we've fallen back into the perennial historical argument,
Eric Walker : Nasa certainly is not buying into LENR for the short time view.
New techniques for thermal power conversion are on the horizon like the linked one:
we've fallen back into the perennial historical argument,
Eric Walker : Nasa certainly is not buying into LENR for the short time view.
New techniques for thermal power conversion are on the horizon like the linked one:
Eric Walker : Nasa certainly is not buying into LENR for the short time view.
New techniques for thermal power conversion are on the horizon like the linked one:
Pyroelectric FUSION:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyroelectric_fusion
Too small COP though.
Too small COP though.
May be you don't know the facts. This is a battery design not a reactor... COP always far below 1... The old (e.g. used in Voyager I) thermo electric batteries just gave a few percent of current/ compared to total thermal power.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…_thermoelectric_generator
Todays solution works at lower T and a much higher Carnot factor.
Im grateful you dismissed this so quickly H-G,
May be you don't know the facts. This is a battery design not a reactor... COP always far below 1... The old (e.g. used in Voyager I) thermo electric batteries just gave a few percent of current/ compared to total thermal power.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…_thermoelectric_generator
Todays solution works at lower T and a much higher Carnot factor.
May be you didn't read what it was about:
https://steemit.com/steemstem/…ic-crystal-nuclear-fusion
Does not look like a battery to me:
"From the pyroelectric crystal's needle, positively charged deuterons are massively accelerated to 80 keV and fired directly into the ErD2 target. When deuterium nuclei hit target, some of them collide head-on with innocent neutral deuterium atoms embedded in the target. Some of these collisions result in a violent nuclear reaction: Nuclear fusion! These fusion events produced free neutrons, which were then detected by the experimenters. In general, detection of free neutrons is conclusive proof that fusion is taking place."
Some of these collisions result in a violent nuclear reaction: Nuclear fusion!
Space-ships need current not neutrons...
You point to a totally different experiment. The link I provided was unambiguous, may be reading is a pain.
New techniques for thermal power conversion are on the horizon like the linked one:
You provided the above link on pyroelectricity. I found it interesting and elaborated on the subject by providing information on a surprising application of this phenomenon.
Do you have a problem with that? At least it was about true deuterium fusion, which is more than you can say about most of the comments on this site.
Its similarity is very interesting. The base as a magnetic fission reaction spewing highly charge material into the sky within a magnetic rotation field~
very Interesting
I would like to be shore I understand your idea H=G what your thinking is build a suction type magnetic root drawing dust particles through the center of an active event "like a excitonium " reaction. charging these particles and then using a upper electric field allowing them to collide ? Sound about right?
If you think its something to try I can build one and see what it will do.
Also, it may be interesting to add a number of these things around the base. it seems they are more or less just a magnet that ack like a soler sell, odd~ maybe they can help retain the dust to a more specific area but it would need to be tested~
maybe something like hematite dust as it looses it heat and magnetics it will just fall back down.
I like your idea!
hopefully he knows someone from japan he can share his idea with. it may help them out
I am sorry Seiber.
I think the most interesting result will be that you sneeze!
Gesundheit!
ya, it looks like this~
btw~
for all I know your an AI
your key word hunt and all the pre assign statements are getting old,
I think the forum has a "I'm not a bot" filter, maybe they should check it for loop holes.
I'm starting to think one got in.
Display MoreMay be you didn't read what it was about:
https://steemit.com/steemstem/…ic-crystal-nuclear-fusion
Does not look like a battery to me:
"From the pyroelectric crystal's needle, positively charged deuterons are massively accelerated to 80 keV and fired directly into the ErD2 target. When deuterium nuclei hit target, some of them collide head-on with innocent neutral deuterium atoms embedded in the target. Some of these collisions result in a violent nuclear reaction: Nuclear fusion! These fusion events produced free neutrons, which were then detected by the experimenters. In general, detection of free neutrons is conclusive proof that fusion is taking place."
Is this really Pyroelectric Crystal Nuclear Fusion?
The auditor of this article first lists all the indicators that are required to prove that the fusion of deuterium is taking place, but he latter admits that only neutrons were detected coming out of this reaction.
This looks like the LENR reaction to me. The mechanism for the LENR reaction is chiral charge separation similar to what occurs in the SAFIRE system where a double layer of plasma is formed inducing a condition of extreme separation of charge. At its very core, all manifestations of the LENR reaction is caused by chiral spin polarization.
The electric charge separation is produced by Chiral particle spin polarization. The magnetic force generated by this polarization is far stronger than the coulomb force thus resulting in the production of polarized electric fields and current flow.
This polarization will induce a weak force reaction that will produce proton and neutron decay and the associated generation of mesons. Another sign of chiral spin polarization is the lack of radioactive reaction byproducts. Radioactive decay is near instantaneous when it is produced though the application of a left handed chiral polarized particle stream.
Fusion is not happening in this reaction even if neutrons are detected. Fusion requires the production of specific gamma radiation at 3 and 14 Mev. It also requires the production of tritium and He3. Without the generation of ALL these tell tale reaction products, fusion is unproven and the LENR reaction is indicated.
To test this posit as an alternative test to the fusion reaction conjecture, a chiral particle steam produced by this heated crystal will greatly reduce the half life of a radioactive isotope. Is there a LENR experimenter who will verity this posit?
Where chiral spin particle polarization is active, this shows what a double layer can do to a tungsten probe tip. By the way, the same reaction happens in the SunCell except the vaporizing tungsten electrode weighs in at over 100 pounds.
its best for now not to show anything to the debunk bots, they will only derail, if japans core comes back up the staircase they win. they have their ticket to ride~
btw~
for all I know your an AI
your key word hunt and all the pre assign statements are getting old,
I think the forum has a "I'm not a bot" filter, maybe they should check it for loop holes.
I'm starting to think one got in.
Seiber,
Once in a while H-G has a sense of humor, so that rules out his being a bot. That said, he could be more constructive than he is. To his credit, he does contribute something of interest on occasion.