I'm just wondering, if IH has some evidence that the e-cat actually does not work, then are they withdrawing their patents that claim it has a COP of 10 or better?
IT would seem that if it genuinely does not work then they must withdraw the patent claim, but if they dont, then it sounds like legal maneuvering to me, not something driven by testing results.
And what exactly did IH fail to confirm? a COP of 50? That there was a COP over 1?
These rumors and idiotic hyper-skepticism of everything from the Lugano report to now the ERV report that Darden himslef paid for, is just silly stuff.l