Adrian Ashfield Member

  • Male
  • from Near Philadelphia
  • Member since Oct 21st 2014
  • Last Activity:
Posts
638
Likes Received
344
Points
3,529
Profile Hits
996
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from JedRothwell)

    You are lying... again.
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    I'm trying to avoid adding to the babble by pointing out errors, but this new piece of weird babbler logic was funny enough to post.

    Apparently Roseland thinks I "was conned by Ross" even though I don't think his reactors have been proven to work and I…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    It seems nothing of importance for pages again, just babble. I'm adding to it by pointing out the many errors when the topic doesn't matter a damn..
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from oldguy)

    It was applied for in Dec 2016. The patent was only just issued so it was the recent one. It was the only patent mentioned on the Rossi thread in recent times.
    Read my original comment on the subject f on Wednesday.
    It does state…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from JedRothwell)

    I didn't make many comments at that time because others had said what I was thinking and in general the claims were largely someone saying something without proof. I was waiting to see it argued in court. Unlike you who jumped…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    THHuxleynew,
    I don't know why it is so difficult for you t grasp that I'm interested in LENR, particularly the QX and SK reactors, as they are the only reactors claimed to be currently working. I am not interested in rehashing the old stuff that was…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from JedRothwell)

    To repeat what I told you earlier, I am not interested in rehashing this old story.
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from oldguy)

    You would know if you had been following the thread. You could go back to Wednesday yourself and find the link but that is too much trouble for you.
    WO2018119352A1.pdf
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from THHuxleynew)

    It was interesting to see how Rossi thinks it works. You are missing the point. Axil's comment suggested that the babblers were not expert enough to comment on on fundamentals like this.

    Very few know about or understand the…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from oldguy)

    The one that has just been issued, linked and discussed on the previous pages.
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from THHuxleynew)

    The guilty party often lies in their initial statements and that is not brought out until it has been argued in court. Without that it is not proven.
    Read Mats Lewan's interview with Rossi.
    Cherokee are not as angelic as you…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from JedRothwell)

    (Quote from JedRothwell)


    As I have already told you both those statements are not true, I have to conclude they are deliberate lies.
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from THHuxleynew)

    I haven't attempted to rationalize Tom Darden's testimony as as I don't think IH's testimony is any more reliable than Rossi's. It didn't get argued and adjudicated in court, so is not proven. IH claimed they had researched…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from THHuxleynew)

    This thread is not about me. It is supposed to be about Rossi and his blog.
    I could write a critical reply about your supposed failings too, but I have no desire to do so and Alan Smith recently cautioned this was not desirable.…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from IobseRvable)

    Time will tell who is right. Your generalities prove nothing.
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from interested observer)

    I really dislike it when people make up things about my views. I have expressed them often enough that there is no excuse not to know them.

    I don't take Rossi's claims to be true just because he made them.
    I said that…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from seven_of_twenty)

    Talking about Rossi's turbine being impossible, this weird babbler logic suggest s there can never be anything new. If it doesn't exist already it is not possible.
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from Shane D.)

    Why? You are right I had not been following that thread, but I don't see that I missed much.
    I was simply replying to the post that gave the link.


    It looks to me that IH , who had Rossi's IP, set out to write a spoiler patent…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from gio06)

    Several things of interest about this patent. The claimed inventor was Murray, for IH.
    The application was in Dec 2016 and it talks about extensive research and testing showing excess heat.

    I didn't read it all as it was so vague,…
  • Adrian Ashfield

    Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
    Post
    (Quote from PIH)

    I've known about the Brayton cycle probably longer than you have been alive.


    You started the insults with your idiotic comment:
    "Adrian is the only "Engineer" I know, who doesn't know the relationship between P,V and T. ... …