Amnesty Plea? Lamposts and ropes
TalkTV, UK: Plank Of The Week nominee Emily Oster
[Note: TalkTV still pro-jab]
Why is COVID-19 Response So Militarized?
U.S. Covid Response Taken Over By National Security Council in March 2020 to Impose Pre-Prepared Lockdown Plan, Evidence Shows
In previous articles I discussed the probability that Deborah Birx, the White House Coronavirus Task Force Coordinator, was not a representative of the public health agencies but, rather, was appointed by the National Security Council. I now have proof that this was, indeed, the case. I have also uncovered documents that show:
.....
It means our response to the Covid pandemic was led by groups and agencies that are in the business of responding to wars and terrorist threats, not public health crises or disease outbreaks
I believe that the national security authorities took control of the Covid pandemic response not just in the U.S. but in many of our allied countries (the U.K., Australia, Germany, Israel and others) because they knew SARS-CoV-2 was an engineered virus that leaked from a lab researching potential bioweapons...
Rejection of Emily Oster's Amnesty plea hits msm
Daily Telegraph: Pro-lockdown fanatics don’t deserve an amnesty
Camilla Tominey, deputy editor, writes that “it’s not just in retrospect that we know the Covid measures were a disaster – we were vilified for pointing it out at the time”.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/11/04/pro-lockdown-fanatics-dont-deserve-amnesty/
Covid amnesty? Why we must never forgive or forget
I remember how nervous I was attending my first anti-Covid-lockdown protest.
It was early autumn 2020. A friend had invited me to the demonstration in Hyde Park as her brother, a statistician and data scientist, had crunched the numbers and figured out the Government was lying to us. He stood on a stump and made a speech with a megaphone, followed by others
"We didn't know" [A Lie] There is a Latin maxim all first-year criminal law students learn, ignorantia juris non excusat. It means ignorance is not a justifiable excuse for breaking the law
‘Pandemic Amnesty’? It’s just more narrative reinforcement
Kit Knightly tears into the suggestion of an amnesty
Rather than asking for amnesty they are offering one…to those covid skeptics who have found two and a half years of being on the outside looking in too exhausting to carry on
If you pretend we didn’t mean any harm, we’ll forgive you for telling truth about us
Right Said Fred
Good News
“Finland Refuses to Recommend Bivalent Boosters for Working-Age People”
The Finnish health authority outright refused to recommend bivalent boosters for working-age people and children and acknowledged vaccines cause damage to immune systems, writes Igor Chudov
Compare this to the US, where the Biden administration demands five-year-olds to take their useless bivalent booster two months after these 5-year-olds get their previous useless monovalent booster
Comment
"shibumi; Liked by Igor Chudov
I guess the question is.... at the start of the C0VID con, how many nations knew this was a depop program?
It seems to me that right now, a number of places are dialing down the depop, which suggests to me they might not have been fully aware what what going on.
Interesting that the Five Eyes nations-- US, UK, Canada, AU and NZ-- are all still fully vested in k*lling as many legal citizens-- preferably white -- as they can"
The Amnesty Trope
Like all other Lockdown and Poison Jab Excuses : The "We Didn't Know" Lie
We (I) knew everything we needed to know about SARS-2 already in February 2020 (Diamond Princess being glaring example). The pandemicists and their supporters crossed many bright red lines in their eradicationist zeal and ruined untold millions of lives. That doesn’t all just go away now
Some recent exposes of Emily Oster's promotion test
Emily Oster proposes “a pandemic amnesty,” suggests that “we need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID”
I don’t know much about the American pandemic pundits, but I gather that Brown University economist and “parenting guru” Emily Oster is far from the worst of them...
...Emily " But the thing is: We didn’t know"
The thing is, Emily Oster, that we did know...
Oops, sorry - PJW
They didn't just smear us, they censored us, sacked us, denied us services, denied us the right to travel and assemble, destroyed our businesses, left our loved ones to die alone, then denied our attendance at their funerals
Once More on Renowned Fool Emily Oster, and the Malign Influence of Head Girls More Generally
Our governing elite are increasingly selected not for intelligence or ability, but for conscientiousness, agreeability and conformity. The consequence is a new kind of midwit tyranny
eg Pixie Balls Cooper, Emily Thornberry MP Lab; Caroline Nokes, Theresa May, MP Con; Sturgeon, SNP; Amber Rudd, Soubry ex Con MP
Comments
"Our governing elite are increasingly selected not for intelligence or ability, but for conscientious, agreeability and conformity. The consequence is a new kind of midwit tyranny."
