Ascoli65 Member

  • from Italy
  • Member since May 28th 2016
Posts
404
Likes Received
152
Points
2,172
Profile Hits
873
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)


    OK, Shane, I know, the people you mentioned can be considered scientists even if they work in their garages. But, let me repeat once again the Alan Smith words: "scientists who still believe Rossi". So we are talking about their…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)


    Shane, please remember that our speech was about the words of Alan Smith: "scientists who still believe Rossi". So we are talking about scientists, not garage tinkerers.

    To be credible, these scientists must be respectable as said…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Bob)


    Thanks for agreeing with me, but you probably didn't read my comments carefully, or they were not quite understandable.


    Leaving aside that you switched the two groups of scientists, making it more difficult for the readers to make a…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)


    Shane, you are wrong, sorry. I'm not asking for those names. Knowing the names of the scientists in the second group, the endorsers, has no use. The only names that must be known are those of the scientists of the first group, the…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)


    Sorry, Shane, I still don't understand your point. You mention only one group (of scientists, I guess), while I mentioned 2 groups of scientists:
    (a) direct witnesses, and
    (b) some colleagues of them (i.e. of the first group, and…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)


    But I was not talking about the people trying to replicate the Ecat devices. They may have some interest in stating that they got some interesting results, or it may just be a matter of hallucinations. I don't care about them, I…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)


    I don't think that the scientists mentioned by Alan "believe Rossi", because he is clearly not believable. At most they believe in the Ecat. It's very different.

    The believing on the Ecat is based on the declarations of scientists…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Alan Fletcher)


    Thank you for your answers to my questions.

    You started the "Proving the Rossi eCat is Real" document a few weeks after the first Ecat tests, at the beginning of 2011 (1). This document should have examined all the possible…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Alan Fletcher)


    The qumbu page (1) contains links to your document "Proving the Rossi eCat is Real -- Version 4.30" (2) where you analyze many possible fakes of the Ecat tests carried out in 2011. The last version is dated March 2013.


    I…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from seven_of_twenty)


    No, I'm sorry, he didn't help to design the 2011 tests. This image may help you to remember:
    rB93G1X.jpg


    In 2011, Lewan has documented 4 tests. The setting of the two tests held in April was identical to that of March 29, documented…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from seven_of_twenty)


    Sincerely I'm not interested neither in the Stockholm demo, nor in the role of Lewan in the Ecat affair. I'm more interested in understanding the sources of the public credulity in the Ecat. Lewan is not a main source of…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from seven_of_twenty)


    Yes, they are (were) smart, and also very competent in LENR and/or physics, that's the reason why you can't say they have been fooled.

    (Quote)


    Or they had never been, and now they are simply silent. How can you know it?

  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from THHuxleynew)


    THH, to be sure that it was a trickery product it suffices to positively demonstrate the occurring of a deliberate tricksty action. The test carried out on December 16, 2010, the first Ecat test which has been documented,…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from seven_of_twenty)


    But not so many, not for so long, not by a so controversial and discredited man.

    (Quote)


    But they are usually looking for funds and celebrity.

    (Quote)


    What you says is applicable only to some Swedish professors with…
  • Ascoli65

    Like (Post)
    (Quote)

    Right, they have to do only with Journal of Nuclear Physics.
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from seven_of_twenty)


    I posted the entire mail sent to Vortex on January 22, 2011, a week after the January 14 demo and on the eve of the publication of the calorimetric report.

    (Quote)


    ????

    (Quote)


    Obviously? How can you say this? How is it…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from can)


    Thanks. Anyway JR wrote "Rossi later published it on his web site." But, as already said, this is not the main point.

    Here everybody is criticizing AA for his faith in the Ecat results. But AA has a very good argument when he says that…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from JedRothwell)


    Could you please provide the link to the JoNP page where the Penon report was published? I haven't found it.

    Anyway, the main point is that the calorimetric report of the 1-year test at Doral is by no means the only, or even…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from JedRothwell)


    Not true. FWIK, the Penon report was not published by Rossi on JoNP, but appeared as an Exhibit of the Rossi vs. Darden case.

    The only report published by Rossi, which also contains the best evidences of how the tests and…
  • Ascoli65

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    @ lobseRvable, hi!

    (Quote from IobseRvable)


    Here is some of them:
    From http://coldfusioncommunity.net…/2017/01/0329.0_Day_1.pdf

    OPENING STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS
    MR. CHAIKEN: Your Honor, […]
    […]
    To create fusion, to create fusion