Daniel_G Member
- Male
- Member since Apr 10th 2019
- Last Activity:
- Reactions Received
- 598
- Points
- 2,893
- Profile Hits
- 3,033
LENR Partners
-
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY.
My apologies Bruce as I’ve been working 18h days lately and my brevity may be interpreted as me being coy or rude. I periodically glance at the forum and tried to answer as best I could without thoroughly studying the thread. I will give a more… -
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread MIZUNO REPLICATION AND MATERIALS ONLY.
(Quote from Bruce__H)
Hi Bruce. You misunderstood me. I do not use the same meshes as I’ve been working with a new generation reactor design. Apples and oranges. I am using the zero precious metal design so it’s not unexpected to see differences. -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to RobertBryant’s post in the thread Polarization and LENR?. (Quote from Alan Smith)
what was the current?
... 1 amp could give 1 Tesla
https://physics.stackexchange.…609/1-tesla-electromagnet
1Tesla is not much compared to 30 T..
but to corral protons,deuterium at a temperature of 300 C is probably … -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to RobertBryant’s post in the thread Coriolis Tokamak Reactor. (Quote from Promethian)
for plasmoids and promethioids -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to Curbina’s post in the thread The church of SM physics. I think this thread is veering off topic (unsurprisingly). Anyway just wanted to add that as the electric sun model is being strongly validated by the results of the SAFIRE project, probably in the future the electric black hole has chances to do so… -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to Wyttenbach’s post in the thread The church of SM physics. Stackexchange is a site that "as claimed on the paper" allows you to ask questions and to answer questions - of others - about physics.
But to do so you need first to show that you are a follower of the standard physics models. Thus, as a beginner, you… -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to Alan Smith’s post in the thread LAWRENCE LIVERMORE IGNITION OMISSION.. They don't even have to bother falsifying them, they just do censorship by omission. As for the NIF it was set up to work on laser-triggering of nuclear weapons. It can do one shot per week. It has as much relationship to commercial fusion energy as I do… -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to THHuxleynew’s post in the thread LAWRENCE LIVERMORE IGNITION OMISSION.. It is unfortunate that this site - so strongly motivated to examine new nuclear power sources free of preconceptions and bias - should exhibit this bias just because we are talking about inertial confinement fusion (laser-driven) which has major… -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to Curbina’s post in the thread LAWRENCE LIVERMORE IGNITION OMISSION.. But Z-pinch fusion has to remain concealed, lest people realize that this is how stars really form and function. -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to JedRothwell’s post in the thread LENR vs Solar/Wind, and emerging Green Technologies.. (Quote from THHuxleynew)
If cold fusion succeeds, none of that will be necessary. That is why it will eventually be hundreds of times cheaper than any other source of energy.
Cold fusion is closer to success than most people realize, especially you, since… -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to Wyttenbach’s post in the thread LENR vs Solar/Wind, and emerging Green Technologies.. (Quote from THHuxleynew)
This is just a clowns opinion and contains no grain of truth... Both technologies are nonsensical approaches for fusing e.g.D-D. Nobody with the slightest clue of physics will ever believe that >10MeV neutrons are an adequate… -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to RobertBryant’s post in the thread Brillouin Energy Corporation (BEC) updates.. " to extend their funding"
probably a gallant attempt by the " diverse,inclusive team" to broaden the stance from "deterrent" to planet-saving..
some at NIF may have recognised the writing on the wall for the perceived need … -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to JedRothwell’s post in the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please. (Quote from Daniel_G)
Do you mean eligible for the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF) grant? -
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please.
Any eligible company who wants to jointly apply please contact me. -
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread Brillouin Energy Corporation (BEC) updates..
I hope you are joking Jed! COP is energy out divided by energy in 3.15/322 = 0.0098. Robert you are just too generous! The new short pulse lasers are exceedingly power at the cost of <1% efficiency. If I’m not wrong the previous lasers were about 5%… -
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread Brillouin Energy Corporation (BEC) updates..
(Quote from RobertBryant)
Robert your math is completely wrong. NIF successfully converted 322MJ of electrical energy into just over 3MJ of heat as the lasers are very inefficient (around 1%) which they just hand wave away.
Using heat out vs. electricity… -
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please.
It’s a COP of about 0.01 -
Post
Daniel_G Replied to the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please.
It’s an absolute fraud in my opinion. They used laser light energy as the input not the electrical energy required to make the laser light. But the media shills are none the wiser. -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to JedRothwell’s post in the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please. (Quote from gerold.s)
Science by press conference! (As Mel Miles pointed out.) -
Reaction (Post)
Daniel_G Reacted with
to JedRothwell’s post in the thread Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please. Quoting CNN:
A UK fusion scientist told CNN that the result of the US breakthrough is promising, but also shows more work needs to happen to make fusion able to generate electricity on a commercial scale.
“They have worked on the design and the makeup of…