Phase transform of lithium, of course - i.e. melting. Cold fusion requires to have atoms arranged in metal lattice.
in a metal lattice, can it be suspended in a electrolyte steam pocket if the heat creates one from water in the nearby casing "gypsum soak"?forge foundry
Maybe saturated gypsum electrolyte .
TeamSpeak server is quick. you would need someone in the lobby to help others clean up/ delete browser temp files to help with open mic locks and remove un-welcomes
whisper mode help can help with redirecting hidden channs ect. Hand out the Lobby chann only.
Surface tension is school simplicity, you can create a void through a tube having a heat source centered bottom and have surface tension foam hold volume~ .
Still at the Parabolic reflector inlays.
Already choked the cat~ Funny..It was called Cat's paw's
Display MoreI'll tell you how to convince all skeptics - or force them to admit the reality of LENR.
First, develop a high powered LENR system utilizing the know how that's already floating around the community.
Secondly, test the heck out of it - again and again. Once you know it's repeatable and that you can trigger the reactions pretty much at will, then start changing individual parameters to learn what's important and what's not. Importantly, perform experiments testing the SAME materials, components, and fuels from DIFFERENT sources (the more commonly available the better) to make sure they will still allow for the same POWERFUL effect to be reproduced.
Thirdly, start working on how to make your system simpler, cheaper, and faster to build.
Fourthly, design an experiment that will show the massive excess heat in an obvious way. A few things to do: use multiple control reactors, use various instruments to measure temperature, flow rate, or power consumption. Think about how skeptics will attack every little detail and make it impossible for them to criticize your measurements. For example, if they think that your thermocouples are wrong use analog thermometers as well in addition to other techniques to measure temperature. When it comes to flow rate, don't simply use a flow meter in the circuit but utilize a basin with a known quantity of water for the input and measure the output in another basin. From the start, assume they are going to claim that you've screwed everything up.
Fifth, prepare absolutely detailed plans with every last bit of your knowledge that could help replicators to be distributed when your demonstration takes place. Make sure you list every possible parameter and make clear warnings about the areas in which varying from the plan could result in failure. Treat potential replicators like brain dead idiots and explain everything step by step.
The problem is that almost no one wants to do the above.
Who would you tell?
Making calls to the "proper" you will hear nothing but crickets, Or go by P&F push and shove.
Forums and video really don't get you anywhere.
The only way I can think of to get resources needed to test and release information would be to set up the media with some sort of FAKE event to draw them in and force them to report on a on going scenario by feed them all the details.
After 16 pages of this I'm still guessing the only way to suggest a long running LENR gamma reaction is to claim one and take the punishment .
There are deep researchers that don't connect but are front runners to a lot of work from years past,
Who is SRI
https://www.sri.com/work/timel…l-magnetic-logic-computer
F&P experiments could have bin verification of old as hell documents,
Intriguing,
Curious if there metal heating encasement is part of the feed so it can reform as it's destroyed.
High bids for pointless power. The math seems to point to other principles not in the light~ As always...
Odd how fast they remove content from the net.
Seems many of the Documentaries are gone ..including F&Ps
I've read what you all wrote in here for the most part and the frustrations in the boil off. seems to me if one is looking for nothing exciting to happen from the start as they are tinkering, the need to keep accurate measurement was not so important. The push and help should be noted. The impatience had a part to play in this story..
That would be a interesting starting point.
You can start a book at the last page but few would know the story. context out of place,, telling the story this way is always called an agenda, start at the first page .
There are TV documentaries on this you may like to attach to this thread concerning the test,, the push to publish .. the names of the additional assssets assisting...
It may help with .. new to science, understand one of the many ways we each are introduced~
Just something "off the wall"~
I find it interesting they do tests of 50 but only tell of 3 or so within the common , You would think they would make one reaction at a time with only one case to each substance or mix of substance with all the money they go through.
Only TeamSpeak private Servers in my day,srry
I would think using a Tungsten microwave oven magnetron cathode to ignite vanadium would give off false .. until the ignited vanadium was then used as a cathode for another separate magnetron to continue the reaction and other separate particles doing their thing..
lol see how easy that was Director
The guy talking was 2017 nom for the Nobel peace prize talking about the release of info for secrecy orders on patents.
but when its mixed with any other info it needs to be moved to a more "suitable space~
