Posts by Curbina

Quote

Andrea S. Wrote:
Dewey, not that I think JM Products has anything to do with them, but Johnson Matthey is a giant.

matthey.com

When Rossi declared that hydrogen was captured and released by a puck
(whereas a hydrogen bottle was initially used) he may have referred to
their hydrogen getter technology.

http://www.jmprotech.com/prote…absorbent-johnson-matthey

And I have no idea where the rumor came from that "the Customer" used
the steam for producing sponge metal catalysts, but Johnson Matthey
Process Tecnologies does produce those. jmprotech.com/sponge-metal-johnson-matthey

Of course hinting at Johnson Matthey by naming the company JM Products
is a great idea and triggered a lot of speculation by Rossi fans.

It takes very little to feed hopes in internet's virtual world. A while
ago I faked a SiC resistor datasheet as a little joke to back Rossi's
explanation for the weird electrical data in the Lugano report, and
dispersed little fake traces (manufacturer based in NC etc): it was
quite a success.. I received a remarkable number of inquiries on SiC
Industries' fake email address, and I could have made a fortune selling
those coils.

e-catworld.com/2014/11/27/sili…matches-data-from-report/

Display More

The sponge catalyst quote comes from comments by Mats Lewan who hinted this piece of data as coming from some "insider" at some point in the past few months. I really fon't know where was this first published, but I think it was in his blog in the comments section.

Quote

Dewey Weaver wrote

Curbina - It is great news to me that you'd like to focus on the customer. Let's do this Rossi style:

1. Is Johnson Mathei a real company from the UK? Never heard of them.
2. You seem to have some specific knowledge in the "customer" category. Perhaps you can help with some additional details about the lack of evidence for ANY shipping & receiving at the "customer's" sight.
3. How about the customer production hours? There is some very interesting information from IH intelligence and fact-gathering about the times the "customer" "employees" were actually in the building.
4. How is Rossi planning to explain the 24/7 350 day "waste heat" for the extraordinary number of hours that the customer's side of the building was virtually empty?

5. How does one get to be a moderator on this forum?

Display More

Well, Mr. Weaver, I'm a bit shocked that you don't know Johnson Mathey Products (sorry for my incorrect spelling of it in my previous post, it happens that a relevant Chilean former member of the military Junta that runned this country in the 1970s had the name Mathei, and I am used to that spelling), which, as others have said, is a large UK based distributor of chemical industry supplies, specialist in reactives, and Rossi has acknowledged to have them among his Nickel suppliers. Johnson Mathey Products is also known for having supplied the palladium to Fleischmann and Pons, if you aren't aware of that. Johnson Mathey Products is also the only producer of nickel catalyst sponges in the UK, at least

As for being a moderator on this forum, I can only talk about my case: It happens that I'm one of the relatively few persons that is a native Spanish speaking in this forum, and the first one to join AFAIK some years ago, so I was given the honor and responsibility of moderating that particular forum section, which is, unfortunately a place of not much action, as you can see, as the awareness of LENR in general, and the ECat Saga in particular, in the Spanish talking world, is very scarce, in spite of my humble efforts to the contrary.

Some Facts:
1. Rossi had a key to the "customer" production side back door along with unfettered access.
2. Penon sent draft reports to IH that Rossi was not aware of.
3. Rossi would not allow IH experts anywhere near the 1MW system while the "test" was running.
4. Rossi and his attorney guaranteed the "customer" was a real UK based company with real heat needs.
5. Rossi is terrified of the day that the "ERV" becomes public.
6. Rossi had one heat vent in the roof of his operation and that fan was broken with ZERO possibility of
extracting enough heat from that building to keep anyone alive even at 25% power for the 1MW system.
7. Rossi is about to flee to Sweden.
8. Rossi already has big new money in the bank from not one but two new victims.
9. Rossi could care less about LENR - he is all about the money.
10. Rossi is caught, busted and finished by his own hand.
11. Rossi's system temp & pressure data confirms that he has a negative COP for the 1 year test.
12. Rossi has infiltrated all of the blogs with fake handles including "Vortex" and this forum.
13. IH has 3rd party proof that the "customer" side just contained a large radiator.
14. Rossi thinks that everyone uses "sock puppets" and fabrication as a strategy because it works so well for him.

That's enough for now.

Those are really strong allegations, and you provide them as facts, would you care to provide some support to the allegations, I'm specially interested in numbers 2 and 7, if you can add something about those. (Edit to add: it seems the quote tool misfired in this ocassion).

I have said it since moment one when the complaint was known: the customer holds the key to resolve this controversy. I personally think this shell company can't be other than a ex profeso created US subsidiary of Johnson Mathei Products from UK, even if Rossi plainly denies it. In this case Rossi can technically deny it without lying, because JM products is not technically the same company, even if subsidiary. But there is only one UK based company that makes nickel sponges, and it's Johnson Mathei. The only way it could not be Johnson Mathei is that the product is not nickel sponges, but then Mats Lewan was fed disinfo in this regard, and all of us accordingly after reading him, which would be regretable.

