PhysicsForDummies Verified User
- Male
- 60
- from San Diego CA USA
- Member since Jan 8th 2018
- Last Activity:
- Thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?
- Reactions Received
- 1,943
- Points
- 10,408
- Profile Hits
- 9,607
-
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Playground.
[…]
Just remember, if you point the finger at someone, you have four fingers pointing back at you!
Rossi is on Universal Scam Time. And he's using his Universal Stethoscope, which hears both sound and strange radiation.
It's the Sound of Energy Freedom. -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
Interesting but I am not sure I believe it. Under this theory the photons would keep bouncing and keep gaining weight forever. Equal numbers bounce off the other side.
Why do none of these arguments discuss conservation of momentum in a closed system?… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
Once again, why not contact Shawyer with your ideas, rather than just posting here? I believe he will answer you.
In terms of inventions, a functional reactionless drive is long-term more important than functioning LENR, as it would allow us leaving… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
Just a few months ago, I contacted Mr. Shawyer asking for any update about the EMDrive, and he answered personally, telling me about his forthcoming book which is now published. If you have a design in mind with the clever mirror, why not contact… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]Affirming the consequent[edit]
Main article: Affirming the consequent
Any argument that takes the following form is a non sequitur:- If A is true, then B is true.
- B is true.
- Therefore, A is true.
-
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
Maybe Aleksandr is the love child of Axil and Miles Mathis.
"In this paper I will show that if we define π as the relationship between the diameter and the circumference and include motion, the correct value of π is 4.00. In other words, the current… -
PhysicsForDummies reacted with to Cydonia’s post in the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
Probably you are Axil's father as Darth Vader father of Skywalker ?
[…] -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Playground.
[…]
And that picture on the kitchen cabinet door, with the old rack system. That's got to be 10 years ago.
Living in the past. youtu.be/Tn9IyFLDtjk?si=ShpIvNpd-TYGNz-4 -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
"You put me next to Bohr and Einstein, who considered themselves crazy."
No, I don't put you next to them. I put you next to Axil.
"The trivial orthodox expressions from school textbooks that “photons transfer energy” are of no use."
Tell that to people… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
A typical response from a crackpot is to respond to an obviously accurate rebuttal, (for example that photons carry energy) with more unrelated crackpottery. It is called a smokescreen. -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
[…]
Photons carry energy, in case you never noticed solar panels, nor got a sunburn. -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
[…]
22 million Axilons form a quasiparticle called the Megalomaniaxilon. It is a sentient quasiparticle with a greater understanding of physics than all non-axilated humans. -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
[…]
What does this have to do with Widom-Larsen theory not being very useful? -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
[…]
Quick show of hands. Who thinks Alan writes more precisely than Axil.
I vote Alan.
In my definition, precise language should not be composed of 98% gibberish and fantasy. -
PhysicsForDummies reacted with to Cydonia’s post in the thread BLP update.
Agree you are right , only a belief but with time i learnt that my beliefs are most of the time better than others from the field.
But yes that remains a speculation
However to go back in our field, for example, i can tell you that i know how to produce… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread BLP update.
[…]
Shouldn't a "strong belief" come from strong evidence? Or is it more of a "hunch"? There are too many "strong beliefs" on LF. -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
[…]
The EVO is just quasi-particulate in anti-deAxilian spacetime. It is a chiral polariton superconducting BEC which exhibits electroweak unification and forms a complete universe from Dyson vacuum decay. By simply engineering quasiparticles, any… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
When quasiparticles break down, they produce nasty quasiparticulate. That is why I support unparticles. They unpolute. When inventing fanciful particles, physicists should keep things green. Virtual particles are another story. They can be quite virtuous… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread BLP update.
What I find troubling is how Mills plan has become more "Rossiesque" in the sense that he claims to need a fully commercial solution before getting any traction. I may be naive but I think a working prototype could convince university professors the… -
PhysicsForDummies replied to the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
Defkalion has a K in the name, so that futher supports Axil's "Postulate Of Simularity" for the catalysts. Plus sometimes temperatures are measured in degrees K. So units can make a difference.