That is why I have ordered two 40kHz Transducer/Amplifier kits. Beat Frequencies (Harmonics) R Us.
So You hope of inference/frequency down breaking to happen? Or just crashing of particles with others ?
That is why I have ordered two 40kHz Transducer/Amplifier kits. Beat Frequencies (Harmonics) R Us.
So You hope of inference/frequency down breaking to happen? Or just crashing of particles with others ?
This was a Stupid Conspiracy Theory. And I showed that, so who votes it down (so far)? IHFB, of course, I'll claim he doesn't "like" seeing the truth, he has no respect for the time it took to find what I found and reported. (Including the risk of infection.)
You should distinguish between facts, like deliver a poisend link and conspiracy... The problem is that Dewey opened his mouth to early...
The link was poisended and You know who posted it.
And Jed has been as silent as a turk.
There are a few groups in this world which adhere to the omerta and tell nobody who helped them:
1) free masons, 2) mafia, triads...
All it says is that said person has poor protection for their PCs and visits risky websites. About half the planet qualify.
Off course: Any Windows PC has since latest (where I first saw it!) 2000 an official NSA trap door. The same is known for CICSO routers and others...
So your statement is a direct deduction of the US-secrete services involved in world-wide computer hardware deployments...
Or do You really believe all people are careless?
The Rydberg matter research of Holmlid is unconfirmed.
May be you know it: Holmid just reproduced an effect SPAWAR (about a particle source..) patented some years ago. We already discussed this some months ago.
Thus it's up to You to tell us, which new aspect of Holmlids work (not already covered/claimed by the SPAWAR patent) is suspect/not confirmed.
i was referring to replication of the Stringham sonofusion results that Wyttenbach believes to be compelling but Jed says have questionable calorimetry.
@THH. You did not read JED's post carefully. He wrote that (unnamed others) questioned the calorimetry - what could have included You too.
The calorimetry is as simple as a kitchen teapot. Run the transducer for one minute. Measure delta T.
Now You can start to argue what can go wrong with the measurement of a teapot.
There is no RF-inference no recombination no chemical active reactants etc...
It's Your turn. Put a pot of water on yor stove and explain us all what can go wrong with the T-measurement.
I just want to remind you all, that nuclear charge movement of 4,6,8,12, as seen in many Russian and mizuno experiments, can not be explained by one single neutral particle.
We must distinguish two phases in transmutations.
1) Ignition
2) Action = exchange of nuclear charge
What you discuss is the ignition phase only.
Inspired by you guys I have just ordered a pair of 100W 40kHz transducers and amplifiers. What fun!
@AlanS: Stringham now (2011..) uses 1.6 Mhz ultra sound waves. This works fine for small homogenous bubbles.
I recommend to set the particle size into relation with the ultra sound wave length (lamda/2-4) and the sound speed e.g. in Nickel (4900m/s).
Thus 40kHz should only impact clusters of particles.
The other aspect is, where You put the transducer. Full contact with the target medium or is gas/air an intermediate medium? A "slow" medium like air will reduce the wavelength.
PS - do you call yourself a believer or a denier? or somone better than both?
@@THH: Neither!!
I strictly take the scientific position, which allows to conclude:
- There exist many different LENR reactions, including "energy neutral" isotop shifts.
- The physical evidence for the existance of a nuclear (LENR) reaction is above 10 sigmas, as we measure all possible radiation of nuclear processes.
- Transmutation are confirmed for a broad range of experiments.
But, one thing is also clear: Nuclear physics has more holes than many believe and LENR is a big chance to complete the picture.
Isn't sono-fusion the same high energy process?
@Z In the He/heat thread I explained the differences. Bubble collapsing speed goes up to mach 10. But contrary to hot fusion inside the bubble a jet of strongly correlated D2 is formed, which is physically close to a metallic state and mechanically very stable. This jet bangs into the lattice, heavy O2 is stripped off and some D2 penetrates the Pd grid.
Thus kinetically sono-fusion is close to hot fusion, but the ignition energy, containment, Radiation, no neutrons (some tritium) etc. is LENR.
