Daniel_G Member
- Male
- Member since Apr 10th 2019
- Last Activity:
- Reactions Received
- 847
- Points
- 4,152
- Profile Hits
- 3,992
-
Daniel_G reacted with to Frogfall’s post in the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please.
Here we go again. Upset and puzzlement over the "heavy element problem".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68787534
[…]
They will find a way to dismiss this evidence, of course, rather than suggest that heavy elements could be formed inside… -
Daniel_G replied to the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
It seems we have a misunderstanding here. I am talking about the act of measuring heat with calorimeter. When I apply 500W of heat via a Kathal wire to the system, I get between 495 and 500W of heat captured in the transpiration air flow as calculated… -
Daniel_G replied to the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
The best flow calorimeter I have seen is that of Jaques Ruer design and used in JP Biberian's lab. This transpiration calorimeter recovers more than 99% of the heat input, practically eliminating calibration error in the heat recovery step.
A 5 or 10% XSH… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Shane D.’s post in the thread Clean Planet Ltd (Japan) updates.
[…]
Not only is CP presenting this June 18 at the American Nuclear Society (ANS) event, but also Huang and his team from Taiwan with their 2 papers, a group from the Indian Institute of Technology, plus some newcomers from Brigham Young Univ. -
Daniel_G reacted with to Alan Smith’s post in the thread LAB COFFEE TIME AND SWOP-SHOP.
Awhile since I posted in this thread. I have been messing with higher temperature electrolysis for H2 implantation into metals like Fe and Ni and have tried several methods of keeping the cells warm, none of them entirely satisfactory. But then I though… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Wyttenbach’s post in the thread LENR Theories Discussion..
[…]
All EM flux loops are closed, thus by induction divergence is always 0. There is no need to find an additional prove.
I always explain to the standard model church followers that the 4 potential fails for particles and hence renormalization is… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Edo’s post in the thread Is the neutron actually less massive than the proton is?!.
[…]
TY for the response, I will try to provide something of an answer, but as mentioned this is not yet definitive, meaning still a research topic.
Back then, at the ICCF in Fort Collins the SAM team had the privilege to meet and talk with Norman about… -
Daniel_G reacted with to RobertBryant’s post in the thread Is the neutron actually less massive than the proton is?!.
[…]
Edo..Sorry to respond with another question to the n-p matter..
but you are engaged in the noble task of sorting out nuclear structure
in an accessible,architectural way,,
Norman Cook invested much time in comprehending the varied evidence… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Curbina’s post in the thread Is the neutron actually less massive than the proton is?!.
[…]
Would you agree to the idea that the sacred “100 years of experiments” are more correctly described as “100 years of interpretation of experimental results under a wrong set of assumptions that built one over another”?