axil Verified User
  • Member since Oct 10th 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by axil

    Quote

    Thing is, some people are just naturally abrasive. MY is one such. Eric says it well above. I don't like banning except when applied to contentless nuisances. MY is not contentless, however annoying.


    MY brags about destroying people and their life's work. She is like a big game hunter that points with pride to the heads displayed on her rec room wall full of glee and accomplishment in the havoc and pain that she creates; in the application of her considerable set of skills to the state of complete emptiness and destruction that she can foment: "Cry 'Havoc!', and let slip the dogs of war"... She is a case study in the Shakespearean classical and age old description of pathological evil.

    Its strange enough that the physical processes that cause the nickel battery to fail after a 5 year period which includes a thousand charge/ discharge cycles is exactly the process that hydrogen under the influence of nickel, potassium and lithium needs to become receptive to the LENR reaction.


    The special state of hydrogen is metastable and will now accept a shock of EMF to change it up into a LENR active state. Rossi uses a fuel preperation stage to accomply the same thing that a nickel battery does over an extended multi-year timeframe. The gray powder in this fuel speaks to the production of a special form of hydrogen in his fuel that makes the Rossi's reactor functional.

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille: The Cosmic Microwave Background


    Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille mentions Semmelweis as the hero of false anchoring in science.


    Because of false anchoring, this video put forth a theory that the cosmic background is nonsense.

    The rules here presumably ban her, and thereby lose facts. If MY were a troll, contributing nothing, I'd understand it. As it is she represents one end of a spectrum of opinion - the "scam-max" view". And she brings facts that she thinks support that view.


    2 Corinthians 2:11
    in order that Satan might not outwit us. For we are not unaware of his schemes.


    Mark 9:43
    If your hand causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes out.

    The shanahan conjecture has been made obsolete and ineffectual by recent advances in LENR. The Thomas Clarke objections are also obsolete and not applicable to the state of LENR as has been advanced to its current state of perfection. On Christmas last, Rossi told us that the input power produced by his latest LENR efforts are amplified by a factor of 10 times with regards to the electric current generated on output. Also an equal amount of heat is produced to equal the output current. There is in addition a production of visible light equal to a 500 watt incandescent light source. Even with this primitive prototype designated as E-CAT X which gains capability on a daily basis, this huge energy production gain are beyond the limited scope of these contrarian conjectures. These conjectures are beyond any utility in discussion---so much so that these amazing advances in LENR make the shanahan and Clarke conjectures irrelevant oddities from a past age. They are just a waste of internet baud-rate.


    It's simple; Rossi has the goods or he doesn't; there will be no doubt about it. We will know the efficacy of this LENR product plainly when we see it.

    @s_grey


    I wonder if it would be possible for the ash produced in one of your reactor tests could be placed on a sheet of photo enlargement paper to check for the presence of any Exotic Neutral Particles that are coming from that ash. Black and white would do fine.


    see


    Ilford 5x7 Multigrade 1M B&W Paper, Glossy Surface, 25 sheets
    by Ilford
    Price:$9.99 + $4.99 shipping




    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009R6FA/ref=s9_zwish_hd_bw_bE3Hr_g229_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-11&pf_rd_r=00TJJE8RRG84M16RRNY9&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=ccb04e88-be55-5aa6-a99e-a3d7c85440de&pf_rd_i=3349231

    Holmlid is suffering from the same nuclear physics meme that plagued F&P in there understanding and communications of the reaction that they found. Dr G. Miley suffers from the delusions of the same meme. Compression to overcome the coulomb barrier through close prosimity of hydrogen atoms to each other may not be a factor in the processes that appears in Holmlids' reaction.


    One way to show that this meme is false is to show that the cause of LENR is not depleted by extended applications of the reaction and/or an increase in the number of laser shots executed per second. This means that the hydrogen rydberg matter is not consumed by the reaction.

    2. Fuel is packed into a metal pipe photo: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/1.jpg


    If have speculated here in this forum that the Exotic Neutral Particle (ENP) that produces the LENR effect is mobile and can penetrate and pass through the material that most replicators use to confine that ENP and the LENR reaction.


    An iron pipe might be an absolute requirement as a method of LENR confinement. If you remember, Rossi uses steal sheets in the structural material in his wafer.


    I also wonder if a grounding wire is affixed to that pipe, can a current to ground be detected in that grounding wire?


    Rossi claims to produce electrostatic based current flow in his wafer based reactor.


    It would be an easy conformation of overunity if a current to ground is detected that is greater in magnitude than that used as input current.

    @s_grey: your criteria for choosing the content of a NiMH battery as a 'fuel' is interesting, in a good way.