Is interesting to see NASA still considering LENR as a future technology. I had not checked the status of the patent application of Zawodny, and just had a look and I'm a bit sad to know it was abandoned, after being rejected in a non final manner by the USPTO. The rejection letter is interesting to read, if you haven't already. https://register.epo.org/documentView?number=US.201113070552.A&documentId=1-10-US++130705520DP1+

Quote from Curbina

Dear Frank Grimer: Since I knew about your Beta Atmosphere ideas and Theory, I have been fascinated by the thought process that led you to propose it. I wonder if you are familiar with the work of Alberto Carpintieri in rock compression neutron releases…

Dear Frank: Perhaps you don't remember me but we met in the SKDB forum (I was user Chilean One). There is where I got acquainted with your Beta Atmosphere Theory and I spent some good hours reading the base documents and many posts of you related to it. I also followed your comments in other forums like Besslerwheel.com and overunity.com. I really liked your description of the thought process that led you from concrete compresion experiments to the idea that everything is inmersed in an atmosphere that keeps matter compressed. I also remember your posts about the triple point, and the thoughtfull description of your ideas about. It is really a pleasure to read you, you come out as a smart,somehow cocky and juvenile in a good way character, even if you are a wise and thoughtfull elder.

Now, when you mention that Tesla also discovered the Beta Atmosphere, can you point us to what is his work on this to have a clear idea?

My Best Regards!!!

Camilo Urbina

Dear Frank Grimer: Since I knew about your Beta Atmosphere ideas and Theory, I have been fascinated by the thought process that led you to propose it. I wonder if you are familiar with the work of Alberto Carpintieri in rock compression neutron releases and how LENR could be an important yet overlooked until now part of the geophysical phenomenology. He was so criticized by one of hisl works around 3 years ago that he lost an important position in Italy due to his "heresy" against orthodox nuclear science. Have you read some of his works?

Me parece que tenemos un "bot" comentando. Un Bot que busca términos específicos e inserta comentarios ad hoc, pero en este caso ha fallado en detectar el idioma en el que se desarrolla la conversación.

(Translation to English:: It seems to me that we have a "bot" commenting. A Bot that searchs for specific terms and inserts comments ad hoc, but in this case it has failed to detect the languaje in which the conversation is being had).

@Thomas Clarke:

An average COP of 50 and a company that will probably be subpoenaed to show the energy bills to back either part claims, can hardly be called a measurement error. Factor in that the maximum power a wich the plant was connected was 250 Kw, and then you can say that in the worst case scenario, the COP was 4.

I strongly encourage to read the lawsuit filled by Rossi. Penon claims a COP in excess of 50.

http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-c…4/Leonardosuit01-main.pdf

Key allegations: The ERV report found a COP in average of 50 during the whole test period.
[lexicon]IH[/lexicon] measurements at all times coincided with both Rossis and the ERV's.
[lexicon]IH[/lexicon] failed to pay the US$89 millions that they obligated by contract upon the end of the test period if COP was at least 6.
[lexicon]IH[/lexicon] unbeknownst to Rossi disseminated the trade secrets and attempted to patent themselves.

Now we have to hear [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] counterargumentation, but just on these points, it seems that this will be a long legal battle.

I don't know what is what you say that is not validated David, the lawsuit or the COPs. But Rossi confirms the validity of the Public Release.

Frank Acland
ECW Admin

I have contacted Rossi, he informed the press release was legitimate,
but all questions about this must be directed to the attorney John
Annesser named in the press release.

This is an E-cat astrophe... The news of a COP between 6to 50 is very weak to counter the rupture with [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and the involvement of Fabio Penon.

I think that true skepticism, the one that tries to find all possible explanations to observations and talks backed by evidence, is wellcome.

What I consider unnaceptable is when the self appointed skeptic implies that the only possible explanation is fraud, and moreover, that anyone that is not considering seriously with the possibility that the only possible explanation is fraud, is a deluded/ignorant/wishfull thinking retard, or worse, a person in on the fraud.

It was relayed to some of us via Facebook by Shaun McCarthy, Barty, but it was also confirmed directly to Frank, who has purchased one, and is awaiting the arrival.

The shipping of the first batch of Ocubes, delayed by customs bureaucracy, was sent past friday. Next weeks should prove very interesting.

Majorana, can you point us to the source of your statement?

Some times reading more about who Geneste is and how he thinks helps to understand what he says. Googling his name does not reveals that much, but his linked in profile is interesting. In particular he has a list of publications, all of them very interesting and encompassing a wide range of topics that are somehow related. He is also an author of a Politic scienc fiction book called "The Chinese Slap", and the topic of the book is very interesting. So, Mr. Geneste is a box full of surprises himself.

His job description:

Vice-President Chief scientistAirbus Groupseptiembre de 2009 – actualidad (6 años)Toulouse- Advise Airbus Group in all its fields of operation.
- Global expert in mathematics and physics.
- Lead specific R&D.
- Look for technological rupture.

I recall the "leaked" report from a visit of Nelson, signed by him, I have a copy in my LENR folder, there was two versions, one with the signature blackened, and the one with the names on it, which was apparently uploaded by mistake, I have the version with the signature. This new "leak"seems to be a more detailed presentation of the same series of events and time frame. But I also recall that Nelson went there not as NASA representative but as a consulting engineer.

A pitty that all these interesting Russian works are so hard to interpret accurately due to the languaje barrier, as the Googlations are really of ambiguous nature so many times.
Is this newsbit an abstract of a paper? or just a news release?

Quote from Mary Yugo

Celani should simply used bundles of wires to step up his effect and increase his signal to noise ratio. I have suggested this to MFPM and never got a coherent reason as to why not. Imagine, for example, ten thin wires surrounding a single rod heater. …

Is quite refreshing to see you doing suggestions and methodological recommendations, albeit in a slightly scornfull manner, but a level of scornfull I still find constructive, rather than belittling people and results. I hope you have decided to mantain this level of participation, as if you do, I will finally be actually interested in following your imputs, and will consider you an asset to this forum. You see, we "fanboys" are as interested in finding the truth as you, but with a positive attitude.