Posts by Robert Mills

In my opinion the scientists did a credible job trying to prove if there was or was not something worth consideration. No test is perfect and all tests can be make better in retrospect including this one. I see no evidence that would make one not want to further pursue this phenomenon. Ignore everything but the data. the 62Ni and the COP could be wrong but are more likely correct in that the quality of the test was high enough to preclude most possible errors. So I would say we need to move on and see more tests and more prototype devices and some replications, Like all theories this will or will not stand the test of time. Opinions and rhetoric are not the way to the truth, the fact that something does not do what is expected does not make it impossible.