    The nickel alloy you used might still have had KOH traces, which could be important for observing the effect in the same way lithium is (perhaps even more so in the case of potassium).


    You loaded the cell in air without applying a vacuum before starting the test, correct?


    http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1312/1312.6851.pdf


    How to extract metalized hydrogen from a 5 year old battery.


    Quote

    In our earlier study, it was demonstrated, that as a result of the thermal runaway of nickel–cadmium batteries, large amounts of hydrogen are released19. The thermal decomposition of electrodes demonstrated that hydrogen accumulates in the electrodes of nickel–cadmium batteries in the process of their operation. So KSX-25 battery with the service period of over five years contains approximately 800 liters of hydrogen. The capacity of an oxide-nickel electrode as a hydrogen absorber was quantified as 13.4 wt% and 0.4 g сm −3 (ref. 20). The obtained result exceeds the earlier obtained results for nickel hydride (obtained using traditional methods) by 10 times21, and for any reversible metal hydrides, including magnesium hydride or complex hydrides by 2 times22,23. This article is devoted to the determination of where and in what form hydrogen accumulates in electrodes of nickel–cadmium batteries. It is possible to physically divide oxide-nickel electrode into two phases – active substance (nickel hydroxide) and metal–ceramic matrix (in the case of sintered electrodes present in KSX-25 batteries). If hydrogen is intercalated into nickel hydroxides then, when nickel hydroxides reacts with acids and forms soluble salts, intercalary hydrogen will be released, because nickel hydroxides disappear and the salt dissolves into the solution. Any type of acid, which forms soluble salts with nickel hydroxide, but does not interact or poorly interact with metal matrix, can be used for this purpose. For example, it possible to use sulfuric acid, which interacts with nickel hydroxides with the formation of soluble salt of nickel sulfate...and so on...


    One of my criteria for HRM formation is time. This paper illustrates that a nickel battery used for 5 years will produce HRM.

    "By the way, LeClair produces transuranic elements as verified by Ed Storms in cavitation"


    Do you have a link for this?


    Quote

    The large scale transmutation of elements was verified by three separate independent scanning electron microscope elemental analysis (SEM-EDAX) of the transmuted material, including University of Maine, Orono Laboratory for Surface Science & Technology (SEM-EDAX & XPS under contract), by courtesy of Media Sciences, located in Oakland, New Jersey and by courtesy of well-known Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) researcher and advocate Dr. Edmund Storms, formerly of Los Alamos in New Mexico. The University of Maine, Orono Chemistry Department also performed an analysis known as XPS that measured nucleus binding energy, confirming that the glassy coating seen covering much of the reactor cores was diamond. The SEM analyses collectively detected a total of 34 elements ranging from carbon to polonium. The same samples analyzed by SEM-EDAX and XPS were also analyzed with laser ablative inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (LA-ICP-MS) by Shiva Technologies (an operating unit of Evans Analytical Group) located in Syracuse, NY. The more sensitive LA-ICP-MS detected a total of 78 elements ranging from lithium to californium and 108 isotopes ranging from 7Li to 249Cf, a standard detection set that does not include all the possible isotopes, but including most of the stable isotopes and many short and long lived radioactive isotopes. Together, the five analyses showed that nearly every element in the periodic table was detected in every type of transmuted particle in different distributions, up to the limit of the LA-ICP-MS detection range, californium.

    @Ecco


    There is a positive feedback loop at issue in LENR. LENR must extract more energy from the nucleus than it uses to maintain itself. The various cases of meltdown when LENR is overstimulated illustrates this positive feedback loop when it runs away from control.


    Consider the Exotic Neutral Particles found through their photo-emissions from the ash assays that gainful LENR experiments produce.


    http://restframe.com/downloads/tachyon_monopoles.pdf


    This paper attempts to characterize the mass and energy that these ENP deminstates


    "Adamenko and Vysotskii8,9 estimated an upper limit of kinetic energy at E ∼ −10^^6GeV and particle mass at ≈ 10−23g (≈ 560GeV). "


    This tells us that the HRM gains mass from the nuclear reactions that it catalyzes over time. When HRM extracts energy from matter, part of it is given back as downshifted photons through hawking radiation and another part is stored in a photon based BEC. It is this BEC that shields the HRM from destruction. The more energetic that this BEC becomes, the more longlived and impervious to damage the HRM becomes. The lifetime of the HRM is defined by the amount of photons that hawking's radiation is broadcast to the far field. As hawking radiation is emitted over a long timeframe, the HRM may become a bubble of negative vacuum energy (a tachyon) predicted by string theory.

    I don't want to take you too far yet, you might become incredulous as Holmlid has.

