willydial Member
- Male
- 71
- from San Diego Ca
- Member since Jan 21st 2015
- Last Activity:
- Reactions Received
- 8
- Points
- 53
- Profile Hits
- 4,262
-
willydial reacted with to orsova’s post in the thread EMDrive: Newton's Laws can be "bypassed"?.
-
willydial reacted with to Storms’s post in the thread AI and LENR - The Bots Get Busy..
Knowing what is known is important. However, this is not the problem. The problem starts when the behaviors are combined to create a model explaining their relationship to the fusion reaction. Everyone selects a different set of behaviors to support… -
willydial reacted with to Shane D.’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
Either one, or the other, but please keep the discussion going. Been fascinating to watch from my perspective. Dr. Storms opinion and theory, like no other, may be controversial, but it stirs up such interesting dialogue. -
willydial reacted with to Storms’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
Let's see if we can agree on some basic facts. Perhaps this exercise can identify where the conflict is most intense.
1. Society needs a source of heat energy that is inexpensive, nonpolluting, and comes from a sustainable source.
2. The cold fusion… -
willydial reacted with to Drgenek’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
Yes, we will gain more from analysis of actual measurements. In principle heat production is a matter of increasing the number of nuclear active catalysts or in your theory NAE. Agreed that the "weight" of the data supports that fusion outside Lawson… -
-
willydial reacted with to Storms’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
Hi Alan,
The behavior has been and can be reproduced many different ways using electrolysis, direct reaction with D2 or H2 gas, application of low voltage gas discharge, or by laser stimulation. Making a material nuclear active is the only challenge. … -
willydial reacted with to Alan Smith’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
Within at least one experimental framework my good friend Ed Storms ( Storms above) has solved the problem of reproducible LENR. -
-
willydial reacted with to Drgenek’s post in the thread LENR Theories Discussion..
[…]
Sorry. -
willydial reacted with to Diadon Acs’s post in the thread LENR Theories Discussion..
Hey everyone,
Here
Unified LENR Theory: Mathematical Models and Frameworks is a link to a new research article based on the development of LENR ARA
This is the first attempt at bridging the theoretical models with each other and laying out a framework that… -
willydial reacted with to Aleksandr Nikitin’s post in the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
[…]
Our Forum, led by the helmsman Alan Smith, reminds me of the raft that we grabbed onto to escape the sinking "Titanic" of modern science.
I am grateful that on this forum I can express new crazy ideas, receive the latest information, and hope to meet… -
willydial reacted with to Alan Smith’s post in the thread The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction..
[…]
And it has at times had to do both.
[…]
Thank you. That is much appreciate by me, and the rest of the forum team, together we do the best we can. -
willydial reacted with to RobertBryant’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
and nobody inside CERN will even glance at LENR..
its contrary to the HENR dogma .
They are still in the Collision age of Nuclear Physics -
willydial reacted with to Alan Smith’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
I'm sorry if I was not clear. My point was that the claims from CERN (for example) do not have any possibility of being falsified, in that nobody has access to the machine, the raw data, or the data engineering methods used. It might be good science,… -
willydial reacted with to Alan Smith’s post in the thread The perpetual “is LENR even real” argument thread..
[…]
I would remind you that something that is not falsifiable is definitely not science. For example, the scientific claims that come out of CERN are not falsifiable, because nobody else has the equipment to replicate them, so that never happens, the…