In their patent they claim that "the COP was over 10" in one experiment and "at least 6 times larger than the energy used for pre-heating and controlling the reaction container" in another.
Interesting also that the mention sono-fusion ignition (ultra sound) to start the process!
Wyttenbach: I see no intrinsic barrier to such discussion with you, except I'm not sure your motives are for greater understanding? But, if you tell me they are, then another thread might be worthwhile as suggested earlier?
My motives are very clear. I want to stop a silly and useless discussion between believers and deniers.
Sono-fusion is a nice testbed for LENR because it leaves no room for split arguments. The calorimetry is kitchen proved and as simple as preparing a cup of Japanese green tea. You can also see radiation of all kind and a true He/heat equivalence. The COP is moderate, but increasing. 2011 it was somewhat below 4.
But, as I already posted three times: That might be the reason You wont like it.
That the water in the transparent pump lines was brown indicates, as noted, substantial dissolved iron. The hypothesized steam loop would have this effect:
I just wanted to remind You that the foto is not of the 1MW used in Doral. There are significant differences... But anyway is a dirty technology and a sign of engineering incompetence.
I noticed (more precisely: recalled) that the leading author Holmlid uses iron oxide catalysts for its production.
Has been proposed by R.Mills theory a long time ago...
Some people think his calorimetry is weak, for reasons beyond the scope of the discussion. I would not call his work irrefutable.
Who are the some people??
The calorimetry is simple, because You can start/stop the reaction any microsecond You like. His setup works like a simple coffee water heater. Run it one minute and measure T... But we can argue about the wrong thermometer...
Other methods of calorimetry have been used to confirm the effect. I think every major method listed in Hemminger and Hohne have been used. It is not possible that every major method of calorimetry has major errors that experts are unaware of.
Sono-fusion is LENR on demand, easy to measure and simple to understand.
That's why especially THH doesn't like the irrefutable work of Stringham. Thus I post it again.
Here the latest overview paper of the Stringham : iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol15.pdf#page=62
Already in 1995 LANL - Los Alamos National Laboratory confirmed the ratio heat/bubble=He produced. (JED told us, many times, about this fact too...) Stringham counted the cavitation/fusion bubbles, which are in line with the heat produced. As the maximum COP is close to 4, we also must not discuss about marginal significance... Read conclusion point 5. The other measurement is the photon count of the Bremsstrahlung (fig.5) which clearly indicates the nature/intensity of the process.
Sono-fusion is LENR, albeit the underlaying process is more like hot-fusion!!! Thus it is politically very risky to discuss these facts ... More experimental details are given in the older paper: lenrcanr.org/acrobat/StringhamRlowmassmhz.pdf
and more actual with COP: lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRwhenbubble.pdf
1) Why do all tubes in the photo contain brown liquid, which is evidently leaking?
Here the original picture Rossi posted. May be just before starting the leakings... (Steam damage of pumps?)
(But check, there are some differences, which makes the first ing48 picture doubtful).
Post just overlapped...
What would be the best way to use his money?
@AV:
1) Finance at university level projects
6) Finance the project MFMP demanding the utmost transparency in the exposition of results.
That's my obvious quote. Basic knowledge should be public.
I like the "golden egg laying wool milk pig" !
Have customers testify that they bought X tons of the product every week.
It must be X times 33.5 tons a day not weeks!
Not only is this entirely off topic, the gross incivility then stimulates more off-topic commentary, such as this. Such users should be warned and if it repeats, banned. But right now, a gross impersonation, highly uncivil, is defiant and is being tolerated. Not a good sign.
If this is to be "the trusted LENR community," there must be open, clear, trusted and effective moderation and administration. Otherwise, forgeddaboudit. Experts will avoid participating, and the above comment was aimed at an expert (i.e., someone with high real-world knowledge), to discourage participation.
ABD: Can we now draw the conclusion, that you liked the bikini maidens??
Or should we thank JED for this fleshy present????
What stopped Rossi from doing this years ago? This is how it appears at present: he didn't do this because he hasn't had a plant that could make a profit selling heat like this. It's that simple.
I guess, there is only one Rossi that fit's into one plant - the only one that needs him!