1 Dimensional LENR Theories

  • Quote

    How? Luttinger Liquids are formed and studied ONLY unidimensionally, in LINES. They are LINEAR liquids.


    Luttinger liquids were observed in two or more dimensions already. But the important point is, that Luttinger liquids form and remain stable at higher temperatures when they are aligned unidimensionally. And for explanation of this effect the general highdimensional approach would be already useful. Of course, many other approaches are possible: for example Casimir force has been predicted to be stronger between ends of needles (and weaker or even repulsive above cavities) (which also points to common aspects of quantum entanglement and quantum vacuum).

  • Luttinger liquids were observed in two or more dimensions already. But the important point is, that Luttinger liquids form and remain stable at higher temperatures when they are aligned unidimensionally. And for explanation of this effect the general highdimensional approach would be already useful.

    From the link you provided,


    The Luttinger liquid model originated from studies of one-dimensional Fermi systems, however, it results that many ideas inspired by such a model can find applications to phenomena occurring even in higher dimensions. Quantum Hall systems which essentially are correlated two-dimensional electronic systems in a strong perpendicular magnetic field have an edge. It turns out that the quantum Hall edge states can be described by a one-dimensional Luttinger model. In this work, we give a general background of the quantum Hall and Luttinger liquid physics and then point out the relationship between the quantum Hall edge states and its one-dimensional Luttinger liquid representation. Such a description is very useful given that the Luttinger liquid model has the property that it can be bosonized and solved. The fact that we can introduce a simpler model of noninteracting bosons, even if the quantum Hall edge states of electrons are interacting, allows one to calculate exactly various quantities of interest.



    Basically it means that using the 1 dimensional approach makes the math easier. Extrapolating that to extradimensional approaches, in your case hyper-dimensional approaches beyond even 3 dimensions, causes that simplicity to vanish.

  • According to Holmlid switching on the lab light is enough to trigger strong nuclear reactions in UDH/UDD. So we talk about 1..4 eV.

    There's a lot of interest in conflating Ultra Dense Hydrogen with Mills's Hydrino.

    LENR and UDH


    I suppose it's time to add to that conflation and say that a linear Bose Einstein Condensate of hydrogen might have the same appearance as well. The rules of formation of a linear BEC vs. linear UDH vs. linear Hydrino are all what's up for grabs. What if they are all the same thing when it comes to LENR?

  • Quote

    and say that a linear Bose Einstein Condensate of hydrogen might have the same appearance as well


    I already linked the Holmlid picture of his linear Rydberg hydrogen. But BE condensate for hydrogen has no meaning for Lipinski fusion: all protons fuse there immediatel with high yield.

  • Currently the V1DLLBEC 'force' would appear to be Coulombic.

    Why not magnetic? What kind of force is involved in "one long chain of atoms that's spinning"

    I have no ID modeI . I prefer the 4D/6D model developed by Wyttenbach

    which yields neutron mass and proton radius etc with an accuracy

    the standard model only dreams of.

    https://www.researchgate.net/p…context=ProjectUpdatesLog


    Gravitational appears to be too weak by a few orders of magnitude.

    https://www.researchgate.net/p…origin=publication_detail

    https://file.scirp.org/pdf/WJNST_2016041915005611.pdf


    The Coulomb force also appears to be a barrier to approach of protons and protons since Rutherford scattering,1911.

    Rutherford and a whole century of physicists appear to have overlooked the old 'fish' force.

    They were buying the 'strange' force instead.

    That was until 2016. when Schaeffer showed that Poisson shares jurisdiction with Coulomb.

    Some may quibble about the log log fit..but a more accurate replication of 1911 is entirely feasible in 20XX.


    "The result, obtained by applyingelectrostatic Coulomb’s law and magnetic Poisson’s law with

    the corresponding fundamental constants, is in accord with the experimental value

    of the deuteron binding energy −2.225 MeV for −2.13 Me"

  • Seems you all have the science.

    A Theory of alchemy

    Everything was crushed Dust~

    A mix of-obsidian volcanic/ vanadium,hematite,minimum ingredients mixed with high temp fireplace mortar until it exits all the holes."2 months"added as calking line in the case.:"not much" product.

    Solid aluminum mercury Alchemy feeding to the mortar mix ~ not over it. starting the reaction in the mercury at one end. 2 or 3 weeks to fill the entire topography.

    using a microwave to feed/fill the cracks in the obsidian within the gypsum electrolyte body.

    likely salt was under the solid aluminum blank

    Sea water as the feed and steam

    3 months before it will be ready.

    the evo.electromag ect

    Not that I'm telling you it will work.. just getting it off my chest.