Portal

Latest Posts

    1. Topic
    2. Replies
    3. Last Reply
    1. Rossi vs. Darden developments - Part 2 6.6k

      • barty
    2. Replies
      6.6k
      Views
      309k
      6.6k
    3. THHuxleynew

    1. (not MFMP but) BG preparing some big announcement? 292

      • Hans Moog
    2. Replies
      292
      Views
      26k
      292
    3. robert bryant

    1. MFMP: Automated experiment with Ni-LiAlH 321

      • barty
    2. Replies
      321
      Views
      16k
      321
    3. Can

    1. BLP update 59

      • David Nygren
    2. Replies
      59
      Views
      3.4k
      59
    3. joshg

    1. Ultrasonic Fuel Treatment 75

      • LFH Sam
    2. Replies
      75
      Views
      4.6k
      75
    3. Alan Smith

    1. The Playground 1.9k

      • Rends
    2. Replies
      1.9k
      Views
      108k
      1.9k
    1. Generator Tarasenko based on the model of the planet Earth 195

      • Gennadiy Tarassenko
    2. Replies
      195
      Views
      31k
      195
    3. Gennadiy Tarassenko

    1. Trading attitude: Fusion froide : la fin du pétrole et le pactole ? 6

      • AlainCo
    2. Replies
      6
      Views
      755
      6
    3. Wyttenbach

    1. Simple New 'Differential Calorimetric' Reactor Design. 37

      • Alan Smith
    2. Replies
      37
      Views
      1.5k
      37
    3. Alan Smith

    1. The process by which the proton decays in LENR 35

      • axil
    2. Replies
      35
      Views
      1.5k
      35
    3. axil

Recent Activities

  • bang99

    Like (Post)
    (Quote from IH Fanboy)

    If you mean by "running/testing for themselves" that the "chief scientist of IH" (=Rossi) performed the test where "they" have seen a COP of 11, then you are probably right.


    But we all know that Rossi claims for the "Doral test"…
  • THHuxleynew

    Post
    Peter Gluck

    This is my kettle of fish so I'll answer:

    (Quote)



    What are the certainties?
    Nothing in the ERV report is certain, except that the headline is wrong by some large factor. That is because it is impossible by a factor of more than 2.5 for…
  • LFH Sam

    Like (Post)
    (Quote from we_cat_global)


    Like this one?


  • bang99

    Like (Post)
    Abd has obtained transcripts 48, 84, 97 and 106, now available on his site and copied onto the Google Drive (you'll probably want to sort by "Last modifed" to see them).


  • THHuxleynew

    Like (Post)
    (Quote from IH Fanboy)

    The question is: Did they also use a "Rossi-built" measurement method?
    If so, then it's obvious they measured the same COP.

    As far as I understood the negative COP developments at IH, they first measured high COPs with…
  • THHuxleynew

    Like (Post)
    (Quote from IH Fanboy)


    In order to hope to sort out a coherent account, whatever it is, it is very important to keep the timeline in mind, as there was clearly an evolution in thinking over time, surely for the IH principals, and possibly for Rossi as…
  • Peter Gluck

    Post
    dear42,

    we all is not real...However, can you explain your understanding of the "mechanism"? Which data of the ERV Report do you deny, and why? What are you certainties?
    If the Report is false it was an alternative SCENARIO-
    can you describe it? …
  • AlainCo

    Like (Post)
    (Quote from IH Fanboy)


    That does not prove the e-cat does not work. It proves that a test protocol Rossi and Fabiani were using did not work, and that one specific e-cat they were given did not work during that test. Do they extrapolate from that to…
  • AlainCo

    Like (Post)
    This board uses a lot of us verses them psychology. The assumption is that one side must be good and the other side evil. Instead we need to view each side as people. Now people frequently are not logical or rational in their thinking nor are they…
  • AlainCo

    Like (Post)
    (Quote from IH Fanboy)

    How was this debunked?
    The Lugano result indeed does not need an input power mismeasurement, given the favorable errors achievable with a wrong emissivity setting.
    But there still is the unexplained 6:1 ratio of "Joule heating"…