th 2015
- Last Activity:
Posts by physicsdog
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Or I can patiently wait for a product to purchase right after Underwriters Laboratory and the other "Certificators" verify the safety of the "New Fire"!!! But it really does depend on if the results will be "positive or negative".
Best regards,
:nuke: Dog
-
-
Well written and especially like your gaming analogies.
:nuke: Dog
-
I am sorry Alain, I just don't see it your way. Thanks for allowing me on this forum.
Dog
-
Alain - I would just like to see a product. It just doesn't take a year with an allusion to significant SSM to prove something works - it will be renamed and rebranded for another year wit new and improved features
Dog
-
-
It is a tough world out there...
i only worry about sticks and stones because if someone truly has an innovative invention or breakthrough discovery - it will stand on its own merit.
The dream of cheap abundant energy is a worthy and noble pursuit. Whenever some person or organization perpetrates a fraud or disingenuous series of activities which take funding from more promising and verifiable projects - that is saddening to me and I think other folks on this site feel the same way. Now some may be more vehement than others within this forum but I applaud Alain in his judgment for allowing dissent. If some folks think AR is a fraud then they are very much entitled to their opinion. If they just plain lie in the process of stating their opinion then you or anyone else with indisputable facts can, in turn, prove them wrong. As an example, I get a real kick out of the different posters who refer or direct people on this forum to a certain reference from a DIA article regarding the pursuit of LENR which was written in 2009.
I know of no one in DOD technical circles who invests any time investigating if a DIA CYA piece has or had any merit. -
-
-
Still doesn't matter because we don't know if the results will be "positive or negative". Until you can get AR to publish his results as positive, and get some real independent verification - this isn't going anywhere just as it hasn't gone anywhere these last several decades (1989?).
Dog
-
Ty,
Rich folks are like Generals - if they don't have a strong and competent Technical Director/Advisor, they buy into multiple scams. The only difference is Generals use tax payer funding and this particular guy will use his and perhaps his brothers. I made my living technically advising Generals but was able to observe and commiserate with my private industry collegues on multiple occasions over a 40 year career. Let's hope he gets truly professional focused help.
:nuke: Dog
-
And how does it fit in with a dream about alleged LENR?
:nuke: Dog
-
Upon watching the video you posted it strikes me that any father can recognize the actions and expressions on AR's face when Mats walks back in on AR.
Not scientific but an observation any parent would instantly follow up with "Andreeeeaaaaaa what were you doing while I was awaaaaay?".
Dog
-
Delay, delay, delay, delay...
But it will still depend on if the "results are positive or negative".
Happy Next Year.
Dog