- Exactly. Perfectly expressed
Igor Chudov, Writes Igor’s Newsletter; Liked by eugyppius
"I disagree with Prof. Oster and want Covid criminals punished for poisoning millions of people and taking away our civil liberties.
That said, Emily is not the thought leader here -- she was selected to launch this amnesty "trial balloon" as a pleasantly appearing individual who was not implicated in the nastiest of behaviors.
There was a reason why "they" selected Emily and not Dr Leana Wen or Monica Gandhi.
Emily here is not the mastermind of the amnesty idea -- she is a figurehead. She is not exactly dumb, but being "data driven" without realizing that data is supplied by crooks shows lack of thinking, possibly intentional"
Lockdown Proponent Calls for Amnesty – But Where’s the Apology?
[Look at photo - looks like Sturgeon, BBC, C4 "Head Girl" Devi Srindar]
I’ll admit, I nearly spat out my coffee when I saw Brown Professor Emily Oster’s new headline in the Atlantic on Monday morning: “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty: We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about Covid.”
It’s the headline we’ve been waiting to see – and, in the revisionist, gaslighting style that’s become the journalistic norm on the response to Covid – it’s about the closest thing to an outright admission of guilt that we’ve seen since Covid began...
...On the contrary, studies have long shown that it was the mandates themselves that caused the public to panic, making them believe their chances of dying of Covid – which never had an overall infection fatality rate much higher than 0.2% – were hundreds of times greater than they really were
Further, there’s a growing mountain of evidence that the handful of key officials who led the initial push for unprecedented lockdowns and mandates did not, in fact, do so in good faith....
Dr. John Campbell: Excess deaths continue
"I must be very careful what I say" - or banned
---and Deaths should be Lower as dry tinder and brought forward eliminated tens of thousands - but this is ignored as is jab
Authorities still in Denial over a year after this Depopulation started
Update: CoronaVax safety in the Netherlands
Dr. Robert Malone with an update of Dr. Theo Schetters´ survey of public data from the Netherlands showing a correlation of excess deaths with the booster campaigns.
Two easy read Insightful articles
The Fatal Flaw in the UKHSA’s Inflated Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates
[Will it be the duplicitous definition that "unjabbed" includes those jabbed in previous 14 to 21 days? Read on...]
In last week’s post I mentioned that prior to the vaccines’ release there were calls for there to be rigorous monitoring of the vaccines’ safety and effectiveness
Thus I was pleased to read last Wednesday of the latest attempts by the the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), an independent group of medics, scientists and academics, to get the U.K.’s medical products regulator, the MHRA, to explain why it hasn’t kept its promises to monitor the safety and effectiveness of the Covid vaccines in the time since they were rolled out back in December 2020. I’d add that this situation has been mirrored worldwide, with remarkably little in the way of the type of monitoring that would be expected of a new medical product.
The importance of these post-approval monitoring studies can’t be understated – pre-approval...
A key quote
Quote"The outcomes from prior attempts to make a coronavirus vaccine. Scientists have been trying to make a vaccine to protect against coronavirus infection (‘colds’) for decades. They all failed – not simply because ‘they didn’t work’, but also because some candidate vaccines resulted in increased risk from disease, potentially coming to light some time after the vaccines were given..."
Oxford Study Finds Negative Vaccine Effectiveness Against Covid Hospitalisation and Death
...one of many over last year
In spring 2021 the U.K.’s health agencies were in full swing, trying to get everyone in turn to take their free Covid vaccine
Back then, many people still believed that Covid was a serious threat to all of us, and as a result initial take-up was rapid and even younger age groups eagerly awaited their turn to take the elixir that would offer salvation. Back in those simple days there wasn’t much need to explain the details...
As time went on, however, it appeared that some ‘foolish’ people weren’t in mortal fear of Covid, despite the best efforts of the nudge units to make it appear that Covid was killing a large proportion of healthy individuals. So the agencies changed tactics. If people weren’t going to clamour for the vaccines, they’d use emotional blackmail and appeal for people to take their dose to ‘protect granny’ and to...
BTW: My super fit, 'healthy eating' fully jabbed and boosted brother now has Covid again and bed-ridden again. Fourth / fifth time time this year
I'm so glad, in Dec 2020, I read publicly available safety data and concluded "Dangerous poison snake oil; say NO"
Sadly most responded with 'Gov't, NHS, MSM... Would not lie to us' and/or Coercion "I must take it so I can..."
