PhysicsForDummies Verified User

[…]

What will you win? Crackpot of the Year Award?

[…]

He speaks in gibberish

[…]

I am sorry to say I think your paper is gibberish. There are many statements with no meaning. Here are some of my favorites.

"We can change the motion of matter in the only way - by the corresponding motion of matter."
Huh?
Was this a cut and paste…

[…]

Just remember, if you point the finger at someone, you have four fingers pointing back at you!
Rossi is on Universal Scam Time. And he's using his Universal Stethoscope, which hears both sound and strange radiation.

It's the Sound of Energy Freedom.

[…]

Interesting but I am not sure I believe it. Under this theory the photons would keep bouncing and keep gaining weight forever. Equal numbers bounce off the other side.
Why do none of these arguments discuss conservation of momentum in a closed system?…

[…]

Once again, why not contact Shawyer with your ideas, rather than just posting here? I believe he will answer you.
In terms of inventions, a functional reactionless drive is long-term more important than functioning LENR, as it would allow us leaving…

[…]

Just a few months ago, I contacted Mr. Shawyer asking for any update about the EMDrive, and he answered personally, telling me about his forthcoming book which is now published. If you have a design in mind with the clever mirror, why not contact…

[…]

Affirming the consequent[edit]

Main article: Affirming the consequent

Any argument that takes the following form is a non sequitur:

1. If A is true, then B is true.
2. B is true.
3. Therefore, A is true.

Even if the premise and conclusion are both true, the…

[…]

Maybe Aleksandr is the love child of Axil and Miles Mathis.

"In this paper I will show that if we define π as the relationship between the diameter and the circumference and include motion, the correct value of π is 4.00. In other words, the current…

[…]

And that picture on the kitchen cabinet door, with the old rack system. That's got to be 10 years ago.
Living in the past. youtu.be/Tn9IyFLDtjk?si=ShpIvNpd-TYGNz-4

[…]

"You put me next to Bohr and Einstein, who considered themselves crazy."
No, I don't put you next to them. I put you next to Axil.
"The trivial orthodox expressions from school textbooks that “photons transfer energy” are of no use."
Tell that to people…

[…]

A typical response from a crackpot is to respond to an obviously accurate rebuttal, (for example that photons carry energy) with more unrelated crackpottery. It is called a smokescreen.

[…]

Photons carry energy, in case you never noticed solar panels, nor got a sunburn.

[…]

22 million Axilons form a quasiparticle called the Megalomaniaxilon. It is a sentient quasiparticle with a greater understanding of physics than all non-axilated humans.

[…]

What does this have to do with Widom-Larsen theory not being very useful?

[…]

Quick show of hands. Who thinks Alan writes more precisely than Axil.
I vote Alan.
In my definition, precise language should not be composed of 98% gibberish and fantasy.

[…]

Shouldn't a "strong belief" come from strong evidence? Or is it more of a "hunch"? There are too many "strong beliefs" on LF.

[…]

The EVO is just quasi-particulate in anti-deAxilian spacetime. It is a chiral polariton superconducting BEC which exhibits electroweak unification and forms a complete universe from Dyson vacuum decay. By simply engineering quasiparticles, any…