CWatters Beginner

Not at all. All we have done is shown data that we described as 'interesting' - anything beyond that is a product of your own bias.

I (and Russ) have discussed everything we feel able to discuss as clearly as possible. Radiation events, triggering (or not) ETC. Everybody knows what happens when you make premature claims unsupported by watertight data. It's no good stamping your foot…

Notice to the Mizuno bucket brigade: Easier for you to make your posts on Mizuno's bucket of water than for me to transfer them over there.

We have a good NASA thread going, and you guys are cluttering it up.

Thank you for your comments, but that is quite enough on personalities, this is the LENR forum, not 'Hello' magazine.

(Quote from Alan Smith)


(Quote from Alan Smith)


RFI is funny stuff. I've spent many weeks down salt mines away from unwanted radio waves trying to solve RFI problems.

It sounds like you know thing or two about how to run an experiment but I wouldnt…

I agree. In this instance H-G Branzell is acting out the part of a Troll. I suspect he just can't help it.

Gosh this forum is getting boring. Must you lot fill every thread with arguments about a bucket of water?

This is the reactor design we are using currently. The large object protruding from the alumina foam housing is an 'S' type thermocouple in an alumina tube thermowell, held onto this is a bundle of small tubes which contain various items - fuel more…

Aw c'mon, I never said that! Really! Trust me I'd never lie about something as important as that!

JR's definition of replication is "Joe ran something and claimed it produced excess energy. It had metals and hydrogen it it, so it must be cold fusion…

(Quote from JedRothwell)


The very first diesel engine produced in 1900 ran on peanut oil.

Guys, I think that you have to revise your interpretation and use of the expression "over unity" in connection with energy producing machines. It is a brand name of perpetuum mobile crackpottery.
Just look here: …

Brilliant. Who else would buy a free energy patent than someone who believes they have invented a free energy machine.

I notice it says the deal is worth $3m not that they paid $3m. Perhaps they agreed a licence deal that requires them to pay a $1…

Ive not really followed Mills in detail but... What does he do with all the ash/Hydrinos produced by his reactors? Does he send it to university research labs so they can validate his theories? Chuck it all in the trash can?

It looks like they are projecting their tokens to go from $1 to $450 in two years based on them taking a third of the platinum market and making a profit of $4.5bn.

I don't think so.

I don't know if it's the same in the USA but here in the UK it's possible to negotiate an initial rent free period when you move into industrial properties. A company I know managed to get a three storey office block free for 18 months.

It's also…

We three (Russ, Martin &I) are not members of the 'lookithat' school of science, but very careful workers who double and triple-check everything we do. I took a unilateral decision to post the radiation data in here because in the 'dead time' leading up…

I also won't believe Rossi until he has satisfied customers. I'd settle for a peer reviewed paper in a respectable journal and independent replication but Rossi shows no sign of going down that route.

I think some people in this thread are being a bit tough on RussGeorge. He's posted interesting raw data within days of collecting it and you beat him up for not divulging all the details and expect him to speculate on the cause before he's happy to do…

(Quote from seven_of_twenty)

There are plenty of threads for discussing Rossi. This is not one of them.

The classic move of placing shielding between the reactor and the Geiger counter would be appropriate now. If you can show that the increase in counts is missing when the shielding is in place but returns after the shielding is taken away then that…