Now they grudgingly admit they lied, but still best to do as told in case...
Will sheeple ever rebel?
Researchers investigating long COVID might do themselves a favor by...
Accepting it's psychosomatic as UK ONS a year or more ago revealed: over 50% of Long Covid cases had never had Covid
A BBC broadcast in May 2021 strongly suggested same: Covid Jab cures long covid
Good article with indisputable facts - unless you're "three monkeys"
Bird flu on the rampage
Outbreaks of a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza are leaving a path of destruction across Europe
What's changed over last few years?
Wild birds the same, Lockdowned caged game birds released in spring the same
Poultry: chickens etc no longer in barns - they're outside Free Range
More 'be kind', 'be green' idiocy backfires and does more harm
Bivalent Bombshell? BA.4/BA.5 mRNA Booster Dose Fails Comparative Antibody Titer Test: Could it be Antigenic Sin?
Second Opinion confirms
Incoming: more denial Gov'ts order social media to supress and censor Free Speech:
Judge Orders Fauci to Testify Under Oath on Social Media Censorship
In a 28-page order, U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty has ordered NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, and other leading federal officials in charge of the response to Covid to be deposed (testify under oath) in Missouri v. Biden
The case which NCLA Legal is representing plaintiffs including Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff against the Biden administration for its coercion of social media companies to violate free speech during Covid.
Discovery documents in the case previously revealed a vast federal censorship army, with more than 80 federal officials across at least 11 federal agencies having secretly coordinated with social media companies to censor private speech, in what plaintiff Aaron Kheriaty described as potentially “the most ...
Dr. John Campbell:
I have to be very careful what truths I tell - or I'm banned
Florida Changes Guidance for mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines due to Heart Damage Risk
Who fact checks the fact checkers?
Some here claim Gov'ts don't order social media to censor
Oh yes they do
How the EU is Imposing Brutal Online Censorship of ‘COVID-19 Disinformation’ on the Whole World
Twitter is obviously at the centre of what is commonly known as ‘Big Tech censorship’. It has been busily using the censorship tools at its disposal – from removing or quarantining tweets to surreptitiously ‘deboosting’ them (shadow-banning) to outright account suspension – for at least two years now
Those who have managed to remain on the platform will have noticed a sharp...
Also
These folks miss the facts: The CoV-19 outbreak in China started in early August 2019. So November is a no brainer. The real problem is that Moderna, a spin off of a US military lab made CoV-19 spike patents, already in 2016...Of course hidden (now known) as it was a military patent...
The naming is the important point. It had no name then
WHO didn't name it Covid-19 until Jan/Feb 2020
U.S. D.O.D issued a contract for COVID-19 Research to a company in Ukraine, 3 months before COVID-19 was known to exist
The contract awarded in November 2019 for ‘COVID-19 Research’,at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19, was not only instructed to take place in Ukraine, it was in fact part of a much larger contract for a ‘Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine’
ICAN & Siri Glimstad Force CDC to Release v-Safe Data: 7.7% of all 10m Users Experience Health Event Due to COVID-19 Vaccines
New definition of "Very Rare" coming soon: CDC & WHO "1 in 10 is Very Rare"
Update
Why did the CDC hide the V-safe data from the American people for almost two years?
Steve Kirsch looks at the newly released safety survey data and says it “clearly shows that these vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines we’ve ever created”
The v-safe data shows that 33.1% of the people who got the vaccine suffered from a significant adverse event and 7.7% had to seek professional medical care
stevekirsch.substack.com/p/why-did-the-cdc-hide-the-v-safe-data
"Safe and Effective"? Yes, for depopulation
Net Zero "Vaccine"
ICAN & Siri Glimstad Force CDC to Release v-Safe Data: 7.7% of all 10m Users Experience Health Event Due to COVID-19 Vaccines
New definition of "Very Rare" coming soon: CDC & WHO "1 in 10 is Very Rare"
"...There are five issues in particular where it’s completely verboten to express sceptical views and if you do you can expect to be cancelled, not just by PayPal but by YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.
: the wisdom of the lockdown policy and associated Covid restrictions, the efficacy and safety of the mRNA vaccines, Net Zero and the ‘climate emergency’, the need to teach five year-olds* that sex is a social construct and the war in Ukraine
Dissent from the prevailing orthodoxy in any of those areas is no longer permitted..."
* five year-olds