    As far as I am aware of, the ultra-dense form is the primary reason for nuclear emissions, excess heat other anomalies in Holmlid's case. It's been conjectured that because it's so dense, the products of nuclear reactions occurring below the surface the products have a hard time escaping, unless the ultra-dense layer is removed, depleted or thinned out.


    If we take this away, I have no idea how RM-based LENR would be supposed to work. My rationalization is that he may be wrong on what the ultra-dense form actually is, but his observations are for the most part correct. Since HRM is a precursor to these effects, this automatically makes HRM important.


    It might be informative for you to get another slant on how HRM works by looking at the water crystal as the active agent in the cavitation process. The water crystal is formed instantaneously by the huge pressure that is produced by the final stage of cavitation bubble collapse.


    You will be amazed by the strength that this crystal demonstrates especially when it eroded hard stuff like diamond.


    If HRM provides the internal heat source active in the interiors of planets and the sun, HRM would need to be almost indestructible. HRM has cosmological significance as dark matter and it is very much more momentous in its structure and its robustness then you might now suspect.


    By the way, LeClair produces transuranic elements as verified by Ed Storms in cavitation which means that the water crystal can handle pressures and heat produced in a supernova.

    Axil,


    I think you forgot to mention the gammas.


    BTW, are you a robot, axil? I doubt it that you would pass the Turing test.


    The transfer of energy between the disrupted nucleus(s) and the Hydrogen Rydberg matter is done through quantum entanglement using the monopole beam as an energy conduit and not through EMF photons.

    Longview, let us remember what SPPs really are:



    Selling the idea that these feeble surface phenomena could stop gamma radiation is akin to selling cotton T-shirts as protection against AK-47 bullets.


    The process of energy transfer an downshifting is more involved as follows:


    The SPPs concentrated on the surface of the hydrogen Rydberg matter where their collective activity is organized into a Bose condensate. This bose condensate is a dark mode soliton that can accumulate EMF but not broadcast it to the outside world.


    The monopole beam output of this condensate projects from the positively charged head of the HRM crystal. Any nuclear matter that falls in the path of this beam will experience proton and neutron decay while ate the same time transfer nuclear binding energy down the monopole beam to the polariton bose condensate. The condensate will radiate away its accumulated energy content via hawking radiation in the infrared over time. It has be discovered that any dark system with a defined boundary will produce hawking radiation through that boundary where its energy content will be redistributed back to the environment.



    FIGURE 6. A subretinal implant allows a blind patient to see again. (Courtesy of Implant AG)In a photonic setup that is not a simulation or imitation, but exhibits a fundamental effect of gravitational black holes, researchers from Universitá degli Studi di Milano, INFN sezione di Milano, Universitá dell'Insubria, and Universitá di Milano-Bicocca in Italy, and Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland use a laser pulse filament to create a traveling refractive-index perturbation within fused silica—with the result that actual Hawking radiation, which is normally only produced at the event horizon of a gravitational black hole, is instead created on an optical table. Hawking radiation is a purely quantum effect in which photon pairs arise from nothing, with one pulled into the black hole and the other radiated out into space. In the lab, the traveling index perturbation is what separates the quantum-vacuum-produced photon pairs.



    From


    http://www.laserfocusworld.com…ers-a-vital-alliance.html

    • Rydberg matter largely pertains to deuterium and hydrogen. Presumably if we go along with it, we will need a separate explanation for transmutations like those seen by Iwamura, Mizuno, Karabut and Savvatimova.
    • If we get rid of ultra-dense deuterium, how is Rydberg matter-based LENR supposed to work, exactly?


    There is a more direct route to Rydberg Matter (RM) that involves the production of all the pressure required for RM formation, that method being cavitation. LeClair produced the water crystal which is a form of hexagonal Rydberg matter that uses the hydroxyl groups OH- as the subunit of the RM crystal structure. Many of the properties of RM can be seen in the behavior of the water crystal.


    It also has been shown that molten salts can produce erosion of pump impellers at the rate of 10 times that of water. There must also be a form of molten salt that forms graphite like hexagonal crystals under pressure from the constituents of molten salt. The same is true for mercury whose erosion rate in cavitation is greater than that of water. A survey of chemical compounds could be undertaken to test these compounds for erosion levels during cavitation which can indicate if RM will form through the application of extreme pressure. I would be interested in the survey through cavitation of liquid metals such as lithium, lithium hydride and sodium and sodium chloride as RM formation candidates.


    A LENR reactor could be designed to use molten Lithium hydride as the working medium in a cavitating mode. I would suspect that LiH based RM might well be extracted from that cavitating reactor in a fuel pre-preparation mode to be used in LENR reactors that we are now well acquainted with.

