Continuing where I left from,,,
5. Have other materials of similar nuclear mass been used for the Catalyst and Target? And was any difference in behaviour observed? (Its speculative but I'm wondering if elements or isotopes similar to but different to the naturally active materials have an impact) If so:
a) I understand Iron is used in the Catalyst has it been tried with purified isotopes such as purified Fe56 or Fe58 only?
b) I understand Nicekl is used in the Target has it been tried with purified isotopes such as purified Ni58 or Ni62 only?
c) Have either the target or Catalyst been tried with dopants of close but different elements such as Manganese or Cobalt or Copper or others?
d) Does the Catalyst need to be an Oxide or does pure Iron work as well with different results?
e) Does the Catalyst only work with the Potassium Present and do other contaminants such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Argon or others effect its performance.
I suppose differences chemically similar or different materials or dopants would also be interesting.
f) Does the experiment work with Targets that are not in the Group 10 transition Metals
g) Are there other chemically efficient catalysts
I guess you didn't understand the catalytic section of my talk it is no fancy stuff
surface + 2D electron gas (electrons from Alkali metals) and Hydrogen arriving is needed to form Rydberg atom that can condense into Rydberg matter of Hydrogen, Thats it !
the surface can be metal and insulator since catalytic activity depends on combination of favourable surface processes that can come from both type of surfaces. Some alloys can not be doped by alkali metals to form 2D electron states on the surface.
This is standard surface physics or surface chemistry depending on who is practicing this. No fancy dark stuff needed so far:-)
6. In terms of energetics do you see a slow increase of energy generating the effect or a sudden burst of energy being required?
The feeble laser 10ns, 100mw pulse is the sole initiator of this if he is hitting different amount of p(o) or d(0) the correlated amount of particle current is generated.
7. In usual high energy Nuclear Physics experiments such as DAPhiNE Kaons are produced (either directly or indirectly from Phi Mesons I'm not sure about the exact process) with high energy electron or proton beams interacting with a Nucleon in and Nucleus to cause Nucleon resonance which then allows Mesons and if the energy is high enough for Kaons to be produced. Photogeneration of Kaons using high energy Gamma can also have a similar effect. Very High energies are required for the processes, however, of the order of 1 GeV.
a) Do you see a similar high energy photo generation or particle impact process going on in your experiment?
b) Do you suggest that collective behaviour and entanglement is enabling excitement of a nucleon to sufficient energy to spawn the Mesons?
The laser is so feeble it can not excite anything on the scale of meson, so the energy to create a meson has to come from the fusion energy or from the proton/neutron in p(0) or d(0)
Is fancy dark stuff needed here? I don´t know lets wait for further confirmation since unstable-able proton is something that is not of current consensus in the particle physics world.
But if you think of it, free proton is stable, that is known with arbitrary precision
The research questions: Can you entangled 2 protons? Are they then stable? has never been addressed theoretically or experimentally by the nuclear physics community
If so could this also generate the large quantities of Kaons seen above?
c) If not it would suggest the possibility of some other process is generating the Mesons in large quantities perhaps directly from the SPP of sufficient accumulated energy as has been mentioned by Axil.
d) Do you have some other mechanism in mind and would you be able to share the idea?
SPP ? Is as good guess as anyone at this stage since further experimental confirmation and data is completely lacking,
I can give this cryptic Rossi style answer to what mechanism we are browsing it is not "dark" it is "weak" 
8. I understand that the preparation of the catalyst and fuel took a long time.
a) was this due to the preparation of the Catalyst to form suitable surfaces and structures to stimulate Rydberg Matter formation?
b) was this due to the time for H or D absorption?
c) was this due to the time for Rydberg Matter Formation?
d) was this due to the production of SPP on the UDD? (Or does this only appear later if so how long does it take for a suitable SPP to form with out stimulation)
Once again
open the can of the container fetch the Fe2O3:K pellet and you have a Rydberg matter generator for p(1) and d(1) ,that´s it!
getting p(0), d(0) from p(1) and d(1) is done by the laser initially.
Graphite can also do this according to older papers of Leif.
Greetings
Sveinn
