Online
Daniel_G Member
- Male
- Member since Apr 10th 2019
- Last Activity:
- Reactions Received
- 836
- Points
- 4,131
- Profile Hits
- 3,871
-
Daniel_G reacted with to Alan Smith’s post in the thread LAB COFFEE TIME AND SWOP-SHOP.
Awhile since I posted in this thread. I have been messing with higher temperature electrolysis for H2 implantation into metals like Fe and Ni and have tried several methods of keeping the cells warm, none of them entirely satisfactory. But then I though… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Wyttenbach’s post in the thread LENR Theories Discussion..
[…]
All EM flux loops are closed, thus by induction divergence is always 0. There is no need to find an additional prove.
I always explain to the standard model church followers that the 4 potential fails for particles and hence renormalization is… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Edo’s post in the thread Is the neutron actually less massive than the proton is?!.
[…]
TY for the response, I will try to provide something of an answer, but as mentioned this is not yet definitive, meaning still a research topic.
Back then, at the ICCF in Fort Collins the SAM team had the privilege to meet and talk with Norman about… -
Daniel_G reacted with to RobertBryant’s post in the thread Is the neutron actually less massive than the proton is?!.
[…]
Edo..Sorry to respond with another question to the n-p matter..
but you are engaged in the noble task of sorting out nuclear structure
in an accessible,architectural way,,
Norman Cook invested much time in comprehending the varied evidence… -
Daniel_G reacted with to Curbina’s post in the thread Is the neutron actually less massive than the proton is?!.
[…]
Would you agree to the idea that the sacred “100 years of experiments” are more correctly described as “100 years of interpretation of experimental results under a wrong set of assumptions that built one over another”?