    The key to successful high powered LENR+ engineering is the production of hydrogen Rydberg matter (HRM) or one of its related topologically chemical compounds that possess the same crystallographic structure, that being a long linear string of hexagonal crystal planes.


    Central to this production method is the application of high pressure to hydrogen in the formation of HRM. In the Sun and the interiors of the large gas planets, it takes the application of approximately 250,000 atmospheres of pressure to compress hydrogen to the point where HRM will form. Hydrogen has a complicated phase diagram as a function of pressure and temperature. To produce HRM in the lab where the ambient temperature is constant, pressure is the operative variable that once as its constraints are met will result in the generation of HRM in the lab setting.


    To understand how past LENR production methods fit into the pressure/HRM meme, both to palladium/deuterium and Nickel/hydrogen LENR methods are based on generating high pressure hydrogen to meet the minimum pressure generation requirements. The Etiam Inc. patent application calls out a number of HRM fabrication techniques that allows HRM to be produced in the Lab environment that involve lowering the pressure required for HRM formation.


    1 - Using molecular bounds in transition metals to compress hydrogen through capillary action. Palladium absorbs hydrogen where molecular bound compression increases as the percentage hydrogen loading increases.


    For nickel which does not absorb hydrogen, nickel requires sintering or surface preparation to open up lattice cavities or cracks that allow hydrogen to penetrate into the nickel where it is compressed by molecular bounds.


    2 – The use of lithium and/or other alkali metals to lower the pressure requirements for HRM formation by 400%. Other low work function additives like rare earth oxides can be used as an addition as seen in the Lugano fuel particle.


    3 – The use of quantum mechanically based hexagonal crystal catalyst such as graphite, mica, and/or quartz as a quantum mechanical template to format the hexagonal crystal structure of HRM. Holmlid uses graphite. Rossi uses mica. And the referenced patent uses powdered quartz.


    4 – The use of cavitation as a way to increase pressure in the metal lattice that holds the HRM in compression.


    5 - The use of a low voltage electrostatic stimulation to help in the HRM formation process.


    6 - The use of an electric arc to induce a shock wave to increase pressure in HRM formation.


    7 – Time. The formation of HRM is constrained by probability when the pressure of formation is marginal. The uncertain principle allows the pressure to increase as a result of the uncertainty in the distances between the hydrogen atoms in the crystal. It is possible that the pressure for HRM formation to reach formation levels even if the sum of the production methods doesn’t meet the minimum pressure threshold. Of course, the closer the pressure threshold is to the formation threshold, the more probable HRM formation becomes.



    =============


    Once HRM is created and released by the lattice, it is electrostatically attracted to the surface of the nickel or palladium micro particles where it is loaded with Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) produced at the boundary surface between the transition metal and the dielectric (hydrogen) using infrared photon pumping. The SPP is quasiparticles that produces an intense EMF covering on the surface of the HRM which causes the LENR reaction through the destabilization of the protons and neutrons in the nucleus.



    In Holmlid's case the photons are visible and green in color or ultraviolet in the case of ambient florescent lighting.

    [quote]


    I don't think that mentions SPPs. My doubt here is the excessively high energy you attribute to an SPP. That would have physical consequences, but to evaluate those I'd like to know how big is the SPP.


    With the work of Holmlid involving Hydrogen Rydberg Matter(HRM), I have changed by mind as to how energy is accumulated in the Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP) whose paths are seen in photo emulsions of LENR ash. It is the nanoparticle: HRM that carries the energy on its surface in the form of accumulated SPPs. The linear chainlike hexagonal nature of the crystal structure of the HRM produces an amplification function where the EMF content of many SPPs are combined and focused to project at the front of the HRM. The spiral paths which are traveled by these ENPs show that the EMF is a monopole field. Because SPPs produce monopole fields, SPPs are the best candidate as the surface EMF field that populates the HRM particle.


    The mesons produced in the Holmlid experiments involving HRM point to a decay in the proton and neutron particles inside the nucleus. According to accepted theory, this proton decay occurs when the monopole flux tube interacts with nuclear matter.


    http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1512/article_23107.pdf


    Because Holmlid is seeing mesons, this a strong indicator that an Exotic Neutral Particle is producing a monopole field to disrupt protons.


    Monopole catalysis of proton decay




    Every star in the universe is a hydrogen fusion reactor, evidently hydrogen will fuse to produce helium. The Coulomb repulsion that won't allow proton proximity leading to fusion can be overcome with an easily produced catalyst.


    This might be hard for you to believe this, but I don't believe that hydrogen fusion is the energy source of the stars, LENR is.
    This will be common knowledge when LENR is recognised by profession science.


    See


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.