Online PhysicsForDummies Member
- Male
- 57
- from San Diego CA USA
- Member since Jan 8th 2018
- Last Activity:
- Thread Understanding low energy nuclear reactions. An overview by Péter Kálmán, Budapest University of Technology and Economics
- Reactions Received
- 1,083
- Points
- 5,107
- Profile Hits
- 5,077
-
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Understanding low energy nuclear reactions. An overview by Péter Kálmán, Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
(Quote from Cherepanov2020)
Did I miss your explanation of how your magnetic mass theory explains the mass differences between a positron and proton? Or how your theory mathematically predicts anything new that can be tested? -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Clearance Items.
This post was not moved to clearance. I just chose to post here since I don't know where else.
Can Barty or the mods put back the original trollbox please? What is this telegram thing? I went to create a login but it was asking for too much information.… -
Reaction (Post)
PhysicsForDummies Reacted with
to Zeus46’s post in the thread ICCF19 - Vladimir Vysotskii - Biological remediation of radioactive cesium, Thread for discussion of Biological Transmutations. Has anyone ever reproduced Kervran's results? It seems there is a lot of contradictory evidence that supports the conventional view...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/…0032579119434378-main.pdf
The Effects of Low Levels of Calcium
in the Diet of Laying… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread "Physchemistry of the microworld" which was opened for us by the Russian physicist Kanarev F.M., 1993-2016.
(Quote from Wyttenbach)
-
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Understanding low energy nuclear reactions. An overview by Péter Kálmán, Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
(Quote from Cherepanov2020)
In the synchrotron where I worked summers at Cornell (materials handling, not theoretical physics), electrons and positrons were accelerated to relativistic speed. Their relativistic mass should have been way larger and they… -
Reaction (Post)
PhysicsForDummies Reacted with
to Mark U’s post in the thread Understanding low energy nuclear reactions. An overview by Péter Kálmán, Budapest University of Technology and Economics. It seems that Coulomb's "masse electrique" is simply our present "electrical charge". Mere semantics!
Look at Mills : he envisions the electrons as a 2D surface of moving "charge/mass" or "mass/charge", yet he certainly doesn't ignore the reality of… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Cydonia)
I am not so familiar with these other three guys, but are they aware you are in effect associating them with Rossi?
I don't think they would be pleased to be defamed like this. -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Mark U)
If we have to switch around his yes/no answers to the questions we *believe* they correspond to, we can support any conclusion. Correct?
Your explanation which Rossi shot down was only necessary because his paper explains no source of… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Mark U)
Hi Mark. I was just reading your good questions to Rossi from Jan 6 on RossiLiveCat.
I am a bit confused by his answers to a couple of your good questions.
I am hoping you can clear up the meaning of Rossi's answers just like you… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Ascoli65)
That's 3 things. Reminds me of Monty Python, Spanish Inquisition:
"NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
Can we get back to just exposing/making fun of Rossi now? This is the Rossi thread you know. How about we make a new thread for speculation on individual LENR Forum members agendas. -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Alan Smith)
The quality of any forum depends subjectively on what one perceives as quality, which many times is dependent on one's personal agenda.
For example, I think the ECW members believe their forum quality is tremendous, from their… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Shane D.)
(Quote from sam12)
Yeah Shane, where have you been? Sam and I agree. The Rossi thread is Great Again! Just check all the new lively banter. Nothing like discussing all the new ground breaking physics in the philosopher's latest… -
Reaction (Post)
PhysicsForDummies Reacted with
to Curbina’s post in the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion. (Quote from Bruce__H)
As much as I dislike to discuss this issue, the amount of water a diaphragm pump can move Can be completely out of the rated specs if the counter pressure is absent, I have pumps that are rated for 60 liters per hour at 20 psi back… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Mark U)
That is really my point. Rossi explains nothing about energy generation. If Rossi had really explained anything perhaps his admirers wouldn't be going through such great pains trying to explain what they think he meant to explain.… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Mark U)
But a loss in energy comes with a gain in entropy. Burn a log for example. Energy is released and the ash is more disordered (higher entropy).
How are these new Rossi states both low energy and low entropy? -
Reaction (Post)
PhysicsForDummies Reacted with
to Mark U’s post in the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion. (Quote from PhysicsForDummies)
The ultimate 'explanation' is brief and given near the bottom of page 12, my bold and insertions in square brackets:
"This process [the compression and ordering of the electrons in plasma] is a consequence of a Vacuum… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Mark U)
Scientific papers should not be "oblique". Philosophy papers, maybe.
I must be dense. I do not see any explanation of energy generation (besides the bogus results at the end). Can you supply the specific sections and sentences you think… -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from LeBob)
If we would like to hope, we can hope!
He is not talking about anything meaningful concerning energy generation. That's the problem. -
Post
PhysicsForDummies Replied to the thread Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion.
(Quote from Ahlfors)
No comment