RobertBryant Member

(Quote from THHuxleynew)


the problem is that the calculations are rather imprecise for nuclear parameters
especially for the n-p mass difference.

Still Stephan Durr is young yet...
who knows what another seven years of teraflops will bring.>>>>

…

The final version of Holmlid and Zeiner-Gundersen's UDH review got published today:

Ultradense protium p(0) and deuterium D(0) and their relation to ordinary Rydberg matter: a review
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1402-4896/ab1276

You mentioned them but no video.
youtu.be/PbKzNkE9NQM?t=444

they get a bit touchy at the end.
interesting theories.

(Quote from THHuxleynew)


THH: Calm down! You very well know that Mills stuff is well written and has been published in may journals. His APS publishing of an accepted paper with a given publishing date has been suppressed with mafia methods. (To ensure…

(Quote from THHuxleynew)


I just want to remind you that all QED calculations also are based on alpha (and its error) ... But I completely agree that Mills, while doing calculations, sometimes works very sloppy. I never used his alpha for the el-g-factor…

(Quote from THHuxleynew)


Sorry ...can't buy a cyclotron on ebay
even a simple gamma spectrometer at $2000 + is a bit much
but there appears to be some work in CERN (Eu taxes) and Essex ( gratis)
(Quote from THHuxleynew)

Mills did refer to…

(Quote from Zephir_AWT)


Thanks for that - it has been worrying me on and off all day.

I don't think that Mills must be completely wrong - there can be less or more spherical shadows of metastable subquantum levels beneath fundamental s- d- orbitals close to atom nuclei, for dense clusters of atoms or for atoms inside narrow cavities -…

(Quote from THHuxleynew)

Maybe Mills doesn't have 6 figure precision n-p mass
but then Durr et al 2015 has even less.
Perhaps Durr should be looking at his assumptions too.

There are also some other interesting point in Mills critique.
point …

Sorry, I leave you playing this kind of horn.

(Quote from hunter)


Can you do Val de ri val de ra?

For instance the A-B effect cited by some as a QM effect is explained by Mills classically
He has a small critique around that explanation, I think.

One more blow of your own trumpet and you’ll have a chord.

(Quote from Zephir_AWT)

Kepler's law may not be tested on orbital electrons..
Mills has a whole lot to say about outer orbital electrons

however inner electrons in the K shell he hardly mentions
especially not for atoms like gold. …

(Quote from Wyttenbach)

Thanks youtu.be/BCGWGJOUjHY
Not quite understood the mumbling past 10:30 but it is otherwise explains phenomenon.

(Quote from THHuxleynew)


SO does THHuxley care to limit his broad and sweeping generalisation

to specific inferences that Mills has made
Yes or No.???
It is never a good idea to generalise...
actually Mills makes some fairly interesting points…

(Quote from Zephir_AWT)

(Quote from Zephir_AWT)


This "electrons in outer orbital shells..." is nonsense - may be a typo: "inner shell orbits are supposed to move faster. But calculations show that there is no classic correlation between relativistic…

(Quote from THHuxleynew)

You actually did not make a specific statement
You actually said
Mills's critique of conventional science is so clearly both wrong and ignorant
it was one or your BROAD SWEEPING GENERALISATIONS..
Besides actually …

From: entanglement

"
According to some interpretations of quantum mechanics, the effect of one measurement occurs instantly. Other interpretations which don't recognize wavefunction collapse dispute that there is any "effect" at all. However, all…

(Quote from clarifier)


clarifier As Alan said:

(Quote from Alan Smith)


Do not encourage such excesses.