Posts by DnG

Just like Gennadiy Tarassenko cannon balls.. grape ...hematite fused magnetic focus point resonators. Seems we do a lo of talking but don't say much,

out in space or off the beach ~

Quote from Dr Richard

Shure, why don't they? What I don't understand is why such a large well funded company is wasting its time with such experiments you couldn't fry an egg on. Can anyone see any point to it or is it just another example of corporate pen pushing to shore up a list of questionable patents? Sympathy for the lab workers with no idea whats going on.

I think a lot of them are just wasting time waiting for the curtain to fall so they can get to work.Some are obviios they are doing it ..some not so much.

My theory todate

Points of view. maybe to load and unload a jump gate magnetron to move the wave to a dissipation platform with right and left hand spin could make better gains under the barrier. it would turn into just another capacitor but still interesting

https://link.springer.com/arti…9lrz2VXMXPhE1pNobHLjMSnZY

Besides, calling it a grape without the video... I don't add everything in this forum~

For the point clarifier. I have invited certain groups to my posts.

Adding references to a device

Most of my posts are not necessarily intended for the up to date members.

Quote from clarifier

Please do not repeat old stuff.

Most don't know the ingredients of mayonnaise ..~lol

it would be better to think of the fuel pill as one above the other and not side by side as a ?my reference"

Its then 3 focus points of release. Another thing ..the vague mention about protein reaction in a 2.4 .. things we would never think to put in a microwave oven do the damnedest things sometimes.

as references to the inner workings.

2 round cavities creating multiple center point with one of them feeding another magnetron ect..

May help to see the Principal relationship fundamental

Reminds me of red cells in gypsum.

https://phys.org/news/2019-03-…zZCKh4BLraA9J1RCVEVQV2Mik

To the point.

In past posts, i've shown a electromagnet wire device, iron post illustrations that are wrong. The formula of the fuel mix I'm using has not been verified as a nucular potential, it seems better to keep away from the cold fusion fuel mix that's being used in the eletrco magnetic regions of the reactor until now, not to go down that road but it seems to be a deception if I explain it without scientific proof.

The fuel mixture ingredents incoperate the magnetic feild properties, installed between the half shells of the Gypsom casing half shells. When each two halfs of the casing are assembled, matching up all the casing layers when the fuel mixture drys will leave a passage of loose hair like material in the center of all the compartment vanes after a couple of months, so when the casing is completly dry, a low voltage spark can be applied and aline the particles for a path of least resistance, increasing the voltage will heat and create magnatic feilds.

As you increase the voltage certain portions of the fuel mix will flow along the path to a focus point, allowing voltage discharge at the focus point assisted by the reaction of aluminum and mercury creating a push pull movement.

Not to skip steps but until recently, The fuel mix can and will go through gamanucular reaction if you push it through spark timing and voltage. The need for sheilding is necessary if you have any intentions of following this fuel mixture procedure. Only the focus point of high energy discharge can obtain tempatures high enough to create Gama and assisting voltage through the magnetron allowing the obsitien glass structure to charge the casing,

The deceptions I am cleaning up right now is the fact that they're no copper wire electro magnetic devices anywhere within this reactor case, everything is incorperated within the fuel, preprepared within the passages. You should be prepared for a nuclear reaction as you create shorter timed and more powerful voltage discharges to the focus point.

I would recommend using a PI chart (Pulses per second and voltage) similar to this illustration as a reference.

Edit,, Added the missing step to the flower and the feed location alignment.

This full design does not need to go to a nuclear level to be effective but it will.

Using a hand tazer... focus point plate and running the high volt around the system for magnetic s is a pain... a ,microwave pre=heat the focus point or it just grounds out as I remember.

Frustration.

Black line is my dry fuel mix,

Self aligning as dry path obsidian walls ect.

LENR"s skeptics.. for and against may be a better name at this point.

I still like calling it galvanic corrosion. That way they know it takes time and not just a paint job.

its here already, the parts list, the reactor build and the science for each step. If you have participated in this forum ..years of reading, you know it's all here. no big money in this for the players.. just science~ If your really looking just spend the $300 and let it rip. The papers are here~

Quote from RobertBryant

This sounds like Plos One has THHuxleynew and SOT as consultants

the old " electronic interference" problem/canard

from decades ago...

thousands of plasma researchers are of course totally unaware ..

and have no accommodation for it.. even if they were aware

is to publish ie" :to all seeing eye"

then get the rug pulled out~

Seems you all have the science.

A Theory of alchemy

Everything was crushed Dust~

A mix of-obsidian volcanic/ vanadium,hematite,minimum ingredients mixed with high temp fireplace mortar until it exits all the holes."2 months"added as calking line in the case.:"not much" product.

Solid aluminum mercury Alchemy feeding to the mortar mix ~ not over it. starting the reaction in the mercury at one end. 2 or 3 weeks to fill the entire topography.

using a microwave to feed/fill the cracks in the obsidian within the gypsum electrolyte body.

likely salt was under the solid aluminum blank

Sea water as the feed and steam

3 months before it will be ready.

the evo.electromag ect

Not that I'm telling you it will work.. just getting it off my chest.

Seems awfully familiar~

Quote from seven_of_twenty

Perhaps I overstated the case a bit but Dr. Price was highly enthusiastic about Rossi in 2015:

Rossi, however, has been going from strength to strength. While it is fair to say that the jury is still out, there has been a lot of good news for my hopes of a free dinner in the past couple of years. There were two reports (in 2013 and 2014) on tests of Rossi’s device by teams of Swedish and Italian physicists whose scientific credentials are not in doubt, and who had access to one of his devices for extended periods (a month for the second test). Both reports claimed levels of excess heat far beyond anything explicable in chemical terms, in the testers’ view. (The second report also claimed isotopic shifts in the composition of the fuel.) Since then, there have been several reports of duplications by experimenters in Russia and China, guided by details in the 2014 report.

Yes, he does say the proverbial "jury is still out" but then he waxes enthusiastic as if Rossi's main problem was his "reputation trap." The entire report reflects serious lack of understanding about what was done, how and by who.

https://aeon.co/essays/why-do-…ossibility-of-cold-fusion

And of course, Price's Rossi probability is now at 50% whereas it should hover near zero. Rossi is about as likely to come through for believers as is Madoff. And hopefully, someday he will end up in the same place.

Display More

If /.when they call Rossi's ... would it open or Slam the Door closed? Seems something more is gearing up, adding his name to everything.