Someone should call the building's landlord.
IHSupporter
Member
- Member since Mar 30th 2017
- Last Activity:
Posts by IHSupporter
-
-
1 mW? Did you happen to work on the 1st draft of the JMC agreement?
oops thanks for catching that .... MW of course.
-
If 1mW of heat where flowing out of a window, I would think that there would be wavy resolution around the window. Have you ever looked across a hot car and noticed how there is "atmospheric distortion"? As an amateur astronomer, "atmospheric distortion" is often a problem in getting good photos.
-
Is there a picture of the water tank? In the schematics they have it down at the bottom, but didn't West say they had to raise it an it was a lot of work to support that amount of water. On a raised platform???????
-
I had been under the impression that the max flow rate they advertise is when the pump is working against not back pressure (meaning 1 bar - 0 bar g ) . That is the max those little fellows could pump would be 32l/h when working at Penon's claimed pressure.
-
My impression is that the volume of the stroke is constant but the stroke rate is adjusted to give the required flow rate. And with that pump
http://www.prominent.us/produc…ems/Solenoid_Pumps/GammaL
the max stroke rate is 180 spm.
I can understand how back pressure would reduce the flow but I don't see how a 1bar (or 0 barg) would increase the rate past its stated max.
-
I don't see how a solenoid diaphragm pump could excide its max by decrease of pressure. Don't they have a max volume of the diaphragm volume and a max stroke rate. I would expect that would set the max flow rate regardless of the lack of back pressure (vac). That is I would not expect them to be able to move more than the captured volume on each stroke.
-
Rossi's comment about heating a room is laughable. I can heat my room in the winter with a 1kW room heater even when freezing outside. How hot would it get in a room in Florida in the summer when it is 98F outside and humid with 10 kW heaters going constantly?
-
I am still waiting for someone, anyone to give evidence that Rossi had 1MW with COP60 that is not based on what Rossi says or data that was given by Rossi. It is Rossi that must prove his case against IH. I don't see where that has been done with the preponderance of the evidence. What has Rossi offered to prove his case?
The few statements that he has made like customers and hidden fans, he has not supported by documents or photos. Most of his items read like a defense instead of a prosecution.
-
Sam
I don't know about Huxley but for me I edit my responses mostly because of "fat fingers" on a little touch pad and I don't notice the mistakes on the small screen. It is not till I view it on the "big" computer screen that I even notice the mistakes.
-
Shane ---he placed a radiator in an insulated box?
yes, I don't understand how you get much air flow inside the insulated box. I didn't see enough to tell if there were any way for the air to flow in and out of the box. And if it did flow out of the box how did it get out of the warehouse?
-
IF THEN statements are very standard. They are often used in logic theory and in programing. For example: for Integer J...... IF J>2 but J<4 then J=3.
-
My view is that technology is never transferred until it works without the inventor alone with the device and in the hands of the one it is to be transferred to.
.. and good experiments require replication, calibration, and controls.
-
You left out the word 'if'. You have no idea what software was used.
Read again, If was the first word in the post.
It is a typical IF THEN statement.
-
If Penon actually did as he said in the test plan (use T type thermocouple) but Fabiani used K thermocouple software ID -
then a T thermocouple at 99C (giving 4.232mV) would show up looking like a K thermocouple at 103C (4.220 MV).
Do you believe Penon told the truth in his test plan?
Anyway you look at it, Fabiani only having two thermal data points for an entire day is sloppy.
It would be so easy to have non reprehensive thermal readings if you only took one data point a day.
example:
I often wondered why Rossi said he stayed late. Perhaps to be there when the data was taken.
You know you could fake excess heat by just stopping the flow for a few moments before a single heat reading and then letting the heated water flow just as the temperature was read at the single time during the day. The flow is only recorded as the total for the day so it would not even show up in that. Close a valve then open just before the reading. Wouldn't take much to fool a one or two data point a day system.
-
Notice that K thermocouples were used but Penon's test plan had called for T type. Another case of bait and switch.
-
Display More
Murray had no qualms with the temperature readings.
Murray, 215-3, page 170
. . . The temperature sensors, I think
·6· ·they were fine.· I believe they were K type
·7· ·thermocouples, and they logged those to some type of a
·8· ·device.
Saying that the sensors were fine does not mean that the recorded readings that Rossi listed were fine.
IH repeated requests for the raw data and to my knowledge never got them. All that they got was
the daily items that were forwarded from Rossi's "hand" records.
Fabiani has not released the logged data that I am aware of.
-
Maybe an expert report in a $90M+ case isn't the right place for levity.
And perhaps not good for Rossi to say he is talking to himself and answer phone calls from himself.
-
Display More
0.0 bar is a perfect vacuum. That's what's it is called, in ordinary colloquial English. You sometimes redefine things to mean whatever pops into your mind, but most people would call 0.0 bar a perfect vacuum. Yes, we all know it has more matter per cubic meter than interstellar space does, but if the instrument shows a zero to every significant decimal place, that's as perfect as it comes.
In real life, this number, along with all of Rossi's other numbers are perfect bullshit, not a perfect vacuum. As Smith put it:
"Mr. Fabiani’s pressure and temperature data are reported to four decimal places. This would lead one to believe that the instrumentation used was capable of measuring pressure to 1/10,000 of a bar and temperature to 1/10,000 of a degree C. This is some serious research grade instrumentation." Document 235-10, p. 31
(Note to I H Fanboy: He was kidding. Actually, those numbers are fake, along with steadily increasing cumulative power on the day when the electricity was turned off, shown on the same page. Doesn't stuff like that make you wonder?!? I am amazed that you just accept every single thing Rossi claims, without question.)
I wonder if we can see the barometric pressure swings in the raw data if the instruments can tet to 10E-4 Bar.
-
Display More
And from the right vantage point, those white steam wisps constantly rising from the building (that don't show up in Google and that nobody has mentioned seeing) could also account for those white thingy's in the mezzanine window that look like cloud reflections in glass but aren't because Rossi said that's where he blew out all the heat and sucked in all the fresh air with his big electric fans (that were powered by a separate secret source because otherwise there would be more electric consumption than observed).
Did you have any Dictionary items to contribute?
Always good to have you around, IHFB.
And I do wish you an awesome Friday evening.
Have you run the numbers of the utility bill consumption by the "customer" and Rossi's claimed fans? I would love to see those.
How do the numbers look when you throw in that pump? are there any days on the bills that high?
I wonder how the "customer" dumped the heat so uniformly with the variations in the weather and the day/night temperature swings.
